Six years after the official end of the Great Recession in June 2009, U.S. manufacturers, wholesalers, and retailers continue to play it safe and act conservatively with respect to their inventory holdings. Many companies, though, have been caught off guard by several major developments in the U.S. and global macroeconomic environment during the past 12 months. These include the following:
World oil and commodity prices have plunged. In June of 2014, Brent crude, a benchmark for world oil prices, stood at around US $112/barrel. By the end of January of this year, it had plunged to a low of $48.40/barrel. As of June 2015, the Brent price had recovered by approximately $15/barrel from the end-of-January reading, but it still remains around $48/barrel lower than its June 2014 level. World commodity prices have also fallen sharply over the past year. The IHS Materials Price Index (MPI)—an aggregation of exchanged and non-exchanged traded commodity prices computed by IHS—plunged by approximately 40 percent between the last week of June 2014 and early July of this year (see Figure 1).
For most economies, lower oil and commodity prices typically provide a net benefit, but for energy-producing countries whose economies heavily depend on oil revenues, such as Saudi Arabia or Russia, they have a strong negative effect. In the United States, lower oil prices are a good thing or a bad thing, depending on whom you ask—or where you live. For consumers, lower oil prices are good: They translate to lower gasoline prices at the pump, which frees up cash in household budgets and helps to boost consumer spending. Lower energy prices also allow companies to reduce their transportation costs, creating savings that can increase their margins or be passed along to consumers. But falling oil prices are behind a pullback in energy exploration and investment in several parts of the United States, including West Texas, North Dakota, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Louisiana, and Alaska. Moreover, spending on equipment and structures like drilling rigs by businesses in the energy and mining industries has been hit hard as drilling activity has diminished. Texas as a whole is likely to fare relatively well thanks to its diversified economic structure, but North Dakota and Oklahoma are seeing a major impact, since their local economies depend to a significant degree on energy production.
The U.S. dollar continues to appreciate in value. In the past 12 months the U.S. dollar has appreciated considerably compared to most major currencies. At the beginning of August 2014, the value of a euro was in the neighborhood of US $1.34. In mid-March of this year, the euro exchange rate hit a 12-year low of $1.05. It has recovered very slightly, to approximately $1.09 as of the third week of July.
A stronger dollar helps boost imports, as imported products become relatively cheaper, and it lowers consumer and producer price inflation by making imported consumer products and intermediate inputs less expensive. However, it places corresponding downward pressure on exports of manufactured goods.
Several emerging markets are slowing down—and some are in deep recession. The Russian and Brazilian economies continue to contract and are still in recession. Russia's real gross domestic product (GDP) was down 0.6 percent year-over-year in the first quarter of 2015. We at IHS expect a total of four quarters of contraction, with Russia pulling out of its recession by the fourth quarter of this year. One challenge for the country is that over 50 percent of the government's revenue is energy-based, so lower energy prices have a strong negative effect on the economy. Another is that the sanctions imposed by the United States and the European Union due to Russia's involvement in the Ukrainian and Crimean conflicts are unlikely to be lifted before 2016. These sanctions are restraining credit availability—and therefore are elevating interest rates—by isolating Russia from international capital markets.
Brazil's real GDP fell 0.2 percent quarter-on-quarter in Q1, and we expect the second and third quarters to be in negative territory as well. Brazil's troubled economic situation—we anticipate a 1.4 percent contraction this year and tepid 0.6 percent growth in 2016—could also take a turn for the worse. Rising inflation is forcing the country's central bank to raise interest rates at a time when the economy is already contracting.
Turbulence roils China's stock market, and a Greek tragedy unfolds. For anyone in tune with international economic developments, the headlines in June and July of this year have been extraordinary. Greece came very close to exiting the eurozone, and China suffered a major stock market correction.
Fortunately, the "contagion" effect of these events on other economies has been mild, as evidenced by the limited volatility in global financial markets and foreign-exchange rates. One reason is that banks in the rest of the world have dramatically reduced their exposure to Greek debt, from about €247 billion in mid-2012 to €34 billion this year. In addition, European authorities have set up emergency bailout funds to insulate the rest of Europe from the fallout of the ongoing Greek crisis. Another is that the Chinese equity bubble was largely financed with local money, so foreign banks have limited exposure. Moreover, swift action by China's government seems to have stopped the stock market rout—at least temporarily.
Consumer spending gives the U.S. a boost
Mixed or tepid growth in some emerging markets, uncertainty around the Greek debt crisis, and a stronger dollar all have placed significant downward pressure on U.S. exports. Real exports of goods declined 3 percent in the first quarter of 2015. In addition, the labor-related West Coast port disruptions in the last quarter of 2014 and the early part of this year put a damper on both import and export trade. Many retailers had a difficult time restocking, and manufacturers' and wholesalers' inventories were running low in the first two quarters of the year.
After stalling in the early part of 2015, the U.S. economy is expected to resume its relatively better expansion, mostly on the backs of consumer spending and a sustained housing-market recovery. IHS expects consumer spending patterns to be more balanced in the 2015-2017 period than they were from 2010 through 2014, with stronger growth in services and nondurable goods. The robust growth in auto sales that has been an important driver of consumer spending over the past few years, caused by a release of pent-up demand, is likely to moderate. Light-vehicle sales climbed at double-digit rates from 2010 through 2012, but sales growth slowed to 7.6 percent in 2013 and declined further, to 5.7 percent, in 2014. Auto unit sales are expected to increase over the next three years, but at a significantly slower pace. Light-vehicle unit sales are expected to rise 3.6 percent in 2015 and around 2.0 percent in 2016 and 2017.
Retailers have been relatively cautious when it comes to inventory building because of tight margins, fierce competition, and price discounting. However, since consumer spending and the housing market will be the main drivers of economic growth for the next couple of years, IHS expects retail inventory growth to outpace wholesale and manufacturing inventories by a considerable margin in the period 2015-2017 (see Figure 2). We are currently forecasting increases in real retail inventories of 3.4 percent in 2015, 4.9 percent in 2016, and 4.1 percent in 2017.
Manufacturing inventories are expected to be considerably weaker, with exports handicapped by weak global markets and the strong dollar. We expect real manufacturing inventories to increase 0.9 percent in 2015, and then 1.7 percent in 2016 and 1.8 percent in 2017.
Wholesale inventories have seen a disproportionate buildup in 2014 and the first half of 2015, so their growth rate is expected to slow to 2.1 percent in 2016 and 1.5 percent in 2017. Like manufacturing, wholesale inventories are exposed to the weakness of export markets, which is mitigating growth; however, wholesalers also benefit from strength in sales and inventories on the retail side.
Just 29% of supply chain organizations have the competitive characteristics they’ll need for future readiness, according to a Gartner survey released Tuesday. The survey focused on how organizations are preparing for future challenges and to keep their supply chains competitive.
Gartner surveyed 579 supply chain practitioners to determine the capabilities needed to manage the “future drivers of influence” on supply chains, which include artificial intelligence (AI) achievement and the ability to navigate new trade policies. According to the survey, the five competitive characteristics are: agility, resilience, regionalization, integrated ecosystems, and integrated enterprise strategy.
The survey analysis identified “leaders” among the respondents as supply chain organizations that have already developed at least three of the five competitive characteristics necessary to address the top five drivers of supply chain’s future.
Less than a third have met that threshold.
“Leaders shared a commitment to preparation through long-term, deliberate strategies, while non-leaders were more often focused on short-term priorities,” Pierfrancesco Manenti, vice president analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a statement announcing the survey results.
“Most leaders have yet to invest in the most advanced technologies (e.g. real-time visibility, digital supply chain twin), but plan to do so in the next three-to-five years,” Manenti also said in the statement. “Leaders see technology as an enabler to their overall business strategies, while non-leaders more often invest in technology first, without having fully established their foundational capabilities.”
As part of the survey, respondents were asked to identify the future drivers of influence on supply chain performance over the next three to five years. The top five drivers are: achievement capability of AI (74%); the amount of new ESG regulations and trade policies being released (67%); geopolitical fight/transition for power (65%); control over data (62%); and talent scarcity (59%).
The analysis also identified four unique profiles of supply chain organizations, based on what their leaders deem as the most crucial capabilities for empowering their organizations over the next three to five years.
First, 54% of retailers are looking for ways to increase their financial recovery from returns. That’s because the cost to return a purchase averages 27% of the purchase price, which erases as much as 50% of the sales margin. But consumers have their own interests in mind: 76% of shoppers admit they’ve embellished or exaggerated the return reason to avoid a fee, a 39% increase from 2023 to 204.
Second, return experiences matter to consumers. A whopping 80% of shoppers stopped shopping at a retailer because of changes to the return policy—a 34% increase YoY.
Third, returns fraud and abuse is top-of-mind-for retailers, with wardrobing rising 38% in 2024. In fact, over two thirds (69%) of shoppers admit to wardrobing, which is the practice of buying an item for a specific reason or event and returning it after use. Shoppers also practice bracketing, or purchasing an item in a variety of colors or sizes and then returning all the unwanted options.
Fourth, returns come with a steep cost in terms of sustainability, with returns amounting to 8.4 billion pounds of landfill waste in 2023 alone.
“As returns have become an integral part of the shopper experience, retailers must balance meeting sky-high expectations with rising costs, environmental impact, and fraudulent behaviors,” Amena Ali, CEO of Optoro, said in the firm’s “2024 Returns Unwrapped” report. “By understanding shoppers’ behaviors and preferences around returns, retailers can create returns experiences that embrace their needs while driving deeper loyalty and protecting their bottom line.”
Facing an evolving supply chain landscape in 2025, companies are being forced to rethink their distribution strategies to cope with challenges like rising cost pressures, persistent labor shortages, and the complexities of managing SKU proliferation.
1. Optimize labor productivity and costs. Forward-thinking businesses are leveraging technology to get more done with fewer resources through approaches like slotting optimization, automation and robotics, and inventory visibility.
2. Maximize capacity with smart solutions. With e-commerce volumes rising, facilities need to handle more SKUs and orders without expanding their physical footprint. That can be achieved through high-density storage and dynamic throughput.
3. Streamline returns management. Returns are a growing challenge, thanks to the continued growth of e-commerce and the consumer practice of bracketing. Businesses can handle that with smarter reverse logistics processes like automated returns processing and reverse logistics visibility.
4. Accelerate order fulfillment with robotics. Robotic solutions are transforming the way orders are fulfilled, helping businesses meet customer expectations faster and more accurately than ever before by using autonomous mobile robots (AMRs and robotic picking.
5. Enhance end-of-line packaging. The final step in the supply chain is often the most visible to customers. So optimizing packaging processes can reduce costs, improve efficiency, and support sustainability goals through automated packaging systems and sustainability initiatives.
Geopolitical rivalries, alliances, and aspirations are rewiring the global economy—and the imposition of new tariffs on foreign imports by the U.S. will accelerate that process, according to an analysis by Boston Consulting Group (BCG).
Without a broad increase in tariffs, world trade in goods will keep growing at an average of 2.9% annually for the next eight years, the firm forecasts in its report, “Great Powers, Geopolitics, and the Future of Trade.” But the routes goods travel will change markedly as North America reduces its dependence on China and China builds up its links with the Global South, which is cementing its power in the global trade map.
“Global trade is set to top $29 trillion by 2033, but the routes these goods will travel is changing at a remarkable pace,” Aparna Bharadwaj, managing director and partner at BCG, said in a release. “Trade lanes were already shifting from historical patterns and looming US tariffs will accelerate this. Navigating these new dynamics will be critical for any global business.”
To understand those changes, BCG modeled the direct impact of the 60/25/20 scenario (60% tariff on Chinese goods, a 25% on goods from Canada and Mexico, and a 20% on imports from all other countries). The results show that the tariffs would add $640 billion to the cost of importing goods from the top ten U.S. import nations, based on 2023 levels, unless alternative sources or suppliers are found.
In terms of product categories imported by the U.S., the greatest impact would be on imported auto parts and automotive vehicles, which would primarily affect trade with Mexico, the EU, and Japan. Consumer electronics, electrical machinery, and fashion goods would be most affected by higher tariffs on Chinese goods. Specifically, the report forecasts that a 60% tariff rate would add $61 billion to cost of importing consumer electronics products from China into the U.S.
That strategy is described by RILA President Brian Dodge in a document titled “2025 Retail Public Policy Agenda,” which begins by describing leading retailers as “dynamic and multifaceted businesses that begin on Main Street and stretch across the world to bring high value and affordable consumer goods to American families.”
RILA says its policy priorities support that membership in four ways:
Investing in people. Retail is for everyone; the place for a first job, 2nd chance, third act, or a side hustle – the retail workforce represents the American workforce.
Ensuring a safe, sustainable future. RILA is working with lawmakers to help shape policies that protect our customers and meet expectations regarding environmental concerns.
Leading in the community. Retail is more than a store; we are an integral part of the fabric of our communities.
“As Congress and the Trump administration move forward to adopt policies that reduce regulatory burdens, create economic growth, and bring value to American families, understanding how such policies will impact retailers and the communities we serve is imperative,” Dodge said. “RILA and its member companies look forward to collaborating with policymakers to provide industry-specific insights and data to help shape any policies under consideration.”