Victoria Kickham, an editor at large for Supply Chain Quarterly, started her career as a newspaper reporter in the Boston area before moving into B2B journalism. She has covered manufacturing, distribution and supply chain issues for a variety of publications in the industrial and electronics sectors, and now writes about everything from forklift batteries to omnichannel business trends for Supply Chain Quarterly's sister publication, DC Velocity.
Business leaders are looking at all aspects of their operations to find ways to become more environmentally friendly these days, from energy and water usage in their facilities, to fuel consumption in their transportation networks, to the types of paper and packaging they consume across their operations. Experts say packaging is an especially hot topic, and they point to the growing ranks of businesses seeking sustainable solutions for product transport—the boxes, trays, pallets, and containers used to move products through their supply chains.
Demand for reusable transport packaging (RTP), as it’s known, increased 66% in 2020 and was expected to rise 88% in 2021 on its way to even higher levels this year, according to the Reusable Packaging Association (RPA), which published its first annual “State of the Industry” report on RTP in late 2020 and plans to release new data later this year. Consumers’ concern for the environment and the growing use of automated equipment throughout the supply chain were driving forces cited at the time, and they continue to be key motivators, according to Norm Kukuk, president of reusable packaging manufacturer Orbis and a member of RPA, which represents both suppliers and users of reusable packaging.
“We are seeing more interest, absolutely,” says Kukuk, emphasizing the increased demand for reusables in the food, medical, and pharmaceutical industries, which have also been major adopters of automated material handling equipment. “Our plastic packaging is high tolerance [so it can be used more easily] on conveyors and in automation. Because of that, [plastic] pallets and handheld totes are seeing more demand.”
But plastic isn’t the only reusable getting attention. Metal and wood factor into it as well, according to RPA, which defines reusable transport packaging solutions as those made from durable materials designed for multiple uses in rigorous operations and logistics systems. They stand in contrast to “one-way” packaging solutions, such as corrugated boxes and containers, which are designed for a single use before being recycled or tossed in a landfill. Reusable transport packaging represented a little more than 20% of the total global packaging market in 2020, also according to RPA, a figure that is rising as business customers and consumers alike seek to become part of the circular economy.
“These packaging products are designed for lasting use in a system that ensures their effective recovery and return for continuous purpose,” according to RPA. “Reusable transport packaging products are largely designed for business-to-business applications, although the growth of e-commerce and home delivery applications is opening opportunities for the effective use of reusable packaging for transporting merchandise to households” as well.
MAKING A ROUND TRIP
The goal of reusable transport packaging is to replace one-way solutions with those that can be used multiple times. Pallets are a case in point. Both wood and plastic pallets can be reused, and increasingly, the plastic variety are being used over and over again in food and beverage operations, often because they are easy to clean and are less prone to contamination, according to Kukuk. Third-party logistics service providers (3PLs) are investing more in this type of reusable packaging as well, he says.
“Our goal is to replace limited-use with high-volume-reuse packaging,” says Kukuk, adding that Orbis’ plastic pallets, in particular, are designed for the circular economy—where they’re used as many times as possible. It’s all part of a broader effort to develop a “circular supply chain,” in which the reusables are returned to the point of origin to be refilled and sent out again. In other models, reusables are managed by a third party that pools pallets, containers, and other reusables and then readies them for reuse by other partners in the pooling system.
The frequency of reuse varies. Pallet lifespan, for instance, largely depends on how the unit is used, and manufacturers of both the plastic and wood varieties tout the virtues of whichever type they make. Kukuk says one of Orbis’ plastic pallets recently underwent testing at the Virginia Tech Center for Packaging and Unit Load Design and was found to have a lifespan of more than 400 cycles, for instance. Meanwhile, experts at the National Wooden Pallet & Container Association note that wood is the only 100% renewable and recyclable reusable product available, and that wooden pallets still dominate the market. But no matter where a company stands on the issue, both products fit the bill as reusable transport packaging and can become part of a company’s environmental sustainability story—especially as environmental, social, and governance (ESG) initiatives gain prominence in supply chains.
“Our customers have ESG [objectives] that they are committed to, [and] we are helping them understand how reusable packaging can help them meet those goals,” Kukuk explains, noting that Orbis recently hired a sustainability director to advance those efforts.
A separate industry study on the demand for returnable transport packaging underscores those sentiments. A March 2023 report from the market research firm Future Market Insights estimated that the returnable transport packaging market would hit nearly $28 billion this year and rise to nearly $46 billion over the next 10 years, primarily due to an increased focus on reuse and recycling worldwide, ongoing demands to reduce waste, and a push to reduce the utilization of single-use packages in favor of the round-trip variety. The report cites the retail, food and beverage, logistics, chemicals, and building and construction sectors as key market drivers.
A CASE IN POINT
A recent sustainable packaging project by the materials science company W.L. Gore & Associates illustrates the ways in which companies are trying to reduce their environmental impact by rethinking the way they transport goods. Gore—which is best known for its waterproof, breathable Gore-Tex fabrics—switched from using single-use cardboard containers to transport large, bulky rolls of one of its products to using reusable metal racks. Ken Staz, the company’s U.S. regional logistics operations leader, presented details of the project at the recent annual meeting of the Warehousing Education and Research Council (WERC), a warehouse industry trade group.
Staz explained that the previous shipping method required customers to either discard or recycle the cardboard boxes once the product was received—taking the disposal decision out of Gore’s hands. To gain more control over the process, Gore built a prototype of a reusable metal shipping rack that could accommodate the 240-pound rolls of product. Once the product has been removed, the racks can be broken down at the customer location and shipped back for re-use. Today, Gore is using the racks for international shipments, which are handled by the company’s third-party logistics service provider. The 3PL manages the labeling and tracking of the racks for shipping as well as sorting, inspecting, and restocking the racks at Gore’s facilities after they’ve been returned.
Staz told attendees the project will achieve a return on investment (ROI) in just over three years and has yielded annual cost savings as well.
Above all, he says, it reinforces the company’s desire to be kinder to the environment and demonstrates its willingness to take on projects aimed at meeting that goal.
“Today, sustainability is more front of mind than it has been historically,” he told attendees.
Editor’s note: This article originally appeared in the July 2023 issue of DC Velocity.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.
Specifically, the two sides remain at odds over provisions related to the deployment of semi-automated technologies like rail-mounted gantry cranes, according to an analysis by the Kansas-based 3PL Noatum Logistics. The ILA has strongly opposed further automation, arguing it threatens dockworker protections, while the USMX contends that automation enhances productivity and can create long-term opportunities for labor.
In fact, U.S. importers are already taking action to prevent the impact of such a strike, “pulling forward” their container shipments by rushing imports to earlier dates on the calendar, according to analysis by supply chain visibility provider Project44. That strategy can help companies to build enough safety stock to dampen the damage of events like the strike and like the steep tariffs being threatened by the incoming Trump administration.
Likewise, some ocean carriers have already instituted January surcharges in pre-emption of possible labor action, which could support inbound ocean rates if a strike occurs, according to freight market analysts with TD Cowen. In the meantime, the outcome of the new negotiations are seen with “significant uncertainty,” due to the contentious history of the discussion and to the timing of the talks that overlap with a transition between two White House regimes, analysts said.