In the ever-evolving omnichannel landscape, consumers seamlessly transition among online and offline channels, requiring retailers to provide a unified experience across channels. Having re-engineered their supply chains to meet this challenge, retailers are now deploying artificial intelligence (AI) to take omnichannel retailing to the next level.
A recent survey conducted by the MIT Center for Transportation and Logistics (MIT CTL) examined where AI-driven innovations are having the most impact on omnichannel fulfillment. Figure 1 encapsulates the survey findings. The research is based on replies from more than 130 logistics, warehousing, and supply chain professionals from across the retail industry to an annual online questionnaire. Not surprisingly, respondents ranked demand forecasting as the top domain affected by AI, followed by customer experience, customer service and chatbots, and inventory management. However, AI has a critically important role to play in transforming all the areas ranked, such as warehousing and returns management. Let’s delve into these different roles.
Refining demand forecasting
The survey results indicate that respondents believe that AI applications will have the greatest impact on demand forecasting processes. This transformative technology increases forecast accuracy by incorporating the impact of several layers of complex data as well as the available historical data. Such layers could include weather, special holidays, regional buying habits, demographics, social media activity, online reviews, and the potential impact of planned marketing efforts.
Another major benefit of using AI-powered demand forecasting is that it is more flexible and adaptable compared to traditional methods. Retailers can adjust their forecasts as disruptions and seasonality change market conditions.
Profiting from personalization
Another important application of AI is in personalizing the omnichannel experience. Walmart recently launched a new generative AI search feature that allows customers to search for products by use cases such as for baby showers or Super Bowl parties, rather than by product or brand name. The company can recommend relevant products and offer customers a more personalized and unique shopping experience. This feature provides a more streamlined, intuitive shopping experience.
In fashion retail, companies like Zara are offering “click & try” apps that give customers access to intelligent fitting rooms. Customers select items through a digital interface before trying them on in-store. The rooms use RFID technology to recognize the items brought in, offering options to request different sizes or colors directly from the fitting room. These types of tools improve the customer experience by reducing waiting times in changing rooms and at points of sale. The apps can also enhance the management of in-store inventory. RFID technology provides real-time data on which items are being tried on and their locations, helping to keep inventory counts accurate and up to date. Furthermore, by analyzing which items are tried on most frequently and which are converted into sales, stores can better understand customer preferences and demand, leading to more efficient stock management and replenishment policies.
Elevating customer satisfaction
Customer satisfaction is another key driver of AI implementation in the omnichannel space. Amazon recently launched its Fit Insights AI-powered tool that enhances customers’ buying choices by making size charts from diverse brands more consistent and aggregating product reviews and information on fabric types. L’Oréal’s BeautyGenius virtual beauty advisor delivers similar benefits.
Tools like these seek to both enhance the customer experience and provide a strong marketing message in order to increase product awareness and redirect customers to e-commerce links or stores to find recommended products. There are indirect benefits too, such as reduced return rates and the gathering of relevant data for demand forecasting and inventory management processes.
Optimizing inventory
Providing fulfillmentfor multiple channels and creating a seamless experience requires the best inventory allocation practices. The survey ranks inventory management as the fourth most important area. To strategically position inventory, Walmart has harnessed the power of AI and machine learning-driven inventory management systems, combining years of historical data with macroeconomic trends, large-scale weather patterns, and local demographics. By leveraging this technology, the retailer optimizes the distribution of products across multiple channels, enhancing customers’ seamless shopping experience, especially during peak seasons. The AI helps to ensure that customers have a consistent, uniform experience across all channels. For example, AI-enabled inventory management systems make sure that when a shopper visits a store based on online inventory information, the item is indeed there.
AI can also be used to tackle the challenge of excess and aging inventory. The consumer goods company Unilever is leveraging AI in digital discounting and pricing intelligence to set the best price for discontinued products and move them to retailers where the items are most likely to sell. AI algorithms analyze various factors such as demand trends, a product’s shelf life, and inventory levels to determine optimal discount rates. Thanks to this tool, the company can reduce prices dynamically on products that are nearing the end of their life cycle or are in excess, allowing the company to clear out inventory more effectively. Pricing intelligence then applies advanced analytics and machine learning techniques to gain insights from a wide range of data sources, including market trends, competitor pricing, and consumer behavior. This tool helps Unilever set competitive prices and identify the best retailers and geographic markets for discontinued or excess products.
Streamlining operations
AI is also being used to enhance warehousing operations. Intelligent automation (also known as cognitive automation) has disrupted warehousing by blending robotic process automation with cutting-edge technologies such as AI, augmented reality, and computer vision. For example, the grocery technology company Ocado Group utilizes swarms of robots that operate on a dense 3D grid system, known as “the Hive,” to move crates containing grocery items to picking stations that are typically operated by humans. (This is often referred to as a “goods-to-person system.”) The Ocado Smart Platform (OSP) combines the power of AI, robotics, and automation to manage and optimize these operations. AI is used to control the robot swarms, ensuring efficient traffic management and operational flow within the warehouses. Additionally, and more recently, AI-powered tools like robotic arms equipped with computer vision and sensors are being used to pick and handle diverse items from the inventory. This integration of AI not only contributes to streamlined operations but also increases the speed and accuracy of order fulfillment. In this context, AI integration boosts throughput, reduces order processing times, and informs inventory optimization and allocation decisions for streamlined operations.
Another recent example is the use of autonomous forklifts and AI-powered tools that use machine vision and dynamic planning to unload pallets from a truck and send them directly to the automated storage and retrieval system. Walmart is currently using these autonomous forklifts at its Brooksville, Florida, distribution center and plans to roll them out to four more distribution centers in the next 16 months.
Challenges and barriers
When implementing AI tools, data availability and quality are key to successful implementations. AI tools can manage massive amounts of data and connect relevant customer information with inventory and warehouse management systems. They can also collect information from multiple tiers across the supply chain and external sources. But the quality of the training data used can limit the potential impact of these tools.
Systems integration is another potential barrier to achieving AI’s full potential. Integrating the technology with legacy systems can be challenging, especially in terms of the required investment and infrastructure.
Companies also need to know that incorporating such a disruptive technology into business decisions cannot fully succeed without human-AI collaboration. As explained in a recent article by MIT CTL’s Maria Saenz and Devadrita Nair, humans provide the context, judgment, and adaptability that’s needed when using AI to improve responsiveness in unpredictable, dynamic environments. For this reason, getting the most out of an AI implementation requires that companies pay careful attention to talent development to make sure that their employees have both the necessary soft and hard skills.
What’s next?
Expect a surge in AI utilization in the omnichannel space beyond conventional tools. Companies are increasingly leveraging AI to train associates and introduce virtual assistants, enhancing and augmenting human tasks.
Still, AI’s most striking effects in omnichannel supply chains have yet to unfold. There is immense potential for integrating AI across many supply chain areas, including personalized customer experiences, automated replenishment systems, warehouse management systems, and adjusting store layouts in response to customer demand.
Finally, the industry must not underestimate the critical importance of the right talent. Human understanding of AI tools and the models behind them, coupled with the ability to evaluate outcomes and challenge results with critical thinking, is of crucial importance. Upskilling and reskilling employees to prepare them for transformative change is also imperative.
Editor’s note:To see the full results of MIT’s survey, see the infographic that was published on DC Velocity in February 2024.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
Specifically, the two sides remain at odds over provisions related to the deployment of semi-automated technologies like rail-mounted gantry cranes, according to an analysis by the Kansas-based 3PL Noatum Logistics. The ILA has strongly opposed further automation, arguing it threatens dockworker protections, while the USMX contends that automation enhances productivity and can create long-term opportunities for labor.
In fact, U.S. importers are already taking action to prevent the impact of such a strike, “pulling forward” their container shipments by rushing imports to earlier dates on the calendar, according to analysis by supply chain visibility provider Project44. That strategy can help companies to build enough safety stock to dampen the damage of events like the strike and like the steep tariffs being threatened by the incoming Trump administration.
Likewise, some ocean carriers have already instituted January surcharges in pre-emption of possible labor action, which could support inbound ocean rates if a strike occurs, according to freight market analysts with TD Cowen. In the meantime, the outcome of the new negotiations are seen with “significant uncertainty,” due to the contentious history of the discussion and to the timing of the talks that overlap with a transition between two White House regimes, analysts said.
That percentage is even greater than the 13.21% of total retail sales that were returned. Measured in dollars, returns (including both legitimate and fraudulent) last year reached $685 billion out of the $5.19 trillion in total retail sales.
“It’s clear why retailers want to limit bad actors that exhibit fraudulent and abusive returns behavior, but the reality is that they are finding stricter returns policies are not reducing the returns fraud they face,” Michael Osborne, CEO of Appriss Retail, said in a release.
Specifically, the report lists the leading types of returns fraud and abuse reported by retailers in 2024, including findings that:
60% of retailers surveyed reported incidents of “wardrobing,” or the act of consumers buying an item, using the merchandise, and then returning it.
55% cited cases of returning an item obtained through fraudulent or stolen tender, such as stolen credit cards, counterfeit bills, gift cards obtained through fraudulent means or fraudulent checks.
48% of retailers faced occurrences of returning stolen merchandise.
Together, those statistics show that the problem remains prevalent despite growing efforts by retailers to curb retail returns fraud through stricter returns policies, while still offering a sufficiently open returns policy to keep customers loyal, they said.
“Returns are a significant cost for retailers, and the rise of online shopping could increase this trend,” Kevin Mahoney, managing director, retail, Deloitte Consulting LLP, said. “As retailers implement policies to address this issue, they should avoid negatively affecting customer loyalty and retention. Effective policies should reduce losses for the retailer while minimally impacting the customer experience. This approach can be crucial for long-term success.”