Put sustainability at the core of your sourcing strategy
Historically, procurement has prioritized three key considerations in strategic sourcing decisions: quality, service, and price. Given rising environmental risks and changing consumer sentiment, it’s time to place sustainability, as a fourth dimension, at the center of your sourcing strategy.
In early January, the fifth annual AlixPartners Disruption Index (ADI) survey1 revealed that global business leaders are getting better at managing disruption after more than three years of pandemic, supply chain instability, worker shortages, and inflation. However, the business world in 2024 is facing a new age of disruption that will continue to challenge leaders in new ways. The ADI shows that newly emerging factors outside of executives’ control are now setting CEOs’ business agenda, with climate-induced volatility claiming a spot in the top four disruptive forces executives expect to face this year. Similarly, the World Economic Forum's recent Global Risks Report 2024 places a spotlight on the critical nature of environmental concerns. Out of the top ten risks projected over the next decade, five are directly related to environmental factors.
Procurement organizations hold an essential role in redefining sourcing strategies to address these imminent risks while ensuring the economic viability of their organizations. Traditionally, strategic sourcing has focused on three dimensions: quality, service, and price, but adding in a fourth dimension—sustainability—gives firms the ability to improve resiliency and their environmental footprint in tandem with superior commercial outcomes.
In conducting hundreds of sourcing events for clients, we have found that those who position sourcing as a fork-in-the-road choice between profit and sustainability have it wrong. Good strategic sourcing strategies will align naturally with environmental, social, and governance (ESG) goals when the process incorporates the right criteria.
For example, we have found that suppliers that prioritize meeting quality process accreditations like ISO tend to also have more advanced sustainability programs. These suppliers are typically in compliance with new ESG reporting requirements and present lower greenhouse gas emissions within their own operations and throughout their value chain. Likewise, efforts to reduce material usage or offer more eco-friendly packaging not only help to meet sustainability goals but also reduce costs and enhance value propositions.
A well-structured strategic sourcing process improves margins, boosts resilience, and enhances ESG performance for both the company and its suppliers. In other words, incorporating sustainability as a core dimension in sourcing can act as a proxy to better vendor selection and more robust supply chain outcomes.
Here are five ways to better incorporate sustainability into your strategic sourcing process.
1. Prioritize sustainable suppliers
Procurement organizations can make a substantial impact by using a weighting rubric that values suppliers that meet the four strategic sourcing dimensions, including sustainability. Several companies now provide reliable ESG ratings for a fact-based evaluation to compare different suppliers. These ratings should be weighed against cost, service, and quality as part of the supplier selection criteria. By selecting vendors that implement forward-thinking ESG strategies—utilizing renewable resources, minimizing waste, and reducing carbon footprints—procurement organizations can promote responsible and environmentally conscious practices throughout the supply chain.
2. Encourage suppliers to provide eco-friendly, waste-reducing packaging
Recent findings show 57% of consumers are “less likely” to buy products in nonsustainable packaging and 86% of consumers among younger generations are willing to pay more for sustainable packaging. By encouraging potential suppliers to provide innovative and waste-reducing packaging in requests for proposals (RFP), organizations can significantly decrease the environmental footprint of the products and services they procure—and often increase margin.
As part of strategic sourcing, companies can use a Design & Source to Value (DSV) approach, which can support the valuation of key cost and attribute drivers of their products, thereby allowing for the removal or reduction of low-value materials or processes, and often leading to new brand-enhancing concepts. This approach differs from the traditional optimization as it considers the full product value through consumers’ lens to create better and more affordable design. A successful DSV effort requires close collaboration across marketing, research and development, operations, and procurement.
3. Favor energy-efficient products and services
Procurement organizations can play a crucial role in promoting energy-efficient products and services, especially for capital investments for property, plants, and equipment. By proactively selecting items that consume less energy, such as energy-efficient building materials and technologies or smart thermostats and controllers, they not only reduce their own environmental footprint but also create a strong market demand for energy-efficient solutions. This demand encourages suppliers to invest in innovative technologies, further driving progress in sustainability. Embracing energy-efficient procurement delivers substantial economic benefits, resulting in cost savings, improved operational efficiency, and enhanced competitiveness.
4. Drive overall decarbonization
Together with sustainable packaging and use of energy-efficient technologies, electrification and clean sources of energy can significantly support decarbonization and combat climate change. Procurement organizations wield significant influence through their vast supply chain networks and can help encourage the use of clean energy. For example, procurement organizations can incentivize suppliers to electrify their vehicle fleets and use solar power to obtain savings in energy costs and a reduction in their carbon footprint. To identify where suppliers can reduce their carbon emissions, companies can utilize an approach like Should-Carbon modeling, which uses quantifiable data to estimate carbon through the different stages of the value chain (for example from farm to table for a dairy product).
5. Collaborate with external partners and report on progress
Collaboration is a powerful tool for driving environmental change. Procurement organizations can partner with suppliers, industry associations, and other stakeholders to collectively address environmental challenges. This can include identifying areas for improvement, develop corrective action plans, and implement measurable metrics for tracking progress and setting targets.
More mature companies can drive capability development within their supply base by sharing best practices and recognizing top performers. By transparently reporting on their progress and achievements in environmental sustainability, these organizations can inspire others to follow suit and contribute to a growing movement of responsible procurement. Organizations that track and report sustainability metrics tend to manage cost and operational key performance indicators (KPIs) better, maintaining overall control of their business.
A vital role to play
The role of procurement teams has never been more vital. Their decisions directly influence bottom lines and set the environmental course for entire industries. By enhancing proven strategic sourcing and related toolkits with pragmatic sustainability principles, procurement can steer businesses toward both more robust profitability and improved stakeholder outcomes.
By embracing ESG-forward approaches—not as a “fork-in the-road” decision but rather as a way to turbo-charge their supply chains—procurement to foster innovation, reshape supply chains to be more resilient to shocks, and, most importantly, champion a sustainable future.
Notes:
1.The AlixPartners Disruption Index surveys 3,100 senior executives across 10 industries and 11 countries to uncover the latest global business concerns. The survey questions executives on the degree to which their business is being disrupted, the various disruptive forces impacting them, the pace at which these disruptive forces are accelerating, and the strategies they are employing to confront them.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
Specifically, the two sides remain at odds over provisions related to the deployment of semi-automated technologies like rail-mounted gantry cranes, according to an analysis by the Kansas-based 3PL Noatum Logistics. The ILA has strongly opposed further automation, arguing it threatens dockworker protections, while the USMX contends that automation enhances productivity and can create long-term opportunities for labor.
In fact, U.S. importers are already taking action to prevent the impact of such a strike, “pulling forward” their container shipments by rushing imports to earlier dates on the calendar, according to analysis by supply chain visibility provider Project44. That strategy can help companies to build enough safety stock to dampen the damage of events like the strike and like the steep tariffs being threatened by the incoming Trump administration.
Likewise, some ocean carriers have already instituted January surcharges in pre-emption of possible labor action, which could support inbound ocean rates if a strike occurs, according to freight market analysts with TD Cowen. In the meantime, the outcome of the new negotiations are seen with “significant uncertainty,” due to the contentious history of the discussion and to the timing of the talks that overlap with a transition between two White House regimes, analysts said.
That percentage is even greater than the 13.21% of total retail sales that were returned. Measured in dollars, returns (including both legitimate and fraudulent) last year reached $685 billion out of the $5.19 trillion in total retail sales.
“It’s clear why retailers want to limit bad actors that exhibit fraudulent and abusive returns behavior, but the reality is that they are finding stricter returns policies are not reducing the returns fraud they face,” Michael Osborne, CEO of Appriss Retail, said in a release.
Specifically, the report lists the leading types of returns fraud and abuse reported by retailers in 2024, including findings that:
60% of retailers surveyed reported incidents of “wardrobing,” or the act of consumers buying an item, using the merchandise, and then returning it.
55% cited cases of returning an item obtained through fraudulent or stolen tender, such as stolen credit cards, counterfeit bills, gift cards obtained through fraudulent means or fraudulent checks.
48% of retailers faced occurrences of returning stolen merchandise.
Together, those statistics show that the problem remains prevalent despite growing efforts by retailers to curb retail returns fraud through stricter returns policies, while still offering a sufficiently open returns policy to keep customers loyal, they said.
“Returns are a significant cost for retailers, and the rise of online shopping could increase this trend,” Kevin Mahoney, managing director, retail, Deloitte Consulting LLP, said. “As retailers implement policies to address this issue, they should avoid negatively affecting customer loyalty and retention. Effective policies should reduce losses for the retailer while minimally impacting the customer experience. This approach can be crucial for long-term success.”