Early in his career, Robert Martichenko recognized that although lean principles had long been utilized to improve manufacturing processes, companies would greatly benefit by extending those practices to partners within the supply chain. This idea led him to launch LeanCor Supply Chain Group, a company that provides lean supply chain and logistics training and education, consulting, and third-party logistics (3PL) services.
Martichenko's mission is to help organizations apply lean thinking to eliminate waste, improve supply chain performance, and build a culture of operational excellence. But this is not just a commercial objective for him. He also devotes a considerable amount of his time to promoting education in this field. In addition to running his company, he is a senior instructor for the Lean Enterprise Institute and the Georgia Tech Supply Chain and Logistics Institute, and is a frequent speaker for industry groups around the world. A Six Sigma Black Belt, Martichenko has written or co-authored six books. Two of them—People: A leader's day-to-day guide to building, managing, and sustaining lean organizations, and Building a Lean Fulfillment Stream—have won the Shingo Research and Professional Publication Award for research and writing that conveys new knowledge and understanding of lean and operational excellence. (He's also just written his first novel, Drift and Hum: The Great Canadian-American Novel, about friendship, growing up in the north, and dealing with life's challenges.)
Martichenko's influence has been widespread. He has expanded the boundaries of supply chain management to include lean practices, a development that is helping businesses to better manage globalization, market and product complexity, and changing customer preferences and demand patterns.
For his thought leadership and devotion to improving professional standards and educational opportunities in supply chain management, Martichenko received the 2015 Distinguished Service Award (DSA) from the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals. The prestigious award, the organization's highest honor, is given to an individual for significant achievements in the logistics and supply chain management professions.
The Timmins, Ontario, Canada, native recently spoke about lean, innovation, and education with Supply Chain Quarterly Editor Toby Gooley.
Name: Robert Martichenko Title: Chief Executive Officer Organization: LeanCor Supply Chain Group Education: Bachelor's degree in mathematics from the University of Windsor (Ontario); Master of Business Administration in finance from Baker College Business Experience: Worked in the transportation and warehousing industry in Canada and the United States; founded LeanCor in 2005 CSCMP Member: Since 1998
Your education was in mathematics and finance. Has that helped you in your career?
There is no question that mathematics has been and continues to be helpful in my work. A lot of problem solving in logistics and supply chain has an analytical element, and mathematics is extremely helpful. There's very little you can do in supply chain management without that.
My MBA in finance came later; I did that after 10 years in industry. I specifically chose to focus on finance, as opposed to operations, because I was getting operations experience at work. I had recognized that one reason why we were not moving the ball down the field in supply chain as quickly as we needed to is that we were not connecting with the language of finance: revenue, operating costs, margin, and working capital. I thought that was important, and that I needed a more solid education around the language of the [chief executive officer].
Why is the lean philosophy—originally developed for manufacturing—important in supply chain management?
Because lean originally was used for manufacturing, the term "lean manufacturing" took hold, which is unfortunate because it perpetuates the idea that it's only about manufacturing. What lean says to us is to make customer consumption visible, then manufacture and distribute to the pace of customer consumption. So lean in its essence is a supply chain strategy.
If you look at the companies that pioneered this concept and at those that have successfully implemented lean from end to end, they're actually lean supply chain organizations. If you look at the ones with underwhelming or unsuccessful initiatives, it's because they believed lean is only for manufacturing, and they never connected lean to their customers. So what they have is factories that are building inventory faster and stockpiling inventory that's going to sit in a warehouse for six months. That business sees marginal or no actual benefits.
A lot of organizations believe that simply using lean tools to identify and eliminate waste is a lean system. For example, some organizations are using lean tools, such as 5S, quality at the source, and one-piece flow, to improve a particular function. But I would say that's a tactical definition of lean thinking. Then there's a true strategic definition, where you're using it as a business methodology to create a learning culture that is focused on flow. You want to create a business environment where problems are made visible and you can see and fix the root cause by focusing on flow. It's about the end-to-end flow, not just about using tools at the functional level.
You're known as an advocate for supply chain innovation. What role can innovation play in supply chain management?
When people see the word innovation, we most often think of technology. But I think the real breakthrough is not one of technological innovation but one of thought innovation. We have to think about things differently. We need to move away from a focus on achieving economies of scale and toward economies of time. [For example,] reducing lead times is the most important thing we should be doing.
The idea of total cost and understanding the end-to-end system costs of these business decisions—that to me is innovation and the next frontier in supply chain. We're now working on a concept called supply chain advancement, or SCA. At essence, it involves the recognition that people at all levels of an organization make business decisions, but the value or waste created by those decisions will be manifested inside the supply chain. For example, people could make a business decision in marketing, but that decision is not going to create value or waste in marketing, it will do that in the supply chain. The same thing happens in product development, and similarly for all other functions.
What that means is recognizing that every single decision being made in a business is going to have an impact on the supply chain. Whether you have 10 people or 10,000 people in a company, every one of them should have some fundamental knowledge of supply chain management so they will understand the impact their decisions will have on the supply chain.
You're involved in education as a volunteer, not just through CSCMP, but also at the high school and university levels. Why is that a personal priority?
Some of the work I've enjoyed the most is speaking at universities. I'm also participating in a mentoring program at the College of Charleston (South Carolina, USA). I do this for a few reasons: I am passionate about the industry, and even today, with all the great work that CSCMP has done and the universities are doing, there is still a lack of understanding about the jobs and roles that are available to young people in our field. We're a long way from kids in high school understanding the amazing world of supply chain, and I want to help young people understand the great career opportunities it offers.
Focusing on training and teaching, and getting in front of young people, senior executives, and other professionals also makes me clarify my own thoughts. I've written several books, and writing is my way of synthesizing my own thoughts. When I teach, it's similar.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.
Specifically, the two sides remain at odds over provisions related to the deployment of semi-automated technologies like rail-mounted gantry cranes, according to an analysis by the Kansas-based 3PL Noatum Logistics. The ILA has strongly opposed further automation, arguing it threatens dockworker protections, while the USMX contends that automation enhances productivity and can create long-term opportunities for labor.
In fact, U.S. importers are already taking action to prevent the impact of such a strike, “pulling forward” their container shipments by rushing imports to earlier dates on the calendar, according to analysis by supply chain visibility provider Project44. That strategy can help companies to build enough safety stock to dampen the damage of events like the strike and like the steep tariffs being threatened by the incoming Trump administration.
Likewise, some ocean carriers have already instituted January surcharges in pre-emption of possible labor action, which could support inbound ocean rates if a strike occurs, according to freight market analysts with TD Cowen. In the meantime, the outcome of the new negotiations are seen with “significant uncertainty,” due to the contentious history of the discussion and to the timing of the talks that overlap with a transition between two White House regimes, analysts said.