Early in his career, Robert Martichenko recognized that although lean principles had long been utilized to improve manufacturing processes, companies would greatly benefit by extending those practices to partners within the supply chain. This idea led him to launch LeanCor Supply Chain Group, a company that provides lean supply chain and logistics training and education, consulting, and third-party logistics (3PL) services.
Martichenko's mission is to help organizations apply lean thinking to eliminate waste, improve supply chain performance, and build a culture of operational excellence. But this is not just a commercial objective for him. He also devotes a considerable amount of his time to promoting education in this field. In addition to running his company, he is a senior instructor for the Lean Enterprise Institute and the Georgia Tech Supply Chain and Logistics Institute, and is a frequent speaker for industry groups around the world. A Six Sigma Black Belt, Martichenko has written or co-authored six books. Two of them—People: A leader's day-to-day guide to building, managing, and sustaining lean organizations, and Building a Lean Fulfillment Stream—have won the Shingo Research and Professional Publication Award for research and writing that conveys new knowledge and understanding of lean and operational excellence. (He's also just written his first novel, Drift and Hum: The Great Canadian-American Novel, about friendship, growing up in the north, and dealing with life's challenges.)
Martichenko's influence has been widespread. He has expanded the boundaries of supply chain management to include lean practices, a development that is helping businesses to better manage globalization, market and product complexity, and changing customer preferences and demand patterns.
For his thought leadership and devotion to improving professional standards and educational opportunities in supply chain management, Martichenko received the 2015 Distinguished Service Award (DSA) from the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals. The prestigious award, the organization's highest honor, is given to an individual for significant achievements in the logistics and supply chain management professions.
The Timmins, Ontario, Canada, native recently spoke about lean, innovation, and education with Supply Chain Quarterly Editor Toby Gooley.
Name: Robert Martichenko Title: Chief Executive Officer Organization: LeanCor Supply Chain Group Education: Bachelor's degree in mathematics from the University of Windsor (Ontario); Master of Business Administration in finance from Baker College Business Experience: Worked in the transportation and warehousing industry in Canada and the United States; founded LeanCor in 2005 CSCMP Member: Since 1998
Your education was in mathematics and finance. Has that helped you in your career?
There is no question that mathematics has been and continues to be helpful in my work. A lot of problem solving in logistics and supply chain has an analytical element, and mathematics is extremely helpful. There's very little you can do in supply chain management without that.
My MBA in finance came later; I did that after 10 years in industry. I specifically chose to focus on finance, as opposed to operations, because I was getting operations experience at work. I had recognized that one reason why we were not moving the ball down the field in supply chain as quickly as we needed to is that we were not connecting with the language of finance: revenue, operating costs, margin, and working capital. I thought that was important, and that I needed a more solid education around the language of the [chief executive officer].
Why is the lean philosophy—originally developed for manufacturing—important in supply chain management?
Because lean originally was used for manufacturing, the term "lean manufacturing" took hold, which is unfortunate because it perpetuates the idea that it's only about manufacturing. What lean says to us is to make customer consumption visible, then manufacture and distribute to the pace of customer consumption. So lean in its essence is a supply chain strategy.
If you look at the companies that pioneered this concept and at those that have successfully implemented lean from end to end, they're actually lean supply chain organizations. If you look at the ones with underwhelming or unsuccessful initiatives, it's because they believed lean is only for manufacturing, and they never connected lean to their customers. So what they have is factories that are building inventory faster and stockpiling inventory that's going to sit in a warehouse for six months. That business sees marginal or no actual benefits.
A lot of organizations believe that simply using lean tools to identify and eliminate waste is a lean system. For example, some organizations are using lean tools, such as 5S, quality at the source, and one-piece flow, to improve a particular function. But I would say that's a tactical definition of lean thinking. Then there's a true strategic definition, where you're using it as a business methodology to create a learning culture that is focused on flow. You want to create a business environment where problems are made visible and you can see and fix the root cause by focusing on flow. It's about the end-to-end flow, not just about using tools at the functional level.
You're known as an advocate for supply chain innovation. What role can innovation play in supply chain management?
When people see the word innovation, we most often think of technology. But I think the real breakthrough is not one of technological innovation but one of thought innovation. We have to think about things differently. We need to move away from a focus on achieving economies of scale and toward economies of time. [For example,] reducing lead times is the most important thing we should be doing.
The idea of total cost and understanding the end-to-end system costs of these business decisions—that to me is innovation and the next frontier in supply chain. We're now working on a concept called supply chain advancement, or SCA. At essence, it involves the recognition that people at all levels of an organization make business decisions, but the value or waste created by those decisions will be manifested inside the supply chain. For example, people could make a business decision in marketing, but that decision is not going to create value or waste in marketing, it will do that in the supply chain. The same thing happens in product development, and similarly for all other functions.
What that means is recognizing that every single decision being made in a business is going to have an impact on the supply chain. Whether you have 10 people or 10,000 people in a company, every one of them should have some fundamental knowledge of supply chain management so they will understand the impact their decisions will have on the supply chain.
You're involved in education as a volunteer, not just through CSCMP, but also at the high school and university levels. Why is that a personal priority?
Some of the work I've enjoyed the most is speaking at universities. I'm also participating in a mentoring program at the College of Charleston (South Carolina, USA). I do this for a few reasons: I am passionate about the industry, and even today, with all the great work that CSCMP has done and the universities are doing, there is still a lack of understanding about the jobs and roles that are available to young people in our field. We're a long way from kids in high school understanding the amazing world of supply chain, and I want to help young people understand the great career opportunities it offers.
Focusing on training and teaching, and getting in front of young people, senior executives, and other professionals also makes me clarify my own thoughts. I've written several books, and writing is my way of synthesizing my own thoughts. When I teach, it's similar.
Just 29% of supply chain organizations have the competitive characteristics they’ll need for future readiness, according to a Gartner survey released Tuesday. The survey focused on how organizations are preparing for future challenges and to keep their supply chains competitive.
Gartner surveyed 579 supply chain practitioners to determine the capabilities needed to manage the “future drivers of influence” on supply chains, which include artificial intelligence (AI) achievement and the ability to navigate new trade policies. According to the survey, the five competitive characteristics are: agility, resilience, regionalization, integrated ecosystems, and integrated enterprise strategy.
The survey analysis identified “leaders” among the respondents as supply chain organizations that have already developed at least three of the five competitive characteristics necessary to address the top five drivers of supply chain’s future.
Less than a third have met that threshold.
“Leaders shared a commitment to preparation through long-term, deliberate strategies, while non-leaders were more often focused on short-term priorities,” Pierfrancesco Manenti, vice president analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a statement announcing the survey results.
“Most leaders have yet to invest in the most advanced technologies (e.g. real-time visibility, digital supply chain twin), but plan to do so in the next three-to-five years,” Manenti also said in the statement. “Leaders see technology as an enabler to their overall business strategies, while non-leaders more often invest in technology first, without having fully established their foundational capabilities.”
As part of the survey, respondents were asked to identify the future drivers of influence on supply chain performance over the next three to five years. The top five drivers are: achievement capability of AI (74%); the amount of new ESG regulations and trade policies being released (67%); geopolitical fight/transition for power (65%); control over data (62%); and talent scarcity (59%).
The analysis also identified four unique profiles of supply chain organizations, based on what their leaders deem as the most crucial capabilities for empowering their organizations over the next three to five years.
First, 54% of retailers are looking for ways to increase their financial recovery from returns. That’s because the cost to return a purchase averages 27% of the purchase price, which erases as much as 50% of the sales margin. But consumers have their own interests in mind: 76% of shoppers admit they’ve embellished or exaggerated the return reason to avoid a fee, a 39% increase from 2023 to 204.
Second, return experiences matter to consumers. A whopping 80% of shoppers stopped shopping at a retailer because of changes to the return policy—a 34% increase YoY.
Third, returns fraud and abuse is top-of-mind-for retailers, with wardrobing rising 38% in 2024. In fact, over two thirds (69%) of shoppers admit to wardrobing, which is the practice of buying an item for a specific reason or event and returning it after use. Shoppers also practice bracketing, or purchasing an item in a variety of colors or sizes and then returning all the unwanted options.
Fourth, returns come with a steep cost in terms of sustainability, with returns amounting to 8.4 billion pounds of landfill waste in 2023 alone.
“As returns have become an integral part of the shopper experience, retailers must balance meeting sky-high expectations with rising costs, environmental impact, and fraudulent behaviors,” Amena Ali, CEO of Optoro, said in the firm’s “2024 Returns Unwrapped” report. “By understanding shoppers’ behaviors and preferences around returns, retailers can create returns experiences that embrace their needs while driving deeper loyalty and protecting their bottom line.”
Facing an evolving supply chain landscape in 2025, companies are being forced to rethink their distribution strategies to cope with challenges like rising cost pressures, persistent labor shortages, and the complexities of managing SKU proliferation.
1. Optimize labor productivity and costs. Forward-thinking businesses are leveraging technology to get more done with fewer resources through approaches like slotting optimization, automation and robotics, and inventory visibility.
2. Maximize capacity with smart solutions. With e-commerce volumes rising, facilities need to handle more SKUs and orders without expanding their physical footprint. That can be achieved through high-density storage and dynamic throughput.
3. Streamline returns management. Returns are a growing challenge, thanks to the continued growth of e-commerce and the consumer practice of bracketing. Businesses can handle that with smarter reverse logistics processes like automated returns processing and reverse logistics visibility.
4. Accelerate order fulfillment with robotics. Robotic solutions are transforming the way orders are fulfilled, helping businesses meet customer expectations faster and more accurately than ever before by using autonomous mobile robots (AMRs and robotic picking.
5. Enhance end-of-line packaging. The final step in the supply chain is often the most visible to customers. So optimizing packaging processes can reduce costs, improve efficiency, and support sustainability goals through automated packaging systems and sustainability initiatives.
Geopolitical rivalries, alliances, and aspirations are rewiring the global economy—and the imposition of new tariffs on foreign imports by the U.S. will accelerate that process, according to an analysis by Boston Consulting Group (BCG).
Without a broad increase in tariffs, world trade in goods will keep growing at an average of 2.9% annually for the next eight years, the firm forecasts in its report, “Great Powers, Geopolitics, and the Future of Trade.” But the routes goods travel will change markedly as North America reduces its dependence on China and China builds up its links with the Global South, which is cementing its power in the global trade map.
“Global trade is set to top $29 trillion by 2033, but the routes these goods will travel is changing at a remarkable pace,” Aparna Bharadwaj, managing director and partner at BCG, said in a release. “Trade lanes were already shifting from historical patterns and looming US tariffs will accelerate this. Navigating these new dynamics will be critical for any global business.”
To understand those changes, BCG modeled the direct impact of the 60/25/20 scenario (60% tariff on Chinese goods, a 25% on goods from Canada and Mexico, and a 20% on imports from all other countries). The results show that the tariffs would add $640 billion to the cost of importing goods from the top ten U.S. import nations, based on 2023 levels, unless alternative sources or suppliers are found.
In terms of product categories imported by the U.S., the greatest impact would be on imported auto parts and automotive vehicles, which would primarily affect trade with Mexico, the EU, and Japan. Consumer electronics, electrical machinery, and fashion goods would be most affected by higher tariffs on Chinese goods. Specifically, the report forecasts that a 60% tariff rate would add $61 billion to cost of importing consumer electronics products from China into the U.S.
That strategy is described by RILA President Brian Dodge in a document titled “2025 Retail Public Policy Agenda,” which begins by describing leading retailers as “dynamic and multifaceted businesses that begin on Main Street and stretch across the world to bring high value and affordable consumer goods to American families.”
RILA says its policy priorities support that membership in four ways:
Investing in people. Retail is for everyone; the place for a first job, 2nd chance, third act, or a side hustle – the retail workforce represents the American workforce.
Ensuring a safe, sustainable future. RILA is working with lawmakers to help shape policies that protect our customers and meet expectations regarding environmental concerns.
Leading in the community. Retail is more than a store; we are an integral part of the fabric of our communities.
“As Congress and the Trump administration move forward to adopt policies that reduce regulatory burdens, create economic growth, and bring value to American families, understanding how such policies will impact retailers and the communities we serve is imperative,” Dodge said. “RILA and its member companies look forward to collaborating with policymakers to provide industry-specific insights and data to help shape any policies under consideration.”