Why you may not be getting your planned value out of your tech investment
A PwC survey found that 83% of companies have not seen the results that they expected from their supply chain technology implementations. What changes do they need to make to make better use of their digital solutions and improve business outcomes?
After the pandemic hit in 2020, many companies realized how vulnerable their supply chain operations were and put a tremendous amount of investment into supply chain technologies. However, to for these investments to be effective, companies need to set clear objectives and success criteria up front and be ready and willing to make the changes needed so they can achieve these desired outcomes. Indeed, companies should be selective about what investments to make, as not every technology is right for every company. And more importantly, companies should strive to not just execute a technology implementation but also monitor its effectiveness.
To see what progress has been made in terms of supply chain tech advancements and what more is still needed, the consulting company PwC surveyed over 300 executives responsible for supply chain and procurement operations. PwC’s “2023 Digital Trends in Supply Chain Survey” revealed that many of the companies surveyed are using technology to improve their supply chains. Here are some quick insights to consider as you evaluate your own progress.
Where are we with investments?
The vast majority of companies surveyed by PwC reported that they are seeking to increase their digital supply chain capabilities (see Figure 1). For example, 84% of executives said that they had either partially or fully adopted a cloud-based common data platform, which is unsurprising given the steady evolution of cloud solution providers and the expanded reliability of cloud solutions. Other popular technologies—including the internet of things, scanning and intelligent data capture (such as optical character recognition), and third-party spend analytics tools—also ranked among the top investments and adaptations for supply chain leaders. In terms of future spending, artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning are seeing the highest planned investments, with 22% of executives saying their companies plan to invest at least $5 million in those technologies.
FIGURE 1: Technology adoption levels and future investment areas
When you dig further into the data, you can see that different industries have different investment priorities. For instance, there are much higher rates of adoption and planned investment in AI and machine learning in technology, media, and telecommunications industries than in other sectors. Meanwhile, energy, utilities, and resources companies have adopted and/or are investing in drones more than other sectors.
While adoption levels are high, many companies are not yet thoroughly satisfied with their implementations. (See Figure 2.) In our survey, only 17% of respondents said that their technology investment had delivered the expected results. For the majority of respondents, the issue did not lie with the technologies themselves; only 9% indicated that the technology didn’t provide the expected capabilities/functionality. Instead, many of the answers indicated that the problem lay with how the company was implementing those technologies, be it not having adequate time, the necessary capabilities, or change management skills.
Another key challenge to getting more value out your tech investment is whether employees have the right skills and motivation to effectively use the new digital tools. According to the survey, 31% of executives said that a top challenge to digitizing their supply chains was getting employees and teams to work differently, perhaps through using a mix of new tools and processes while also maintaining existing ways of working. Additionally, 25% said they had difficulty attracting, developing, and retaining the “digital native” talent needed to transform their supply chain.
In fact, more than two-thirds of respondents expect digitizing their supply chain to require some upskilling of employees. Responses to the 2023 survey indicate that companies may be planning to work more with current employees rather than recruit new talent. Compared to 2022, fewer executives say they will need to add more employees overall, and more say they will retrain employees for different jobs because their current roles will no longer be necessary.
For their part, employees say they are eager to learn more about innovative technologies in the workplace. In PwC’s recent “Global Hopes and Fears Survey,” 52% of workers selected at least one positive statement about the impact of generative AI on their career—that it will increase productivity, bring opportunities to learn new skills, or create job opportunities.
However, only 7% of supply chain executives said digital upskilling was their top priority. This highlights the need for organizations to invest in training, to clarify and measure what “new ways of working” really entails, and to make the necessary process changes so that they can make better use of their technology investments.
Technological innovations will likely persist, so upskilling your employees should also be an ongoing process that is refreshed and re-evaluated regularly. Digital transformation should be approached with a people-first mindset. Training should focus not just on helping employees better perform their day-to-day jobs but also on adapting to new ways of working and executing strategic goals.
Companies should go beyond simply teaching employees how to use the new technology tools. They should also help them understand why these tools will make their jobs better and what the tools’ full capabilities are. This sort of instruction can be provided through use cases, situation scenarios, and practice exercises. In this way, companies can emphasize outcomes and value-added results and not just implementing a new tool or way of working.
Investing for the long term
One challenge that many companies face is transformative actions continue to compete with more traditional priorities. Many supply chain leaders are still tackling day-to-day fires while trying to activate a new way of working. Finding the bandwidth to make transformative changes is challenging. Leaders may find themselves leaning into cost-related or more near-term initiatives rather than long-term ones. For instance, more than half of respondents (51%) said optimizing costs was a top objective when investing in technology.
It is less evident how companies are factoring their digital investments into long-term business strategies, if at all. Although 53% said that driving growth was a top objective of their supply chain technology investments, other objectives that have the potential to advance returns on digitization long term were far less popular. Less than one-third (30%) cited exploring new innovations and only 16% said implementing a different business model was the top objective for their technology investments.
Another long-term focus for technology investment should be risk and resilience, especially given the disruptions of the last few years. Indeed, 86% of survey respondents either agreed or strongly agreed that their company should invest more in technology to help identify, track, and measure supply chain risk. However, just 34% of operations leaders cited increased resilience as one of their top objectives when investing in supply chain technology. These statistics suggest that companies are either considering investments in the context of current and traditional definitions of risk or have not yet thought about how to merge the intent of wanting to do broader risk management with the technology that will allow them to do it. Either way, this gap should be closed.
That’s not to say that companies should only focus on unlocking long-term growth and not on cutting costs. Rather both should be happening simultaneously, so that they can help feed each other. Technology often is at the heart of that. Solutions today can not only address some of your current issues but also evolve to enable the kind of business you will need to have in the future. Investments made today are a “cost,” but they will often help save money in the future. More importantly, these are investments in capabilities that will likely be required for the future. It can be beneficial to have something that can fit your purpose now and in the future, so that value capture can be sustained and growth can be properly supported and achieved.
More thoughtful implementation needed
If you have not already done so, now is the time to reset your technology enablement strategy. Make investments based on your company’s needs, so you can set up your people for success and help them take advantage of digitalization implementations. Examine not only what has worked but dig into why investments haven’t worked. Be honest about the potential gaps in planning, the quality of execution, and the effectiveness of leaders and staff as well as how well the solution delivered versus what was promised.
Companies that begin to think smarter about their tech investments and consider these strategies in tandem will often be more prepared to deal with disruptions, get a higher return out of their investments, and help to capture the growth opportunities that digitalization has to offer.
Just 29% of supply chain organizations have the competitive characteristics they’ll need for future readiness, according to a Gartner survey released Tuesday. The survey focused on how organizations are preparing for future challenges and to keep their supply chains competitive.
Gartner surveyed 579 supply chain practitioners to determine the capabilities needed to manage the “future drivers of influence” on supply chains, which include artificial intelligence (AI) achievement and the ability to navigate new trade policies. According to the survey, the five competitive characteristics are: agility, resilience, regionalization, integrated ecosystems, and integrated enterprise strategy.
The survey analysis identified “leaders” among the respondents as supply chain organizations that have already developed at least three of the five competitive characteristics necessary to address the top five drivers of supply chain’s future.
Less than a third have met that threshold.
“Leaders shared a commitment to preparation through long-term, deliberate strategies, while non-leaders were more often focused on short-term priorities,” Pierfrancesco Manenti, vice president analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a statement announcing the survey results.
“Most leaders have yet to invest in the most advanced technologies (e.g. real-time visibility, digital supply chain twin), but plan to do so in the next three-to-five years,” Manenti also said in the statement. “Leaders see technology as an enabler to their overall business strategies, while non-leaders more often invest in technology first, without having fully established their foundational capabilities.”
As part of the survey, respondents were asked to identify the future drivers of influence on supply chain performance over the next three to five years. The top five drivers are: achievement capability of AI (74%); the amount of new ESG regulations and trade policies being released (67%); geopolitical fight/transition for power (65%); control over data (62%); and talent scarcity (59%).
The analysis also identified four unique profiles of supply chain organizations, based on what their leaders deem as the most crucial capabilities for empowering their organizations over the next three to five years.
First, 54% of retailers are looking for ways to increase their financial recovery from returns. That’s because the cost to return a purchase averages 27% of the purchase price, which erases as much as 50% of the sales margin. But consumers have their own interests in mind: 76% of shoppers admit they’ve embellished or exaggerated the return reason to avoid a fee, a 39% increase from 2023 to 204.
Second, return experiences matter to consumers. A whopping 80% of shoppers stopped shopping at a retailer because of changes to the return policy—a 34% increase YoY.
Third, returns fraud and abuse is top-of-mind-for retailers, with wardrobing rising 38% in 2024. In fact, over two thirds (69%) of shoppers admit to wardrobing, which is the practice of buying an item for a specific reason or event and returning it after use. Shoppers also practice bracketing, or purchasing an item in a variety of colors or sizes and then returning all the unwanted options.
Fourth, returns come with a steep cost in terms of sustainability, with returns amounting to 8.4 billion pounds of landfill waste in 2023 alone.
“As returns have become an integral part of the shopper experience, retailers must balance meeting sky-high expectations with rising costs, environmental impact, and fraudulent behaviors,” Amena Ali, CEO of Optoro, said in the firm’s “2024 Returns Unwrapped” report. “By understanding shoppers’ behaviors and preferences around returns, retailers can create returns experiences that embrace their needs while driving deeper loyalty and protecting their bottom line.”
Facing an evolving supply chain landscape in 2025, companies are being forced to rethink their distribution strategies to cope with challenges like rising cost pressures, persistent labor shortages, and the complexities of managing SKU proliferation.
1. Optimize labor productivity and costs. Forward-thinking businesses are leveraging technology to get more done with fewer resources through approaches like slotting optimization, automation and robotics, and inventory visibility.
2. Maximize capacity with smart solutions. With e-commerce volumes rising, facilities need to handle more SKUs and orders without expanding their physical footprint. That can be achieved through high-density storage and dynamic throughput.
3. Streamline returns management. Returns are a growing challenge, thanks to the continued growth of e-commerce and the consumer practice of bracketing. Businesses can handle that with smarter reverse logistics processes like automated returns processing and reverse logistics visibility.
4. Accelerate order fulfillment with robotics. Robotic solutions are transforming the way orders are fulfilled, helping businesses meet customer expectations faster and more accurately than ever before by using autonomous mobile robots (AMRs and robotic picking.
5. Enhance end-of-line packaging. The final step in the supply chain is often the most visible to customers. So optimizing packaging processes can reduce costs, improve efficiency, and support sustainability goals through automated packaging systems and sustainability initiatives.
That clash has come as retailers have been hustling to adjust to pandemic swings like a renewed focus on e-commerce, then swiftly reimagining store experiences as foot traffic returned. But even as the dust settles from those changes, retailers are now facing renewed questions about how best to define their omnichannel strategy in a world where customers have increasing power and information.
The answer may come from a five-part strategy using integrated components to fortify omnichannel retail, EY said. The approach can unlock value and customer trust through great experiences, but only when implemented cohesively, not individually, EY warns.
The steps include:
1. Functional integration: Is your operating model and data infrastructure siloed between e-commerce and physical stores, or have you developed a cohesive unit centered around delivering seamless customer experience?
2. Customer insights: With consumer centricity at the heart of operations, are you analyzing all touch points to build a holistic view of preferences, behaviors, and buying patterns?
3. Next-generation inventory: Given the right customer insights, how are you utilizing advanced analytics to ensure inventory is optimized to meet demand precisely where and when it’s needed?
4. Distribution partnerships: Having ensured your customers find what they want where they want it, how are your distribution strategies adapting to deliver these choices to them swiftly and efficiently?
5. Real estate strategy: How is your real estate strategy interconnected with insights, inventory and distribution to enhance experience and maximize your footprint?
When approached cohesively, these efforts all build toward one overarching differentiator for retailers: a better customer experience that reaches from brand engagement and order placement through delivery and return, the EY study said. Amid continued volatility and an economy driven by complex customer demands, the retailers best set up to win are those that are striving to gain real-time visibility into stock levels, offer flexible fulfillment options and modernize merchandising through personalized and dynamic customer experiences.
Geopolitical rivalries, alliances, and aspirations are rewiring the global economy—and the imposition of new tariffs on foreign imports by the U.S. will accelerate that process, according to an analysis by Boston Consulting Group (BCG).
Without a broad increase in tariffs, world trade in goods will keep growing at an average of 2.9% annually for the next eight years, the firm forecasts in its report, “Great Powers, Geopolitics, and the Future of Trade.” But the routes goods travel will change markedly as North America reduces its dependence on China and China builds up its links with the Global South, which is cementing its power in the global trade map.
“Global trade is set to top $29 trillion by 2033, but the routes these goods will travel is changing at a remarkable pace,” Aparna Bharadwaj, managing director and partner at BCG, said in a release. “Trade lanes were already shifting from historical patterns and looming US tariffs will accelerate this. Navigating these new dynamics will be critical for any global business.”
To understand those changes, BCG modeled the direct impact of the 60/25/20 scenario (60% tariff on Chinese goods, a 25% on goods from Canada and Mexico, and a 20% on imports from all other countries). The results show that the tariffs would add $640 billion to the cost of importing goods from the top ten U.S. import nations, based on 2023 levels, unless alternative sources or suppliers are found.
In terms of product categories imported by the U.S., the greatest impact would be on imported auto parts and automotive vehicles, which would primarily affect trade with Mexico, the EU, and Japan. Consumer electronics, electrical machinery, and fashion goods would be most affected by higher tariffs on Chinese goods. Specifically, the report forecasts that a 60% tariff rate would add $61 billion to cost of importing consumer electronics products from China into the U.S.