Why you may not be getting your planned value out of your tech investment
A PwC survey found that 83% of companies have not seen the results that they expected from their supply chain technology implementations. What changes do they need to make to make better use of their digital solutions and improve business outcomes?
After the pandemic hit in 2020, many companies realized how vulnerable their supply chain operations were and put a tremendous amount of investment into supply chain technologies. However, to for these investments to be effective, companies need to set clear objectives and success criteria up front and be ready and willing to make the changes needed so they can achieve these desired outcomes. Indeed, companies should be selective about what investments to make, as not every technology is right for every company. And more importantly, companies should strive to not just execute a technology implementation but also monitor its effectiveness.
To see what progress has been made in terms of supply chain tech advancements and what more is still needed, the consulting company PwC surveyed over 300 executives responsible for supply chain and procurement operations. PwC’s “2023 Digital Trends in Supply Chain Survey” revealed that many of the companies surveyed are using technology to improve their supply chains. Here are some quick insights to consider as you evaluate your own progress.
Where are we with investments?
The vast majority of companies surveyed by PwC reported that they are seeking to increase their digital supply chain capabilities (see Figure 1). For example, 84% of executives said that they had either partially or fully adopted a cloud-based common data platform, which is unsurprising given the steady evolution of cloud solution providers and the expanded reliability of cloud solutions. Other popular technologies—including the internet of things, scanning and intelligent data capture (such as optical character recognition), and third-party spend analytics tools—also ranked among the top investments and adaptations for supply chain leaders. In terms of future spending, artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning are seeing the highest planned investments, with 22% of executives saying their companies plan to invest at least $5 million in those technologies.
FIGURE 1: Technology adoption levels and future investment areas
When you dig further into the data, you can see that different industries have different investment priorities. For instance, there are much higher rates of adoption and planned investment in AI and machine learning in technology, media, and telecommunications industries than in other sectors. Meanwhile, energy, utilities, and resources companies have adopted and/or are investing in drones more than other sectors.
While adoption levels are high, many companies are not yet thoroughly satisfied with their implementations. (See Figure 2.) In our survey, only 17% of respondents said that their technology investment had delivered the expected results. For the majority of respondents, the issue did not lie with the technologies themselves; only 9% indicated that the technology didn’t provide the expected capabilities/functionality. Instead, many of the answers indicated that the problem lay with how the company was implementing those technologies, be it not having adequate time, the necessary capabilities, or change management skills.
Another key challenge to getting more value out your tech investment is whether employees have the right skills and motivation to effectively use the new digital tools. According to the survey, 31% of executives said that a top challenge to digitizing their supply chains was getting employees and teams to work differently, perhaps through using a mix of new tools and processes while also maintaining existing ways of working. Additionally, 25% said they had difficulty attracting, developing, and retaining the “digital native” talent needed to transform their supply chain.
In fact, more than two-thirds of respondents expect digitizing their supply chain to require some upskilling of employees. Responses to the 2023 survey indicate that companies may be planning to work more with current employees rather than recruit new talent. Compared to 2022, fewer executives say they will need to add more employees overall, and more say they will retrain employees for different jobs because their current roles will no longer be necessary.
For their part, employees say they are eager to learn more about innovative technologies in the workplace. In PwC’s recent “Global Hopes and Fears Survey,” 52% of workers selected at least one positive statement about the impact of generative AI on their career—that it will increase productivity, bring opportunities to learn new skills, or create job opportunities.
However, only 7% of supply chain executives said digital upskilling was their top priority. This highlights the need for organizations to invest in training, to clarify and measure what “new ways of working” really entails, and to make the necessary process changes so that they can make better use of their technology investments.
Technological innovations will likely persist, so upskilling your employees should also be an ongoing process that is refreshed and re-evaluated regularly. Digital transformation should be approached with a people-first mindset. Training should focus not just on helping employees better perform their day-to-day jobs but also on adapting to new ways of working and executing strategic goals.
Companies should go beyond simply teaching employees how to use the new technology tools. They should also help them understand why these tools will make their jobs better and what the tools’ full capabilities are. This sort of instruction can be provided through use cases, situation scenarios, and practice exercises. In this way, companies can emphasize outcomes and value-added results and not just implementing a new tool or way of working.
Investing for the long term
One challenge that many companies face is transformative actions continue to compete with more traditional priorities. Many supply chain leaders are still tackling day-to-day fires while trying to activate a new way of working. Finding the bandwidth to make transformative changes is challenging. Leaders may find themselves leaning into cost-related or more near-term initiatives rather than long-term ones. For instance, more than half of respondents (51%) said optimizing costs was a top objective when investing in technology.
It is less evident how companies are factoring their digital investments into long-term business strategies, if at all. Although 53% said that driving growth was a top objective of their supply chain technology investments, other objectives that have the potential to advance returns on digitization long term were far less popular. Less than one-third (30%) cited exploring new innovations and only 16% said implementing a different business model was the top objective for their technology investments.
Another long-term focus for technology investment should be risk and resilience, especially given the disruptions of the last few years. Indeed, 86% of survey respondents either agreed or strongly agreed that their company should invest more in technology to help identify, track, and measure supply chain risk. However, just 34% of operations leaders cited increased resilience as one of their top objectives when investing in supply chain technology. These statistics suggest that companies are either considering investments in the context of current and traditional definitions of risk or have not yet thought about how to merge the intent of wanting to do broader risk management with the technology that will allow them to do it. Either way, this gap should be closed.
That’s not to say that companies should only focus on unlocking long-term growth and not on cutting costs. Rather both should be happening simultaneously, so that they can help feed each other. Technology often is at the heart of that. Solutions today can not only address some of your current issues but also evolve to enable the kind of business you will need to have in the future. Investments made today are a “cost,” but they will often help save money in the future. More importantly, these are investments in capabilities that will likely be required for the future. It can be beneficial to have something that can fit your purpose now and in the future, so that value capture can be sustained and growth can be properly supported and achieved.
More thoughtful implementation needed
If you have not already done so, now is the time to reset your technology enablement strategy. Make investments based on your company’s needs, so you can set up your people for success and help them take advantage of digitalization implementations. Examine not only what has worked but dig into why investments haven’t worked. Be honest about the potential gaps in planning, the quality of execution, and the effectiveness of leaders and staff as well as how well the solution delivered versus what was promised.
Companies that begin to think smarter about their tech investments and consider these strategies in tandem will often be more prepared to deal with disruptions, get a higher return out of their investments, and help to capture the growth opportunities that digitalization has to offer.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.
That percentage is even greater than the 13.21% of total retail sales that were returned. Measured in dollars, returns (including both legitimate and fraudulent) last year reached $685 billion out of the $5.19 trillion in total retail sales.
“It’s clear why retailers want to limit bad actors that exhibit fraudulent and abusive returns behavior, but the reality is that they are finding stricter returns policies are not reducing the returns fraud they face,” Michael Osborne, CEO of Appriss Retail, said in a release.
Specifically, the report lists the leading types of returns fraud and abuse reported by retailers in 2024, including findings that:
60% of retailers surveyed reported incidents of “wardrobing,” or the act of consumers buying an item, using the merchandise, and then returning it.
55% cited cases of returning an item obtained through fraudulent or stolen tender, such as stolen credit cards, counterfeit bills, gift cards obtained through fraudulent means or fraudulent checks.
48% of retailers faced occurrences of returning stolen merchandise.
Together, those statistics show that the problem remains prevalent despite growing efforts by retailers to curb retail returns fraud through stricter returns policies, while still offering a sufficiently open returns policy to keep customers loyal, they said.
“Returns are a significant cost for retailers, and the rise of online shopping could increase this trend,” Kevin Mahoney, managing director, retail, Deloitte Consulting LLP, said. “As retailers implement policies to address this issue, they should avoid negatively affecting customer loyalty and retention. Effective policies should reduce losses for the retailer while minimally impacting the customer experience. This approach can be crucial for long-term success.”