Industrial production weakness in the United States has led to increased talk of a recession, but a deeper examination shows that this weakness is highly concentrated in energy and globally exposed sectors.
The recent weakness in U.S. industrial production has grabbed headlines and raised concerns about another recession. Indeed, with industrial production falling 0.5 percent in February—the fifth decline in the last six months—and with activity down 1.6 percent from last year, the latest industrial-sector data weren't encouraging. With that, capacity utilization has fallen to 75.3 percent, about 4.7 percentage points below its long-term average.
Where is this weakness coming from? There are essentially two sources. The first is energy; the second is "global headwinds."
With regard to energy, the sharp plunge in oil prices has been the main catalyst. As oil prices fell from US$100 per barrel in mid-2014 to around US$30 per barrel in early 2016, investment in the oil and gas sector contracted severely. The sector, which represented about 1 percent of the U.S. economy at the end of 2014, now represents just under 0.5 percent of gross domestic product (GDP). On its own, the drag from reduced oil and gas investment imposed a 0.4 percentage point drag on real GDP last year. Likewise, the drop in industrial production over the past 12 to 18 months has largely been due to reduced energy output (energy products, drilling, converted fuel, and primary metals). The subsector saw its output fall 10 percent from an early-2015 peak, bringing its share of total industrial production back to the 2009 level—prior to the boom in "unconventional energy," such as oil obtained through hydraulic fracturing.
The other key factor weighing on industrial production is often described as "global headwinds" in the form of a strong U.S. dollar and sluggish global demand. Indeed, the near 20 percent appreciation of the U.S. dollar has rendered U.S. exports more expensive, thereby weighing on final external demand. Simultaneously, the sluggish global growth environment, with emerging markets facing a gloomy outlook, has also weighed on U.S. export prospects.
Are we in an industrial recession?
A question on many minds right now is whether the United States has entered an industrial recession. The short answer is both yes and no. Based on the sometimes-abused definition of a recession being two consecutive quarters of contraction, we can say that industrial production indeed entered a recession at the start of 2015. While output rebounded in Q3 2015, it has since fallen back into contraction with a 3.25 percent decline (annualized) in Q4 2015 and another decline expected in Q1 2016.
Is this sufficient to conclude that the entire industrial production complex is in a recession? Not really. As described above, while nonenergy output has flattened, it is not declining. (Figure 1 shows a comparison of energy versus nonenergy-based production.) In fact, despite a number of weak months, manufacturing output has increased in seven of the last eight quarters, and the latest data show manufacturing production trending at a 1.1 percent year-over-year pace in February. More specifically, we find that the weighted sum of manufacturing subsectors contracting in February 2016 was "only" 32 percent—near cyclical lows—and well below the 50-percent threshold generally associated with economywide recessions. (See Figure 2.)
In other words, while some manufacturing sectors are struggling, others are not. With so much of the industrial weakness focused on the energy sector, it is not surprising that machinery is one of those hardest hit. The oilfield equipment collapse has only a limited direct impact since it comprises only about 6 percent of total machinery, but the indirect supply chain impact across other subsegments, such as pumps, motors, and material handling equipment, is more significant. Additionally, because of its high trade intensity (40 percent of output is exported), machinery suffers disproportionately from global headwinds—not only because of the strong dollar but also because equipment demand remains weak in the key European and Chinese markets.
Consumer-oriented sectors, meanwhile, have been more resilient. In the case of food and beverages, there has been a marked acceleration in activity—a direct result of low trade intensity and robust household consumption. Healthy consumer demand is also supporting U.S. automotive production, which, despite a small pullback in Q4, reached a 14-year high last year.
Outlook: Cloudy but not super-stormy
Outside of what appears to be sector-specific weakness in the industrial arena, the rest of the economy continues to display solid fundamentals. We continue to see strong employment growth, solid income growth, and resilient private sector confidence supporting private sector spending. Perhaps the most descriptive illustration of this resilience comes from the Institute for Supply Management's nonmanufacturing index, which appears firmly fixed around the 55 threshold for solid expansion. (See Figure 3.) Since the nonmanufacturing sector represents close to 90 percent of the U.S. economy, this is a good indication that overall the U.S. economy remains on solid footing.
After growing an average 2.9 percent in 2014, industrial production slowed sharply, growing only 0.3 percent in 2015, weighed down by weakness in the energy segment and global headwinds. However, while we expect output will contract in Q1 2016, we foresee subdued positive momentum through the rest of the year. In particular, we expect the drag from energy to become less severe and that an ongoing need or desire to replace the aging stock of industrial equipment will provide some cushion. Additionally, low oil and natural gas prices should support chemical production, which has started to see important investment in new facilities in the United States.
Facing an evolving supply chain landscape in 2025, companies are being forced to rethink their distribution strategies to cope with challenges like rising cost pressures, persistent labor shortages, and the complexities of managing SKU proliferation.
1. Optimize labor productivity and costs. Forward-thinking businesses are leveraging technology to get more done with fewer resources through approaches like slotting optimization, automation and robotics, and inventory visibility.
2. Maximize capacity with smart solutions. With e-commerce volumes rising, facilities need to handle more SKUs and orders without expanding their physical footprint. That can be achieved through high-density storage and dynamic throughput.
3. Streamline returns management. Returns are a growing challenge, thanks to the continued growth of e-commerce and the consumer practice of bracketing. Businesses can handle that with smarter reverse logistics processes like automated returns processing and reverse logistics visibility.
4. Accelerate order fulfillment with robotics. Robotic solutions are transforming the way orders are fulfilled, helping businesses meet customer expectations faster and more accurately than ever before by using autonomous mobile robots (AMRs and robotic picking.
5. Enhance end-of-line packaging. The final step in the supply chain is often the most visible to customers. So optimizing packaging processes can reduce costs, improve efficiency, and support sustainability goals through automated packaging systems and sustainability initiatives.
That clash has come as retailers have been hustling to adjust to pandemic swings like a renewed focus on e-commerce, then swiftly reimagining store experiences as foot traffic returned. But even as the dust settles from those changes, retailers are now facing renewed questions about how best to define their omnichannel strategy in a world where customers have increasing power and information.
The answer may come from a five-part strategy using integrated components to fortify omnichannel retail, EY said. The approach can unlock value and customer trust through great experiences, but only when implemented cohesively, not individually, EY warns.
The steps include:
1. Functional integration: Is your operating model and data infrastructure siloed between e-commerce and physical stores, or have you developed a cohesive unit centered around delivering seamless customer experience?
2. Customer insights: With consumer centricity at the heart of operations, are you analyzing all touch points to build a holistic view of preferences, behaviors, and buying patterns?
3. Next-generation inventory: Given the right customer insights, how are you utilizing advanced analytics to ensure inventory is optimized to meet demand precisely where and when it’s needed?
4. Distribution partnerships: Having ensured your customers find what they want where they want it, how are your distribution strategies adapting to deliver these choices to them swiftly and efficiently?
5. Real estate strategy: How is your real estate strategy interconnected with insights, inventory and distribution to enhance experience and maximize your footprint?
When approached cohesively, these efforts all build toward one overarching differentiator for retailers: a better customer experience that reaches from brand engagement and order placement through delivery and return, the EY study said. Amid continued volatility and an economy driven by complex customer demands, the retailers best set up to win are those that are striving to gain real-time visibility into stock levels, offer flexible fulfillment options and modernize merchandising through personalized and dynamic customer experiences.
Geopolitical rivalries, alliances, and aspirations are rewiring the global economy—and the imposition of new tariffs on foreign imports by the U.S. will accelerate that process, according to an analysis by Boston Consulting Group (BCG).
Without a broad increase in tariffs, world trade in goods will keep growing at an average of 2.9% annually for the next eight years, the firm forecasts in its report, “Great Powers, Geopolitics, and the Future of Trade.” But the routes goods travel will change markedly as North America reduces its dependence on China and China builds up its links with the Global South, which is cementing its power in the global trade map.
“Global trade is set to top $29 trillion by 2033, but the routes these goods will travel is changing at a remarkable pace,” Aparna Bharadwaj, managing director and partner at BCG, said in a release. “Trade lanes were already shifting from historical patterns and looming US tariffs will accelerate this. Navigating these new dynamics will be critical for any global business.”
To understand those changes, BCG modeled the direct impact of the 60/25/20 scenario (60% tariff on Chinese goods, a 25% on goods from Canada and Mexico, and a 20% on imports from all other countries). The results show that the tariffs would add $640 billion to the cost of importing goods from the top ten U.S. import nations, based on 2023 levels, unless alternative sources or suppliers are found.
In terms of product categories imported by the U.S., the greatest impact would be on imported auto parts and automotive vehicles, which would primarily affect trade with Mexico, the EU, and Japan. Consumer electronics, electrical machinery, and fashion goods would be most affected by higher tariffs on Chinese goods. Specifically, the report forecasts that a 60% tariff rate would add $61 billion to cost of importing consumer electronics products from China into the U.S.
Shippers are actively preparing for changes in tariffs and trade policy through steps like analyzing their existing customs data, identifying alternative suppliers, and re-evaluating their cross-border strategies, according to research from logistics provider C.H. Robinson.
They are acting now because survey results show that shippers say the top risk to their supply chains in 2025 is changes in tariffs and trade policy. And nearly 50% say the uncertainty around tariffs and trade policy is already a pain point for them today, the Eden Prairie, Minnesota-based company said.
In a move to answer those concerns, C.H. Robinson says it has been working with its clients by running risk scenarios, building and implementing contingency plans, engineering and executing tariff solutions, and increasing supply chain diversification and agility.
“Having visibility into your full supply chain is no longer a nice-to-have. In 2025, visibility is a competitive differentiator and shippers without the technology and expertise to support real-time data and insights, contingency planning, and quick action will face increased supply chain risks,” Jordan Kass, President of C.H. Robinson Managed Solutions, said in a release.
The company’s survey showed that shippers say the top five ways they are planning for those risks: identifying where they can switch sourcing to save money, analyzing customs data, evaluating cross-border strategies, running risk scenarios, and lowering their dependence on Chinese imports.
President of C.H. Robinson Global Forwarding, Mike Short, said: “In today’s uncertain shipping environment, shippers are looking for ways to reduce their susceptibility to events that impact logistics but are out of their control. By diversifying their supply chains, getting access to the latest information and having a global supply chain partner able to flex with their needs at a moment’s notice, shippers can gain something they don’t always have when disruptions and policy changes occur - options.”
That strategy is described by RILA President Brian Dodge in a document titled “2025 Retail Public Policy Agenda,” which begins by describing leading retailers as “dynamic and multifaceted businesses that begin on Main Street and stretch across the world to bring high value and affordable consumer goods to American families.”
RILA says its policy priorities support that membership in four ways:
Investing in people. Retail is for everyone; the place for a first job, 2nd chance, third act, or a side hustle – the retail workforce represents the American workforce.
Ensuring a safe, sustainable future. RILA is working with lawmakers to help shape policies that protect our customers and meet expectations regarding environmental concerns.
Leading in the community. Retail is more than a store; we are an integral part of the fabric of our communities.
“As Congress and the Trump administration move forward to adopt policies that reduce regulatory burdens, create economic growth, and bring value to American families, understanding how such policies will impact retailers and the communities we serve is imperative,” Dodge said. “RILA and its member companies look forward to collaborating with policymakers to provide industry-specific insights and data to help shape any policies under consideration.”