Tepid growth continues to weigh on the air cargo industry while passenger demand fuels overcapacity in the market. In May, the International Air Transport Association (IATA) reported that global freight ton-kilometers (FTK) for the year to date had declined by 0.5 percent, and that load factors were down by 2.9 percent. Cargo revenues have correspondingly fallen as well; Air France-KLM, for example, saw revenues decline by 16.1 percent in the second quarter of 2016. And according to the U.S. Department of Transportation, the airfreight market is down in all segments in the United States this year. U.S. domestic cargo volumes (cargo revenue ton-miles) are down 0.6 percent for the year as of this writing, while volumes into Latin American are down by almost 12 percent.
Any discussion of overcapacity must begin with the passenger market. According to The Boeing Company, the trend away from "hub and spoke" routing to direct-flight models in international air travel has been enabled by the introduction of more-efficient widebody aircraft. Robust growth in the passenger segment has driven the increased deployment of widebodies, bringing additional cargo capacity in the form of belly space to the global market. Overall, IATA reports that revenue passenger-kilometers are up 6 percent for the year; load factors are near historical highs but are down slightly compared with 2015. The fastest-growing passenger markets have included international lanes into and out of the Middle East, Africa, and Asia.
Article Figures
[Figure 1] Selected global air forwarders' profit and volumeEnlarge this image
Carriers are responding to the glut of capacity by managing cargo-specific aircraft. Air France-KLM, for instance, has removed over 3 percent of its cargo capacity so far in 2016, much of it in full-freighter aircraft. Cargolux, a freight specialist, appears to have shifted some of its existing capacity to new routes, adding services linking Central America to Europe and Europe to Asia, with a focus on the perishable markets. The potential for market forces to drive a reduction in freighter capacity on traditional routes may be a concern for some shippers, particularly those that are reliant on specialized freighter services, such as the chemical industry and others with hazardous shipments that are too dangerous to carry in the belly space of passenger aircraft.
The continued winding-down of inventories suggests that there is no immediate turnaround ahead when it comes to demand growth. The U.S Federal Reserve in Atlanta reported that investment in inventory was down 0.79 percent in Q2 of this year; reduced inventory investment means there is less physical product flowing through supply chains. This trend will eventually shift, but for the short term, at least, continuing overcapacity means that shippers can expect to enjoy low airfreight rates.
Additionally, there will be continued downward pressure on demand as shippers continue the trend of "mode switching" from air to ocean. This trend experienced a brief reversal in 2015, when ocean volumes briefly plummeted due to port labor issues while air volumes remained steady, but the strategy will likely gain more traction in the increasingly uncertain economy. Currently, three factors drive the air-ocean mix:
The types of commodities shipped worldwide. Certain commodities, such as raw materials, are less amenable to air transport. Moreover, production trends like nearshoring would reduce the amount of finished goods in transcontinental air cargo flows.
Inventory policy. Many companies' focus on minimizing the amount of capital tied up in inventory while goods are in transit tends to favor air transport.
The value of the product being shipped. When the total cost of ownership (TCO) is considered, high-value or short-shelf-life goods like pharmaceuticals, fashion retail, and high tech generally favor air, while other industries favor ocean.
Service-level requirements. Increasingly, modal decisions are being viewed in the context of the actual service requirement. Some shippers are breaking shipments into separate air and ocean components, with the air portion being the minimum amount required to maintain satisfactory service levels.
As for pricing, air shipping is a fuel-intensive mode, so low oil prices have had an outsized influence on the total cost of transport. With oil inventories at elevated levels, prices—around US$40 a barrel at this writing—continue to be depressed. This, together with overcapacity, is keeping airfreight rates low.
Shippers have become accustomed to using the spot market to get the best pricing for their shipments. Large consumer packaged-goods companies that traditionally would have shipped 80 percent of their cargoes under contract have flipped and are shipping a similar amount of cargo on the spot market. This has made the most sense given market conditions, but if those conditions change, shippers with short positions may struggle to get capacity if their relationships and knowledge of the marketplace have atrophied while the market is soft.
Air forwarder outlook
The picture for air forwarders has been mixed as they continue to adjust (and readjust) to the weak market. In their most recent quarterly reports, the global airfreight forwarders Kuehne + Nagel (K+N) and Panalpina showed growth in gross profit and airfreight volumes. Meanwhile, DHL Global Forwarding and Expeditors saw decreases in both figures. (See Figure 1.) Some of the big airfreight forwarders have viewed the market as ripe for expansion. Others have been "high-grading" cargo—strategically turning away business that would not provide sufficient financial returns.
While forwarders work on their airfreight strategies, vertical integration by retailers will be a key theme for the short term. The most notable example is Amazon, which has announced that it will lease 20 Boeing 767s for use in domestic service. Large retailers such as Wal-Mart Stores might increasingly find benefits in owning their own freight network—particularly if they are faced with soaring logistics costs. Separately, Amazon China has also registered to operate as a freight forwarder in the United States.
While the market continues to struggle with supply and demand, there is hope on the horizon for airfreight operators. In the first quarter of 2016, cancellations of aircraft orders outpaced new orders at Airbus, and the forecasts for growth have been subdued.**superscript{1} While there is still significant overcapacity in the market, this is the first glimmer of hope for rate stabilization in a long time. Until that happens, though, shippers can expect to enjoy continued low rates.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.
Specifically, the two sides remain at odds over provisions related to the deployment of semi-automated technologies like rail-mounted gantry cranes, according to an analysis by the Kansas-based 3PL Noatum Logistics. The ILA has strongly opposed further automation, arguing it threatens dockworker protections, while the USMX contends that automation enhances productivity and can create long-term opportunities for labor.
In fact, U.S. importers are already taking action to prevent the impact of such a strike, “pulling forward” their container shipments by rushing imports to earlier dates on the calendar, according to analysis by supply chain visibility provider Project44. That strategy can help companies to build enough safety stock to dampen the damage of events like the strike and like the steep tariffs being threatened by the incoming Trump administration.
Likewise, some ocean carriers have already instituted January surcharges in pre-emption of possible labor action, which could support inbound ocean rates if a strike occurs, according to freight market analysts with TD Cowen. In the meantime, the outcome of the new negotiations are seen with “significant uncertainty,” due to the contentious history of the discussion and to the timing of the talks that overlap with a transition between two White House regimes, analysts said.