Tepid growth continues to weigh on the air cargo industry while passenger demand fuels overcapacity in the market. In May, the International Air Transport Association (IATA) reported that global freight ton-kilometers (FTK) for the year to date had declined by 0.5 percent, and that load factors were down by 2.9 percent. Cargo revenues have correspondingly fallen as well; Air France-KLM, for example, saw revenues decline by 16.1 percent in the second quarter of 2016. And according to the U.S. Department of Transportation, the airfreight market is down in all segments in the United States this year. U.S. domestic cargo volumes (cargo revenue ton-miles) are down 0.6 percent for the year as of this writing, while volumes into Latin American are down by almost 12 percent.
Any discussion of overcapacity must begin with the passenger market. According to The Boeing Company, the trend away from "hub and spoke" routing to direct-flight models in international air travel has been enabled by the introduction of more-efficient widebody aircraft. Robust growth in the passenger segment has driven the increased deployment of widebodies, bringing additional cargo capacity in the form of belly space to the global market. Overall, IATA reports that revenue passenger-kilometers are up 6 percent for the year; load factors are near historical highs but are down slightly compared with 2015. The fastest-growing passenger markets have included international lanes into and out of the Middle East, Africa, and Asia.
Article Figures
[Figure 1] Selected global air forwarders' profit and volumeEnlarge this image
Carriers are responding to the glut of capacity by managing cargo-specific aircraft. Air France-KLM, for instance, has removed over 3 percent of its cargo capacity so far in 2016, much of it in full-freighter aircraft. Cargolux, a freight specialist, appears to have shifted some of its existing capacity to new routes, adding services linking Central America to Europe and Europe to Asia, with a focus on the perishable markets. The potential for market forces to drive a reduction in freighter capacity on traditional routes may be a concern for some shippers, particularly those that are reliant on specialized freighter services, such as the chemical industry and others with hazardous shipments that are too dangerous to carry in the belly space of passenger aircraft.
The continued winding-down of inventories suggests that there is no immediate turnaround ahead when it comes to demand growth. The U.S Federal Reserve in Atlanta reported that investment in inventory was down 0.79 percent in Q2 of this year; reduced inventory investment means there is less physical product flowing through supply chains. This trend will eventually shift, but for the short term, at least, continuing overcapacity means that shippers can expect to enjoy low airfreight rates.
Additionally, there will be continued downward pressure on demand as shippers continue the trend of "mode switching" from air to ocean. This trend experienced a brief reversal in 2015, when ocean volumes briefly plummeted due to port labor issues while air volumes remained steady, but the strategy will likely gain more traction in the increasingly uncertain economy. Currently, three factors drive the air-ocean mix:
The types of commodities shipped worldwide. Certain commodities, such as raw materials, are less amenable to air transport. Moreover, production trends like nearshoring would reduce the amount of finished goods in transcontinental air cargo flows.
Inventory policy. Many companies' focus on minimizing the amount of capital tied up in inventory while goods are in transit tends to favor air transport.
The value of the product being shipped. When the total cost of ownership (TCO) is considered, high-value or short-shelf-life goods like pharmaceuticals, fashion retail, and high tech generally favor air, while other industries favor ocean.
Service-level requirements. Increasingly, modal decisions are being viewed in the context of the actual service requirement. Some shippers are breaking shipments into separate air and ocean components, with the air portion being the minimum amount required to maintain satisfactory service levels.
As for pricing, air shipping is a fuel-intensive mode, so low oil prices have had an outsized influence on the total cost of transport. With oil inventories at elevated levels, prices—around US$40 a barrel at this writing—continue to be depressed. This, together with overcapacity, is keeping airfreight rates low.
Shippers have become accustomed to using the spot market to get the best pricing for their shipments. Large consumer packaged-goods companies that traditionally would have shipped 80 percent of their cargoes under contract have flipped and are shipping a similar amount of cargo on the spot market. This has made the most sense given market conditions, but if those conditions change, shippers with short positions may struggle to get capacity if their relationships and knowledge of the marketplace have atrophied while the market is soft.
Air forwarder outlook
The picture for air forwarders has been mixed as they continue to adjust (and readjust) to the weak market. In their most recent quarterly reports, the global airfreight forwarders Kuehne + Nagel (K+N) and Panalpina showed growth in gross profit and airfreight volumes. Meanwhile, DHL Global Forwarding and Expeditors saw decreases in both figures. (See Figure 1.) Some of the big airfreight forwarders have viewed the market as ripe for expansion. Others have been "high-grading" cargo—strategically turning away business that would not provide sufficient financial returns.
While forwarders work on their airfreight strategies, vertical integration by retailers will be a key theme for the short term. The most notable example is Amazon, which has announced that it will lease 20 Boeing 767s for use in domestic service. Large retailers such as Wal-Mart Stores might increasingly find benefits in owning their own freight network—particularly if they are faced with soaring logistics costs. Separately, Amazon China has also registered to operate as a freight forwarder in the United States.
While the market continues to struggle with supply and demand, there is hope on the horizon for airfreight operators. In the first quarter of 2016, cancellations of aircraft orders outpaced new orders at Airbus, and the forecasts for growth have been subdued.**superscript{1} While there is still significant overcapacity in the market, this is the first glimmer of hope for rate stabilization in a long time. Until that happens, though, shippers can expect to enjoy continued low rates.
New Jersey is home to the most congested freight bottleneck in the country for the seventh straight year, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
ATRI’s annual list of the Top 100 Truck Bottlenecks aims to highlight the nation’s most congested highways and help local, state, and federal governments target funding to areas most in need of relief. The data show ways to reduce chokepoints, lower emissions, and drive economic growth, according to the researchers.
The 2025 Top Truck Bottleneck List measures the level of truck-involved congestion at more than 325 locations on the national highway system. The analysis is based on an extensive database of freight truck GPS data and uses several customized software applications and analysis methods, along with terabytes of data from trucking operations, to produce a congestion impact ranking for each location. The bottleneck locations detailed in the latest ATRI list represent the top 100 congested locations, although ATRI continuously monitors more than 325 freight-critical locations, the group said.
For the seventh straight year, the intersection of I-95 and State Route 4 near the George Washington Bridge in Fort Lee, New Jersey, is the top freight bottleneck in the country. The remaining top 10 bottlenecks include: Chicago, I-294 at I-290/I-88; Houston, I-45 at I-69/US 59; Atlanta, I-285 at I-85 (North); Nashville: I-24/I-40 at I-440 (East); Atlanta: I-75 at I-285 (North); Los Angeles, SR 60 at SR 57; Cincinnati, I-71 at I-75; Houston, I-10 at I-45; and Atlanta, I-20 at I-285 (West).
ATRI’s analysis, which utilized data from 2024, found that traffic conditions continue to deteriorate from recent years, partly due to work zones resulting from increased infrastructure investment. Average rush hour truck speeds were 34.2 miles per hour (MPH), down 3% from the previous year. Among the top 10 locations, average rush hour truck speeds were 29.7 MPH.
In addition to squandering time and money, these delays also waste fuel—with trucks burning an estimated 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel and producing more than 65 million metric tons of additional carbon emissions while stuck in traffic jams, according to ATRI.
On a positive note, ATRI said its analysis helps quantify the value of infrastructure investment, pointing to improvements at Chicago’s Jane Byrne Interchange as an example. Once the number one truck bottleneck in the country for three years in a row, the recently constructed interchange saw rush hour truck speeds improve by nearly 25% after construction was completed, according to the report.
“Delays inflicted on truckers by congestion are the equivalent of 436,000 drivers sitting idle for an entire year,” ATRI President and COO Rebecca Brewster said in a statement announcing the findings. “These metrics are getting worse, but the good news is that states do not need to accept the status quo. Illinois was once home to the top bottleneck in the country, but following a sustained effort to expand capacity, the Jane Byrne Interchange in Chicago no longer ranks in the top 10. This data gives policymakers a road map to reduce chokepoints, lower emissions, and drive economic growth.”
Know someone who is making a difference in the world of logistics? Then consider nominating that person as one of DC Velocity’s “Rainmakers”—professionals from all facets of the business whose achievements set them apart from the crowd. In the past, they have included practitioners, consultants, academics, vendors, and even military commanders.
To identify these achievers, DC Velocity’s editorial directors work with members of the magazine’s Editorial Advisory Board. The nomination process begins in January and concludes in April with a vote to determine which nominees will be invited to become Rainmakers.
It’s getting a little easier to find warehouse space in the U.S., as the frantic construction pace of recent years declined to pre-pandemic levels in the fourth quarter of 2024, in line with rising vacancies, according to a report from real estate firm Colliers.
Those trends played out as the gap between new building supply and tenants’ demand narrowed during 2024, the firm said in its “U.S. Industrial Market Outlook Report / Q4 2024.” By the numbers, developers delivered 400 million square feet for the year, 34% below the record 607 million square feet completed in 2023. And net absorption, a key measure of demand, declined by 27%, to 168 million square feet.
Consequently, the U.S. industrial vacancy rate rose by 126 basis points, to 6.8%, as construction activity normalized at year-end to pre-pandemic levels of below 300 million square feet. With supply and demand nearing equilibrium in 2025, the vacancy rate is expected to peak at around 7% before starting to fall again.
Thanks to those market conditions, renters of warehouse space should begin to see some relief from the steep rent hikes they’re seen in recent years. According to Colliers, rent growth decelerated in 2024 after nine consecutive quarters of year-over-year increases surpassing 10%. Average warehouse and distribution rents rose by 5% to $10.12/SF triple net, and rents in some markets actually declined following a period of unprecedented growth when increases often exceeded 25% year-over-year. As the market adjusts, rents are projected to stabilize in 2025, rising between 2% and 5%, in line with historical averages.
In 2024, there were 125 new occupancies of 500,000 square feet or more, led by third-party logistics (3PL) providers, followed by manufacturing companies. Demand peaked in the fourth quarter at 53 million square feet, while the first quarter had the lowest activity at 28 million square feet — the lowest quarterly tally since 2012.
In its economic outlook for the future, Colliers said the U.S. economy remains strong by most measures; with low unemployment, consumer spending surpassing expectations, positive GDP growth, and signs of improvement in manufacturing. However businesses still face challenges including persistent inflation, the lowest hiring rate since 2010, and uncertainties surrounding tariffs, migration, and policies introduced by the new Trump Administration.
As U.S. businesses count down the days until the expiration of the Trump Administration’s monthlong pause of tariffs on Canada and Mexico, a report from Uber Freight says the tariffs will likely be avoided through an extended agreement, since the potential for damaging consequences would be so severe for all parties.
If the tariffs occurred, they could push U.S. inflation higher, adding $1,000 to $1,200 to the average person's cost of living. And relief from interest rates would likely not come to the rescue, since inflation is already above the Fed's target, delaying further rate cuts.
A potential impact of the tariffs in the long run might be to boost domestic freight by giving local manufacturers an edge. However, the magnitude and sudden implementation of these tariffs means we likely won't see such benefits for a while, and the immediate damage will be more significant in the meantime, Uber Freight said in its “2025 Q1 Market update & outlook.”
That market volatility comes even as tough times continue in the freight market. In the U.S. full truckload sector, the cost per loaded mile currently exceeds spot rates significantly, which will likely push rate increases.
However, in the first quarter of 2025, spot rates are now falling, as they usually do in February following the winter peak. According to Uber Freight, this situation arose after truck operating costs rose 2 cents/mile in 2023 despite a 9-cent diesel price decline, thanks to increases in insurance (+13%), truck and trailer costs (+9%), and driver wages (+8%). Costs then fell 2 cents/mile in 2024, resulting in stable costs over the past two years.
Fortunately, Uber Freight predicts that the freight cycle could soon begin to turn, as signs of a recovery are emerging despite weak current demand. A measure of manufacturing growth called the ISM PMI edged up to 50.9 in December, surpassing the expansion threshold for the first time in 26 months.
Accordingly, new orders and production increased while employment stabilized. That means the U.S. manufacturing economy appears to be expanding after a prolonged period of contraction, signaling a positive outlook for freight demand, Uber Freight said.
The surge comes as the U.S. imposed a new 10% tariff on Chinese goods as of February 4, while pausing a more aggressive 25% tariffs on imports from Mexico and Canada until March, Descartes said in its “February Global Shipping Report.”
So far, ports are handling the surge well, with overall port transit time delays not significantly lengthening at the top 10 U.S. ports, despite elevated volumes for a seventh consecutive month. But the future may look more cloudy; businesses with global supply chains are coping with heightened uncertainty as they eye the new U.S. tariffs on China, continuing trade policy tensions, and ongoing geopolitical instability in the Middle East, Descartes said.
“The impact of new and potential tariffs, coupled with a late Chinese Lunar New Year (January 29 – February 12), may have contributed to higher U.S. container imports in January,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “These trade policy developments add significant uncertainty to global supply chains, increasing concerns about rising import costs and supply chain disruptions. As trade tensions escalate, businesses and consumers alike may face the risk of higher prices and prolonged market volatility.”