After an unexpected buildup in 2015, U.S. business inventories dipped in the second quarter of 2016—the first contraction since 2011. Inventories should start to grow again before the end of the year.
Seven years into the recovery, the U.S. economy appears to be growing, but sluggishly. Recent figures for real gross domestic product (GDP) growth seem to show significant weakness. In the second quarter of 2016, real GDP advanced at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of just 1.2 percent, and first-quarter growth stood at a mere 0.8 percent. Moreover, real GDP growth in each of the last three quarters was slower than during any of the preceding quarters since Q1 of 2014.
Other data, however, contradict the gloomy picture of stagnation presented by the headline GDP numbers. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics' monthly employment numbers, for example, tell a different story. Both the June and July reports were uniformly positive and strong, in terms of both the number of payroll jobs added to the economy and the increases in hours worked and wages earned. In addition, the labor-force participation rate grew during that period.
A closer examination of the components of GDP growth helps to illuminate the reasons for this apparent disconnect. The bright spot of the second quarter was real consumer spending, which grew at an annual rate of 4.2 percent. Capital spending by businesses and residential investment fell, but the drop in residential investment is likely to reverse due to strong demand for housing. On the negative side, labor productivity has been a soft spot for the economy; nonfarm business productivity declined in every quarter between Q4 2015 and the second quarter of this year, making this the longest slump since the late 1970s. Productivity is an important factor in determining macroeconomic output, wages, and prices; the combination of higher wages and lower productivity is placing downward pressure on corporate profits, which are already under strain from the downturn in energy and commodity prices. Business investment has also been in negative territory for the past three quarters, while new orders for nondefense capital goods excluding aircraft has declined on a year-over-year basis for the past six quarters.
Not all is doom and gloom, however. Real final sales (real GDP less inventories) and final sales to domestic purchasers (real GDP less inventories and exports), which are better measures of the underlying strength of the economy than the headline number, advanced 2.4 percent and 2.1 percent, respectively, in the second quarter—a far cry from the 1.2 percent overall GDP growth seen during that period. This points to inventories as the main culprit behind the poor GDP performance. Indeed, the largest drag on GDP in the second quarter came from a US$8.1 billion drop in real inventories, the first contraction since 2011.
Such a decline portends good things for the economy in the third and fourth quarters, as businesses running on leaner inventories now will invest in building them up in the latter half of the year, thereby contributing to economic growth. Given that the June and July employment reports probably were unsustainably good, it's likely that greater inventory accumulation will resolve the disconnect between GDP and employment data, as the former catches up and the latter cools down.
The 2014-2015 inventory story
Slowing inventory investment has subtracted at least 0.3 percentage points from the annualized GDP growth rate in each of the last five quarters. This drag was the highest in the second quarter of 2016, hitting 1.2 points. An unintended inventory accumulation during mid-2015 is the cause; that excess had to be whittled down before another inventory build could begin. This accumulation was set in motion by a "perfect storm" of factors. These included the following:
West Coast port labor disruptions. In 2014, a labor contract between a dockworkers union and an association representing their employers at U.S. West Coast ports expired. Tensions between the two groups mounted, and the dockworkers were accused of staging a labor slowdown in order to put pressure on the association to meet their demands. Both imports and exports were affected. On the import side, many ships were unable to unload their cargoes, leading manufacturers, wholesalers, and retailers to exhaust their existing inventories and struggle to restock. Many businesses began ordering supplies from other channels. When the labor dispute was resolved in late February 2015, the backlog of goods began flowing through the ports again. This led businesses to experience inventory surpluses, which peaked in the latter half of 2015.
The strong U.S. dollar. The U.S. dollar's marked appreciation since late 2014 caught many exporters off-guard. Increased relative prices placed downward pressure on U.S. exports, which contributed to the accumulation of unsold inventories for exporting companies.
The decline in global oil and commodity prices. World oil and commodity prices plunged in 2014 and 2015, reducing spending on equipment and structures like drilling rigs in the energy and mining industries.
The global economic slowdown. Turbulence in world economies, and particularly China's financial turmoil and economic slowdown, dealt a blow to China's growth and to that of other emerging markets, reducing aggregate demand.
The missing "pump-price dividend." When gasoline prices dropped in 2014, many retailers expected that the resulting savings would spur consumer spending in the third- and fourth-quarter shopping seasons. These businesses stocked up on inventory in anticipation of that demand. However, that demand did not materialize as expected. Instead, households used their "pump-price dividend"—which amounted on average to approximately $14 in savings per week in 2015 compared to 2014—to pay down debts, build up bank balances, and dine out.
Warm weather. Unseasonably warm weather in the fourth quarter of 2015 resulted in poor clothing sales, as customers had little need of heavy winter gear. This led to a significant accumulation of inventories of clothing.
Economic and inventory outlook
When the current inventory drawdown is put into context, things no longer look so grim for the U.S. economy. Real GDP is projected to increase 1.6 percent this year, 2.4 percent in 2017, and 2.4 percent again in 2018. In 2017 and 2018, export and business-investment growth are expected to pick up due to a weaker dollar. Meanwhile, oil and commodities prices are likely to gradually increase during that period. Consumer spending will drive the expansion forward, supported by growth in employment, real incomes, and household net worth. However, auto sales are likely to start declining in 2018 after reaching an all-time high of 17.78 million units in 2017. Housing construction will continue to recover in response to pent-up demand from young adults and improved credit availability. In addition, the Federal Reserve will remain cautious in regard to raising interest rates.
Retailers are likely to lead the way in inventory building this year, but they will take it slowly because of tight margins, fierce competition, and price discounting. However, consumer spending remains one of the main drivers of economic growth, and retail inventory growth is expected to outpace that for manufacturing and wholesale inventory in 2016. (See Figure 1.) Manufacturing and wholesale inventories are expected to weaken in 2016, then grow at a significantly faster pace in 2017 and 2018 once exports perform better due to a weaker dollar.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.
Specifically, the two sides remain at odds over provisions related to the deployment of semi-automated technologies like rail-mounted gantry cranes, according to an analysis by the Kansas-based 3PL Noatum Logistics. The ILA has strongly opposed further automation, arguing it threatens dockworker protections, while the USMX contends that automation enhances productivity and can create long-term opportunities for labor.
In fact, U.S. importers are already taking action to prevent the impact of such a strike, “pulling forward” their container shipments by rushing imports to earlier dates on the calendar, according to analysis by supply chain visibility provider Project44. That strategy can help companies to build enough safety stock to dampen the damage of events like the strike and like the steep tariffs being threatened by the incoming Trump administration.
Likewise, some ocean carriers have already instituted January surcharges in pre-emption of possible labor action, which could support inbound ocean rates if a strike occurs, according to freight market analysts with TD Cowen. In the meantime, the outcome of the new negotiations are seen with “significant uncertainty,” due to the contentious history of the discussion and to the timing of the talks that overlap with a transition between two White House regimes, analysts said.