E-commerce and omnichannel retail are pushing aside the traditional drivers of business logistics costs, putting the U.S. consumer in the driver's seat when it comes to cost, service, and strategy. The shift may be permanent.
Contributing Editor Toby Gooley is a freelance writer and editor specializing in supply chain, logistics, material handling, and international trade. She previously was Editor at CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. and Senior Editor of SCQ's sister publication, DC VELOCITY. Prior to joining AGiLE Business Media in 2007, she spent 20 years at Logistics Management magazine as Managing Editor and Senior Editor covering international trade and transportation. Prior to that she was an export traffic manager for 10 years. She holds a B.A. in Asian Studies from Cornell University.
Do you remember the old song "What a Difference a Day Makes"? Change "day" to "year," and you've pretty much summed up the impression one gets from reading the latest annual "State of Logistics Report." According to the report, logistics costs as a percentage of U.S. gross domestic product (GDP), inventory levels, freight rates, revenue growth, and shipment volumes for truck, rail, ocean, and air are flat or down, while capacity, inventory carrying costs, and volumes for parcel and express are up. Some shippers are becoming or buying carriers and 3PLs, the lines between logistics service providers and technology vendors are blurrier than ever, and consumers increasingly are determining what gets shipped when, where, and how. Small wonder, then, that the title of this year's report is "Logistics in Transition: New Drivers at the Wheel."
Some of that change was expected, and some was unforeseen. Some observers, perhaps, were lulled by last year's rosy report, which documented strong growth in freight volumes and predicted more of the same in 2015. But macroeconomic factors and an increasingly consumer-centric business environment have put the brakes on some of the trends that had been building since the end of the Great Recession.
[Figure 2] U.S. business logistics costs as a share of nominal GDPEnlarge this image
The annual "State of Logistics Report," produced by the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP) and presented by Penske Logistics, provides an overview of the logistics industry's key trends and the total U.S. logistics costs for the previous year. The research also reviews macroeconomic trends affecting logistics costs and offers a wealth of historical and forecast data.
This is the first year the "State of Logistics Report" was written by the global management consulting firm A.T. Kearney, with input from economists, analysts, carriers, and other industry experts. The new report also incorporated a number of new data sources and changed the way certain information was classified and calculated. For example, motor carriers are now separated by business segment (truckload, less-than-truckload, and private/dedicated carriers), rather than being classified as "intercity" and "intracity," as was done in the past. The research also looks at parcel separately for the first time and includes both air cargo and air express, among other changes.
The big picture
A review of the report's major findings tells a tale of transition and an economy moving at a slower pace. All told, it cost $1.4 trillion to maintain the U.S. business logistics system in 2015. (All figures are in U.S. dollars.) That equated to 7.85 percent of last year's gross domestic product of nearly $18 trillion. Logistics costs rose 2.6 percent year-over-year, a decline from the 4.6 percent compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) seen from 2010 to 2014. The gains during that period were mostly fueled by 5.5 percent annualized growth in transport costs, the largest single component of U.S. business logistics costs. However, transport costs in 2015 rose just 1.3 percent year-over-year, as declining fuel surcharges triggered by the rapid drop in oil prices depressed carrier revenue in most modes and overcapacity pushed down rates in some transport modes. (See Figure 1 for details.)
In addition to transportation costs, total U.S. business logistics costs include inventory carrying costs, comprising financial, storage, and "other"; "carriers' support activities," which includes a much broader range of services than the "shipper-related costs" in past years' reports; and "shippers' administrative costs," which reflect wages and benefits for logistics-related occupations in manufacturing, retail, and wholesale industries as well as the cost of logistics-related information technology (essentially, the annual spend on supply chain management software in the United States).
Logistics costs as a percentage of GDP, historically one of the report's most often-quoted data points, was just six basis points below last year's number, indicating that the system was operating in only a marginally more efficient manner than the year before, according to the report. (See Figure 2.) In the early 1980s, long before the impact of transport deregulation was fully felt, logistics costs accounted for about 15 percent of GDP. The dramatic increase in transportation and logistics efficiency during the last 35 years has been an overlooked factor in the success of the U.S. economy during much of that period.
Transportation: Some up, some down
Transport revenue by mode diverged considerably in 2015, according to the report. Truckload revenue rose just 3 percent as overcapacity drove down rates. Rates started the year off weak and headed downward as the year wore on; for example, the report cites a 15 percent year-on-year decline in spot rates between the first week of January 2015 and the same period in 2016. In response, carriers increased operational efficiency and cut back on equipment orders. The report cautions, however, that energy markets could correct, overcapacity could level off, and other constraints, such as the ongoing driver shortage, could cause rates to head upward in the "not too distant future."
During the panel discussion that followed the report's release at a press conference in June, Marc Althen, president of Penske Logistics, predicted that overcapacity in the trucking segment would not diminish significantly until "at least the first quarter, and more likely the second half of 2017." In his estimation, there are about 80,000 excess tractors on the road in the United States and Canada today, he said.
Truck brokerage services and dedicated fleets are thriving in the current environment, the report said. The report notes that C.H. Robinson executives reported that they received twice as many requests for proposal (RFP) in the first quarter of 2016 as they typically would see. Other winners included less-than-truckload (LTL) and parcel and express. LTL and parcel revenues rose 8 and 7 percent, respectively, as both modes benefited from increased demand for e-commerce-related transactions. LTL rates were generally stable, the report said, and although some big carriers reported declining shipments and revenue, others—particularly those with a heavy presence in e-commerce and retail—saw stable or slight growth.
Business-to-consumer (B2C) e-commerce shipments boosted demand in the ground parcel market in 2015. Two of the biggest players, FedEx and UPS, reported revenue jumps of 9 percent and 3 percent, respectively, for ground parcel service last year. The trend has also been a boon for the U.S. Postal Service, which saw a 14 percent increase in package volume in 2015. However, e-commerce shipments typically generate less revenue and come with higher handling costs, leading carriers to invest in more technology and acquire specialized service providers in a bid to reduce costs and broaden their e-commerce-related service offerings.
At the same time, carriers and third-party logistics providers (3PLs) could potentially be confronted with new and unexpected competitors: their own customers. Amazon's foray into air and ground transportation fits the "logistics in transition" narrative. While many find it disconcerting, the increased competition could have a silver lining, said Ronald M. Marotta, vice president—international division, Yusen Logistics, during the panel discussion. "Quite frankly, Amazon [getting into transportation] is going to push all of us on the service side to move faster, deliver more reliably and more quickly, and serve customers the way they want us to serve them," he said.
Revenues declined in energy-sensitive modes like rail and pipeline. Rail carload revenues, hurt by a sharp drop in demand for coal, fell 12 percent, while pipeline revenues, hampered by lower crude oil prices, fell 11.8 percent, according to the report. Intermodal revenue, the star performer for many years, rose just 2 percent, although volume was flat, as falling truck rates made over-the-road transportation more attractive to some shippers.
Brian Hancock, executive vice president and chief marketing officer of the Kansas City Southern Railway Company, thinks the railroads' intermodal volumes will bounce back. "Fuel prices are cyclical, and it's inevitable that when fuel prices go down, the number of motor carriers increases. Then they cut prices, and when the price of fuel rises, they go out of business," he said at the press conference. "We feel we compete very well against truck, but we won't chase the lowest prices."
Both airfreight and water revenues (the latter includes import, export, and domestic waterborne traffic) increased 2.1 percent. Overcapacity plagues both modes. A shift to widebody aircraft by both cargo and passenger carriers has sent rates plunging. Meanwhile, international containerized shipping is battling record-low eastbound trans-Pacific rates, even as volumes increase modestly. Carriers continue to add capacity at a faster clip than volumes. Several mergers among large carriers and the realignment of vessel-sharing agreements may help to keep things under control.
The divergence in modal revenue is a harbinger of long-term change, according to the report's authors. A profound change in buying habits has now put American consumers "at the wheel" when it comes to influencing U.S. transport costs, rather than traditional industrial standbys like energy. This shift may be permanent, the authors said.
The report also looked at market conditions for international freight forwarding and third-party logistics services. Both play critical roles in freight flows: A.T. Kearney estimates that international forwarders contract for about 90 percent of air cargo capacity and 50 percent of ocean cargo capacity worldwide. On the domestic side, the report cited an Armstrong & Associates estimate that 3PLs handled about 11 percent of U.S. logistics spend in 2015. The outlook for both sectors is healthy—international forwarding is expected to grow about 6 percent annually through 2018, and the domestic 3PL market is forecast to continue its roughly 7 percent annual growth during the same period. But a growing need for increasingly sophisticated supply chain technology in an ever more-competitive market could determine who will thrive and who will fade away.
Inventory: Costs on the rise
The tailwind of low inventory carrying costs that U.S. businesses have enjoyed in recent years came to an end in 2015, and carrying costs are likely to prove a tougher challenge should the cost of money increase. According to the report, inventory carrying costs in 2015 rose 5.1 percent over the year-earlier period, paced by a 7.4 percent increase in the inventory's "financial cost." The financial cost was derived by multiplying the value of a company's business inventory by the average cost of capital it has borrowed to finance the inventory.
Storage costs, which were included in the total inventory calculation, rose 2.5 percent year-over-year, according to the report. The cost of what the report classifies as "other" factors, including inventory obsolescence, insurance, shrinkage, and handling, rose 5.1 percent year-over-year.
Following the U.S. Federal Reserve's moves to cut its benchmark federal funds rate (an overnight interbank lending rate) amid the 2007-08 financial crisis and subsequent recession, inventory carrying costs have remained at historic lows. From 2010 to 2014, capital costs grew by just 0.9 percent, compounded annually, the report concluded. By contrast, storage costs rose 4.7 percent a year, compounded annually.
In December, the Fed raised the benchmark rate from between near zero and 0.25 percent to between 0.25 and 0.50 percent, its first increase in nearly 10 years. The central bank said at the time it was considering several rate increases during 2016, but subpar economic growth in the United States and abroad since then has led policymakers to rethink that position.
From 2010 to 2014, a period generally associated with U.S. economic growth, inventories rose 5 percent a year as businesses restocked in the hope of increased demand, and mega-fulfillment centers were erected to accommodate what would become a multiyear surge in e-commerce traffic. Though inventory levels flattened in 2015—rising just 0.25 percent—the cost of capital did not, the report concluded.
Businesses today have costlier inventory loads to finance than at any time in years. In 2009, inventory value stood at $1.93 trillion. At the end of 2015, it stood at $2.51 trillion, according to the report's data.
The nation's inventory-to-sales ratio, which in the retail trade measures the value of inventories relative to final sales, has been climbing steadily for years, resulting in a protracted inventory bloat. Despite concerns over rising inventory levels and higher borrowing costs, the report's authors do not forecast a general recession. Rather, they say the current trends—notably, the dramatic slowdown in inventory growth last year—represent an "inventory correction."
Rick Gabrielson, vice president of transportation for Lowe's, said during the panel discussion that he expects the growth of e-commerce and omnichannel commerce to impact inventory deployment. He predicted more aggregation of inventory in fewer locations, and that companies will rely more on mechanization and technology to allow faster response and delivery. "I don't think e-commerce requires or necessarily leads to more inventory," he said. "It's about where to play it." However, some markets, he added, will still need more warehouses to meet service requirements.
Prepare for disruption
The U.S. logistics system today is "sound," the report said. Services generally are available when and how they are needed, and pricing is favorable to shippers. But, the authors warned, inadequate infrastructure and the accelerating demand for last-minute home delivery will tax a system that was not designed for e-commerce. The report also forecasts that disruptive technologies, such as the Internet of Things, analytics, robotics, and 3D printing, together with operational constraints like regulations, driver shortages, and infrastructure bottlenecks, will bring about a new era in logistics.
Four "disruptive forces" will shape future costs and performance of the U.S. logistics system, the report concludes. They include:
Technology adoption that will create efficiencies in connectivity, labor, and assets
Operational constraints that will influence the scope, scale, reach, and ability to perform transportation and logistics activities
Macroeconomic trends that will dictate new trade and freight flows
Consumer requirements that will stretch carriers' and 3PLs' capabilities
All of these forces have been talked about for some time. But as they mature and become widespread, they will converge with each other. Overlay them on the e-commerce trend that puts consumers "at the wheel," and it's clear that a very different and challenging era lies ahead for logistics.
About the "State of Logistics Report"
For 27 years, the annual "State of Logistics Report" has quantified the size of the U.S. transportation market and the impact of logistics on the U.S. economy. The late logistics consultant Robert V. Delaney began the study in 1989 as a way to measure logistics efficiency following the deregulation of transportation in the United States. Later, Delaney's colleague, the transportation consultant Rosalyn Wilson, wrote the report under the auspices of the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP). This year's report was written for the first time by the consulting firm A.T. Kearney. As in past years, Penske Logistics was the report's principal supporter.
CSCMP members can download a copy of the 27th Annual "State of Logistics Report" at no charge from CSCMP's website (https://cscmp.org). Nonmembers can purchase the report by going to CSCMP's website, clicking on the "Research" tab, and then selecting "State of Logistics Report."
Editor's note: Videos of the June 21 "State of Logistics Report" presentation at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., and the panel discussion that followed the report's release can be found on Penske Logistics' YouTube channel.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.
Specifically, the two sides remain at odds over provisions related to the deployment of semi-automated technologies like rail-mounted gantry cranes, according to an analysis by the Kansas-based 3PL Noatum Logistics. The ILA has strongly opposed further automation, arguing it threatens dockworker protections, while the USMX contends that automation enhances productivity and can create long-term opportunities for labor.
In fact, U.S. importers are already taking action to prevent the impact of such a strike, “pulling forward” their container shipments by rushing imports to earlier dates on the calendar, according to analysis by supply chain visibility provider Project44. That strategy can help companies to build enough safety stock to dampen the damage of events like the strike and like the steep tariffs being threatened by the incoming Trump administration.
Likewise, some ocean carriers have already instituted January surcharges in pre-emption of possible labor action, which could support inbound ocean rates if a strike occurs, according to freight market analysts with TD Cowen. In the meantime, the outcome of the new negotiations are seen with “significant uncertainty,” due to the contentious history of the discussion and to the timing of the talks that overlap with a transition between two White House regimes, analysts said.