Logistics and supply chain managers are getting smarter ... at least when it comes to using software intelligence to run their supply chains. Sixty-five percent of the respondents to a survey on supply chain software usage said they now use software for analysis.
That was one of the key findings of the annual study conducted for CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly's sister publication, DC Velocity. The findings are based on 167 responses received from readers of both publications. The survey, now in its third year, provides a snapshot of how logistics and supply chain managers are using software to improve their operations.
The breakdown of survey respondents resembled that of previous studies. As in past surveys, manufacturers made up the largest category of survey takers, at 35 percent of respondents. Next came third-party logistics service providers (3PLs), at 15 percent. Wholesale distribution, retail, and transportation each accounted for 9 percent, while the remaining 23 percent fell into the "other" category. A plurality of survey takers came from small companies, with 56 percent working for companies with under $500 million in annual revenue.
WMS still number one
So what software tools are readers using? As was the case in the past two surveys, warehouse management systems (WMS) topped the list, with 50 percent of respondents using this application. Because a WMS oversees distribution center operations, it's a mainstay application for any company running a logistics or supply chain operation.
[Figure 2] What are the hot areas for analytics in the supply chain?Enlarge this image
[Figure 3] Why don't companies take advantage of analytics?Enlarge this image
The second most commonly used application was also no surprise. Enterprise resource planning (ERP) software, which serves as the system of record for financial transactions, was used by 46 percent of the survey respondents. In third place were order management systems, used by 43 percent. Fourth on the list was transportation management software (TMS), used by 41 percent—an unsurprising result given that the software, which is used for managing carriers, is a mainstay of today's logistics operations. In fifth place, cited by 35 percent, was analytics, a software category that's gaining in importance. (For the full list, see Figure 1.)
The ranking of the software tools in the middle also came as little surprise. Although demand planning offers value to large companies selling or making thousands of stock-keeping units (SKUs), many of their smaller counterparts still aren't using sophisticated software tools for forecasting. Similarly, inventory optimization tends to be used by companies struggling to manage the inventory for thousands of SKUs across several locations.
The tools ranked on the bottom of this list are either of interest to a narrow base or are new technology. For example, distributed order management systems, used by 10 percent, is deployed by omnichannel retailers to determine whether to fill an online order from a store or from a warehouse/distribution center. Another application, the control tower system, also cited by 10 percent, is a nascent technology that's now only being deployed by multinational companies to manage their end-to-end supply chains. Ten percent of respondents were using trade management software, an application only of value to companies involved in cross-border trade, and 8 percent were using demand sensing, an advanced application used currently by consumer product companies to quickly discern changes in consumer buying preferences.
Thirty percent of respondents had bought new supply chain software in the past year. Most popular were WMS packages, which were bought by 33 percent, while 24 percent bought a new TMS. Interestingly, the third most frequently purchased type of software was analytics, cited by 15 percent—another indication that more companies are interested in using software intelligence to gain insights into their operations.
The payback struggle continues
The survey found that many companies are still struggling with the issue of return on investment (ROI) on their software purchases. Although 43 percent of respondents said they had received the expected payback from a purchase, an equal number said they were unsure as to whether they had recouped their investment. On the other hand, 14 percent were firm in their view that their company had not received the expected return on their supply chain software investment, not surprising considering that a supply chain software license or subscription can run into the thousands of dollars and entail additional fees for consulting, training, and systems integration.
As the survey made clear, when it comes to payback, expectations vary widely. At one end of the spectrum were companies that expected payback within three months (7 percent). At the other were those that were willing to wait more than three years (6 percent). The remainder expected a return within one year (23 percent), within two years (10 percent), within six months (8 percent), and within three years (5 percent). It should be noted that 38 percent of survey takers said they did not know what the time frame was for expected payback at their company.
Many companies have found that cloud-based software provides a faster ROI than the traditional on-premise deployments; in fact, 49 percent of the respondents that are using cloud software said that this deployment method had shortened payback. Cloud solutions do not entail added costs for installation, hardware, systems integration, maintenance, and custom coding, and their lower upfront costs can translate to a quicker payback.
With those benefits, it's no surprise that the percentage of users moving to the cloud has increased over last year. Forty-five percent of survey respondents said that they are using cloud deployment for at least one type of supply chain software tool, compared to only 33 percent in last year's survey.
Growing use of analysis
The survey results underscored the growing use of software intelligence to find answers to supply chain problems as well as some of the issues associated with using these tools. Sixty-five percent of respondents said they are now using software for analysis. What's interesting is that only 32 percent are using tools especially designed for that purpose. This suggests that many companies conducting software analysis are taking advantage of the embedded analytics that are increasingly found in more advanced TMS, WMS, and inventory optimization (IO) packages.
When it comes to using software intelligence, almost half of those doing analysis—49 percent—use their tools for diagnostics to identify the root cause of problems. Another 43 percent use software for either descriptive or predictive analytics. (Descriptive analytics details and compares performance, while predictive analytics generally takes the form of demand planning tools.) Surprisingly, 39 percent said they were engaging in "big data" analysis, which involves sifting through reams of information for operational insights. Only 13 percent were engaged in cognitive analytics, which uses self-learning and machine-intelligence technologies to mine data, while 12 percent were making use of prescriptive analytics, which proposes solutions.
As for where they're applying these tools, the survey found that 62 percent of those respondents who are using analytics were using them for demand planning or forecasting, a critical business issue for companies trying to determine what to manufacture and distribute. Second on the list was inventory management, another important business issue, as companies must balance the cost of buffer inventory against the potential loss of revenue from a missed sale. Third was transportation, an area of concern as shippers seek to control shipping costs. (See Figure 2 for the complete list.)
Although more companies are turning to analytics, 25 percent have yet to take the plunge and another 10 percent are unsure if their companies are making use of these capabilities. When the nonusers were queried about the reasons for their hesitation, the top reason was lack of information technology (IT) support, cited by 32 percent. (See Figure 3.) That response is not surprising given that one of the issues bedeviling analytics right now is that many of those tools are not easy to use and often require the expertise of data scientists to assist in interpreting the results. The lack of data-visualization capabilities (which would allow users to see the results in the form of charts and graphs) and the need to use third-party software like Tableau to provide any type of results visualization are among the factors hindering greater adoption of analytics in business disciplines like logistics and supply chain management.
The integration challenge
Survey takers were also asked to name the biggest challenge they face to the successful deployment of a supply chain software application. As was the case last year, the number one challenge was systems integration, cited by 28 percent. Clearly, companies still find it difficult to get disparate systems to exchange information. Next on the list was the lack of IT resources, cited by 21 percent of respondents. Inadequate support from upper management, named by 17 percent, was the third most frequently cited challenge. (See Figure 3 for the complete list.)
Overall, the survey's findings underscore two themes in the business world in regard to information technology that, not surprisingly, are influencing supply chain software. Companies are increasingly turning to cloud deployments for software tools to receive a faster ROI and justify the expense. And despite obstacles such as the lack of data visualization, companies are starting to apply more analytics to gain insights into their operations in an effort to cut costs and boost profits.
Facing an evolving supply chain landscape in 2025, companies are being forced to rethink their distribution strategies to cope with challenges like rising cost pressures, persistent labor shortages, and the complexities of managing SKU proliferation.
1. Optimize labor productivity and costs. Forward-thinking businesses are leveraging technology to get more done with fewer resources through approaches like slotting optimization, automation and robotics, and inventory visibility.
2. Maximize capacity with smart solutions. With e-commerce volumes rising, facilities need to handle more SKUs and orders without expanding their physical footprint. That can be achieved through high-density storage and dynamic throughput.
3. Streamline returns management. Returns are a growing challenge, thanks to the continued growth of e-commerce and the consumer practice of bracketing. Businesses can handle that with smarter reverse logistics processes like automated returns processing and reverse logistics visibility.
4. Accelerate order fulfillment with robotics. Robotic solutions are transforming the way orders are fulfilled, helping businesses meet customer expectations faster and more accurately than ever before by using autonomous mobile robots (AMRs and robotic picking.
5. Enhance end-of-line packaging. The final step in the supply chain is often the most visible to customers. So optimizing packaging processes can reduce costs, improve efficiency, and support sustainability goals through automated packaging systems and sustainability initiatives.
That clash has come as retailers have been hustling to adjust to pandemic swings like a renewed focus on e-commerce, then swiftly reimagining store experiences as foot traffic returned. But even as the dust settles from those changes, retailers are now facing renewed questions about how best to define their omnichannel strategy in a world where customers have increasing power and information.
The answer may come from a five-part strategy using integrated components to fortify omnichannel retail, EY said. The approach can unlock value and customer trust through great experiences, but only when implemented cohesively, not individually, EY warns.
The steps include:
1. Functional integration: Is your operating model and data infrastructure siloed between e-commerce and physical stores, or have you developed a cohesive unit centered around delivering seamless customer experience?
2. Customer insights: With consumer centricity at the heart of operations, are you analyzing all touch points to build a holistic view of preferences, behaviors, and buying patterns?
3. Next-generation inventory: Given the right customer insights, how are you utilizing advanced analytics to ensure inventory is optimized to meet demand precisely where and when it’s needed?
4. Distribution partnerships: Having ensured your customers find what they want where they want it, how are your distribution strategies adapting to deliver these choices to them swiftly and efficiently?
5. Real estate strategy: How is your real estate strategy interconnected with insights, inventory and distribution to enhance experience and maximize your footprint?
When approached cohesively, these efforts all build toward one overarching differentiator for retailers: a better customer experience that reaches from brand engagement and order placement through delivery and return, the EY study said. Amid continued volatility and an economy driven by complex customer demands, the retailers best set up to win are those that are striving to gain real-time visibility into stock levels, offer flexible fulfillment options and modernize merchandising through personalized and dynamic customer experiences.
Geopolitical rivalries, alliances, and aspirations are rewiring the global economy—and the imposition of new tariffs on foreign imports by the U.S. will accelerate that process, according to an analysis by Boston Consulting Group (BCG).
Without a broad increase in tariffs, world trade in goods will keep growing at an average of 2.9% annually for the next eight years, the firm forecasts in its report, “Great Powers, Geopolitics, and the Future of Trade.” But the routes goods travel will change markedly as North America reduces its dependence on China and China builds up its links with the Global South, which is cementing its power in the global trade map.
“Global trade is set to top $29 trillion by 2033, but the routes these goods will travel is changing at a remarkable pace,” Aparna Bharadwaj, managing director and partner at BCG, said in a release. “Trade lanes were already shifting from historical patterns and looming US tariffs will accelerate this. Navigating these new dynamics will be critical for any global business.”
To understand those changes, BCG modeled the direct impact of the 60/25/20 scenario (60% tariff on Chinese goods, a 25% on goods from Canada and Mexico, and a 20% on imports from all other countries). The results show that the tariffs would add $640 billion to the cost of importing goods from the top ten U.S. import nations, based on 2023 levels, unless alternative sources or suppliers are found.
In terms of product categories imported by the U.S., the greatest impact would be on imported auto parts and automotive vehicles, which would primarily affect trade with Mexico, the EU, and Japan. Consumer electronics, electrical machinery, and fashion goods would be most affected by higher tariffs on Chinese goods. Specifically, the report forecasts that a 60% tariff rate would add $61 billion to cost of importing consumer electronics products from China into the U.S.
Shippers are actively preparing for changes in tariffs and trade policy through steps like analyzing their existing customs data, identifying alternative suppliers, and re-evaluating their cross-border strategies, according to research from logistics provider C.H. Robinson.
They are acting now because survey results show that shippers say the top risk to their supply chains in 2025 is changes in tariffs and trade policy. And nearly 50% say the uncertainty around tariffs and trade policy is already a pain point for them today, the Eden Prairie, Minnesota-based company said.
In a move to answer those concerns, C.H. Robinson says it has been working with its clients by running risk scenarios, building and implementing contingency plans, engineering and executing tariff solutions, and increasing supply chain diversification and agility.
“Having visibility into your full supply chain is no longer a nice-to-have. In 2025, visibility is a competitive differentiator and shippers without the technology and expertise to support real-time data and insights, contingency planning, and quick action will face increased supply chain risks,” Jordan Kass, President of C.H. Robinson Managed Solutions, said in a release.
The company’s survey showed that shippers say the top five ways they are planning for those risks: identifying where they can switch sourcing to save money, analyzing customs data, evaluating cross-border strategies, running risk scenarios, and lowering their dependence on Chinese imports.
President of C.H. Robinson Global Forwarding, Mike Short, said: “In today’s uncertain shipping environment, shippers are looking for ways to reduce their susceptibility to events that impact logistics but are out of their control. By diversifying their supply chains, getting access to the latest information and having a global supply chain partner able to flex with their needs at a moment’s notice, shippers can gain something they don’t always have when disruptions and policy changes occur - options.”
That strategy is described by RILA President Brian Dodge in a document titled “2025 Retail Public Policy Agenda,” which begins by describing leading retailers as “dynamic and multifaceted businesses that begin on Main Street and stretch across the world to bring high value and affordable consumer goods to American families.”
RILA says its policy priorities support that membership in four ways:
Investing in people. Retail is for everyone; the place for a first job, 2nd chance, third act, or a side hustle – the retail workforce represents the American workforce.
Ensuring a safe, sustainable future. RILA is working with lawmakers to help shape policies that protect our customers and meet expectations regarding environmental concerns.
Leading in the community. Retail is more than a store; we are an integral part of the fabric of our communities.
“As Congress and the Trump administration move forward to adopt policies that reduce regulatory burdens, create economic growth, and bring value to American families, understanding how such policies will impact retailers and the communities we serve is imperative,” Dodge said. “RILA and its member companies look forward to collaborating with policymakers to provide industry-specific insights and data to help shape any policies under consideration.”