What a difference a year makes. In 2014, the U.S. domestic for-hire trucking industry experienced a bounce-back after several years of contraction. Total tons and ton-miles reached the highest level in years, rates were on an upward slope by the end of that year, and, according to the American Trucking Associations, trucking revenue grew to over $700 billion for the first time ever. But just one year later, rates, tonnage, and revenue were stagnating, and the outlook was—and still is—trending toward slow growth in freight movements.
IHS Markit, a global provider of business information, analytics, and solutions, expects total U.S. domestic for-hire truck tonnage will see low year-over-year growth rates over the medium and long term. The proprietary IHS Transportation Transearch database of U.S. commodity movements shows that after a solid 2014, for-hire truck tonnage grew at a rate of just over 1 percent in 2015, to a total of roughly 4.4 billion tons handled by truckload carriers and 110 million tons by less-than-truckload (LTL) carriers. By the end of 2016, total tonnage for both truckload and LTL carriers is expected to be up only slightly—less than 1 percent each—from the 2015 year-end totals.
Truck tonnage should recover slightly in 2017 and 2018. Over the next decade, truckload tonnage is expected to increase at an average annual rate of 1.9 percent, while less-than-truckload tonnage will grow at a 2.5 percent rate. (See Figure 1.) Even with higher growth rates, total LTL tonnage is not expected to exceed 3.0 percent of the total for-hire domestic tonnage during the forecast period.
Why the slowdown?
The slow growth in truck tonnage doesn't seem to be due to any shift to other transportation modes. In fact, any move from truck toward rail intermodal should not impact the total tonnage on the road, as the typical container shipped on the rails has a corresponding truck drayage movement on both the origination and termination sides. Nor are we seeing private fleets taking business away from for-hire carriers. Private fleets are expected to see the same tonnage softness as for-hire trucking, and companies with private fleets increasingly are considering outsourcing their moves to dedicated, for-hire carriers as a cost-cutting measure. Additionally, rail carload and inland barge tonnage are both down. While these are not traditionally competitors for truck tonnage, this decline is another indicator that the slowdown is systemwide and is not limited to any particular mode.
Limitations on the availability of drivers do not seem to be causing the slow growth, either. While the industry continues to experience a shortage of qualified drivers, it's also true that trucking companies are looking to reduce excess capacity rather than expand their hiring. One indication of that trend is a sharp decline in orders for heavy-duty Class 8 tractors, down by one-third year-over-year as of June 2016.
Instead, the overarching reason for slow growth in truck tonnage is weak economic growth in the short term. In other words, the cargo is not there to be moved in the first place. Even the few bright spots in the economy may not offer much hope for a trucking recovery in the near term. The most recent data from the U.S. Department of Commerce shows housing construction rebounding from recession levels, particularly in the West and Northeast. Spending on highway and road construction has also been rising every year since 2011, to an estimated $1.07 billion in 2015, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
While this is certainly good news for the U.S. economy as a whole, the impact on the trucking sector is somewhat circumscribed. For one thing, the effects tend to be more regional; shipments in the construction industries often are associated with a shorter length of haul and therefore have a smaller revenue impact. For another, many of the primary commodities used in those industries—particularly aggregates, steel, lumber, and other building materials—are more likely to be transported by specialty haulers, so the gains are limited to a subsector of the for-hire trucking industry. Due in part to these factors, it is likely that the growth of freight movements will lag behind the growth in U.S. total gross domestic product (GDP).
The road ahead
Shippers have already been experiencing the impact of slow freight growth in the form of lower rates. In May, the Cass Truckload Linehaul Index, which measures per-mile truckload rates, showed three consecutive months of decline and fell to its lowest level since the summer of 2014.
IHS Transportation expects trucking prices to start heading upward in the second half of this year, assuming carriers are able to constrict supply enough to support higher rates. Other potential factors behind rate increases include higher costs for trucking companies in the form of higher wages and fuel prices. Due to the soft market, costs are currently out of synch with rates, and carriers are anxious to pass those higher costs along to customers as soon as the market allows. The industry's extremely high turnover—over 100 percent—and a period of wage stagnation in recent quarters could lead to driver wage increases. Additionally, average highway diesel prices started the year at $2.00 per gallon, but by the end of 2016 could be over $2.50 per gallon, echoing crude oil prices, which at this writing have bounced from their bottom of around $30 a barrel to more than $50 a barrel.
The expectation is for slow growth to continue. With energy prices low and employment gradually improving, U.S. consumers may be inclined to spend more of their paychecks, driving up demand for retail goods and therefore demand for transportation services. But there are a number of risks to consider. Unanticipated economic, political, or security shocks could upset the economic recovery. Another recession could mean a decline in freight movements; it could also lead to higher freight costs as smaller carriers go bankrupt and capacity shrinks further. Federal regulations, particularly upcoming greenhouse gas emissions standards and potential changes to hours-of-service restrictions, could also impact the trucking industry by reducing capacity and further slowing growth. And finally, what happens abroad has a direct impact on U.S. domestic trucking: a slowdown in the global economy or a revisiting of trade agreements may result in fewer goods and materials being transported to and from U.S ports of entry. With so many risk factors in play, buyers of trucking services will need to be vigilant if they're to anticipate how rates and capacity will play out in the coming year.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.
Specifically, the two sides remain at odds over provisions related to the deployment of semi-automated technologies like rail-mounted gantry cranes, according to an analysis by the Kansas-based 3PL Noatum Logistics. The ILA has strongly opposed further automation, arguing it threatens dockworker protections, while the USMX contends that automation enhances productivity and can create long-term opportunities for labor.
In fact, U.S. importers are already taking action to prevent the impact of such a strike, “pulling forward” their container shipments by rushing imports to earlier dates on the calendar, according to analysis by supply chain visibility provider Project44. That strategy can help companies to build enough safety stock to dampen the damage of events like the strike and like the steep tariffs being threatened by the incoming Trump administration.
Likewise, some ocean carriers have already instituted January surcharges in pre-emption of possible labor action, which could support inbound ocean rates if a strike occurs, according to freight market analysts with TD Cowen. In the meantime, the outcome of the new negotiations are seen with “significant uncertainty,” due to the contentious history of the discussion and to the timing of the talks that overlap with a transition between two White House regimes, analysts said.