Kelly Thomas is a supply chain management professional and CEO of Worldlocity, a research and advisory firm focusing on supply chain management software.
Are your existing supply chain software applications and enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems inhibiting your ability to bring innovation to your supply chain processes? A shift in technology architecture toward Web services could help you gain the flexibility and agility you need to innovate—not just once but over and over again.
Web services are pieces of logic from different software applications that can be accessed, used, and combined to form new applications for solving business problems. For example, a Web service that provides material-receipt status based on information from a supplier-collaboration system could be fed to a Web service for an assembly-sequencing system, forming a closed-loop workflow between supply operations and assembly execution. This reflects a significant advance in computer systems and has far-reaching implications for driving breakthrough value in supply chain management.
Web services represents a continuation of a trend in computing that started with distributed systems in the 1980s and led to the client-server architecture of the 1990s. This trend incorporates the progressive unbundling of "monolithic" (stand-alone) systems into components that can be more flexibly deployed.
In the first generation of computer applications, software programs ran the entire sequence of commands as one code source on a massive computer, typically a mainframe. The distributedsystems phase in the 1980s spread this application code across a group of smaller mini-computers. At about the same time, there were improvements that separated the database from the application and ran the database and the application code on separate computing equipment.
The client-server architecture phase in the 1990s led to further unbundling of systems by separating user-specific interaction code from the actual application logic. A program at one site (the client) would send a request to a program at another site (the server). This added flexibility by dramatically improving user interfaces and by allowing them to run locally on personal computers. The new architecture essentially extended flexibility through Web browsers on personal computers, which enabled clients to be "zero-footprint interfaces"—meaning that they do not reside on the local PCs and therefore take up no local space or memory.
Web services represent perhaps the most revolutionary phase of all in this continued movement toward unbundling because they allow different applications to be linked together to manage a process. The ability to take a capability from one application and combine it with another could solve two of the biggest challenges facing companies seeking to drive breakthrough supply chain improvements. First, it would allow them to adapt existing technologies to support specific business processes. And second, it would allow them to change from functionally driven organizations to cross-functional, process-driven supply chains.
Overcoming resistance to change
As shown in Figure 1, organizations, software systems (applications), and business processes are highly intertwined, and each creates its own resistance to change. Changing any one of them in an attempt to drive value will not yield the desired results; they must all change together. It is therefore very difficult to create a process that cuts across these silos.
ERP systems—while offering improved standardization—actually have hindered the development of crossfunctional supply chains. That's because they include stand-alone, functionally oriented modules that drive companies to adapt their business processes to the technology, resulting in reinforced functional barriers within those organizations. Similarly, the success of packaged software of the past 15 years has largely depended on companies adapting their business processes to the standardized requirements of the software.
This approach fundamentally conflicts with a company's desire to use business-process differentiation to distinguish itself from its competitors. In fact, in the last 15 years most supply chain leaders have only achieved success through business-process differentiation that was made possible by software customizations.
Web services architecture, by contrast, gives companies the ability to develop and customize solutions to meet their business-process needs. It also enables them to adapt and extend those solutions as business processes change. Furthermore, Web services make it possible for computer systems to catalyze cross-functional changes in business processes.
As shown in Figure 2, software applications are no longer monolithic; their capabilities can be served up as unbundled Web services. Web services from applications that support different organizations and business processes can therefore be brought together to drive process innovation. For example, a Web service could access supplier-performance data from a supplier-collaboration system and link it to a Web service in a strategic sourcing system, forming a cross-functional workflow for sourcing decisions that take supply chain considerations into account.
Additionally, technologies that leverage Web services allow users to customize and extend solutions, thus giving companies a way to adapt technology solutions to business processes, rather than the other way around.
In the past few years, two additional developments have made it possible for companies to leverage Web services to support innovation in supply chain management:
A supply chain management innovation platform based on a service-oriented architecture (SOA). SOA is an integration and structural design framework that facilitates access to information and services over a network.
A business-content "library" comprising workflows and solutions that incorporate business-process best practices.
In the next two sections, we'll examine these developments and their significance for supply chain management.
A platform for innovation
The mechanism by which Web services can be made visible and then configured together to form new applications is called a platform. Platforms can be generic, meaning they are essentially technologies without any business-process context. Or they can be domain-specific, which means they also contain capabilities that are specific to a domain, such as supply chain management (SCM).
The SCM domain-specific platform has embedded capabilities that are necessary for constructing any supply chain management solution: integration, master data management, collaboration, event management, analytics, and plan-to-plan comparison. The platform also contains business-process "starting points" that reduce the amount of time needed to create applications. For example, a planning workflow typically includes steps for data synchronization, datainput processing, manual adjustments, automatic optimization, publishing, monitoring, and analysis. A workflow that includes these steps is part of the SCM platform; it is a basic version—a starting point—that companies can use and modify to meet their needs.
Web services enabled by SCM platforms will spawn a new generation of solutions based on agility. Agility in this context means the ability to quickly understand a new business problem, and then solve it by repurposing existing assets in innovative ways.
As a technology engine for driving SCM businessprocess innovation, this platform will deliver key capabilities by leveraging and repurposing functional applications from a previous generation (such as transportation management systems, warehouse management systems, ERP, and order management systems) through Web services.
The structure of this innovation engine is shown in Figure 3. SCM innovation begins with business-process innovation, seen at the top of the diagram. Six Sigma or other methodologies are used to examine how processes are carried out today and how they could be done better in the future, and to devise the solution needed to move from the current state to the future state.
Through this process, companies can generate new ideas for improvement, and then use Web services to make those ideas a reality. For example, many companies struggle with propagating supply constraints to sales and marketing systems in order to improve customer service. The Web services approach makes it possible to build a simple workflow across the various systems that exist within the supply operations organization and the sales and marketing organization.
In the past, these solutions would have been delivered through one or more monolithic applications. In many cases, that required cobbling together off-theshelf software and legacy systems into a new standalone application. In the previous constraint-propagation example, for instance, changes and point-topoint integrations may have been required for material flow, production, planning, and order-fulfillment systems. But these types of solutions only added to the complexity of information technology. Ultimately, each functional area ended up with its own optimization engine and data model as well as many customizations. Although these first-generation projects drove value, they were often painful to implement, and they created resistance to further innovation.
The concept of an SCM innovation platform that has emerged in the past several years addresses many of the shortcomings of first-generation solutions. Because it allows companies to leverage, reuse, and repurpose these first-generation solutions, it overcomes the inertia that prevents future innovation.
In this approach, common integration services, data services, and functional services are combined into a single environment, which is then used to deliver new-generation SCM solutions. An integration service provides data movement between two applications; a data service provides mapping between different data sources; and functional services are SCM-specific capabilities such as event management. When companies use this approach, they can take advantage of lessons learned from successful first-generation software implementations.
How would a company use this method to support a business-process innovation? They must first look for available technology components, whether off-theshelf, first-generation applications (optimization engines), or their own legacy applications, shown at the bottom of Figure 3. Workflows are then constructed using a graphical configuration environment that accesses component Web services available in first-generation optimization engines and in legacy applications. These Web services, along with the platform's embedded data model and supply chain functional services, create the new-generation solution.
This method offers tremendous advantages over firstgeneration solutions. For one thing, it avoids the need to create stand-alone applications. For another, these workflows can be extended and modified (using Microsoft's Visual Studio programming environment), and they can be reused to drive further innovation.
Business-content libraries
Once these new-generation workflows have been assembled into complete solutions, they are housed in a business-content library (BCL). A BCL is the construct for managing and administering this newfound flexibility. It also provides the foundation for faster innovation cycles in the future by allowing innovators to reuse workflows.
The BCL becomes the enterprise's technology hub for business-process management by storing best-practice workflow designs in visual graphic and codebased forms. For example, the BCL maintains a bestpractice workflow in a graphical form that is similar to PowerPoint. Embedded within the graphic is the logic that allows an organization to execute that workflow.
The advent of the business-content library will help overcome many of the software-development problems that have hindered innovation. Take the example of enterprise software that has been deployed in the past 10 years. As these monolithic applications have become more complicated, the complexity, cost, and lead time for releasing new versions have also increased. The time between releases for the most popular applications has lengthened considerably.
Furthermore, most companies' appetite for digesting such releases has diminished. All of this has led to a slowdown in the technology-innovation cycle.
But the shift to Web services, in conjunction with BCL management, provides the opportunity to release a new wave of innovation. In most companies today, much of the business-process information either is not explicitly managed or it is managed through PowerPoint, Word, and other documents that may be scattered across the enterprise. The best practice for a specific process, therefore, may not be immediately evident; it may also be challenging for companies to determine how a technology could support a best practice.
On the World Wide Web, though, individuals can access vast sources of information while contributing to the body of knowledge themselves. The intent of the business-content library is similar; it provides a repository of ideas and methodologies within the context of enterprise supply chain management processes and technologies.
Workflows typically published in a BCL include business-process content (best practices) embedded in a visual process diagram that is linked directly to Web services. These services perform the work that enables the processes. The BCL offers both public access (capabilities that can be leveraged across multiple enterprises) and private access (capabilities that can be leveraged within individual enterprises).
As supply chain professionals seek to drive innovation in various areas of the enterprise, they can use the BCL to learn what has been done elsewhere in the company. That information can provide the impetus for additional innovation. As new capabilities are added and documented they can be published in the library, where they will remain available for future use.
The Web services advantage
Web services allow companies to use software in a new way to gain a better understanding of their supply chains. Take the example of determining total landed cost, which requires systematically analyzing scenarios and weighing tradeoffs.
Total landed cost incorporates piece price as well as transportation costs, lead times, inventory buffering, and an understanding of risk factors associated with port strikes, natural disasters, geopolitical instability, and fluctuations in exchange rates and fuel prices. To determine total landed cost, companies must maintain data and workflows that span engineering, procurement, and supply operations, including inventory management and transportation planning and management systems. First-generation solutions for this problem would have included:
Custom systems developed in-house
Custom systems developed by a third party
Off-the-shelf products integrated with each other and with legacy systems
Some combination of the above.
Each of these options offers advantages and disadvantages. But the major disadvantage for all of them is that they create a stand-alone solution that has little flexibility for further innovation.
The Web services approach leverages optimization and legacy-system components that have already been deployed, and it potentially incorporates additional offthe- shelf components. This means tying price information from a company's procurement solution to route, lead time, and other information from its transportation solution as well as with inventory information from its supply chain planning system. The SCM innovation platform brings together and makes visible the Web services from these components, and then cross-functional workflows are created to support decisions about total landed costs. These workflows are assembled into a complete solution that is stored in the business-content library. The workflows can be customized, extended, and reused to support further innovation in the future.
Innovation powers improvement
Trailblazing companies that view technology and process improvements as a means of achieving competitive advantage have largely driven the supply chain advancements of the past dozen years. There's no question that the first-generation, monolithic solutions they deployed did a great deal to bring about innovation.
But those solutions are too rigid to spur further innovation. Continued innovation, therefore, requires a fundamentally different approach.
Web services' flexibility allows companies to experiment. It lets them devise solutions that reuse, repurpose, and extend already-deployed solutions. It also lets them pick and choose the best capabilities from offthe-shelf software. When users have the tools to create new combinations of software components, they will be able to quickly construct the solution they need to achieve the next supply chain breakthrough.
Geopolitical rivalries, alliances, and aspirations are rewiring the global economy—and the imposition of new tariffs on foreign imports by the U.S. will accelerate that process, according to an analysis by Boston Consulting Group (BCG).
Without a broad increase in tariffs, world trade in goods will keep growing at an average of 2.9% annually for the next eight years, the firm forecasts in its report, “Great Powers, Geopolitics, and the Future of Trade.” But the routes goods travel will change markedly as North America reduces its dependence on China and China builds up its links with the Global South, which is cementing its power in the global trade map.
“Global trade is set to top $29 trillion by 2033, but the routes these goods will travel is changing at a remarkable pace,” Aparna Bharadwaj, managing director and partner at BCG, said in a release. “Trade lanes were already shifting from historical patterns and looming US tariffs will accelerate this. Navigating these new dynamics will be critical for any global business.”
To understand those changes, BCG modeled the direct impact of the 60/25/20 scenario (60% tariff on Chinese goods, a 25% on goods from Canada and Mexico, and a 20% on imports from all other countries). The results show that the tariffs would add $640 billion to the cost of importing goods from the top ten U.S. import nations, based on 2023 levels, unless alternative sources or suppliers are found.
In terms of product categories imported by the U.S., the greatest impact would be on imported auto parts and automotive vehicles, which would primarily affect trade with Mexico, the EU, and Japan. Consumer electronics, electrical machinery, and fashion goods would be most affected by higher tariffs on Chinese goods. Specifically, the report forecasts that a 60% tariff rate would add $61 billion to cost of importing consumer electronics products from China into the U.S.
We are in the golden age of warehouse automation. Supply chain leaders today have a dizzying array of new automated solutions to choose from. These include autonomous mobile robots (AMRs), automated storage and retrieval systems (AS/RS), automated case-handling mobile robots, robotic pickers, and advanced software. While predominantly manual facilities remain, advancements in automation are improving existing facilities and use cases demonstrate in very real ways how robotics will forever alter supply chains.
But while the potential gains from automation can be significant, it’s also important to realize that no two organizations’ needs are the same. There is no cookie cutter approach to warehouse automation and robotics. A successful implementation requires not only strategic planning and investment but also a full understanding of the organization’s own unique needs. Before it installs any automation, a company must have a clear picture of its specific processes and requirements and ensure solutions are tailored to its operations. This involves identifying the needs of the specific sector or market segment that the company is trying to serve, what its growth potential is, and where it currently is in its automation journey.
To show how this can be done, let’s take a closer look at the retail industry. Today’s retail distribution centers are some of the most advanced materials handling facilities ever built, simultaneously supporting fulfillment for online purchases and enabling the efficient stocking of brick-and-mortar stores. These facilities demonstrate the impact automation and robotics advancements can have on distribution operations, including enabling unprecedented performance and throughput levels that were unimaginable a few short years ago. For this reason, reviewing the strategic considerations a retailer may face on the way to making a business case for automation will provide a model not just for other retailers but for companies in other industries as well.
Tackling long-standing challenges
Warehouse robotics and automation can help retailers respond to a variety of longstanding challenges. First, there is the growth of e-commerce. The volume of online purchases continues to increase, even as the rate of growth slows to pre-pandemic norms. According to the U.S. Department of Commerce, despite ongoing inflationary forces, American consumers spent more than $300 billion online in the third quarter of 2024, which represented 16.2% of total retail sales and a 7.4% percent increase over the same period in 2023.
Each online purchase is essentially an ad hoc event, making the resulting fulfillment more complex and demanding than the regular, scheduled replenishment of in-store inventories. Automation plays a vital role in helping retailers overcome these challenges. By automating key processes, retailers can achieve faster throughput, can more efficiently handle a larger variety of stock-keeping units (SKUs), and can maintain exceptional order accuracy. Automated systems streamline order picking, packing, and shipping, reducing errors and speeding up operations. This allows retailers to keep up with the growing demands of e-commerce while ensuring customer satisfaction with precise and timely deliveries.
Then there is the issue of labor. Retail supply chain leaders face an ongoing and problematic shortage of workers. While the “2024 State of Warehouse Labor Report” from the online labor marketplace Instawork found some improvement in the labor market, more than 40% of surveyed businesses still reported that warehouse staffing levels remain a cause of revenue loss.
The implementation of automation and robotics in both existing brownfield and new greenfield warehouses is a direct response to these labor market concerns. All forms of warehouse automation, including robotics, are fundamentally efforts to address the shortage of labor or to increase its efficiency. For example, many automated solutions, such as AMRs, are designed to specifically address the most time-consuming activity in warehouses: the 78% of time employees spend walking.
There are other important benefits. Machines don’t require rest, and they are particularly effective at highly repetitive tasks, which are a leading cause of workplace injuries. Automation also creates new career paths for employees, transitioning them away from physically taxing activities that center on moving items through the warehouse to maintaining and overseeing the systems that assume those tasks. Finally, as the cost of labor rises, the cost of technology continues to decrease.
Implementation: Where to begin?
Automated storage and retrieval systems (AS/RS) provides advanced storage capabilities and fast throughput. But they are typically more costly and take longer to implement than less automated systems.
Courtesy of Vanderlande
While the benefits of automation are clear, selecting the right solution for a specific operation can be daunting. To choose among the variety of automated solutions available, retail supply chain leaders must first consider the needs of their specific sector.
The grocery and food sector is a telling example. Few sectors have experienced as rapid a transformation in recent years as the grocery industry. Before the pandemic, online grocery sales were mostly limited to select metropolitan areas. Last year, online grocery sales in the U.S. reached $95.8 billion, according to the data and technology company Mercatus. Consumer grocery purchases are now split between three very distinct fulfillment models: ship-to-home, delivery, and pick-at-store. Those models and the retailer’s unique needs determine the type of warehouses required. As a result, the grocery sector sees everything from full standalone distribution centers to warehouse operations at the “back of the store” and even so–called dark stores—stores that are solely used as warehouses for online orders and are not open to the public.
Due to razor-thin margins and price-sensitive shoppers, the grocery sector is embracing advanced automation, such as AS/RS and palletizing robots. For example, they are utilizing software and automation to build pallets and pallet cages in a stable and space-efficient fashion with products arranged by store layout. By doing so, leading grocers and food retailers ensure that they can quickly move and stock items while keeping labor costs in check—all savings that enable them to maintain margins while competing on price.
Different considerations, however, are the main focus for automation projects in the apparel and general merchandising industries. In apparel, items need to be moved—typically in bags—without being damaged. Additionally, warehouses often have to manage the processing of returns. In both applications, pocket sorters are often used. In contrast, the general merchandise sector deals with highly variable SKUs and the rapid processing of online orders, making throughput levels and order accuracy critically important. Here, a high-performance AS/RS is often a natural choice.
Build new or sweat your existing warehouse assets?
Automated case-handling mobile robots are a good solution for companies looking for more "incremental" automation. Because they can use existing warehouse racks, they can be implemented faster than a more complex system.
Courtesy of Vanderlande
Where retailers are in their growth cycle and in their warehouse automation journey should also be carefully considered when determining what kinds of automation and robots are needed. These two factors will play a particularly strong role in determining whether a retailer implements new automation or sticks with what it already has. This is particularly true today when the cost of capital is a key consideration. As an example, let’s look at how this decision might play out in different retail sectors.
Fast-growing, mid-market retailers: Most of these organizations currently have largely manual distribution centers. They are predominantly moving to build more advanced, fully automated facilities that include AMRs, AS/RS, and robotic pickers. Primed for growth, they are foregoing the improvement of existing warehouses, as even modernization projects can't keep up with growing sales and risk becoming quickly obsolete.
Slower growing mid-market retailers: These companies are embracing more incremental automation. For example, many are deploying a system that includes automated case-handling mobile robots (ACRs). These robotic units are designed to move and retrieve goods stored in traditional, often pre-existing, warehouse racks. As a result, these systems can often be implemented in just a couple of months, offering a faster implementation timeline.
Other mid-market retailers are choosing to implement an AS/RS, which—while automating many of the same tasks—provides more advanced storage capabilities and faster throughput. These systems are, however, more costly and require a more comprehensive planning and installation process, as they can take a year or two to design and make operational.
The largest retail brands: These companies already rely on largely automated warehouses that utilize AS/RS, robotic pickers, and other solutions. They are increasingly choosing to “sweat their assets” by making incremental improvements—such as adding additional shuttles and more storage capacity to an already existing AS/RS or deploying additional robotic pickers to speed throughput. Such improvements can result in significant efficiency gains, without requiring any large capital investments.
No matter what type of automation is selected, however, successful implementation hinges on a crucially important step: creating an effective business case.
The crucially important business case
Before implementing any automation or robotic solution, a company must perform due diligence. It is critical that no project should proceed without first completing a detailed business case. There are several factors to consider, starting with the decision between modernizing an existing brownfield facility or building a new greenfield site. This choice requires evaluating the costs, growth potential, and the return on investment (ROI) associated with a more advanced warehouse system.
Importantly, the business case should not be created in a vacuum. Operational, financial, and legal leaders should all be involved. The process should be sure to incorporate the following steps:
Determine growth projections: No one has a crystal ball, but growth projections and plans should be carefully considered to determine if a new greenfield facility with advanced automation and robotics is viable and necessary. These cutting-edge solutions often deliver the highest ROI but come with significant upfront investment.
Determine the lifecycle of existing warehouses: Are they able to process the number of SKUs, achieve the throughput, and provide the storage capacity needed today? What about for the future? If not, can they be modernized to cost-effectively buy more time?
Calculate the timeframe needed to realize an ROI: How long will it take to achieve the ROI for your automation project over the cost of capital and labor that would be required in its absence? How does this compare to the lifespan of the facility or project in question? Are you looking to see your ROI in three years, five years, or ten? The time required to achieve the desired ROI is key.
Consider the costs and gains associated with incremental advancements: Even if it seems like a new, fully automated facility makes the most sense, consider the alternative approach of making incremental improvements. If you choose to move forward with a greenfield project, it is good to know you carefully considered existing assets.
Run the numbers on your dream warehouse: Even if a new facility that delivers the capabilities of high-performance robots and automation is likely out of reach, run the numbers anyway. It can feel safer to upgrade a warehouse than to build a new automated one, but no one wants to invest significant capital in a facility that hinders growth in the future.
Remember that no automation is automatic: Advanced solutions and robots are never a one-and-done purchase. They must be maintained and managed—tasks that require significant expertise, either from partners or through an investment in employees and training.
By carefully considering the needs and nuances that define success in their sector and creating a detailed business case, supply chain leaders can embrace emerging, powerful robotics and automation with confidence. Regardless of whether they choose to obtain the most advanced capabilities or take a more measured approach, they will do so with the confidence that their investments are based on proven strategies that position them for growth and success in the future.
About the authors: Jake Heldenberg is the director of North American Warehouse Sales Engineering, at Vanderlande. He oversees the design of warehouse systems that combine intelligent software, robotics, and advanced automation. Andy Lockhart is the director of strategic engagement, warehouse solutions, North America, at Vanderlande, where he provides retail customers with innovative, scalable systems; intelligent software; and reliable services to optimize distribution and fulfillment operations.
Shippers are actively preparing for changes in tariffs and trade policy through steps like analyzing their existing customs data, identifying alternative suppliers, and re-evaluating their cross-border strategies, according to research from logistics provider C.H. Robinson.
They are acting now because survey results show that shippers say the top risk to their supply chains in 2025 is changes in tariffs and trade policy. And nearly 50% say the uncertainty around tariffs and trade policy is already a pain point for them today, the Eden Prairie, Minnesota-based company said.
In a move to answer those concerns, C.H. Robinson says it has been working with its clients by running risk scenarios, building and implementing contingency plans, engineering and executing tariff solutions, and increasing supply chain diversification and agility.
“Having visibility into your full supply chain is no longer a nice-to-have. In 2025, visibility is a competitive differentiator and shippers without the technology and expertise to support real-time data and insights, contingency planning, and quick action will face increased supply chain risks,” Jordan Kass, President of C.H. Robinson Managed Solutions, said in a release.
The company’s survey showed that shippers say the top five ways they are planning for those risks: identifying where they can switch sourcing to save money, analyzing customs data, evaluating cross-border strategies, running risk scenarios, and lowering their dependence on Chinese imports.
President of C.H. Robinson Global Forwarding, Mike Short, said: “In today’s uncertain shipping environment, shippers are looking for ways to reduce their susceptibility to events that impact logistics but are out of their control. By diversifying their supply chains, getting access to the latest information and having a global supply chain partner able to flex with their needs at a moment’s notice, shippers can gain something they don’t always have when disruptions and policy changes occur - options.”
That strategy is described by RILA President Brian Dodge in a document titled “2025 Retail Public Policy Agenda,” which begins by describing leading retailers as “dynamic and multifaceted businesses that begin on Main Street and stretch across the world to bring high value and affordable consumer goods to American families.”
RILA says its policy priorities support that membership in four ways:
Investing in people. Retail is for everyone; the place for a first job, 2nd chance, third act, or a side hustle – the retail workforce represents the American workforce.
Ensuring a safe, sustainable future. RILA is working with lawmakers to help shape policies that protect our customers and meet expectations regarding environmental concerns.
Leading in the community. Retail is more than a store; we are an integral part of the fabric of our communities.
“As Congress and the Trump administration move forward to adopt policies that reduce regulatory burdens, create economic growth, and bring value to American families, understanding how such policies will impact retailers and the communities we serve is imperative,” Dodge said. “RILA and its member companies look forward to collaborating with policymakers to provide industry-specific insights and data to help shape any policies under consideration.”
Logistics service provider (LSP) DHL Supply Chain is continuing to extend its investments in global multi-shoring and in reverse logistics, marking efforts to help its clients adjust to the challenging business and economic conditions of 2025.
The company’s focus on improving e-commerce parcel flows comes as a time when retailers are facing an array of delivery challenges—both international and domestic—triggered by a cascade of swift changes in reciprocal tariffs, “de minimis” import fees, and other protectionist escalations of trade war conditions imposed by the newly seated Trump Administration. While business groups are largely opposed to those policies, they still need strategies to accommodate those rules of the road as long as the new rules remain in place.
Accordingly, DHL last week released a new study on the growing importance of multi-shoring strategies that go beyond the classic “China Plus 1” philosophy and focuses on diversifying production and supplier locations even further, to multiple countries. This expanded “China Plus X” strategy can help companies build resilient supply chains by choosing more diverse production locations in response to global trade disruptions. The study offers five criteria for sourcing goods from countries outside China such as India, Vietnam, Hungary, and Mexico, depending on the procurement needs of each particular industry.