How to create a supply chain center of excellence that works
A center of excellence (CoE) staffed by analytics experts can drive supply chain improvements across your organization. Here are six recommendations for ensuring a successful CoE initiative.
Significant business change and fluctuating levels of complexity make it extremely difficult for companies with multiple, independent supply chains to achieve internal supply chain alignment across divisions. Fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG), consumer packaged goods (CPG), retail, and electronics companies can be especially vulnerable to misaligned or fractured supply chains in the face of volatile consumer demand, short product life cycles, erratic supply, and high transportation costs.
To address those and other challenges, some companies have established supply chain centers of excellence (CoEs). A CoE is a designated specialty group within the firm that works together to drive supply chain innovation, collaboration, and excellence across the organization. While many companies use "center of excellence" to refer to anything that is centralized or perhaps outsourced, in this article the term refers to centers of competency focused on supply chain design and flow-path analysis, route planning, inventory deployment, and related advanced analytics. These organizations often serve to unite companies across their supply chain silos. (See the sidebar, "Who could benefit from a CoE?")
CoE experts excel at using models to conduct sensitivity analyses and hypothesis testing. They use their analytical skills to interpret wider data trends for long-term supply chain planning. Since the supply chain best practices that CoEs engender rely on multiple types of data from innumerable information technology (IT) sources, these experts must be capable not only of collecting and cleansing the data (a critical step for accurate supply chain network modeling), but also of building models, conducting sophisticated analyses, and sharing repeatable supply chain insights and knowledge across the organization.
As part of their purview, the CoE team often develops and manages an enterprisewide focus on balanced metrics (also known as holistic or aligned metrics) that can overcome business units' biases while reflecting the different aspects of the supply chain. These metrics can be used to measure supply chain performance and costs spanning inventory, transportation, warehousing, manufacturing, procurement, and customer service functions. Accordingly, well-run CoEs ensure the best use of talent and resources; reduce transportation, inventory, and warehousing costs; and improve customer service levels while ensuring more effective management of inventory-deployment costs across multiple supply chains. Typically, however, they have limited (if any) operational responsibility.
CoEs thrive if they are viewed as bringing long-term strategic benefit to the organization. Their success rides on strong executive support and a thoughtfully developed long-term plan. Well-administered and carefully nurtured CoEs can inspire superior, long-term supply chain results that drive the changes needed for a company to be market-responsive.
In fact, research conducted by the analyst firm Supply Chain Insights1 found that companies with well-resourced, well-oiled CoE teams are more likely to describe themselves as "strategic," "proactive," and internally aligned and functioning from "the outside in" or "from the customer back." These companies rely on their CoE teams (whether centrally or virtually located) to develop models; identify, propose, and manage internal supply chain design projects; and oversee supply chain-design consulting engagements.
Who could benefit from a CoE?
Centers of excellence strengthen supply chains by optimizing operations and inculcating enterprisewide best practices. CoE experts guide and facilitate changes to internal processes, practices, technologies, and strategies to optimize overall organizational performance, providing the most value for large companies that need to:
Sell across multiple channels
Serve volatile or shifting markets
Conduct frequent contingency planning
Develop supply chain strategies to address e-commerce demands
Build a unified, optimized post-merger-and-acquisition supply chain
Six tips for developing an effective CoE
On the surface, centers of excellence may sound like a panacea for supply chain management challenges. However, although they have provided significant value for some companies and their supply chains, they have proved less useful for others. The decision to adopt a CoE strategy therefore comes with a few notable caveats, and ensuring a CoE's long-term viability and sustainability requires some candid self-analysis as well as proactive change management. When done right, a CoE can be a valuable asset that produces long-lasting benefits. With that in mind, here are six guidelines for establishing a successful supply chain center of excellence:
1. Start with a CoE readiness assessment. Before you can begin to develop a CoE, you must know whether you have or can acquire the skills and talent that will be needed to support it. That requires undertaking an honest assessment of whether your company has what it takes to operate a dedicated CoE. Among the questions to ask yourself: Do you have both the critical mass of work and the financial resources required to justify establishing and maintaining a CoE organization? Are you capable of developing high-performance teams? Can your culture attract and retain people with analytical skills in mathematical, inventory, network-design, or transportation modeling? Does your company do a good job of mentoring, developing, and retaining highly skilled professionals?
To get the right people on the CoE team, look for supply chain professionals who have both the aptitude and the passion for analytical modeling, and provide them with rich, diverse experiences. Consider tapping into the supply chain talent as well as the research on best practices at a nearby university with a strong supply chain or operations research program. To help CoE experts stay on top of cutting-edge techniques and practices, you'll also need to provide them with mentoring and skills-development programs that enable them to not only maintain deep expertise, but to also effectively mentor more-junior members. In essence, your CoE needs leaders with both technical and soft skills.
2. Ensure strong executive sponsorship and guidance. Your high-performing CoE team needs to report to a senior-level executive sponsor who has the power to enable them to carve out time to focus on supply chain improvement projects. With sponsorship at the highest corporate level, your CoE team won't become an isolated "island" whose analyses are filed away and never put to use, but rather will lead the way on key supply chain standardization and improvement efforts.
Your CoE team will benefit if you also develop a proactive, cross-functional or cross-divisional steering committee that includes your company's major constituencies. This committee can stay abreast of—and be involved with and internally promote—the CoE's best practices and successes. This will be key to opening doors and overcoming resistance to CoE activities like data gathering and assessing supply chain performance, as well as resistance to making significant operational changes.
CoEs have a tendency to go "off mission." Ironically, this is often the result of doing great work or having great people. As a CoE attains success it can become a catchall for special projects, solving emergencies, and powerful sponsors' pet projects. To prevent this, the senior sponsor and steering committee need to protect the mission of the CoE with an actively managed work-inflow process.
3. Provide good analytical tools. The CoE team often is tasked with reviewing different supply chain technologies and analyzing critical technology gaps and priorities for the organization's short- and long-term supply chain needs and business requirements. CoE experts will analyze a supply chain solution's time-to-value, its return on investment (ROI), and the time needed to close capability gaps. They'll also be able to address business-critical issues, like linking supply chain technologies and strategies to large customers' needs and demands.
Like other good craftsmen, CoE experts like to work with good tools. You'll be best served if you enable your CoE team to choose the feature-rich and robust technology they need to drive supply chain analyses.
4. Bring core CoE team members together in one place. Although it is entirely possible to create a virtual center of excellence by having experts across the company collaborate electronically, they often can be more effective if they work together in the same location. One reason is that doing so can improve communication and collaboration. For example, supply chain design is extremely complex, and the analyses lend themselves to sitting side-by-side and graphically depicting and explaining ideas. A centralized group can also help to resolve another common concern: it's hard for an expert to have credibility across the company when he or she is remote and attached to a particular business unit. And finally, a centrally located department promotes the most efficient use of a limited talent pool, allowing experts to focus on the CoE's mission rather than having to juggle responsibilities on both a business-unit and a corporate level.
5. Develop a clear and meaningful career path for CoE team members. While many companies guide would-be supply chain executives through rotations in functions such as inbound logistics, distribution, and procurement, few develop a meaningful career path for the technical-minded individuals populating their CoE teams. These experts, with their advanced degrees in computer science, operations research, data analytics, or supply chain management, enjoy problem solving and the challenge of improving enterprise systems and processes. They may be excited by the process of analyzing and determining which warehouses should be opened and which should be closed, but they would feel challenged and overwhelmed if they had to manage the actual closing of a distribution center and the relocation of inventory to other operations. It can be difficult to keep their work varied and intellectually stimulating; they rarely want to take on repetitive tasks or duties, and they also tend to like working on varied types of models and analyses.
Ideally, a career path for CoE experts will both challenge their technical competency and protect those rare and valuable members who have both strong technical skills and a high degree of management acumen. However, more-technical CoE employees rarely have a Master of Business Administration (MBA) degree; as a result, their recommendations—no matter how technically sound—may meet opposition. Moreover, although those serving in junior CoE roles may be technically competent managers, they may lack business credibility because they are perceived as not thoroughly understanding the business yet.
Finally, a strong career path is important because CoEs can become overreliant on a single resource: the "resident expert." You'll extend your CoE team's longevity and viability by putting a transition or succession plan in place that ensures the center will continue to run smoothly if your resident expert leaves the group. Keep in mind, though, that the new resident expert will need some time to master his or her new role.
6. Know when to call in reinforcements. Many managers assume that a center of excellence must be entirely internal. Yet the reality for many firms is that they lack the critical mass of work and access to talent in very specialized areas that will enable them to support a fully functional, exclusively internal organization. Additionally, the demanding nature of CoE projects, sometimes accompanied by short timelines, means that it's possible for almost any team to become overwhelmed or to confront a technical challenge that's beyond their expertise. When a project's demands outstrip available capacity, or when projects are quite different than those the CoE has previously managed, CoE leaders may want to consider supplementing the center's capabilities with external resources.
In our experience, the hybrid model (that is, a blend of internal and external resources) is the structure that consistently delivers the highest value for most organizations. It is also the only sustainable model given the significant challenges associated with creating and successfully maintaining a CoE, as well as the many failures of CoEs built on internal-only models, which are often caused by the lack of a critical mass of skills.
Careful consideration
Setting up a center of excellence is not an easy or obvious decision, and there is certainly risk involved. Some have delivered great results, and others have performed unsatisfactorily. In fact, the previously cited research by Supply Chain Insights found that CoEs only work satisfactorily about 50 percent of the time.
Before embarking on the effort and expense of developing a supply chain CoE, then, you should give careful consideration to whether you have the right culture, work environment, business problems, sponsorship, and developmental paths to build and maintain it. If the answer to one or more of these questions is "no," then the next question is whether the deficiency is easily correctable. If you find that the answer to this question is also "no," then a reasonable alternative to consider would be either supplementing your capabilities with external support or focusing on driving value through improved performance in the functional supply chain areas. Either of these alternatives is a better solution than attempting to run a CoE that doesn't have the backing or resources it needs to succeed.
But if you do have the right business needs, culture, and resources, then the potential benefits of establishing a supply chain center of excellence may well justify the cost and effort. The opportunity to analyze metrics, supply chain performance, total cost to serve, and other important success factors across the entire company and then use that analysis to help set policies and develop the best outlook for the business as a whole is a worthy goal.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Specifically, the two sides remain at odds over provisions related to the deployment of semi-automated technologies like rail-mounted gantry cranes, according to an analysis by the Kansas-based 3PL Noatum Logistics. The ILA has strongly opposed further automation, arguing it threatens dockworker protections, while the USMX contends that automation enhances productivity and can create long-term opportunities for labor.
In fact, U.S. importers are already taking action to prevent the impact of such a strike, “pulling forward” their container shipments by rushing imports to earlier dates on the calendar, according to analysis by supply chain visibility provider Project44. That strategy can help companies to build enough safety stock to dampen the damage of events like the strike and like the steep tariffs being threatened by the incoming Trump administration.
Likewise, some ocean carriers have already instituted January surcharges in pre-emption of possible labor action, which could support inbound ocean rates if a strike occurs, according to freight market analysts with TD Cowen. In the meantime, the outcome of the new negotiations are seen with “significant uncertainty,” due to the contentious history of the discussion and to the timing of the talks that overlap with a transition between two White House regimes, analysts said.
That percentage is even greater than the 13.21% of total retail sales that were returned. Measured in dollars, returns (including both legitimate and fraudulent) last year reached $685 billion out of the $5.19 trillion in total retail sales.
“It’s clear why retailers want to limit bad actors that exhibit fraudulent and abusive returns behavior, but the reality is that they are finding stricter returns policies are not reducing the returns fraud they face,” Michael Osborne, CEO of Appriss Retail, said in a release.
Specifically, the report lists the leading types of returns fraud and abuse reported by retailers in 2024, including findings that:
60% of retailers surveyed reported incidents of “wardrobing,” or the act of consumers buying an item, using the merchandise, and then returning it.
55% cited cases of returning an item obtained through fraudulent or stolen tender, such as stolen credit cards, counterfeit bills, gift cards obtained through fraudulent means or fraudulent checks.
48% of retailers faced occurrences of returning stolen merchandise.
Together, those statistics show that the problem remains prevalent despite growing efforts by retailers to curb retail returns fraud through stricter returns policies, while still offering a sufficiently open returns policy to keep customers loyal, they said.
“Returns are a significant cost for retailers, and the rise of online shopping could increase this trend,” Kevin Mahoney, managing director, retail, Deloitte Consulting LLP, said. “As retailers implement policies to address this issue, they should avoid negatively affecting customer loyalty and retention. Effective policies should reduce losses for the retailer while minimally impacting the customer experience. This approach can be crucial for long-term success.”
Maersk’s overall view of the coming year is that the global economy is expected to grow modestly, with the possibility of higher inflation caused by lingering supply chain issues, continued geopolitical tensions, and fiscal policies such as new tariffs. Geopolitical tensions and trade disruptions could threaten global stability, climate change action will continue to shape international cooperation, and the ongoing security issue in the Red Sea is expected to continue into 2025.
Those are difficult challenges, but according to Maersk, a vital part of logistics planning is understanding where risk and weak spots might be and finding ways to dampen the impact of inevitable hurdles.
They include:
1. Build a resilient supply chain As opposed to simply maintaining traditional network designs, Maersk says it is teaming with Hapag-Lloyd to implement a new East-West network called Gemini, beginning in February, 2025. The network will use leaner mainliners and shuttles together, allowing for isolation of port disruptions, minimizing the impact of disruptions to supply chains and routes. More broadly, companies should work with an integrated logistics partner that has multiple solutions—be they by air, truck, barge or rail—allowing supply chains to adapt around issues, while still meeting consumer demands.
2. Implementing technological advances
A key component in ensuring more resilience against disruptions is working with a supply chain supplier that offers advanced real-time tracking systems and AI-powered analytics to provide comprehensive visibility across supply chains. An AI-powered dashboard of analytics can provide end-to-end visibility of shipments, tasks, and updates, enabling efficient logistics management without the need to chase down data. Also, forecasting tools can give predictive analytics to optimize inventory, reduce waste, and enhance efficiency. And incorporating Internet of Things (IoT) into digital solutions can enable live tracking of containers to monitor shipments.
3. Preparing for anything, instead of everything Contingency planning was a big theme for 2024, and remains so for 2025. That need is highlighted by geopolitical instability, climate change and volatility, and changes to tariffs and legislation. So in 2025, businesses should seek to partner with a logistics partner that offers risk and disruption navigation through pre-planned procedures, risk assessments, and alternative solutions.
4. Diversifying all aspects of the supply chain Supply chains have felt the impact of disruption throughout 2024, with the situation in the Red Sea resulting in all shipping having to avoid the Suez Canal, and instead going around the Cape of Good Hope. This has increased demand throughout the year, resulting in businesses trying to move cargo earlier to ensure they can meet customer needs, and even considering nearshoring. As regionalization has become more prevalent, businesses can use nearshoring to diversify suppliers and reduce their dependency on single sources. By ensuring that these suppliers and manufacturers are closer to the consumer market, businesses can keep production costs lower as well as have more ease of reaching markets and avoid delay-related risks from global disruptions. Utilizing options closer to market can also allow companies to better adapt to changes in consumer needs and behavior. Finally, some companies may also find it useful to stock critical materials for future, to act as a buffer against unexpected delays and/or issues relating to trade embargoes.
5. Understanding tariffs, legislation and regulations 2024 was year of customs regulations in EU. And tariffs are expected in the U.S. as well, once the new Trump Administration takes office. However, consistent with President-elect Trump’s first term, threats of increases are often used as a negotiating tool. So companies should take a wait and see approach to U.S. customs, even as they cope with the certainty that further EU customs are set to come into play.