How supply chains can support the shopper experience
This new department challenges the authors of selected Journal of Business Logistics (JBL) articles to explain the real-world implications of their academic research.
The Journal of Business Logistics (JBL), published by the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP), is recognized as one of the leading academic supply chain journals in the world. But sometimes it may be hard for practitioners to see how the research published in its pages applies to what they do on a day-to-day basis. To help bridge that gap, CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly will challenge the authors of selected JBL articles to explain the real-world implications of their academic research. Here, then, is the first installment of our new series, "Research for the Real World."
THE ARTICLE
"What is the Right Supply Chain for Your Shopper? Exploring the Shopper Service Ecosystem," by Hannah J. Stolze, Wheaton College; Diane A. Mollenkopf, University of Tennessee; and Daniel J. Flint, University of Tennessee, published in the June 2016 issue of the Journal of Business Logistics.
THE UPSHOT
Supply chain managers are accustomed to thinking about and designing their companies' supply chains to match either the products they are delivering or the needs of the end consumer of the final product. But those models may not reflect how goods and services are actually bought in an omnichannel retailing environment. Many times the person who buys a product is not the end consumer; accordingly, supply chain managers miss opportunities if they focus only on the end consumer and not on the shopping experience where the purchase decision is actually made. In the marketing realm, this is leading to a new concept called "shopper marketing."
The authors argue that because the shopper's experience is the point at which marketing and the supply chain meet, retail supply chains should be capable of supporting marketing efforts that are aimed at shoppers. Toward that end, the article identifies three types of shoppers (goal shopper, bargain shopper, and social shopper) and matches them with three types of supply chain (efficient, coordinated, and responsive).
Stolze, the lead author, spoke with Supply Chain Quarterly about what this concept could mean for practitioners.
What issues were you seeking to explore through this research?
In 1997 there was a pivotal article in the Harvard Business Review that asked, "What is the right supply chain for your products?" It was very product-focused and followed a very inventory-intensive mindset [in regard to] supply chain management. The article focused on making sure that you had the right product at the right place in the right amount at the right time—what's known as "the four Rs." So, if your product was a can of soup, it was a very functional product, and that automatically placed you in the "efficient supply chain" category. And if your product was a high-end fashion item that was purchased less frequently, then you were automatically placed in the "responsive supply chain" category.
The challenge is that as marketing shifts, the understanding of the shopper shifts, and that shift also needs to occur in the supply chain. To execute [retail] supply chain strategy, it's not so much about having the right supply chain for the product. It's about what occurs at the point of purchase—the mindset of what will the product look like in the retail environment—because the job of the supply chain is really delivering the product to the shopper, not the end consumer.
Consumers are still part of the supply chain, of course; you can't leave them out, but the most important part of the supply chain is when the person makes the purchase. There are different reasons people buy soup, and you need to be able to meet the needs of these different types of shoppers.
Briefly, what are the implications of this research for supply chain practitioners?
It requires a shift in their thinking from the traditional focus on product, inventory, and consumers to the person who will be shopping in the retail store or online in the retail environment. There needs to be a shift to thinking instead about the dynamics of place.
In marketing, the focus is on product, price, promotion, and place. Logistics is all about the "place" piece. Is the product in the right place so it is available when the shopper wants to buy it? Do you have enough product in the right quantity and assortment? Now it's not just about having the right quantity of product, it's also about how the shopper wants to experience the product. So if it's around the time of the Super Bowl that might mean specialized packaging—maybe a shift to larger bags with pictures of football. Or it might mean putting the product in a different place in the store so that it is easier for shoppers to find.
How will (or should) your findings change the way retail supply chain executives think about their supply chains?
Historically, companies have had one supply chain strategy. Either it's been "we are focused on breakbulk closer to the customer" or "we are very fast and responsive." Now they need multiple supply chains, not just for different products but also for the same product.
Let's go back to the soup example. Some people just want to buy a can or package of soup off the store shelf, some customers want to buy soup from a soup bar, some want to buy it bundled with a coupon for bread and American cheese so they can make a grilled-cheese sandwich to go with the soup. How you package and deliver soup to market is different depending on whether it is being delivered to the shelf, being ladled into a container at a bar, or bundled with a grilled-cheese promotion.
Could this also reshape how supply chain organizations interact with marketing organizations?
It is definitely going to increase the need for cross-functional interaction. For example, currently the insights into "who the shopper is" reside in marketing, and the responsibility for executing on those insights resides with logistics and operations. So now, even more than in the past, the two are going to have to talk to one another.
Marketing needs to understand what is possible in the market. And operations and logistics need to understand why they are [designing different supply chains for different shoppers], because it does increase costs, and if they don't know why they are doing it, they are not going to execute it properly.
What is the most important takeaway from your article for practitioners?
I think the big idea is really this concept of an ecosystem focused on the shopper. Traditionally, companies have focused their attention on their own products and their own goals. Now there is more of a need for marketing and supply chain to have a common goal-setting environment for the planning of promotions and the execution of them.
TO READ THE FULL ARTICLE ...
As a member benefit, CSCMP members can access articles in the Journal of Business Logistics at no charge. To read this and other JBL articles, go to CSCMP's website and choose Journal of Business Logistics under the "Develop" tab. Log in to your account and click on the secure link to the Wiley Online Library.
Just 29% of supply chain organizations have the competitive characteristics they’ll need for future readiness, according to a Gartner survey released Tuesday. The survey focused on how organizations are preparing for future challenges and to keep their supply chains competitive.
Gartner surveyed 579 supply chain practitioners to determine the capabilities needed to manage the “future drivers of influence” on supply chains, which include artificial intelligence (AI) achievement and the ability to navigate new trade policies. According to the survey, the five competitive characteristics are: agility, resilience, regionalization, integrated ecosystems, and integrated enterprise strategy.
The survey analysis identified “leaders” among the respondents as supply chain organizations that have already developed at least three of the five competitive characteristics necessary to address the top five drivers of supply chain’s future.
Less than a third have met that threshold.
“Leaders shared a commitment to preparation through long-term, deliberate strategies, while non-leaders were more often focused on short-term priorities,” Pierfrancesco Manenti, vice president analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a statement announcing the survey results.
“Most leaders have yet to invest in the most advanced technologies (e.g. real-time visibility, digital supply chain twin), but plan to do so in the next three-to-five years,” Manenti also said in the statement. “Leaders see technology as an enabler to their overall business strategies, while non-leaders more often invest in technology first, without having fully established their foundational capabilities.”
As part of the survey, respondents were asked to identify the future drivers of influence on supply chain performance over the next three to five years. The top five drivers are: achievement capability of AI (74%); the amount of new ESG regulations and trade policies being released (67%); geopolitical fight/transition for power (65%); control over data (62%); and talent scarcity (59%).
The analysis also identified four unique profiles of supply chain organizations, based on what their leaders deem as the most crucial capabilities for empowering their organizations over the next three to five years.
First, 54% of retailers are looking for ways to increase their financial recovery from returns. That’s because the cost to return a purchase averages 27% of the purchase price, which erases as much as 50% of the sales margin. But consumers have their own interests in mind: 76% of shoppers admit they’ve embellished or exaggerated the return reason to avoid a fee, a 39% increase from 2023 to 204.
Second, return experiences matter to consumers. A whopping 80% of shoppers stopped shopping at a retailer because of changes to the return policy—a 34% increase YoY.
Third, returns fraud and abuse is top-of-mind-for retailers, with wardrobing rising 38% in 2024. In fact, over two thirds (69%) of shoppers admit to wardrobing, which is the practice of buying an item for a specific reason or event and returning it after use. Shoppers also practice bracketing, or purchasing an item in a variety of colors or sizes and then returning all the unwanted options.
Fourth, returns come with a steep cost in terms of sustainability, with returns amounting to 8.4 billion pounds of landfill waste in 2023 alone.
“As returns have become an integral part of the shopper experience, retailers must balance meeting sky-high expectations with rising costs, environmental impact, and fraudulent behaviors,” Amena Ali, CEO of Optoro, said in the firm’s “2024 Returns Unwrapped” report. “By understanding shoppers’ behaviors and preferences around returns, retailers can create returns experiences that embrace their needs while driving deeper loyalty and protecting their bottom line.”
Facing an evolving supply chain landscape in 2025, companies are being forced to rethink their distribution strategies to cope with challenges like rising cost pressures, persistent labor shortages, and the complexities of managing SKU proliferation.
1. Optimize labor productivity and costs. Forward-thinking businesses are leveraging technology to get more done with fewer resources through approaches like slotting optimization, automation and robotics, and inventory visibility.
2. Maximize capacity with smart solutions. With e-commerce volumes rising, facilities need to handle more SKUs and orders without expanding their physical footprint. That can be achieved through high-density storage and dynamic throughput.
3. Streamline returns management. Returns are a growing challenge, thanks to the continued growth of e-commerce and the consumer practice of bracketing. Businesses can handle that with smarter reverse logistics processes like automated returns processing and reverse logistics visibility.
4. Accelerate order fulfillment with robotics. Robotic solutions are transforming the way orders are fulfilled, helping businesses meet customer expectations faster and more accurately than ever before by using autonomous mobile robots (AMRs and robotic picking.
5. Enhance end-of-line packaging. The final step in the supply chain is often the most visible to customers. So optimizing packaging processes can reduce costs, improve efficiency, and support sustainability goals through automated packaging systems and sustainability initiatives.
Geopolitical rivalries, alliances, and aspirations are rewiring the global economy—and the imposition of new tariffs on foreign imports by the U.S. will accelerate that process, according to an analysis by Boston Consulting Group (BCG).
Without a broad increase in tariffs, world trade in goods will keep growing at an average of 2.9% annually for the next eight years, the firm forecasts in its report, “Great Powers, Geopolitics, and the Future of Trade.” But the routes goods travel will change markedly as North America reduces its dependence on China and China builds up its links with the Global South, which is cementing its power in the global trade map.
“Global trade is set to top $29 trillion by 2033, but the routes these goods will travel is changing at a remarkable pace,” Aparna Bharadwaj, managing director and partner at BCG, said in a release. “Trade lanes were already shifting from historical patterns and looming US tariffs will accelerate this. Navigating these new dynamics will be critical for any global business.”
To understand those changes, BCG modeled the direct impact of the 60/25/20 scenario (60% tariff on Chinese goods, a 25% on goods from Canada and Mexico, and a 20% on imports from all other countries). The results show that the tariffs would add $640 billion to the cost of importing goods from the top ten U.S. import nations, based on 2023 levels, unless alternative sources or suppliers are found.
In terms of product categories imported by the U.S., the greatest impact would be on imported auto parts and automotive vehicles, which would primarily affect trade with Mexico, the EU, and Japan. Consumer electronics, electrical machinery, and fashion goods would be most affected by higher tariffs on Chinese goods. Specifically, the report forecasts that a 60% tariff rate would add $61 billion to cost of importing consumer electronics products from China into the U.S.
That strategy is described by RILA President Brian Dodge in a document titled “2025 Retail Public Policy Agenda,” which begins by describing leading retailers as “dynamic and multifaceted businesses that begin on Main Street and stretch across the world to bring high value and affordable consumer goods to American families.”
RILA says its policy priorities support that membership in four ways:
Investing in people. Retail is for everyone; the place for a first job, 2nd chance, third act, or a side hustle – the retail workforce represents the American workforce.
Ensuring a safe, sustainable future. RILA is working with lawmakers to help shape policies that protect our customers and meet expectations regarding environmental concerns.
Leading in the community. Retail is more than a store; we are an integral part of the fabric of our communities.
“As Congress and the Trump administration move forward to adopt policies that reduce regulatory burdens, create economic growth, and bring value to American families, understanding how such policies will impact retailers and the communities we serve is imperative,” Dodge said. “RILA and its member companies look forward to collaborating with policymakers to provide industry-specific insights and data to help shape any policies under consideration.”