"The Fierce Urgency of Now": Why working with minority suppliers still matters
Some corporations have been questioning the importance of minority-owned businesses to their commercial relationships and supply chains. Yet, the author explains in this essay, it's become increasingly clear that diversity and inclusion fuel growth for businesses as well as for the economy at large.
Joset Wright-Lacy is President of the National Minority Supplier Development Council (NMSDC), which advances business opportunities for certified minority business enterprises (MBEs) and connects them to corporate members.
Earlier this year I had the opportunity to participate in a Martin Luther King Day celebratory march in Raleigh, North Carolina. The event was very well attended, with a mix of young and old, black, white, and brown, able and disabled. I was especially heartened to see a large contingent of black fraternities and sororities, including college-age "Greeks" for whom Martin Luther King exists only in the stories of their elders. As my husband and I walked on that brisk and sunny day, a placard that read "The Fierce Urgency of Now," a phrase from Dr. King's famed "I Have a Dream" speech, caught my eye. It resonated with me to the core.
In my work with the National Minority Supplier Development Council (NMSDC), I have recently felt a deep sense of urgency as corporations begin to question the importance of minority-owned businesses to their commercial relationships and supply chains. The refrain is, "What is the 'value proposition' for minority supplier development?" That is, of what value is it for corporations to pursue stronger relationships with minority business enterprises (MBEs) in their supply chains? The question itself is deeply troubling, because it suggests both a belief that minority suppliers have to make a "special case" for inclusion in business opportunities and an assumption that minority suppliers can't deliver service, value, and quality. This kind of thinking can lead to the placement of artificial barriers in front of minorities and usually leads to excuses for dropping support for supply chain diversity when corporate budgets are cut.
This is shortsighted, as there is clear and strong evidence that working with minority-owned suppliers provides business benefits for both buyer and supplier. Moreover, these relationships have a beneficial impact not only on local communities but also on the national economy. In fact, the state of minority-owned businesses is a critical measure of the nation's economic health. NMSDC prepared a study in 2014 that illustrated the economic impact of certified MBEs.1 The study found that MBEs in the United States generate more than $1 billion in economic output every day. That equates to nearly $401 billion annually, in direct, indirect, and induced output effect. Taking a closer look, NMSDC-certified MBEs were directly responsible for more than $139 billion in sales of products and services offered to customers. The increased purchases made by certified MBEs from their suppliers produced indirect output of $116 billion. And the employees and families of certified MBEs contributed significant induced output by purchasing $145 billion of goods and services from other merchants within the United States. By the same calculation and methodology, in 2014, NMSDC-certified MBEs were responsible for the maintenance or creation of more than 2.2 million jobs and generated more than $48 billion in tax revenue to local, state, and federal governments.
While we are awash in news about the state of the U.S. economy, we often fail to recognize that MBEs are part of the nation's growth equation. Think about $1 billion in daily economic output: that's money in the hands of workers and their households that represents the ability to pay for cars, clothes, travel, college educations, and more. And most important, in some minority communities it represents an opportunity to buy a new home, and to move away from grinding poverty and blighted neighborhoods.
The more jobs consumers have and the more wages they earn, the more they are able to participate in the economy, whether that means buying healthy foods or snacks, durable goods or over-the-counter drugs, life's essentials or entertainment, even cars and houses. We cannot expect to have a truly robust economy unless everyone can participate. Putting people to work at good wages is good for what ails the American economy. Corporations that understand this macroeconomic principle are figuring out ways to make sure MBEs have the opportunity to participate in job creation so minorities can participate in the economy.
Minority supplier development drives growth
There is no question that a contract with a minority-owned business is more likely to create a job for a minority individual. This will become more important as U.S. demographics shift and minorities constitute a greater percentage of the population—more than 50 percent by the year 2045, according to current projections. If that demographic group does not have access to well-paying jobs, the U.S. economy will suffer. It calls to mind the words of President Richard M. Nixon, who in 1969 signed an Executive Order creating the precursor to NMSDC, the Office of Minority Business Enterprise: "The opportunity for full participation in our free enterprise system by socially and economically disadvantaged persons is essential if we are to obtain social and economic justice for such persons and improve the functioning of our national economy."
Many corporations and minority suppliers have been engaged in this work for more than 40 years. Yet minority-owned businesses supporting the nation's supply chains still face obstacles that other suppliers do not experience, because minorities' personal and family wealth is dramatically less than that of non-minority entrepreneurs, and there is less opportunity for minorities to fund their own businesses. The NMSDC's 2015 "National Survey on Access to Capital Among Minority Business Enterprises" shows that minority suppliers lack access to early-stage, growth, acquisition, and expansion financing on the same terms and conditions as non-minority suppliers.2 This is due in part to historical and statistical discrimination as well as to unconscious biases and cultural resistance, but also, as the report says, to "several key internal factors, including lack of a growth-oriented exit strategy, lack of knowledge, lack of engagement, MBE certification requirements, and negative perceptions about institutional funding sources."
To help its certified MBEs overcome these barriers, NMSDC is working on key educational goals in such areas as knowledge of financing options beyond bank loans and exit strategies that satisfy private equity and venture capital requirements; outreach and engagement goals focused on strengthening relationships between investors, corporations, and MBEs (for example, through the annual NMSDC Conference and Business Opportunity Exchange, which draws more than 6,000 participants); and certification policy goals that permit MBEs to raise venture capital or private equity without endangering their status as minority-owned businesses.
Often, minority suppliers must demonstrate their ability to "ramp up" production to meet a company's national procurement needs, overcoming both the internal and external barriers to their ability to win contracts. In a corporate environment where "old boy network" relationships sometimes predominate in the supply chain, MBEs may lack access to opportunities even to demonstrate their qualifications and show their capabilities to corporate decision makers. And yet despite these barriers, both internal and external, minority entrepreneurs are still more likely to start a business. NMSDC's 2014 "Economic Impact Report" cites a joint report from the Milken Institute and the Minority Business Development Agency that suggests that the number of minority business owners in the United States (an estimated 3.3 million when the report was published) is growing at a rate of 17 percent annually—"a staggering six times faster than the growth rate of all firms."3
This, then, is the "value proposition" of minority supplier development: it fuels economic growth. "Diversity and inclusion" is not just a catchphrase—it actually contributes value to the corporate bottom line. This is a principle that's long been known but is not always recognized by corporations that don't understand the potential benefits. Quoting from a Wall Street Journal article, now 10 years old: "When a company announces a relationship with a minority supplier, investors and analysts tend to file that news release under 'social good' and move on. But companies that seek out such business relationships see financial benefits, too. New research from Atlanta business consultant Hackett Group shows that companies that 'focus heavily on supplier diversity' generate a 133 percent greater return on procurement investments than the typical business." The article goes on to point out that minority suppliers "may price their products and services better than larger competitors or operate more efficiently" and "also can create sales opportunities for companies that use them, meaning they are benefiting the bottom and top lines."4
More recent reporting and company statements add to the evidence. Consider, for example, this quote from Susannah Raheb, supplier diversity leader for Lockheed Martin Corporation, in the publication Inc.: "We value and leverage the agility, ingenuity, and new perspectives we gain when partnering with small businesses to help us solve a wide variety of challenges and drive affordability into our products, which is a priority for us. ... If there is a more efficient way to do something, we want to know about it. Having a diverse supplier network is one way we leverage a broad spectrum of expertise."5 The retailer Macy's, on its web page describing the "Importance and Value of Vendor Diversity," notes that its programs "help us present distinctive assortments of unique merchandise in our stores—setting us apart from the competition and making our stores the 'go-to' destination for shoppers wanting fresh and exciting choices. Additionally, working with a wide spectrum of vendors helps Macy's support the economic health of the communities where we do business."6 And, to return to the Hackett Group for a contemporary analysis, "On average, supplier diversity programs add $3.6 million to the bottom line for every $1 million in procurement operation costs. The high return on investment is undeniable. ... A positive ROI that boosts socially conscious reputation should push supplier diversity to the forefront of business strategy."7
Now is the time
There is no time like the present to forge links between minority business owners and opportunities in corporate America.
That day in 1963, when Martin Luther King spoke the words I saw on the placard during the march in North Carolina, it was in part "to remind America of the fierce urgency of NOW. This is no time to engage in the luxury of cooling off or to take the tranquilizing drug of gradualism." It may be, as Dr. King said, that minorities live "on a lonely island of poverty in the midst of a vast ocean of material prosperity." But, he added, "We refuse to believe that there are insufficient funds in the great vaults of opportunity of this nation." And finally, as Dr. King observed—and as I observed at the march in Raleigh—many people have come to realize that the economic destinies of all citizens, both those who are in the majority and those who are minorities, are tied together.
Now is the time for corporations to affirm their commitment to minority entrepreneurs who live in the communities and among the consumers that they serve, not only because it is the right thing to do, but indeed to ensure their own corporate financial well-being and the country's social prosperity.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.
Specifically, the two sides remain at odds over provisions related to the deployment of semi-automated technologies like rail-mounted gantry cranes, according to an analysis by the Kansas-based 3PL Noatum Logistics. The ILA has strongly opposed further automation, arguing it threatens dockworker protections, while the USMX contends that automation enhances productivity and can create long-term opportunities for labor.
In fact, U.S. importers are already taking action to prevent the impact of such a strike, “pulling forward” their container shipments by rushing imports to earlier dates on the calendar, according to analysis by supply chain visibility provider Project44. That strategy can help companies to build enough safety stock to dampen the damage of events like the strike and like the steep tariffs being threatened by the incoming Trump administration.
Likewise, some ocean carriers have already instituted January surcharges in pre-emption of possible labor action, which could support inbound ocean rates if a strike occurs, according to freight market analysts with TD Cowen. In the meantime, the outcome of the new negotiations are seen with “significant uncertainty,” due to the contentious history of the discussion and to the timing of the talks that overlap with a transition between two White House regimes, analysts said.