The dangers of focusing only on the supply chain's last mile
In a world where companies are under increasing pressure to tighten product time-to-market, improving efficiency at every stage of the supply chain is a must.
Sue Welch is the Founder and CEO of Bamboo Rose, a collaborative B2B platform that combines intelligent product life-cycle management, sourcing, and global trade management.
In just about any circumstance, it'd be foolish to invest all of one's resources in the
final steps of a process without building a strong foundation for that process up front. It's
impossible to complete a doctoral dissertation without investing in years of early education
to solidify the language skills required to write even the most basic of papers. It would be
inadvisable, even dangerous, to run a marathon without first focusing on the initial training
that makes those final strides across the finish line possible.
The impulse to focus on the final steps, rather than on maintaining balance and focus
throughout a process, seems absurd. So why do so many organizations invest the majority
of their resources in bolstering their performance in the "last mile"—the phase when
products move from warehouse to customer—of their supply chains?
New tools and technologies not only have expedited the activities carried out in the last
mile of the supply chain but also have made them more reliable, transparent, and cost-effective.
The time frame from product development to delivery has been condensed, which is of the utmost
importance in the new era of nearly on-demand retail. It's no surprise, then, that eliminating
latency and opacity in the part of the supply chain where most of the actual movement of goods
occurs has received the greatest attention from companies that are responding to the pressures
of modern retailing.
However, no matter how efficient shipping and delivery might be, the entire effort can
potentially be sabotaged by inefficient product development and other obstructions or
oversights that may occur in the mid-stages of the supply chain. Consider that the typical
product-development cycle is a largely linear process. Too often, critical input doesn't
arrive until late in the game, requiring a redo, or at least an adjustment to the process.
If, for instance, you're designing a new teak coffee table, you could take a trip to Indonesia,
evaluate samples from multiple suppliers, keep track of your thoughts with a combination of
Evernote files and JPG photos, and spec out the product for a physical sample—only to
find out that while you may have identified the best source for teak, the latest consumer
trend in coffee tables is actually marble, not wood. After all that time, expense, and
effort, you now have to go back to the beginning of the process. So although it may seem
intuitive to save input gathered from the last mile until the end of the process, it would
be much more efficient to get that feedback earlier on—not just in the beginning stages,
but also throughout the product life cycle.
New tools can help buyers avoid that conundrum by fostering collaboration from all levels
of the supply chain. With the support of technology, the product-development process truly
becomes collaborative instead of linear, and each party, from designer to sourcing executive
to retailer, can weigh in at all stages of product development. Meanwhile, you can ditch the
Evernote plus JPG filing system, because today's retail technology makes sharing visual and
social—more like what you're used to seeing in your personal life.
The power of having time on your side
Today the most effective companies focus not just on the last mile, but also on allocating
resources to achieve balance throughout the end-to-end process. But how can organizations
speed up product development and other early-stage processes that don't involve as much
physical movement of inventory?
Product-development teams spend significant time on what we think of as administrative
tasks during the sourcing, supplier-selection, and product-development phases, also known
as the "first mile." Most are still sharing cumbersome spreadsheets and haphazardly snipped
screenshots back and forth through cluttered e-mail chains. Such inefficiencies can put
teams at risk of missing internal deadlines and exceeding cost limits.
Using technology to collaborate and co-create through real-time sharing of ideas and
information streamlines the product-development process and gives teams more time to be
creative and stand out from the competition. Freeing time that traditionally has been
spent passing spreadsheets back and forth among e-mail chains with 40 participants, each
chiming in with minor revisions over the course of a week, is one of the most powerful
ways to drive efficiency in the first mile. As the American Psychological Association
states, "With increased time pressure, you take the simplest pathway, not one that's
elegant or creative. But if you're able to spend more time exploring the maze, you're
more likely to hit on exciting or new solutions."
Organizations would never dream of sacrificing speed, precision, and cost-effectiveness
in the last mile of the supply chain. Every cent saved per mile is viewed as a major win.
Neglecting the opportunity to similarly increase efficiency throughout the supply chain,
including the earlier stages, is "penny-wise and pound-foolish." As the margin for
error continues to narrow, companies can't afford to overhaul just one aspect of their
supply chains and ignore less visible areas like product development.
First, 54% of retailers are looking for ways to increase their financial recovery from returns. That’s because the cost to return a purchase averages 27% of the purchase price, which erases as much as 50% of the sales margin. But consumers have their own interests in mind: 76% of shoppers admit they’ve embellished or exaggerated the return reason to avoid a fee, a 39% increase from 2023 to 204.
Second, return experiences matter to consumers. A whopping 80% of shoppers stopped shopping at a retailer because of changes to the return policy—a 34% increase YoY.
Third, returns fraud and abuse is top-of-mind-for retailers, with wardrobing rising 38% in 2024. In fact, over two thirds (69%) of shoppers admit to wardrobing, which is the practice of buying an item for a specific reason or event and returning it after use. Shoppers also practice bracketing, or purchasing an item in a variety of colors or sizes and then returning all the unwanted options.
Fourth, returns come with a steep cost in terms of sustainability, with returns amounting to 8.4 billion pounds of landfill waste in 2023 alone.
“As returns have become an integral part of the shopper experience, retailers must balance meeting sky-high expectations with rising costs, environmental impact, and fraudulent behaviors,” Amena Ali, CEO of Optoro, said in the firm’s “2024 Returns Unwrapped” report. “By understanding shoppers’ behaviors and preferences around returns, retailers can create returns experiences that embrace their needs while driving deeper loyalty and protecting their bottom line.”
Facing an evolving supply chain landscape in 2025, companies are being forced to rethink their distribution strategies to cope with challenges like rising cost pressures, persistent labor shortages, and the complexities of managing SKU proliferation.
1. Optimize labor productivity and costs. Forward-thinking businesses are leveraging technology to get more done with fewer resources through approaches like slotting optimization, automation and robotics, and inventory visibility.
2. Maximize capacity with smart solutions. With e-commerce volumes rising, facilities need to handle more SKUs and orders without expanding their physical footprint. That can be achieved through high-density storage and dynamic throughput.
3. Streamline returns management. Returns are a growing challenge, thanks to the continued growth of e-commerce and the consumer practice of bracketing. Businesses can handle that with smarter reverse logistics processes like automated returns processing and reverse logistics visibility.
4. Accelerate order fulfillment with robotics. Robotic solutions are transforming the way orders are fulfilled, helping businesses meet customer expectations faster and more accurately than ever before by using autonomous mobile robots (AMRs and robotic picking.
5. Enhance end-of-line packaging. The final step in the supply chain is often the most visible to customers. So optimizing packaging processes can reduce costs, improve efficiency, and support sustainability goals through automated packaging systems and sustainability initiatives.
That clash has come as retailers have been hustling to adjust to pandemic swings like a renewed focus on e-commerce, then swiftly reimagining store experiences as foot traffic returned. But even as the dust settles from those changes, retailers are now facing renewed questions about how best to define their omnichannel strategy in a world where customers have increasing power and information.
The answer may come from a five-part strategy using integrated components to fortify omnichannel retail, EY said. The approach can unlock value and customer trust through great experiences, but only when implemented cohesively, not individually, EY warns.
The steps include:
1. Functional integration: Is your operating model and data infrastructure siloed between e-commerce and physical stores, or have you developed a cohesive unit centered around delivering seamless customer experience?
2. Customer insights: With consumer centricity at the heart of operations, are you analyzing all touch points to build a holistic view of preferences, behaviors, and buying patterns?
3. Next-generation inventory: Given the right customer insights, how are you utilizing advanced analytics to ensure inventory is optimized to meet demand precisely where and when it’s needed?
4. Distribution partnerships: Having ensured your customers find what they want where they want it, how are your distribution strategies adapting to deliver these choices to them swiftly and efficiently?
5. Real estate strategy: How is your real estate strategy interconnected with insights, inventory and distribution to enhance experience and maximize your footprint?
When approached cohesively, these efforts all build toward one overarching differentiator for retailers: a better customer experience that reaches from brand engagement and order placement through delivery and return, the EY study said. Amid continued volatility and an economy driven by complex customer demands, the retailers best set up to win are those that are striving to gain real-time visibility into stock levels, offer flexible fulfillment options and modernize merchandising through personalized and dynamic customer experiences.
Geopolitical rivalries, alliances, and aspirations are rewiring the global economy—and the imposition of new tariffs on foreign imports by the U.S. will accelerate that process, according to an analysis by Boston Consulting Group (BCG).
Without a broad increase in tariffs, world trade in goods will keep growing at an average of 2.9% annually for the next eight years, the firm forecasts in its report, “Great Powers, Geopolitics, and the Future of Trade.” But the routes goods travel will change markedly as North America reduces its dependence on China and China builds up its links with the Global South, which is cementing its power in the global trade map.
“Global trade is set to top $29 trillion by 2033, but the routes these goods will travel is changing at a remarkable pace,” Aparna Bharadwaj, managing director and partner at BCG, said in a release. “Trade lanes were already shifting from historical patterns and looming US tariffs will accelerate this. Navigating these new dynamics will be critical for any global business.”
To understand those changes, BCG modeled the direct impact of the 60/25/20 scenario (60% tariff on Chinese goods, a 25% on goods from Canada and Mexico, and a 20% on imports from all other countries). The results show that the tariffs would add $640 billion to the cost of importing goods from the top ten U.S. import nations, based on 2023 levels, unless alternative sources or suppliers are found.
In terms of product categories imported by the U.S., the greatest impact would be on imported auto parts and automotive vehicles, which would primarily affect trade with Mexico, the EU, and Japan. Consumer electronics, electrical machinery, and fashion goods would be most affected by higher tariffs on Chinese goods. Specifically, the report forecasts that a 60% tariff rate would add $61 billion to cost of importing consumer electronics products from China into the U.S.
That strategy is described by RILA President Brian Dodge in a document titled “2025 Retail Public Policy Agenda,” which begins by describing leading retailers as “dynamic and multifaceted businesses that begin on Main Street and stretch across the world to bring high value and affordable consumer goods to American families.”
RILA says its policy priorities support that membership in four ways:
Investing in people. Retail is for everyone; the place for a first job, 2nd chance, third act, or a side hustle – the retail workforce represents the American workforce.
Ensuring a safe, sustainable future. RILA is working with lawmakers to help shape policies that protect our customers and meet expectations regarding environmental concerns.
Leading in the community. Retail is more than a store; we are an integral part of the fabric of our communities.
“As Congress and the Trump administration move forward to adopt policies that reduce regulatory burdens, create economic growth, and bring value to American families, understanding how such policies will impact retailers and the communities we serve is imperative,” Dodge said. “RILA and its member companies look forward to collaborating with policymakers to provide industry-specific insights and data to help shape any policies under consideration.”