Third-party logistics companies expect to see more revenue growth in 2017, but that positive outlook is tempered by concerns about new competitors, technology, and the Trump administration's policies.
Dr. Robert C. Lieb is Professor of Supply Chain Management at Northeastern University and author of a long-running study of the third-party logistics industry.
For the major players in the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, 2016 was a year of modest growth. This year could turn out better for them: Participants in my 2016 survey of 3PL chief executive officers (CEOs) were generally optimistic about prospects for 2017, forecasting an average revenue growth rate of 7.85 percent for the year. The experience of many of those companies in the first quarter of 2017 was quite positive and on track with those projections. Some were inclined to increase their projections based on their expectations that post-election corporate tax cuts and major increases in infrastructure spending would trigger greater economic growth. However, those initiatives have yet to gain traction in Washington.
Despite that positive outlook, 3PLs currently face a range of concerns, including the growing need for costly new technology, the advent of new competition, uncertainty surrounding U.S. political developments, and cybersecurity challenges, among others. How they prepare for and respond to these challenges will affect their success in the near term and beyond.
Confronting constant change
Many large 3PLs are increasingly devoting resources to keeping up with the rapid pace of technological change, not only in terms of their desire for greater operating efficiencies, but also in response to customer demands. The marketplace wants to see improvements in areas such as visibility technology, mobile applications, cloud-based solutions, and digital freight-matching services. At the same time, some 3PLs are considering more extensive use of robotics and warehouse automation in their facilities to remain competitive. They are also increasingly using data analytics, not only to support their own initiatives, but also to assist customers in seeking supply chain efficiencies. Unfortunately, the cost of keeping pace with rapidly changing technology is substantial, and many 3PLs are hard-pressed to finance these technology upgrades. The larger competitors are investing heavily in technology to differentiate their services, and this is steadily raising the capital threshold to participate in this market segment.
While most 3PLs tend to focus on a limited number of industry verticals that typically include electronics, automotive, and fast-moving consumer goods, the explosive growth of e-commerce has made that sector an increasingly important part of their revenue base. In my 2016 3PL CEO survey, the respondents reported that, on average, e-commerce accounted for 14 percent of their revenue base, and that those revenues had grown by an average of 18.5 percent in the previous year.
However, the pace at which the e-commerce market is changing and the magnitude of the investments that are necessary to meet customer requirements pose serious challenges to 3PLs. Retailers continue to focus on shortening the last-mile delivery cycle while expanding free shipping and free returns programs. That has resulted in a dramatic increase in the cost of fulfillment, not only for the retailers, but also for the 3PLs servicing that market. It's difficult, though, for 3PLs to recover those added costs. The expenses incurred by these omnichannel retailers have reduced or, in many cases, eliminated their margins. In turn, that has led them to resist price increases by carriers and 3PLs.
Amazon.com Inc. continues to be the main driver of e-commerce, but other large retailers, such as Wal-Mart Stores Inc., are responding to Amazon's market challenge. The overall retail marketplace will continue to be chaotic as e-commerce volume grows, brick-and-mortar retailers struggle to right-size their store networks and develop omnichannel strategies, and many large retailers fail. While all this is occurring, Amazon has been opening convenience stores, bookstores, and grocery stores—and even announced its acquisition of grocer Whole Foods Market. Meanwhile, third-party logistics companies that are intent on expanding their share of the e-commerce market can anticipate significant challenges, particularly as the last-mile delivery segment, which some 3PLs covet, is becoming increasingly crowded with new entrants ranging from small, niche players to Amazon, Google, Uber Technologies Inc., and Lyft Inc.
Uncertainties abound
The 3PLs that made major acquisitions during the 2014-2016 period are now in the process of integrating the acquired companies into their organizations. That is typically a difficult and costly process. The end result of such acquisitions often includes an expansion of the acquiring companies' service offerings and geographical coverage, accompanied by a reduction in competition in certain markets impacted by those acquisitions. While the pace of acquisitions has slowed somewhat, more are likely this year. CEVA Group Plc, which has a substantial debt load, has been put on the block by its owner, the private equity firm Apollo Global Management LLC, and is attracting interest from several possible suitors. Several other large 3PLs are rumored to be in play. However, there appear to be no bargains in the current marketplace.
Many 3PLs generate substantial revenues from supporting import and export activities and operating in foreign countries, and the "America First" policies of the Trump administration now threaten the stability of that segment of their business. Trump has rejected U.S. participation in the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) free trade agreement, threatened to blow up the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), wants to renegotiate the provisions of the free trade agreement signed with Korea, and wants "better" trade deals with China and Germany. Many observers fear that this posturing and threatening could trigger a global recession. This climate is particularly troubling to those U.S.-based 3PLs that have already invested substantial funds in Mexico to develop local infrastructure and/or support the projected growth of cross-border traffic. Trump's threats have led some of those 3PLs to at least temporarily limit further investments in that market.
Looking forward, 3PLs should also be concerned about cybersecurity and terrorism. In late June, A.P. Møller-Maersk reported serious disruptions of its operations due to hacking, as did FedEx's TNT Express unit. Such disruptions not only increase costs, but also potentially seriously damage long-term customer relationships. As a result, 3PLs' security and recovery costs are likely to increase substantially in the coming year.
So far the third-party logistics industry has been spared from any significant terrorist activities. However, the fact that terrorists have been using motor vehicles in their attacks should be taken seriously by 3PLs. Many have not focused adequate attention on addressing business-continuity risks such as natural disasters, and the costs of that lack of attention have been substantial. Responses to my 2016 3PL CEO survey indicated that many 3PLs do not consider their companies to be at risk for terrorist attacks. (See Figure 1.) That is not particularly aligned with the realities of today's world, and it should be the cause of great concern.
As we've seen, with 3PLs facing a number of market pressures, political uncertainties, and potential threats to their business models, they're increasingly exposed to financial risk. While opportunities for growth remain significant, clearly this is no easy time to be in the third-party logistics business.
Just 29% of supply chain organizations have the competitive characteristics they’ll need for future readiness, according to a Gartner survey released Tuesday. The survey focused on how organizations are preparing for future challenges and to keep their supply chains competitive.
Gartner surveyed 579 supply chain practitioners to determine the capabilities needed to manage the “future drivers of influence” on supply chains, which include artificial intelligence (AI) achievement and the ability to navigate new trade policies. According to the survey, the five competitive characteristics are: agility, resilience, regionalization, integrated ecosystems, and integrated enterprise strategy.
The survey analysis identified “leaders” among the respondents as supply chain organizations that have already developed at least three of the five competitive characteristics necessary to address the top five drivers of supply chain’s future.
Less than a third have met that threshold.
“Leaders shared a commitment to preparation through long-term, deliberate strategies, while non-leaders were more often focused on short-term priorities,” Pierfrancesco Manenti, vice president analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a statement announcing the survey results.
“Most leaders have yet to invest in the most advanced technologies (e.g. real-time visibility, digital supply chain twin), but plan to do so in the next three-to-five years,” Manenti also said in the statement. “Leaders see technology as an enabler to their overall business strategies, while non-leaders more often invest in technology first, without having fully established their foundational capabilities.”
As part of the survey, respondents were asked to identify the future drivers of influence on supply chain performance over the next three to five years. The top five drivers are: achievement capability of AI (74%); the amount of new ESG regulations and trade policies being released (67%); geopolitical fight/transition for power (65%); control over data (62%); and talent scarcity (59%).
The analysis also identified four unique profiles of supply chain organizations, based on what their leaders deem as the most crucial capabilities for empowering their organizations over the next three to five years.
First, 54% of retailers are looking for ways to increase their financial recovery from returns. That’s because the cost to return a purchase averages 27% of the purchase price, which erases as much as 50% of the sales margin. But consumers have their own interests in mind: 76% of shoppers admit they’ve embellished or exaggerated the return reason to avoid a fee, a 39% increase from 2023 to 204.
Second, return experiences matter to consumers. A whopping 80% of shoppers stopped shopping at a retailer because of changes to the return policy—a 34% increase YoY.
Third, returns fraud and abuse is top-of-mind-for retailers, with wardrobing rising 38% in 2024. In fact, over two thirds (69%) of shoppers admit to wardrobing, which is the practice of buying an item for a specific reason or event and returning it after use. Shoppers also practice bracketing, or purchasing an item in a variety of colors or sizes and then returning all the unwanted options.
Fourth, returns come with a steep cost in terms of sustainability, with returns amounting to 8.4 billion pounds of landfill waste in 2023 alone.
“As returns have become an integral part of the shopper experience, retailers must balance meeting sky-high expectations with rising costs, environmental impact, and fraudulent behaviors,” Amena Ali, CEO of Optoro, said in the firm’s “2024 Returns Unwrapped” report. “By understanding shoppers’ behaviors and preferences around returns, retailers can create returns experiences that embrace their needs while driving deeper loyalty and protecting their bottom line.”
Facing an evolving supply chain landscape in 2025, companies are being forced to rethink their distribution strategies to cope with challenges like rising cost pressures, persistent labor shortages, and the complexities of managing SKU proliferation.
1. Optimize labor productivity and costs. Forward-thinking businesses are leveraging technology to get more done with fewer resources through approaches like slotting optimization, automation and robotics, and inventory visibility.
2. Maximize capacity with smart solutions. With e-commerce volumes rising, facilities need to handle more SKUs and orders without expanding their physical footprint. That can be achieved through high-density storage and dynamic throughput.
3. Streamline returns management. Returns are a growing challenge, thanks to the continued growth of e-commerce and the consumer practice of bracketing. Businesses can handle that with smarter reverse logistics processes like automated returns processing and reverse logistics visibility.
4. Accelerate order fulfillment with robotics. Robotic solutions are transforming the way orders are fulfilled, helping businesses meet customer expectations faster and more accurately than ever before by using autonomous mobile robots (AMRs and robotic picking.
5. Enhance end-of-line packaging. The final step in the supply chain is often the most visible to customers. So optimizing packaging processes can reduce costs, improve efficiency, and support sustainability goals through automated packaging systems and sustainability initiatives.
That clash has come as retailers have been hustling to adjust to pandemic swings like a renewed focus on e-commerce, then swiftly reimagining store experiences as foot traffic returned. But even as the dust settles from those changes, retailers are now facing renewed questions about how best to define their omnichannel strategy in a world where customers have increasing power and information.
The answer may come from a five-part strategy using integrated components to fortify omnichannel retail, EY said. The approach can unlock value and customer trust through great experiences, but only when implemented cohesively, not individually, EY warns.
The steps include:
1. Functional integration: Is your operating model and data infrastructure siloed between e-commerce and physical stores, or have you developed a cohesive unit centered around delivering seamless customer experience?
2. Customer insights: With consumer centricity at the heart of operations, are you analyzing all touch points to build a holistic view of preferences, behaviors, and buying patterns?
3. Next-generation inventory: Given the right customer insights, how are you utilizing advanced analytics to ensure inventory is optimized to meet demand precisely where and when it’s needed?
4. Distribution partnerships: Having ensured your customers find what they want where they want it, how are your distribution strategies adapting to deliver these choices to them swiftly and efficiently?
5. Real estate strategy: How is your real estate strategy interconnected with insights, inventory and distribution to enhance experience and maximize your footprint?
When approached cohesively, these efforts all build toward one overarching differentiator for retailers: a better customer experience that reaches from brand engagement and order placement through delivery and return, the EY study said. Amid continued volatility and an economy driven by complex customer demands, the retailers best set up to win are those that are striving to gain real-time visibility into stock levels, offer flexible fulfillment options and modernize merchandising through personalized and dynamic customer experiences.
Geopolitical rivalries, alliances, and aspirations are rewiring the global economy—and the imposition of new tariffs on foreign imports by the U.S. will accelerate that process, according to an analysis by Boston Consulting Group (BCG).
Without a broad increase in tariffs, world trade in goods will keep growing at an average of 2.9% annually for the next eight years, the firm forecasts in its report, “Great Powers, Geopolitics, and the Future of Trade.” But the routes goods travel will change markedly as North America reduces its dependence on China and China builds up its links with the Global South, which is cementing its power in the global trade map.
“Global trade is set to top $29 trillion by 2033, but the routes these goods will travel is changing at a remarkable pace,” Aparna Bharadwaj, managing director and partner at BCG, said in a release. “Trade lanes were already shifting from historical patterns and looming US tariffs will accelerate this. Navigating these new dynamics will be critical for any global business.”
To understand those changes, BCG modeled the direct impact of the 60/25/20 scenario (60% tariff on Chinese goods, a 25% on goods from Canada and Mexico, and a 20% on imports from all other countries). The results show that the tariffs would add $640 billion to the cost of importing goods from the top ten U.S. import nations, based on 2023 levels, unless alternative sources or suppliers are found.
In terms of product categories imported by the U.S., the greatest impact would be on imported auto parts and automotive vehicles, which would primarily affect trade with Mexico, the EU, and Japan. Consumer electronics, electrical machinery, and fashion goods would be most affected by higher tariffs on Chinese goods. Specifically, the report forecasts that a 60% tariff rate would add $61 billion to cost of importing consumer electronics products from China into the U.S.