Third-party logistics companies expect to see more revenue growth in 2017, but that positive outlook is tempered by concerns about new competitors, technology, and the Trump administration's policies.
Dr. Robert C. Lieb is Professor of Supply Chain Management at Northeastern University and author of a long-running study of the third-party logistics industry.
For the major players in the third-party logistics (3PL) industry, 2016 was a year of modest growth. This year could turn out better for them: Participants in my 2016 survey of 3PL chief executive officers (CEOs) were generally optimistic about prospects for 2017, forecasting an average revenue growth rate of 7.85 percent for the year. The experience of many of those companies in the first quarter of 2017 was quite positive and on track with those projections. Some were inclined to increase their projections based on their expectations that post-election corporate tax cuts and major increases in infrastructure spending would trigger greater economic growth. However, those initiatives have yet to gain traction in Washington.
Despite that positive outlook, 3PLs currently face a range of concerns, including the growing need for costly new technology, the advent of new competition, uncertainty surrounding U.S. political developments, and cybersecurity challenges, among others. How they prepare for and respond to these challenges will affect their success in the near term and beyond.
Confronting constant change
Many large 3PLs are increasingly devoting resources to keeping up with the rapid pace of technological change, not only in terms of their desire for greater operating efficiencies, but also in response to customer demands. The marketplace wants to see improvements in areas such as visibility technology, mobile applications, cloud-based solutions, and digital freight-matching services. At the same time, some 3PLs are considering more extensive use of robotics and warehouse automation in their facilities to remain competitive. They are also increasingly using data analytics, not only to support their own initiatives, but also to assist customers in seeking supply chain efficiencies. Unfortunately, the cost of keeping pace with rapidly changing technology is substantial, and many 3PLs are hard-pressed to finance these technology upgrades. The larger competitors are investing heavily in technology to differentiate their services, and this is steadily raising the capital threshold to participate in this market segment.
While most 3PLs tend to focus on a limited number of industry verticals that typically include electronics, automotive, and fast-moving consumer goods, the explosive growth of e-commerce has made that sector an increasingly important part of their revenue base. In my 2016 3PL CEO survey, the respondents reported that, on average, e-commerce accounted for 14 percent of their revenue base, and that those revenues had grown by an average of 18.5 percent in the previous year.
However, the pace at which the e-commerce market is changing and the magnitude of the investments that are necessary to meet customer requirements pose serious challenges to 3PLs. Retailers continue to focus on shortening the last-mile delivery cycle while expanding free shipping and free returns programs. That has resulted in a dramatic increase in the cost of fulfillment, not only for the retailers, but also for the 3PLs servicing that market. It's difficult, though, for 3PLs to recover those added costs. The expenses incurred by these omnichannel retailers have reduced or, in many cases, eliminated their margins. In turn, that has led them to resist price increases by carriers and 3PLs.
Amazon.com Inc. continues to be the main driver of e-commerce, but other large retailers, such as Wal-Mart Stores Inc., are responding to Amazon's market challenge. The overall retail marketplace will continue to be chaotic as e-commerce volume grows, brick-and-mortar retailers struggle to right-size their store networks and develop omnichannel strategies, and many large retailers fail. While all this is occurring, Amazon has been opening convenience stores, bookstores, and grocery stores—and even announced its acquisition of grocer Whole Foods Market. Meanwhile, third-party logistics companies that are intent on expanding their share of the e-commerce market can anticipate significant challenges, particularly as the last-mile delivery segment, which some 3PLs covet, is becoming increasingly crowded with new entrants ranging from small, niche players to Amazon, Google, Uber Technologies Inc., and Lyft Inc.
Uncertainties abound
The 3PLs that made major acquisitions during the 2014-2016 period are now in the process of integrating the acquired companies into their organizations. That is typically a difficult and costly process. The end result of such acquisitions often includes an expansion of the acquiring companies' service offerings and geographical coverage, accompanied by a reduction in competition in certain markets impacted by those acquisitions. While the pace of acquisitions has slowed somewhat, more are likely this year. CEVA Group Plc, which has a substantial debt load, has been put on the block by its owner, the private equity firm Apollo Global Management LLC, and is attracting interest from several possible suitors. Several other large 3PLs are rumored to be in play. However, there appear to be no bargains in the current marketplace.
Many 3PLs generate substantial revenues from supporting import and export activities and operating in foreign countries, and the "America First" policies of the Trump administration now threaten the stability of that segment of their business. Trump has rejected U.S. participation in the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) free trade agreement, threatened to blow up the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), wants to renegotiate the provisions of the free trade agreement signed with Korea, and wants "better" trade deals with China and Germany. Many observers fear that this posturing and threatening could trigger a global recession. This climate is particularly troubling to those U.S.-based 3PLs that have already invested substantial funds in Mexico to develop local infrastructure and/or support the projected growth of cross-border traffic. Trump's threats have led some of those 3PLs to at least temporarily limit further investments in that market.
Looking forward, 3PLs should also be concerned about cybersecurity and terrorism. In late June, A.P. Møller-Maersk reported serious disruptions of its operations due to hacking, as did FedEx's TNT Express unit. Such disruptions not only increase costs, but also potentially seriously damage long-term customer relationships. As a result, 3PLs' security and recovery costs are likely to increase substantially in the coming year.
So far the third-party logistics industry has been spared from any significant terrorist activities. However, the fact that terrorists have been using motor vehicles in their attacks should be taken seriously by 3PLs. Many have not focused adequate attention on addressing business-continuity risks such as natural disasters, and the costs of that lack of attention have been substantial. Responses to my 2016 3PL CEO survey indicated that many 3PLs do not consider their companies to be at risk for terrorist attacks. (See Figure 1.) That is not particularly aligned with the realities of today's world, and it should be the cause of great concern.
As we've seen, with 3PLs facing a number of market pressures, political uncertainties, and potential threats to their business models, they're increasingly exposed to financial risk. While opportunities for growth remain significant, clearly this is no easy time to be in the third-party logistics business.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
Specifically, the two sides remain at odds over provisions related to the deployment of semi-automated technologies like rail-mounted gantry cranes, according to an analysis by the Kansas-based 3PL Noatum Logistics. The ILA has strongly opposed further automation, arguing it threatens dockworker protections, while the USMX contends that automation enhances productivity and can create long-term opportunities for labor.
In fact, U.S. importers are already taking action to prevent the impact of such a strike, “pulling forward” their container shipments by rushing imports to earlier dates on the calendar, according to analysis by supply chain visibility provider Project44. That strategy can help companies to build enough safety stock to dampen the damage of events like the strike and like the steep tariffs being threatened by the incoming Trump administration.
Likewise, some ocean carriers have already instituted January surcharges in pre-emption of possible labor action, which could support inbound ocean rates if a strike occurs, according to freight market analysts with TD Cowen. In the meantime, the outcome of the new negotiations are seen with “significant uncertainty,” due to the contentious history of the discussion and to the timing of the talks that overlap with a transition between two White House regimes, analysts said.
That percentage is even greater than the 13.21% of total retail sales that were returned. Measured in dollars, returns (including both legitimate and fraudulent) last year reached $685 billion out of the $5.19 trillion in total retail sales.
“It’s clear why retailers want to limit bad actors that exhibit fraudulent and abusive returns behavior, but the reality is that they are finding stricter returns policies are not reducing the returns fraud they face,” Michael Osborne, CEO of Appriss Retail, said in a release.
Specifically, the report lists the leading types of returns fraud and abuse reported by retailers in 2024, including findings that:
60% of retailers surveyed reported incidents of “wardrobing,” or the act of consumers buying an item, using the merchandise, and then returning it.
55% cited cases of returning an item obtained through fraudulent or stolen tender, such as stolen credit cards, counterfeit bills, gift cards obtained through fraudulent means or fraudulent checks.
48% of retailers faced occurrences of returning stolen merchandise.
Together, those statistics show that the problem remains prevalent despite growing efforts by retailers to curb retail returns fraud through stricter returns policies, while still offering a sufficiently open returns policy to keep customers loyal, they said.
“Returns are a significant cost for retailers, and the rise of online shopping could increase this trend,” Kevin Mahoney, managing director, retail, Deloitte Consulting LLP, said. “As retailers implement policies to address this issue, they should avoid negatively affecting customer loyalty and retention. Effective policies should reduce losses for the retailer while minimally impacting the customer experience. This approach can be crucial for long-term success.”