For the past 10 years, Gartner has conducted a study of supply chain management technology users' wants and needs. For that study, we ask end users to comment on their priorities, challenges, and investment strategies related to those technologies. The 473 respondents who completed the 2017 survey were qualified according to industry as well as their personal involvement in decisions regarding supply chain management processes, strategy, and supporting technology. A key component of the study is to evaluate how various factors like information technology (IT) investments influence supply chain maturity.
A notable takeaway from this year's study is that better allocating supply chain IT investments appears to be a key contributor to improving supply chain maturity. This matters because Gartner's research has consistently found a strong correlation between a company's supply chain maturity and its overall business performance. Nearly 90 percent of organizations at the highest (Stages 4 and 5) supply chain maturity levels are above-average performers or leaders in their industry while, regrettably, over 40 percent of companies at the lowest (Stage 1) supply chain maturity level are below average.
Article Figures
[Figure 1] SCM IT budget allocation by supply chain maturityEnlarge this image
Measuring maturity and IT spending
The relationship between supply chain maturity and investments in supply chain IT was revealed by examining respondents' answers in the context of both Gartner's supply chain maturity model and the "Run, Grow, Transform" framework Gartner uses to categorize IT spending.
The supply chain maturity model defines five stages for supply chain capability: React, Anticipate, Integrate, Collaborate, and Orchestrate. To reach the highest level of maturity, companies must sequentially progress through each stage:
Stage 1 (React) supply chains are revenue-focused and have a "firefighting" operational culture and a fragmented approach to product supply and delivery. Supporting technology is lacking and/or fragmented, and individual business units rely on a mix of legacy systems, third-party software, and spreadsheets to support supply chain functions.
Stage 2 (Anticipate) supply chains begin building more cohesive organizations with greater emphasis on standardizing processes and reducing costs. They focus supply chain IT investments on specific operating functions, although these remain disconnected due to the lack of an integrated supply chain strategy.
Stage 3 (Integrate) supply chains seek to efficiently deliver outcomes across the value chain by crafting a holistic design of supply chain processes that span functional boundaries. The supply chain organization's expanded scope of control includes planning and execution functions as well as, at minimum, a center of excellence to support strategy, design, and performance improvement.
Stage 4 (Collaborate) supply chains strive to better align with and deliver customer-defined value through a market-based orientation and "outside-in" supply chain design. Companies develop cost-to-serve insights and begin working with selected customers and strategic suppliers to develop and optimize multienterprise business processes.
Stage 5 (Orchestrate) maturity is likely relevant for only those few companies that have the market-leadership position, vision, and capability to go beyond one-to-one collaborative relationships. Success requires cultural values and governance that balance operational excellence with innovation and multienterprise value creation through partner ecosystem orchestration.
In the "Run, Grow, Transform" framework, run-the-business IT initiatives address essential, generally undifferentiated business processes. These typically focus on operational processes, maintaining the status quo, reducing costs, and improving accuracy or control. In supply chain IT this can include things like infrastructure costs, application maintenance, and basic support services. Grow-the-business initiatives aim to improve operations and performance within current business models. They often are measured in financial terms, such as revenue and earnings, or in operational terms, such as cycle times, customer retention, or quality. A key aspect of a grow-the-business discussion is that the value comes from directly affecting existing business processes. In supply chain IT this can include things like implementing new or upgrading existing applications.
Transform-the-business initiatives blaze new trails, supporting, for example, new markets, new products, new processes, and new business models. Transformational change affects entire ecosystems, including a company's employees, partners, markets, and customers, and can in some cases fundamentally alter the trajectory of markets. In supply chain IT, transform-the-business initiatives are strategically inspired, and thus usually are driven from the top down. It is often hard to identify and quantify specific value from transform-the-business initiatives due to business unknowns.
Transform-the-business investments improve maturity
Gartner's study found that Stage 1 maturity companies allocate 67 percent of their supply chain IT budgets to basic, run-the business services, 25 percent to grow-the-business initiatives, and less than 10 percent to transformational investments. In contrast, the highest-state maturity organizations (Stages 4 and 5) are far more balanced; only 40 percent of their budgets are aimed at run-the-business services, while 26 percent is allocated to transformational investments—over three times the 8 percent allocated to transformational initiatives by Stage 1 maturity companies. (See Figure 1.)
As the above descriptions of the five maturity stages suggest, supply chain technology is integral to companies' ability to "anticipate, integrate, collaborate, and orchestrate" their internal and external supply chains. That is supported by the study's findings, which indicate that for supply chain organizations to reach higher stages of maturity they must focus more attention on how they apportion their IT investments.
Any effort to develop a strategy for IT investments with an eye toward advancing supply chain maturity must begin with laying a solid foundation by building a cohesive system of record that becomes the transactional backbone for the enterprise. To achieve Stage 2 maturity, supply chain organizations then need to consolidate transactional systems of record while also investing in stand-alone point solutions for functional standardization and scalability. Stage 3 maturity requires organizations to use design modeling and analysis to evaluate supply lead times, cost to deliver, and inventory positioning in support of resilience, efficiency, and agility. They must also target investments to develop platforms that help them synchronize processes across individual functional domains regardless of reporting relationships and span of control.
Finally, to reach Stage 4 and Stage 5 maturity, organizations must accelerate the convergence of planning and execution to enhance visibility, collaboration, and agility across a networked supply chain by emphasizing technology investments that enable multienterprise process orchestration within and across partner ecosystems. In particular, Stage 5 organizations achieve competitive advantage by making technology investments that are built upon a stable system-of-record foundation, enhanced with high-value-added systems that enable differentiation and innovation.
As previously noted, a major benefit of achieving higher levels of supply chain maturity is that it directly correlates with stronger corporate performance. That's reason enough to invest in technology that will support and enable advances in maturity. But there's an additional benefit to be had: Gartner's research finds that for companies to improve their overall business performance they must reallocate supply chain IT investments, with a strong emphasis on earmarking more capital for growth-oriented and transformational IT initiatives.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
Specifically, the two sides remain at odds over provisions related to the deployment of semi-automated technologies like rail-mounted gantry cranes, according to an analysis by the Kansas-based 3PL Noatum Logistics. The ILA has strongly opposed further automation, arguing it threatens dockworker protections, while the USMX contends that automation enhances productivity and can create long-term opportunities for labor.
In fact, U.S. importers are already taking action to prevent the impact of such a strike, “pulling forward” their container shipments by rushing imports to earlier dates on the calendar, according to analysis by supply chain visibility provider Project44. That strategy can help companies to build enough safety stock to dampen the damage of events like the strike and like the steep tariffs being threatened by the incoming Trump administration.
Likewise, some ocean carriers have already instituted January surcharges in pre-emption of possible labor action, which could support inbound ocean rates if a strike occurs, according to freight market analysts with TD Cowen. In the meantime, the outcome of the new negotiations are seen with “significant uncertainty,” due to the contentious history of the discussion and to the timing of the talks that overlap with a transition between two White House regimes, analysts said.
That percentage is even greater than the 13.21% of total retail sales that were returned. Measured in dollars, returns (including both legitimate and fraudulent) last year reached $685 billion out of the $5.19 trillion in total retail sales.
“It’s clear why retailers want to limit bad actors that exhibit fraudulent and abusive returns behavior, but the reality is that they are finding stricter returns policies are not reducing the returns fraud they face,” Michael Osborne, CEO of Appriss Retail, said in a release.
Specifically, the report lists the leading types of returns fraud and abuse reported by retailers in 2024, including findings that:
60% of retailers surveyed reported incidents of “wardrobing,” or the act of consumers buying an item, using the merchandise, and then returning it.
55% cited cases of returning an item obtained through fraudulent or stolen tender, such as stolen credit cards, counterfeit bills, gift cards obtained through fraudulent means or fraudulent checks.
48% of retailers faced occurrences of returning stolen merchandise.
Together, those statistics show that the problem remains prevalent despite growing efforts by retailers to curb retail returns fraud through stricter returns policies, while still offering a sufficiently open returns policy to keep customers loyal, they said.
“Returns are a significant cost for retailers, and the rise of online shopping could increase this trend,” Kevin Mahoney, managing director, retail, Deloitte Consulting LLP, said. “As retailers implement policies to address this issue, they should avoid negatively affecting customer loyalty and retention. Effective policies should reduce losses for the retailer while minimally impacting the customer experience. This approach can be crucial for long-term success.”