All over the world, heading offshore to outsource production has become so commonplace that it is now accepted as the norm. Offshoring does indeed make sense for many companies, especially those that want to establish a global footprint. Too many, however, outsource production for the wrong reasons.
Lured by the promise of cheaper labor, they are blind to the tactical costs of manufacturing overseas. While they may save money on unskilled labor and by achieving economies of scale, they ultimately will pay more because of longer lead times, increased inventories, the need for more management resources for planning and logistics, and constraints on their ability to respond quickly to changing demand.
Despite these and other hidden costs, offshore manufacturing has become a fact of life. Now the challenge for many companies is to manage the resulting global supply chain effectively. They can accomplish this by conducting thorough research, developing a logical strategy, and managing proactively to prevent problems. Effective management also requires establishing open communication with suppliers about expectations, especially when all requirements are contractual.
If you are considering offshoring some or all of your manufacturing, the following will provide a basic guide to the potential problems, business considerations, and success strategies associated with this increasingly common practice.
Know the pain points
No matter what business you're in, you will find that offshoring brings many pain points to the fore. When outsourcing some or all of your operations, you will have to deal with longer lead times. Their length will be determined by the complexity, variation, and shipping times for the parts or products involved. Longer lead times will also require you to forecast inventory needs more accurately.
In addition, you'll confront cultural and time-zone differences that can make communication difficult and can engender misunderstandings. You'll need to address issues of product integrity, quality, and variation. Sometimes you may encounter impractical shipping options. And you may have limited or no visibility into the overseas operation, making it difficult to identify a problem before it's too late to fix it.
The most pressing of these problems are lead times and quality issues. There's no getting around the fact that transit times, not to mention often-forgotten factors like holidays, vacations, and the like in the manufacturing country, will greatly increase a product's lead time. Because every company wants to have sufficient products on hand when its customers want them, you will likely have to stockpile inventory—and that will incur enormous costs in capital and warehousing. Accurate, effective forecasting will help, but even the best forecasts won't remain accurate when they must be firmed up two to six months in advance of production.
Additional pressure to stockpile inventory can result when sourcing a single item from an overseas manufacturer that insists on shipping full ocean containers. This requirement forces you to buy more of a product than is needed at a particular time, which adds inventory, transportation, and storage costs. Moreover, many Asian manufacturers require cash up front for their services. All of these factors can force your company to make larger capital investments than intended.
Another critical issue is maintaining product quality and integrity. A number of incidents involving manufacturers in Asia that produced substandard or unsafe products have made the news recently. Involvement in such a scandal can cost you—not only in lost profits but also in brand loyalty. It's hard to gain back trust once it's been lost.
Quality issues often are closely tied to a lack of visibility into offshore manufacturing operations. If you choose to manufacture overseas, you must be willing and able to closely oversee those operations (or hire someone trustworthy to do so) to ensure that quality standards are being met.
Given all the potential problems associated with offshore manufacturing, you might wonder why anyone would want to do it. The reason is that, at least for some, the benefits outweigh the pitfalls. To make sure that is indeed the case—in other words, that it is not just a matter of perception and that the benefits actually do outweigh the negatives—you'll need to do extensive, thorough, and accurate research before going ahead.
Research first
It goes without saying that nobody should jump right into something as complex and fraught with pitfalls as offshore manufacturing without first doing extensive, careful research.
One mistake companies often make is focusing on the lowest purchase price per item instead of considering the total landed cost of sourcing from offshore suppliers. Total landed cost includes such cost factors as transportation, port charges, duties and taxes, insurance, and material. It also includes internal, "soft" costs, such as those for capital tied up in excess inventory and storage and for often-overlooked considerations like the cost of handling inefficiently loaded containers.
Not all products are suited to offshoring. The ones that are most suitable may be those that have long lifecycles, are simple and cheap, do not undergo frequent design changes, will be sold or used in the region where they are produced, and/or require significant manual labor inputs.
There are several reasons why these types of products make good candidates for offshore manufacturing. For one thing, when products have longer lifecycles, there is less risk associated with carrying enough inventory to compensate for long lead times. For another, it may be more cost effective to outsource items that are cheap enough that quality isn't a concern; that is, if it's less costly to scrap bad parts overseas than it would be to manufacture in the home country to the quality standards required to avoid scrapping bad parts.
Other strong candidates are parts or products that will be sold near the site of manufacture or will be shipped to another offshore location for assembly. Manufacturing products in the region where they will be sold results in shorter lead times, lower inventories, improved customer service, and higher profits. Moreover, buying a component offshore for use in an assembly that is produced in the same region improves lead times and flexibility while reducing working-capital requirements.
Finally, when it comes to labor, the value-added content can be as important as the cost of wages and benefits. When a product with low value-added content is manufactured in a process that eliminates waste, it may actually be cheaper to produce it locally rather than offshore.
After determining which products are suitable for outsourcing, it's time to consider where to produce them. Not all offshore locations are created equal, and—as noted earlier—cheap labor shouldn't be the only deciding factor. While investigating various locales, consider not only labor costs but also managerial costs (which may not be as inexpensive as many people assume); protections provided for intellectual property; the availability of utilities and other infrastructure, including associated trade-offs (for example, good roads versus poor roads); and local culture— especially as it pertains to business and legal practices.
All of these considerations will come into play in another important step: creating a "value-chain map" that captures all of the costs and operational data (such as cycle times, inventory, and so forth) associated with your product's journey from the offshore facility to its final destination. Visualizing each point in the value stream, from order to delivery, makes it possible to predict where problems might occur—and to take steps to prevent them from happening.
Prevent problems
Once you've completed that "homework" and (with the aid of a value-chain map) have developed plans to address every identifiable contingency, you can take steps to help ensure the success of your offshoring venture.
Perhaps the best advice is to do everything possible to avoid problems in the first place! And that's essentially what the following suggestions are all about. They may seem quite basic, but these preventive measures are often overlooked when companies focus simply on cheap labor.
Perform comprehensive assessments of offshore suppliers to ensure that they are capable of meeting your expectations. Look at areas such as manufacturing capabilities (such as productivity and quality) and capacities, quality systems, technology and technical expertise, ability to comply with specifications, cost structure, and financial stability.
Lay out terms for agreements and partnerships in contractual form. Specify exactly what you need with respect to quality, cost, delivery, and service.
Communicate regularly and clearly with offshore suppliers. Don't assume that an offshore manufacturer understands what you require. Put expectations in clear, unambiguous writing, especially with respect to quality, and be prepared to follow up.
Use key metrics and a scorecard system to understand if product is flowing as planned. Establishing a system for tracking and measuring performance— much like those you use on the home-based manufacturing floor—will allow you to assess offshore performance at a glance and will provide early warning when product flow is getting off-track.
Visit offshore manufacturing sites regularly to find and solve problems before they become big enough to affect your company's ability to profitably meet its customers' requirements.
Weigh the facts
Offshoring can be a logical and cost-effective way to improve your company's competitiveness, but as we've seen, there's more to it than simply choosing a manufacturing site or finding a contract manufacturer overseas.
Ensuring success requires learning and weighing all of the facts before contracting with an offshore supplier. Map the value chain, understand your total landed costs, visit the potential supplier, and thoroughly assess its capabilities to be certain that the right partner has been selected. Once you've chosen that partner, document all of your requirements regarding order volumes, product specifications, and operational details in the contract. And finally, monitor offshore suppliers no differently than you would your own manufacturing operations.
Going offshore can improve your competitiveness and open up new markets; just remember to make that decision based on facts that take all costs into account. And once you've decided to manufacture overseas, stay vigilant and continue to carefully monitor and manage your supplier.
Just 29% of supply chain organizations have the competitive characteristics they’ll need for future readiness, according to a Gartner survey released Tuesday. The survey focused on how organizations are preparing for future challenges and to keep their supply chains competitive.
Gartner surveyed 579 supply chain practitioners to determine the capabilities needed to manage the “future drivers of influence” on supply chains, which include artificial intelligence (AI) achievement and the ability to navigate new trade policies. According to the survey, the five competitive characteristics are: agility, resilience, regionalization, integrated ecosystems, and integrated enterprise strategy.
The survey analysis identified “leaders” among the respondents as supply chain organizations that have already developed at least three of the five competitive characteristics necessary to address the top five drivers of supply chain’s future.
Less than a third have met that threshold.
“Leaders shared a commitment to preparation through long-term, deliberate strategies, while non-leaders were more often focused on short-term priorities,” Pierfrancesco Manenti, vice president analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a statement announcing the survey results.
“Most leaders have yet to invest in the most advanced technologies (e.g. real-time visibility, digital supply chain twin), but plan to do so in the next three-to-five years,” Manenti also said in the statement. “Leaders see technology as an enabler to their overall business strategies, while non-leaders more often invest in technology first, without having fully established their foundational capabilities.”
As part of the survey, respondents were asked to identify the future drivers of influence on supply chain performance over the next three to five years. The top five drivers are: achievement capability of AI (74%); the amount of new ESG regulations and trade policies being released (67%); geopolitical fight/transition for power (65%); control over data (62%); and talent scarcity (59%).
The analysis also identified four unique profiles of supply chain organizations, based on what their leaders deem as the most crucial capabilities for empowering their organizations over the next three to five years.
First, 54% of retailers are looking for ways to increase their financial recovery from returns. That’s because the cost to return a purchase averages 27% of the purchase price, which erases as much as 50% of the sales margin. But consumers have their own interests in mind: 76% of shoppers admit they’ve embellished or exaggerated the return reason to avoid a fee, a 39% increase from 2023 to 204.
Second, return experiences matter to consumers. A whopping 80% of shoppers stopped shopping at a retailer because of changes to the return policy—a 34% increase YoY.
Third, returns fraud and abuse is top-of-mind-for retailers, with wardrobing rising 38% in 2024. In fact, over two thirds (69%) of shoppers admit to wardrobing, which is the practice of buying an item for a specific reason or event and returning it after use. Shoppers also practice bracketing, or purchasing an item in a variety of colors or sizes and then returning all the unwanted options.
Fourth, returns come with a steep cost in terms of sustainability, with returns amounting to 8.4 billion pounds of landfill waste in 2023 alone.
“As returns have become an integral part of the shopper experience, retailers must balance meeting sky-high expectations with rising costs, environmental impact, and fraudulent behaviors,” Amena Ali, CEO of Optoro, said in the firm’s “2024 Returns Unwrapped” report. “By understanding shoppers’ behaviors and preferences around returns, retailers can create returns experiences that embrace their needs while driving deeper loyalty and protecting their bottom line.”
Facing an evolving supply chain landscape in 2025, companies are being forced to rethink their distribution strategies to cope with challenges like rising cost pressures, persistent labor shortages, and the complexities of managing SKU proliferation.
1. Optimize labor productivity and costs. Forward-thinking businesses are leveraging technology to get more done with fewer resources through approaches like slotting optimization, automation and robotics, and inventory visibility.
2. Maximize capacity with smart solutions. With e-commerce volumes rising, facilities need to handle more SKUs and orders without expanding their physical footprint. That can be achieved through high-density storage and dynamic throughput.
3. Streamline returns management. Returns are a growing challenge, thanks to the continued growth of e-commerce and the consumer practice of bracketing. Businesses can handle that with smarter reverse logistics processes like automated returns processing and reverse logistics visibility.
4. Accelerate order fulfillment with robotics. Robotic solutions are transforming the way orders are fulfilled, helping businesses meet customer expectations faster and more accurately than ever before by using autonomous mobile robots (AMRs and robotic picking.
5. Enhance end-of-line packaging. The final step in the supply chain is often the most visible to customers. So optimizing packaging processes can reduce costs, improve efficiency, and support sustainability goals through automated packaging systems and sustainability initiatives.
That clash has come as retailers have been hustling to adjust to pandemic swings like a renewed focus on e-commerce, then swiftly reimagining store experiences as foot traffic returned. But even as the dust settles from those changes, retailers are now facing renewed questions about how best to define their omnichannel strategy in a world where customers have increasing power and information.
The answer may come from a five-part strategy using integrated components to fortify omnichannel retail, EY said. The approach can unlock value and customer trust through great experiences, but only when implemented cohesively, not individually, EY warns.
The steps include:
1. Functional integration: Is your operating model and data infrastructure siloed between e-commerce and physical stores, or have you developed a cohesive unit centered around delivering seamless customer experience?
2. Customer insights: With consumer centricity at the heart of operations, are you analyzing all touch points to build a holistic view of preferences, behaviors, and buying patterns?
3. Next-generation inventory: Given the right customer insights, how are you utilizing advanced analytics to ensure inventory is optimized to meet demand precisely where and when it’s needed?
4. Distribution partnerships: Having ensured your customers find what they want where they want it, how are your distribution strategies adapting to deliver these choices to them swiftly and efficiently?
5. Real estate strategy: How is your real estate strategy interconnected with insights, inventory and distribution to enhance experience and maximize your footprint?
When approached cohesively, these efforts all build toward one overarching differentiator for retailers: a better customer experience that reaches from brand engagement and order placement through delivery and return, the EY study said. Amid continued volatility and an economy driven by complex customer demands, the retailers best set up to win are those that are striving to gain real-time visibility into stock levels, offer flexible fulfillment options and modernize merchandising through personalized and dynamic customer experiences.
Geopolitical rivalries, alliances, and aspirations are rewiring the global economy—and the imposition of new tariffs on foreign imports by the U.S. will accelerate that process, according to an analysis by Boston Consulting Group (BCG).
Without a broad increase in tariffs, world trade in goods will keep growing at an average of 2.9% annually for the next eight years, the firm forecasts in its report, “Great Powers, Geopolitics, and the Future of Trade.” But the routes goods travel will change markedly as North America reduces its dependence on China and China builds up its links with the Global South, which is cementing its power in the global trade map.
“Global trade is set to top $29 trillion by 2033, but the routes these goods will travel is changing at a remarkable pace,” Aparna Bharadwaj, managing director and partner at BCG, said in a release. “Trade lanes were already shifting from historical patterns and looming US tariffs will accelerate this. Navigating these new dynamics will be critical for any global business.”
To understand those changes, BCG modeled the direct impact of the 60/25/20 scenario (60% tariff on Chinese goods, a 25% on goods from Canada and Mexico, and a 20% on imports from all other countries). The results show that the tariffs would add $640 billion to the cost of importing goods from the top ten U.S. import nations, based on 2023 levels, unless alternative sources or suppliers are found.
In terms of product categories imported by the U.S., the greatest impact would be on imported auto parts and automotive vehicles, which would primarily affect trade with Mexico, the EU, and Japan. Consumer electronics, electrical machinery, and fashion goods would be most affected by higher tariffs on Chinese goods. Specifically, the report forecasts that a 60% tariff rate would add $61 billion to cost of importing consumer electronics products from China into the U.S.