The adoption of advanced data analytics is already reshaping the ocean shipping industry, bringing transformative improvements in information management, operational efficiency, and decision-making.
The past year has seen an unprecedented amount of change in the ocean shipping industry. Carrier bankruptcies, mergers, and large-scale reconfiguration among carrier alliances have reshaped the container industry at an astonishing pace. While the pace of acquisitions is unlikely to slow soon, there are even bigger changes afoot, some of which will lead to greater transformations than those we've seen this year.
After riding out a turbulent first half of 2016, rates steadily recovered from dismal levels for ocean container carriers. Drewry's World Container Index, a composite of container freight rates on eight major routes between the United States, Europe, and Asia, dipped below $700 in March of 2016 before turning around to peak at over $1,800 in January of 2017. (See Figure 1.) For most of this year, by contrast, rates on the index have been rangebound between $1,400 and $1,600—more than double the rates seen in the previous year.
Ports are seeing volume increases compared with the previous year. The news organization Reuters, looking at U.S. government data, reported that export shipments of coal have risen more than 60 percent this year. Container volumes are also up, and inbound volumes have risen in every major U.S. port; in June, Houston, Savannah, and Charleston all reported double-digit growth. Exports were also up in every U.S. port except Long Beach for that same month.
For the first time in many years, capacity is keeping pace with demand. Scrapping and newbuilds are expected to net out to around 3 percent in 2017 per Drewry, and capacity is forecast to grow 3 to 5 percent over the next couple of years. The current overhang in capacity remains, and competition for business is likely to keep rates steady for the next few years.
Ocean shipping is one of the oldest industries around, and you can see that today in the way its business is managed. Transactions are manual, data is distributed across parties and geographies, and many basic processes have remained the same for centuries. However, all of that is about to change as transformative ways of analyzing data quickly make their way into the industry.
Data moves front and center
Over the past few years, shippers have become much more savvy regarding the application of digital solutions to the management of their supply chains. Yet many have found that, though they have ample logistics data, it is siloed between geographies, transportation modes, or business units and is seldom available on a real-time basis.
To solve this problem, many shippers now are building advanced "data lakes" (storage repositories for raw data) to help them combine different types of information across functions, borders, and modes. While there are commercially available tools to coordinate visibility of assets in transit, shippers frequently find that non-transportation data is siloed across functions, making it difficult to make global planning and inventory decisions, implement them, and measure their impact. Accordingly, industry leaders are applying data science techniques to join data across functions into single data sources. This enables these organizations to implement metrics for measuring network performance in real time.
Innovation by key players in the ocean shipping industry like Maersk may soon ease shippers' difficulty in managing global transactions. Cloud-based ledger (also known as blockchain) platforms, essentially new and more secure ways of sharing data within and across the shipping ecosystem, will enable seamless and secure virtual document workflows that support real-time collaboration between trade partners as well as governmental, financial, and commercial stakeholders. Successful implementation will require alignment across a very wide array of stakeholders, but conceptually this nascent technology could drastically simplify complex processes and data flows that shippers and carriers struggle with daily.
Another area of analytical transformation is in container ports themselves. For a variety of reasons, ports have developed a reputation for inefficiency and opacity. In the United States, everything from labor agreements to lack of investment can be cited as root causes of this issue. However, the tide has begun to turn toward automation and digital transformation in port operations.
For example, the immediate benefits of this shift, such as lower costs and faster throughput, are already being realized at port facilities like the Middle Harbor terminal in Long Beach and the highly automated TraPac terminal in Los Angeles. Another example is the increasing use of technology to help manage terminal congestion. Truck appointment systems are becoming more prevalent on both coasts. In Los Angeles and Long Beach, an initiative with GE Transportation to create a portal for sharing information on container availability will help the ports better handle the large container volumes associated with bigger vessels. Artificial intelligence will enable greater control and flexibility in loading and unloading ships. Coupled with decentralized ledgers, this will enable shippers, carriers, and ports to plan across entities and provide differentiated service offerings such as expedited discharge.
But port automation is not universally welcomed. As the labor slowdown in response to a new automated gate system at the Port of Charleston in early 2017 showed, actions by labor unions concerned about the impact of automation on their members will increase the cost of investing in automated technologies.
Partnerships go digital
Even the ways in which shippers and carriers do business together are going digital. Traditional negotiation processes have been in place in bulk shipping since the 1950s. Negotiating a spot tender has required shippers to maintain a panel of brokers who communicate pricing from their ship owners via phone, text, or even fax and telex. Given the more dynamic market environments for both commodities and shipping, there has been a move away from longer-term contracts of affreightment to reliance on spot charters to address last-minute changes in demand. This has led to the oversimplification of procurement processes (especially compared with what is seen in other modes, like trucking) and brute-force application of resources to manage manual processes.
The metals, mining, and petroleum company BHP Billiton changed that earlier this year by launching a freight portal to communicate directly with ship owners, enabling them to reach a broad audience in a short amount of time. Reportedly, this happened at rates below the market and without the need for brokers as intermediaries. BHP is not alone; others are experimenting with new platforms designed to speed up a process that has long sapped a considerable amount of shippers' attention and resources.
Analytics help to manage risk
In the container world, shippers are employing advanced analytics to manage costs, service, and risks. The Hanjin Shipping bankruptcy in 2016 was a reminder to shippers that host countries are increasingly reluctant to bail out failing ocean carriers. In the face of accelerating merger and acquisition activity and realignment among carrier alliances, shippers are using predictive modeling in addition to cost optimization tools to balance carrier financial risk, network disruption potential, and service performance to determine the best overall value of a carrier contract portfolio, rather than narrowly focusing on linehaul cost.
Simply stated, the amount of change the industry has recently experienced is staggering. Rate variability and the restructuring of the market through mergers, bankruptcies, and carrier realignment has arguably never been greater. However, like many other industries, ocean transportation is in the early stages of a digital transformation that will lead to even greater change. Successful participants can expect to deliver increased visibility, efficiency, and value. While the carriers and shippers that are able to adapt the fastest in this new environment will yield the best results, this promises to be a time in which all parties can benefit.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.
Specifically, the two sides remain at odds over provisions related to the deployment of semi-automated technologies like rail-mounted gantry cranes, according to an analysis by the Kansas-based 3PL Noatum Logistics. The ILA has strongly opposed further automation, arguing it threatens dockworker protections, while the USMX contends that automation enhances productivity and can create long-term opportunities for labor.
In fact, U.S. importers are already taking action to prevent the impact of such a strike, “pulling forward” their container shipments by rushing imports to earlier dates on the calendar, according to analysis by supply chain visibility provider Project44. That strategy can help companies to build enough safety stock to dampen the damage of events like the strike and like the steep tariffs being threatened by the incoming Trump administration.
Likewise, some ocean carriers have already instituted January surcharges in pre-emption of possible labor action, which could support inbound ocean rates if a strike occurs, according to freight market analysts with TD Cowen. In the meantime, the outcome of the new negotiations are seen with “significant uncertainty,” due to the contentious history of the discussion and to the timing of the talks that overlap with a transition between two White House regimes, analysts said.