U.S. logistics costs in 2016 fell for the first time since 2010, logistics costs as a percentage of U.S. GDP dropped to its lowest level since the Great Recession, and transportation spending fell even as energy prices rose. Add technology to the mix, and it's anyone's guess what will happen next.
Contributing Editor Toby Gooley is a freelance writer and editor specializing in supply chain, logistics, material handling, and international trade. She previously was Editor at CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. and Senior Editor of SCQ's sister publication, DC VELOCITY. Prior to joining AGiLE Business Media in 2007, she spent 20 years at Logistics Management magazine as Managing Editor and Senior Editor covering international trade and transportation. Prior to that she was an export traffic manager for 10 years. She holds a B.A. in Asian Studies from Cornell University.
The 28th annual "State of Logistics Report," produced by the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP) and presented by Penske Logistics, paints a somber picture of logistics activity during 2016. The report, which provides an overview of key industry trends and the total U.S. logistics costs for the previous year, shows expenditures declining for the first time since 2009 and logistics spending as a percentage of U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) dropping to its lowest level since the depths of the Great Recession.
Written by the global management consulting firm A.T. Kearney, the report includes an extensive review of macroeconomic trends affecting logistics costs and offers a wealth of historical and forecast data. This year the research indicates that profound changes, which once seemed far in the future, have already become part of logistics managers' daily reality. The report cites shifting demand patterns, technological advances that are altering industry economics, and new competitors that are challenging old business models. While these changes will lead to a "fully digital, connected, and flexible supply chain," the report says, they will also create new winners and losers. That includes employees whose jobs will be permanently altered—and in many cases eliminated—by automation, artificial intelligence, and other technologies. Small wonder, then, that the title of this year's report is "Accelerating into Uncertainty."
[Figure 2] U.S. business logistics costs as a share of nominal GDPEnlarge this image
The report found that spending last year was constrained by uneven economic growth, overcapacity across virtually all modes, and corresponding rate weakness. As shown in Figure 1, total logistics expenditures—framed in the report as "costs"—fell 1.5 percent year-over-year, to $1.39 trillion. (All figures are in U.S. dollars.) The decline contrasts with a 4.6-percent increase in logistics spending, compounded annually, from 2010 to 2015, as the U.S. economy and the logistics businesses supporting it emerged from their worst downturn in more than 70 years.
Logistics costs as a percentage of GDP, traditionally viewed as the report's headline number, came in at 7.5 percent in 2016, the lowest point since 2009, when the ratio stood at 7.37 percent. The report's authors cited a "sharper improvement" in logistics efficiency last year as the principal reason for the decline. The ratio moved in a very tight range between 2011 and 2015, and ended 2015 at 7.84 percent. (See Figure 2.)
In addition to transportation costs (all modes plus parcel and pipeline), total U.S. business logistics costs include: inventory carrying costs, comprising financial, storage, business inventory, and "other" (obsolescence, shrinkage, handling, and insurance); "carriers' support activities," which covers a broad range of services, including forwarding, contract logistics, packing, and support services for transportation; and "shippers' administrative costs," which reflect wages and benefits for logistics-related occupations as well as the cost of logistics-related information technology.
Transportation: Some up, some down
Truckload expenditures, the largest line item among the cost categories, fell 1.6 percent year-over-year to $269.4 billion. That may not be the case by the time next year's report comes out. It is "not sustainable" for so many carriers to accept noncompensatory margins; shippers should therefore expect to see higher trucking prices in the fourth quarter of 2017 and first quarter of 2018, said Marc Althen, president of Penske Logistics, at a June 20 press conference in Washington, D.C., where the report was released.
Rail carload expenditures—buffeted by continued weakness in coal volumes and declines in spending on energy exploration and development caused by lower oil prices—fell by 13.8 percent, according to the report. Intermodal spending declined 2.5 percent. Rail demand was "anomalously low" last year, and volumes and associated spending should rise this year, said Beth Whited, executive vice president and chief marketing officer for the U.S. railroad Union Pacific Corp., at the press conference.
Whited said she expects single-digit volume increases in 2017, with coal and grain exports leading the way, and "a significant jump" in 2018 as new chemical production facilities begin to pump out product.
Spending on water transportation, which covers both U.S. domestic and import and export traffic, dropped 10 percent, reflecting persistent liner overcapacity and rate pressures on international trade lanes, according to the report. Airfreight spending, which includes U.S. domestic and export and import cargo as well as air express, rose 1.5 percent.
Not surprisingly, parcel spending, supported by increases in demand for e-commerce fulfillment and delivery, jumped 10 percent, the report said. For the first time in the report's history, parcel moved ahead of rail in terms of modal spending, taking second place behind motor carriers.
Total spending on "carriers' support activities" was up. However, both freight forwarding and third-party logistics companies are struggling to adapt to global economic trends, new competitors, and technological advancements that are undermining their traditional business models, the report said. Among the growing trends is customer demand for "one-stop" integrated services, a major factor in the recent wave of consolidation in this segment. Meanwhile, "shippers' administrative costs" declined by 4.6 percent in 2016.
Inventory: Carrying costs head downward
In 2009, inventory value stood at $1.93 trillion. In 2016, it stood at $2.49 trillion, up from the previous year's tally of $2.47 trillion, according to the report's data. Despite that rise, overall inventory carrying costs declined by 3.2 percent, from $423 billion in 2015 to $410 billion last year.
The report identified several reasons for that apparent disconnect. Perhaps the biggest influence was a sizable decline in the weighted average cost of capital, which drove down the financial costs of carrying inventory by 7.7 percent. Another factor: The nation's inventory-to-sales ratio, which in the retail trade measures the value of on-hand inventories relative to final sales, steadily declined after peaking in the second quarter of 2016. Additionally, the category of inventory carrying costs that includes obsolescence, shrinkage, insurance, and handling fell 3.2 percent.
Also significant was the fact that although available warehouse space fell to what the report called a "historic low" of 8.2 percent by the fourth quarter of 2016 (later eclipsed in early 2017 by a new low of 8 percent), spending on warehouse services in 2016 rose just 1.8 percent over 2015 levels, about half the pace of its five-year compounded annual growth rate.
These muted spending levels may not last for much longer, however. Decisions by 21 states to raise their minimum wage and the growing need for e-commerce warehouse operators to invest in expensive automated material handling systems will have "a significant effect" on warehouse costs, Sean Monahan, an A.T. Kearney partner and the report's lead author, said at the press conference.
Different directions
The decline in transportation spending came amid a rise in energy prices off of multiyear lows. This marks the second consecutive year that the two trends moved in opposite directions, reinforcing the notion that energy is no longer the primary factor driving logistics spending. Rather, consumers have become the main influence, the report said.
The report's authors said the logistics industry "appears destined for a prolonged bout of cognitive dissonance" as it reconciles subpar GDP growth—first-quarter output rose a scant 1.2 percent—with rising stock market values, better consumer-confidence data, and ongoing investments in information technology.
Yet the inherent uncertainty has not slowed the pace of change as newcomers challenge established players for market share and incumbents refresh their business models, the report said. In one of their most provocative forecasts, the authors said they expect more large shippers to follow the lead of Amazon.com Inc. and either establish new or expand existing in-house logistics operations. Seattle, Washington-based Amazon, the nation's largest online retailer, has added aircraft and truck trailers. It is also constructing an air cargo hub in Cincinnati, Ohio, to support its two-day delivery service, Amazon Prime.
For now, caution rules the day, reflected in declines in the closely watched inventory-to-sales ratio, the report said. The authors acknowledged that the declines could be attributed to more accurate forecasting tools that minimize the risk of over-ordering. However, they added, a more plausible case can be made that companies unsure about future demand are holding inventory levels closer to actual retail sales figures instead of stocking up in anticipation of future growth.
About the "State of Logistics Report"
For 28 years, the annual "State of Logistics Report" has quantified the impact of logistics on the U.S. economy. The late logistics consultant Robert V. Delaney began the study in 1989 as a way to measure logistics efficiency following the deregulation of transportation in the United States. Later, transportation consultant Rosalyn Wilson wrote the report under the auspices of the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP). The report is now written for CSCMP by the consulting firm A.T. Kearney, with input from economists, analysts, and other industry experts. As in past years, Penske Logistics was the report's principal supporter.
CSCMP members can download a copy of the 43-page report at no charge from CSCMP's website. Nonmembers can purchase it by going to CSCMP's website, clicking on the "Develop" tab, and then selecting "State of Logistics Report."
Editor's note: Videos of the June 20, 2017, "State of Logistics Report" presentation, an interview with lead author Sean Monahan, and the panel discussion that followed the report's release at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., can be found on Penske Logistics' YouTube channel.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
Specifically, the two sides remain at odds over provisions related to the deployment of semi-automated technologies like rail-mounted gantry cranes, according to an analysis by the Kansas-based 3PL Noatum Logistics. The ILA has strongly opposed further automation, arguing it threatens dockworker protections, while the USMX contends that automation enhances productivity and can create long-term opportunities for labor.
In fact, U.S. importers are already taking action to prevent the impact of such a strike, “pulling forward” their container shipments by rushing imports to earlier dates on the calendar, according to analysis by supply chain visibility provider Project44. That strategy can help companies to build enough safety stock to dampen the damage of events like the strike and like the steep tariffs being threatened by the incoming Trump administration.
Likewise, some ocean carriers have already instituted January surcharges in pre-emption of possible labor action, which could support inbound ocean rates if a strike occurs, according to freight market analysts with TD Cowen. In the meantime, the outcome of the new negotiations are seen with “significant uncertainty,” due to the contentious history of the discussion and to the timing of the talks that overlap with a transition between two White House regimes, analysts said.
That percentage is even greater than the 13.21% of total retail sales that were returned. Measured in dollars, returns (including both legitimate and fraudulent) last year reached $685 billion out of the $5.19 trillion in total retail sales.
“It’s clear why retailers want to limit bad actors that exhibit fraudulent and abusive returns behavior, but the reality is that they are finding stricter returns policies are not reducing the returns fraud they face,” Michael Osborne, CEO of Appriss Retail, said in a release.
Specifically, the report lists the leading types of returns fraud and abuse reported by retailers in 2024, including findings that:
60% of retailers surveyed reported incidents of “wardrobing,” or the act of consumers buying an item, using the merchandise, and then returning it.
55% cited cases of returning an item obtained through fraudulent or stolen tender, such as stolen credit cards, counterfeit bills, gift cards obtained through fraudulent means or fraudulent checks.
48% of retailers faced occurrences of returning stolen merchandise.
Together, those statistics show that the problem remains prevalent despite growing efforts by retailers to curb retail returns fraud through stricter returns policies, while still offering a sufficiently open returns policy to keep customers loyal, they said.
“Returns are a significant cost for retailers, and the rise of online shopping could increase this trend,” Kevin Mahoney, managing director, retail, Deloitte Consulting LLP, said. “As retailers implement policies to address this issue, they should avoid negatively affecting customer loyalty and retention. Effective policies should reduce losses for the retailer while minimally impacting the customer experience. This approach can be crucial for long-term success.”