The year 2017 is looking very good for retailers. As the end of the year approaches, consumer spending continues to be supported by elevated levels of confidence and solid gains in employment, real disposable income, and household net worth. Strong gains in the equity markets are also helping to boost discretionary spending this holiday season.
While the outlook is positive for retailers in general, one channel—online sales—is consistently outperforming its counterpart, the brick-and-mortar stores. Online holiday retail sales growth this year is likely to outpace last year's growth, roaring ahead at a 13.0 percent year-on-year rate, according to the IHS Markit forecast. (See Figure 1.) As a share of holiday spending, online retail sales reach new highs every year, and this year will be no exception: in 2016, online sales represented 16.8 percent of holiday retail sales, while this year that share is likely to be 18.2 percent.
[Figure 2] Core goods prices decline while services prices riseEnlarge this image
Online retail sales follow a cyclical pattern and typically are particularly robust during the holiday shopping season. During the past five years, electronic shopping and mail-order sales (not seasonally adjusted) were an average of 30.1 percent higher in December than in the prior month of November. But there is also a structural change happening: online stores are tremendously outpacing brick-and-mortar retailers across the board, not just during the holidays. As a share of total retail trade, e-commerce increases every year, and its pace is quickening; in the third quarter of 2017, the online portion of retail trade was 16.4 percent, compared with 14.8 percent a mere one year earlier.
Several factors are responsible for this shift. Convenience cannot be denied, and as online shopping gains share, shipping and delivery times by online retailers and parcel delivery services have dropped. But the biggest factor is prices. The absence of a sales tax for many online retailers without a physical presence in a given state gives these retailers a built-in price advantage. The cost of holding inventory is also lower for online retailers, which can store vast quantities in centralized warehouses until they are needed. From the consumer's perspective, the online nature of cyber-stores makes comparison shopping possible across virtually the entire world. And new smartphone-based "shopping apps" that can send live updates on bargains and promotions, as well as scour the Internet for deals, have allowed some shoppers to find the lowest prices in real time.
Consumer goods prices slide downward
The supremacy of e-commerce is pushing down prices at brick-and-mortar stores, which are increasingly fighting for market share, and so are offering amped-up price promotions. But online sales are not the only reason consumers are finding that their dollars go farther than usual. Prices for goods across the U.S.—and to some extent, across the globe—are growing slowly or even declining. On a quarterly year-over-year basis, consumer prices for commodities other than food and energy have been in negative territory since the first half of 2013. There are several factors at play:
The stronger dollar over the past couple of years has helped to lower the cost of imported consumer goods. Moreover, the strong dollar has reduced the competitiveness of U.S. exports in international markets, resulting in a larger supply surplus at home.
Many multinational corporations are shifting production or sourcing away from the eastern provinces of China, where labor costs have been rising, to lower-cost areas such as Vietnam or China's interior and western provinces.
Lower energy prices imply lower transportation costs for U.S. importers. In addition, domestically sourced goods and materials have become less expensive to transport.
The cost of many consumer goods that are especially popular during the holidays, such as televisions and electronics, continues to decline as their production becomes more efficient. Indeed, television and computer prices have fallen by more than 10 percent a year over most of the last decade.
The U.S. economic recovery is currently over eight years old—a relatively mature age for expansions. Often, inflationary pressure begins to build up during the latter stages of an expansion. This time, however, price and wage inflation have remained subdued. (See Figure 2.) In the third quarter of 2017, the Federal Reserve's favorite measure of core inflation, the core personal consumption expenditures (PCE) deflator excluding food and energy, was the slowest since 2015. There are many plausible explanations for this persistently low inflation, but little consensus as to the root causes. Some possible reasons include:
Lackluster growth and, for some countries, large output gaps. Sometimes referred to as "secular stagnation," the languid recovery from the 2008-09 recession has had a restraining effect on the buildup of inflationary pressures.
Excess industrial capacity. Global goods prices have also been pushed down by substantial amounts of excess capacity (much of it in China) in industries such as steel, iron ore, chemicals, and automotive.
Technology. Product and process innovations are cutting production costs and are being passed on to consumers as lower prices (or at least smaller price increases).
International commodity prices have gained some traction in the latter half of 2017, which may complicate this picture. As measured by the IHS Markit Materials Price Index (MPI), they rose at the end of 2016, suffered a correction between February and June, and started rising strongly again in the third quarter. Reasons for the third-quarter rebound include favorable data from China and Europe, the U.S. dollar depreciation, higher oil prices, and investor buying.
China is the biggest factor for the buoyant mood in markets. Growth has proven to be remarkably stable in 2017, with industrial activity actually accelerating into the second quarter before easing in July. The performance of the eurozone economy has also proved to be a pleasant surprise. At the same time, increased instability in the U.S. has been weighing on the dollar since the start of the year. Our research shows that for certain exchange-traded commodities, as much as half of the movement in the U.S. dollar is translated into an opposite move in prices. Higher oil prices, another feature of the current rally, act in a number of ways to influence the broader commodity complex, and investors have also added some momentum. Investors moved to the sidelines in commodity markets between 2013 and 2015 as prices first peaked and then began their long fall in the summer of 2014, but this began to reverse in 2016.
Looking forward, we do not expect commodities to come to the rescue for goods prices. Fundamentals do not point to a prolonged rally. For example, we expect to see a slowdown in real gross domestic product (GDP) growth in China and financial markets to tighten. Interest rates are moving higher, and the U.S. dollar is expected to begin depreciating in the second half of 2018. This should place some upward pressure on price inflation for imported consumer goods. Until then, though, look for lower consumer good prices to continue—a positive development for the American consumer this holiday season. Happy shopping!
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.
Specifically, the two sides remain at odds over provisions related to the deployment of semi-automated technologies like rail-mounted gantry cranes, according to an analysis by the Kansas-based 3PL Noatum Logistics. The ILA has strongly opposed further automation, arguing it threatens dockworker protections, while the USMX contends that automation enhances productivity and can create long-term opportunities for labor.
In fact, U.S. importers are already taking action to prevent the impact of such a strike, “pulling forward” their container shipments by rushing imports to earlier dates on the calendar, according to analysis by supply chain visibility provider Project44. That strategy can help companies to build enough safety stock to dampen the damage of events like the strike and like the steep tariffs being threatened by the incoming Trump administration.
Likewise, some ocean carriers have already instituted January surcharges in pre-emption of possible labor action, which could support inbound ocean rates if a strike occurs, according to freight market analysts with TD Cowen. In the meantime, the outcome of the new negotiations are seen with “significant uncertainty,” due to the contentious history of the discussion and to the timing of the talks that overlap with a transition between two White House regimes, analysts said.