Amazon.com Inc.'s recent plan to team with partners who want to launch their own delivery businesses is Chairman and CEO Jeff Bezos' latest attempt to bridge the gap between the Seattle, Washington-based company's breathtaking volume growth—estimated at 20 percent per quarter—and the delivery infrastructure it requires to hit its ever-demanding service commitments.
The concept itself is not foreign to Amazon; it already uses local couriers as well as stopgap citizen drivers to fill a temporary delivery void under its "Flex" service. This new step expands and formalizes that existing concept, according to Mark S. Schoeman, president and CEO of The Colography Group, Inc., a consultancy.
James Thomson, a former top Amazon executive and now a partner at Buy Box Experts, a marketing firm that helps companies work with Amazon, lauded the move, saying it will efficiently funnel local delivery operations through one partner who can supply 20 to 40 drivers, rather than Amazon's having to deal individually with dozens of one-person operators in each market.
Thomson said the service that stands to benefit the most from the initiative is "Prime Now," which promises deliveries to Amazon "Prime" subscription members within 2 to 4 hours of ordering. Currently, a small percentage of Amazon's volumes move under Prime Now. However, Amazon sees the program as a "category killer," Thomson said.
Currently Memphis, Tennessee-based FedEx Corp. and Atlanta, Georgia-based UPS Inc. move most of Prime Now's traffic. However, Amazon isn't satisfied with the status quo, according to Thomson. The alternative, until now, was working with one-person operators, which Amazon found unwieldy, Thomson said. The new initiative will allow Amazon to quickly scale up the Prime Now network, Thomson said.
The Amazon program resembles the independent contractor structure currently used by FedEx to support its fast-growing ground parcel service, known as "FedEx Ground." In the 20 years since FedEx began domestic ground deliveries, the operation has transitioned from a relationship between the company and independent drivers to an "independent service provider" (ISP) model, where a third-party is layered between FedEx and the drivers. Because of multiyear contractual commitments exist between FedEx and its ISPs, it is doubtful that Amazon will be able to poach FedEx's partners, said Bascome Majors, transport analyst for Susquehanna Capital Partners, an investment firm.
One key difference is that FedEx does not provide the type of support to its contractors that Amazon has promised to its fledgling partners. Amazon said it will provide training, technology, discounts on fuel, insurance, leases of Amazon-branded equipment, and most importantly, a stable flow of packages. The individuals, in turn, would receive incents to hire thousands of drivers across the U.S. to augment Amazon's established delivery network.
Starting Gun Sounds
The initiative, which officially began last week and is available nationwide, focuses on last-mile delivery services, the segment showing the fastest growth, as well as strong profitability, due to the continued surge in e-commerce ordering and fulfillment. Commercial drivers' licenses will not be required as long as the vehicles in use fall under the 10,000-pound gross vehicle weight threshold. Gross vehicle weight is the sum of cargo, cab, and trailer. Those who sign up for the program can work with other delivery concerns as long as they don't use Amazon-branded trucks or wear company uniforms.
In the medium term, Amazon wants the new network as finely tuned as possible by the time the peak holiday delivery season rolls around.
Amazon said it is seeking partners who could manage 20 to 40 daily routes with between 40 to 100 employees. The payment structure consists of a fixed monthly fee based on the number of vehicles operated, a rate based on a route's length, and a per-package fee for each successfully delivered package. Based on Amazon's assumptions of a US$10,000 startup fee and annual revenue potential of US$1 to US$4.5 million, a partner could pocket between US$75,000 and US$300,000 a year.
Amazon said it has earmarked US$1 million in startup funding to military veterans, and it will offer US$10,000 reimbursements to qualified veterans.
Amazon said the program is aimed at supplementing the work of its existing delivery partners, not to replace them. Dave Clark, the company's senior vice president, worldwide operations, said in a statement that the company has "great partners" in FedEx, UPS, and the U.S. Postal Service (USPS), among others. Amazon has said its logistics buildout is designed to stay ahead of its internal growth and not take volumes away from its partners, whom it currently needs. Amazon, which currently moves 5 to 7 percent of its own traffic, is anxious to gain more control over its shipping both to meet customer requirements and to drive down its shipping costs, which continue to spiral upward as volumes surge.
However, Amazon's customers are its priorities, not its carriers. If operators in the new network can deliver goods cheaper than its established partners, it could shift existing business, and direct fresh volumes, to the newcomers. Should that happen, the pain could be felt most by USPS, which, according to consultancy MWPVL International, handled about 62 percent of Amazon's parcels last year. According to Majors of Susquehanna, USPS stands to lose about US$550 million in annual revenue should Amazon divert one-third of its last-mile packages now moving under the USPS' "Parcel Select" direct-to-residence service.
Majors estimated the Amazon operation is realistically capable of shipping about 400,000 packages a day.
The analyst said the threat of shipment diversion is likely to place a cap on rate increases for Parcel Select. At the same time, President Donald Trump has ratcheted up the rhetoric about USPS' unprofitability, arguing that it loses money on every package tendered by Amazon. The claim is widely believed to be untrue.
UPS and FedEx could be hurt as well because the last mile is a highly profitable part of each enterprise, said Thomson of Buy Box.
Just 29% of supply chain organizations have the competitive characteristics they’ll need for future readiness, according to a Gartner survey released Tuesday. The survey focused on how organizations are preparing for future challenges and to keep their supply chains competitive.
Gartner surveyed 579 supply chain practitioners to determine the capabilities needed to manage the “future drivers of influence” on supply chains, which include artificial intelligence (AI) achievement and the ability to navigate new trade policies. According to the survey, the five competitive characteristics are: agility, resilience, regionalization, integrated ecosystems, and integrated enterprise strategy.
The survey analysis identified “leaders” among the respondents as supply chain organizations that have already developed at least three of the five competitive characteristics necessary to address the top five drivers of supply chain’s future.
Less than a third have met that threshold.
“Leaders shared a commitment to preparation through long-term, deliberate strategies, while non-leaders were more often focused on short-term priorities,” Pierfrancesco Manenti, vice president analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a statement announcing the survey results.
“Most leaders have yet to invest in the most advanced technologies (e.g. real-time visibility, digital supply chain twin), but plan to do so in the next three-to-five years,” Manenti also said in the statement. “Leaders see technology as an enabler to their overall business strategies, while non-leaders more often invest in technology first, without having fully established their foundational capabilities.”
As part of the survey, respondents were asked to identify the future drivers of influence on supply chain performance over the next three to five years. The top five drivers are: achievement capability of AI (74%); the amount of new ESG regulations and trade policies being released (67%); geopolitical fight/transition for power (65%); control over data (62%); and talent scarcity (59%).
The analysis also identified four unique profiles of supply chain organizations, based on what their leaders deem as the most crucial capabilities for empowering their organizations over the next three to five years.
First, 54% of retailers are looking for ways to increase their financial recovery from returns. That’s because the cost to return a purchase averages 27% of the purchase price, which erases as much as 50% of the sales margin. But consumers have their own interests in mind: 76% of shoppers admit they’ve embellished or exaggerated the return reason to avoid a fee, a 39% increase from 2023 to 204.
Second, return experiences matter to consumers. A whopping 80% of shoppers stopped shopping at a retailer because of changes to the return policy—a 34% increase YoY.
Third, returns fraud and abuse is top-of-mind-for retailers, with wardrobing rising 38% in 2024. In fact, over two thirds (69%) of shoppers admit to wardrobing, which is the practice of buying an item for a specific reason or event and returning it after use. Shoppers also practice bracketing, or purchasing an item in a variety of colors or sizes and then returning all the unwanted options.
Fourth, returns come with a steep cost in terms of sustainability, with returns amounting to 8.4 billion pounds of landfill waste in 2023 alone.
“As returns have become an integral part of the shopper experience, retailers must balance meeting sky-high expectations with rising costs, environmental impact, and fraudulent behaviors,” Amena Ali, CEO of Optoro, said in the firm’s “2024 Returns Unwrapped” report. “By understanding shoppers’ behaviors and preferences around returns, retailers can create returns experiences that embrace their needs while driving deeper loyalty and protecting their bottom line.”
Facing an evolving supply chain landscape in 2025, companies are being forced to rethink their distribution strategies to cope with challenges like rising cost pressures, persistent labor shortages, and the complexities of managing SKU proliferation.
1. Optimize labor productivity and costs. Forward-thinking businesses are leveraging technology to get more done with fewer resources through approaches like slotting optimization, automation and robotics, and inventory visibility.
2. Maximize capacity with smart solutions. With e-commerce volumes rising, facilities need to handle more SKUs and orders without expanding their physical footprint. That can be achieved through high-density storage and dynamic throughput.
3. Streamline returns management. Returns are a growing challenge, thanks to the continued growth of e-commerce and the consumer practice of bracketing. Businesses can handle that with smarter reverse logistics processes like automated returns processing and reverse logistics visibility.
4. Accelerate order fulfillment with robotics. Robotic solutions are transforming the way orders are fulfilled, helping businesses meet customer expectations faster and more accurately than ever before by using autonomous mobile robots (AMRs and robotic picking.
5. Enhance end-of-line packaging. The final step in the supply chain is often the most visible to customers. So optimizing packaging processes can reduce costs, improve efficiency, and support sustainability goals through automated packaging systems and sustainability initiatives.
Geopolitical rivalries, alliances, and aspirations are rewiring the global economy—and the imposition of new tariffs on foreign imports by the U.S. will accelerate that process, according to an analysis by Boston Consulting Group (BCG).
Without a broad increase in tariffs, world trade in goods will keep growing at an average of 2.9% annually for the next eight years, the firm forecasts in its report, “Great Powers, Geopolitics, and the Future of Trade.” But the routes goods travel will change markedly as North America reduces its dependence on China and China builds up its links with the Global South, which is cementing its power in the global trade map.
“Global trade is set to top $29 trillion by 2033, but the routes these goods will travel is changing at a remarkable pace,” Aparna Bharadwaj, managing director and partner at BCG, said in a release. “Trade lanes were already shifting from historical patterns and looming US tariffs will accelerate this. Navigating these new dynamics will be critical for any global business.”
To understand those changes, BCG modeled the direct impact of the 60/25/20 scenario (60% tariff on Chinese goods, a 25% on goods from Canada and Mexico, and a 20% on imports from all other countries). The results show that the tariffs would add $640 billion to the cost of importing goods from the top ten U.S. import nations, based on 2023 levels, unless alternative sources or suppliers are found.
In terms of product categories imported by the U.S., the greatest impact would be on imported auto parts and automotive vehicles, which would primarily affect trade with Mexico, the EU, and Japan. Consumer electronics, electrical machinery, and fashion goods would be most affected by higher tariffs on Chinese goods. Specifically, the report forecasts that a 60% tariff rate would add $61 billion to cost of importing consumer electronics products from China into the U.S.
That strategy is described by RILA President Brian Dodge in a document titled “2025 Retail Public Policy Agenda,” which begins by describing leading retailers as “dynamic and multifaceted businesses that begin on Main Street and stretch across the world to bring high value and affordable consumer goods to American families.”
RILA says its policy priorities support that membership in four ways:
Investing in people. Retail is for everyone; the place for a first job, 2nd chance, third act, or a side hustle – the retail workforce represents the American workforce.
Ensuring a safe, sustainable future. RILA is working with lawmakers to help shape policies that protect our customers and meet expectations regarding environmental concerns.
Leading in the community. Retail is more than a store; we are an integral part of the fabric of our communities.
“As Congress and the Trump administration move forward to adopt policies that reduce regulatory burdens, create economic growth, and bring value to American families, understanding how such policies will impact retailers and the communities we serve is imperative,” Dodge said. “RILA and its member companies look forward to collaborating with policymakers to provide industry-specific insights and data to help shape any policies under consideration.”