Until recently, the recovery from the global financial crisis of 2008-09 was one of the most disappointing seen in the postwar period. Even as late as last year, many economists were convinced that the world had entered "secular stagnation"—a permanent downshift in economic growth. The anemic global recovery was powered primarily by moderate growth in only a few economies, including the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany.
For its part, economic growth in the United States continues to strengthen. U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) grew at a 2.6 percent annualized rate during the fourth quarter of 2017, and the pace of inventory building was well below the sustainable level, which means that inventory investment will likely boost growth in the near term. In addition, employment markets are strong: job growth remains brisk, and average hourly earnings have accelerated, which bodes well for domestic consumer demand. Finally, the trade value of the U.S. dollar dropped at the beginning of the year, improving the outlook for U.S. exporters.
[Figure 2] IHS Markit materials price index ends a long rallyEnlarge this image
The near-term U.S. outlook has also strengthened thanks to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), which, among other things, cuts personal taxes through 2025, allows full expensing of equipment through 2022 and partial expensing through 2026, and permanently reduces the corporate tax rate from 35 to 21 percent. Although there will likely be some payback when these provisions expire and the government faces a tighter fiscal situation, over the next couple of years, at least, the TCJA should result in increased personal income, which will further spur domestic consumer demand. Taken together, these improved conditions have caused IHS Markit to raise our forecast for U.S. growth in 2018 to 2.9 percent, which would beat each of the two previous years.
While the previous stages of the recovery were largely based on growth in a small number of countries, worldwide economic growth in the past year—the biggest improvement since 2011—was built on broader foundations. In particular, the economic prospects of the eurozone and Japan (shown in Figure 1), and some large emerging markets, such as Russia and Brazil, have turned around.
We estimate that the eurozone economy expanded 2.5 percent in 2017 to achieve its best year of growth since 2007. Labor markets in Europe continue to improve; with inflation falling back in recent months, the weak wage growth that has been seen in some countries will take less of a toll on real household incomes. The European business climate is likely to remain favorable, and a still-competitive euro should help exports, although political uncertainty related to Italy's elections, the possibility of Catalonian independence, and ongoing Brexit negotiations remains high.
As of the third quarter of 2017, Japan had experienced its longest stretch of economic growth since 2001. As a consequence, Japan's unemployment rate fell to a 24-year low of 2.7 percent in November. And despite major structural challenges that are likely to drag down growth in the medium run, the Chinese economy is still showing resilience, with retail sales, exports, and housing starts all making strong showings at the end of 2017.
As the United States' outlook has improved, that of its northern neighbor has, too. The Canadian economy likely roared ahead in 2017 at a 3 percent rate, and given advances in the labor market and a resilient housing sector, domestic demand looks likely to maintain much of its momentum. Output continues to trend upward, consumer sentiment is climbing, and Canada's consumers do not seem bothered by existing debt burdens.
The outlook for emerging markets continues to improve as well. Commodity prices are still rising strongly, which has stabilized the economies of commodity exporters, and the fall of the U.S. dollar is removing a major source of downward pressure on the currencies of developing economies.
Whereas much of the global economic recovery had been characterized by strength in a few key countries, global growth is now becoming more harmonized. Consequently, world growth is likely to remain robust for at least most of the coming year and probably through 2019. Interrupting this global expansion would require a large shock. Recently, U.S. and international equities markets have been hit with a wave of selloffs and volatility, but market declines of 10-20 percent are not unusual; historically, they occur every two or three years. On their own, these declines should not be enough to trigger contraction in the broader economy.
Emerging price pressures on supply chains?
For years, the slowness of the economic expansion kept inflationary pressures at bay. But now that prices have gained traction, inflation anxiety is on the rise. The 10-year break-even point—a measure of inflation expectations based on the U.S. bond market—rose 2.0 percent for the first time since last March. These inflation expectations fell to around 1.7 percent last summer but rebounded sharply in January of this year. With U.S. growth strengthening and the unemployment rate expected to approach 3.5 percent in the next couple of years—well below most estimates of "full employment"—inflationary risks are overwhelmingly on the upside. Japan, Brazil, and India are seeing a quickening of inflation as well. The major exception is the eurozone, where the indolence of prices can be attributed to a strengthening euro and still-significant slack in the labor market. Commodity prices, as measured by the IHS Markit Materials Price Index, have risen steadily since early November 2017 and, although they have begun to slip a bit, still stand at close to their highest level since November 2014. (See Figure 2.)
What does this mean for inflation? Despite the rally in commodity markets at the end of last year, IHS Markit expects commodity prices to remain within a moderate range. Recent price increases in many sectors are the result of attempts to control supply or of special factors that have disrupted supply chains, such as China's effort to improve air quality and limit waste-material imports. Additionally, in the last week of January commodity markets saw their first decline in 12 weeks.
Still, a sharper-than-expected hike in inflation rates could interrupt the trajectory of economic growth and disrupt global supply chains. If central banks tighten more aggressively than financial markets expect, the damage to confidence and the expansion could be substantial.
The next year could be a turning point for many of the world's major central banks, including the European Central Bank and the Bank of Japan, which will take their feet off the accelerator and may even start to touch the brakes. After raising the federal funds rate by 25 basis points at its December 12-13, 2017, meeting (an expected move), the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank's Open Market Committee is poised to hike interest rates three times in 2018. IHS Markit believes that the Fed will raise interest rates in March. This means that short-term interest rates will be a little higher for the next couple of years, but that inflation is unlikely to spiral out of control.
At present, inflation is still modest, albeit rising, so any scenario in which central banks are forced to suddenly apply the monetary brakes seems at least a year or two away. We therefore judge it unlikely that any major central bank would raise interest rates high enough in the next year to derail the global recovery. In short, the global economy is open for business—and we should have at least a few good years ahead of us.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.
Specifically, the two sides remain at odds over provisions related to the deployment of semi-automated technologies like rail-mounted gantry cranes, according to an analysis by the Kansas-based 3PL Noatum Logistics. The ILA has strongly opposed further automation, arguing it threatens dockworker protections, while the USMX contends that automation enhances productivity and can create long-term opportunities for labor.
In fact, U.S. importers are already taking action to prevent the impact of such a strike, “pulling forward” their container shipments by rushing imports to earlier dates on the calendar, according to analysis by supply chain visibility provider Project44. That strategy can help companies to build enough safety stock to dampen the damage of events like the strike and like the steep tariffs being threatened by the incoming Trump administration.
Likewise, some ocean carriers have already instituted January surcharges in pre-emption of possible labor action, which could support inbound ocean rates if a strike occurs, according to freight market analysts with TD Cowen. In the meantime, the outcome of the new negotiations are seen with “significant uncertainty,” due to the contentious history of the discussion and to the timing of the talks that overlap with a transition between two White House regimes, analysts said.
That percentage is even greater than the 13.21% of total retail sales that were returned. Measured in dollars, returns (including both legitimate and fraudulent) last year reached $685 billion out of the $5.19 trillion in total retail sales.
“It’s clear why retailers want to limit bad actors that exhibit fraudulent and abusive returns behavior, but the reality is that they are finding stricter returns policies are not reducing the returns fraud they face,” Michael Osborne, CEO of Appriss Retail, said in a release.
Specifically, the report lists the leading types of returns fraud and abuse reported by retailers in 2024, including findings that:
60% of retailers surveyed reported incidents of “wardrobing,” or the act of consumers buying an item, using the merchandise, and then returning it.
55% cited cases of returning an item obtained through fraudulent or stolen tender, such as stolen credit cards, counterfeit bills, gift cards obtained through fraudulent means or fraudulent checks.
48% of retailers faced occurrences of returning stolen merchandise.
Together, those statistics show that the problem remains prevalent despite growing efforts by retailers to curb retail returns fraud through stricter returns policies, while still offering a sufficiently open returns policy to keep customers loyal, they said.
“Returns are a significant cost for retailers, and the rise of online shopping could increase this trend,” Kevin Mahoney, managing director, retail, Deloitte Consulting LLP, said. “As retailers implement policies to address this issue, they should avoid negatively affecting customer loyalty and retention. Effective policies should reduce losses for the retailer while minimally impacting the customer experience. This approach can be crucial for long-term success.”