In the past, compliance with international trade regulations might have been viewed as an esoteric and "nice but not necessary" backroom function. But that's no longer the case. As supply chains continue to extend into all four corners of the world, and international security regulations become ever more complex, companies are making trade compliance one of their top priorities.
It's in their best interest to do so. Trade compliance is the thread that weaves a company's supply chain together, creating a seamless global shipping process. If an organization's supply chain is not supported by a sound trade compliance structure, it risks being barred from conducting business globally, as well as possible fines or imprisonment of key individuals.
And that's why Mark Baxa's mission is critical. As leader of Monsanto Company's global trade compliance initiatives, his job is to preserve the company's freedom to operate globally. While not a lawyer by trade, Baxa is well-versed in trade law, both U.S. and international. His understanding of these often-complicated rules is essential to keeping the company's seeds and other agricultural products flowing unimpeded into airports and seaports around the world.
In short, globalism is the name of the game today. In this recent interview, Baxa explains that if you want to stay in that game, you need to play by the rules of trade compliance.
Name: Mark Baxa Title: Global Logistics and Trade Compliance Lead Organization: Monsanto Company
President of CSCMP's St. Louis Roundtable
Bachelor of Science degree in crop science, University of Illinois
Monsanto Manufacturing and Engineering Award
Asgrow Inner Circle Award
Upjohn Academy Award
Six Sigma Champion
What responsibilities does trade compliance encompass?
Trade compliance establishes the policies and processes that are used to carry out a company's global shipments. It ensures that the organization acting as the importer or exporter of record and the freight forwarders and customs brokers who represent it adhere to the official international shipping requirements.
Trade compliance is accountable for everything from issuing policy on required documents to determining export-license needs to denied-party-list management criteria, anti-boycott statements, embargoes, and specific commodity management, trade policy, tariff structures, duties, taxes, financial reporting, document retention, proof of performance, letters of credit, third-party contractual obligations, power-of-attorney management, official customs point of contact, supply chain security, government trade agencies, Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) adherence, and internal audits.
As a global trade compliance manager, you need to work within the laws of your own country, those of the country you're doing business with, and international business laws. How do you juggle these different laws, and how do you resolve any conflicts that may arise?
Good questions. All trade, U.S., and foreign laws must be taken into consideration as part of a comprehensive trade compliance effort. Global participants must interact at the business and legal levels, putting all questions on the table for discussion. Generally speaking, the importer must specify his requirements and show proof of the specific regulations that govern them.
"Can we sell to someone who is on a U.S. government denied-party list but not recognized as such in the country we are selling to?" is an easy question to answer: No! However, issues can become increasingly complex when dealing with certain customers and commodities. If a question arises that could have multiple answers, consult with a foreign trade policy attorney. In most cases, United States law governs U.S.-based multinationals operating on foreign soil.
What's more important when dealing with international trade compliance issues: a supply chain management background or a law degree?
The answer is "both," as each is extremely important. Having a well-rounded supply chain management background and experience managing complex shipping scenarios and third-party vendors who support trade activity is essential to leading an organization's trade compliance efforts. To ensure that your company meets today's stringent government compliance requirements, however, it doesn't hurt to be an attorney. If you're a supply chain manager without a law degree, you need to have access to a legal team that practices trade law.
Are there different nuances of global trade compliance that apply to large, multinational companies versus smaller companies that may be venturing into international business for the first time?
Company size does not come into play when transacting business internationally. As the importer or exporter of record, all U.S.-based firms are bound by the same requirements. Before any company makes its first import or export shipment, it should seek counsel of a legal firm that practices trade law ? or it could face serious ramifications like noncompliance fines, penalties, disbarment, or even the imprisonment of company staff members [if it should commit a serious violation].
A single shipment of one stock-keeping unit (SKU) that might have dual uses —such as a civilian and a military purpose —transacted without a required export license and sold to a denied party could result in very severe penalties for an organization. When it comes to company size and scale, the rules apply to all.
How do international trade embargoes affect the global supply chain? For example, the United States has a trade embargo in force against Cuba, but many of its trading partners do business there.
There are a number of things that come to mind relative to embargoes, but let me address two of them. First, it takes skilled and knowledgeable compliance and legal staff to determine if your products fit under any embargo exception guidelines. Great care should be exercised here, as the guidelines for exception often include obtaining a commodity-specific export license. In the case of U.S. exports, don't assume that one U.S. government agency has all the requirements you must meet. Exceptions are often complex and require careful, multiagency research.
The second and perhaps least understood issue relating to trade embargoes is dual nationals who carry a U.S. passport in addition to another country's passport. United States citizens are prohibited from engaging in any business activity with countries that are under a U.S. embargo. This creates problems for U.S. companies that have global operations staffed by dual nationals or U.S. citizens on assignment in foreign countries. In either case, embargoes impact a company's ability to conduct business. They lead to underutilized production capacity and resources as well as create surplus inventory that otherwise would have been intended for a particular country.
In a perfect world, everybody abides by the law. But what about doing business in countries where payoffs and other extra-legal expenses are the rules of the game?
My response is ... get out of those countries, stop participating, and self-disclose to the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) before someone else does it for you. The "game" is rapidly changing for corrupt business practices and is affecting all parties involved, including third-party vendors conducting business on a company's behalf. The FCPA has seen more activity in the last five years than in the previous 20 years combined, and many countries have created similar laws to punish corruption. Foreign-based companies have also come under the DOJ's scrutiny, with a number of them suffering serious consequences for such violations.
What advice can you give to a company that wants to do business globally for the first time?
Check and double-check the rules and regulations governing the export/import of the commodity you plan to ship to or receive from foreign countries. There is a host of U.S. government web sites and resources governing foreign trade to and from the United States. These include the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), U.S. Department of the Treasury, DOJ, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
If your business task is complex, seek legal counsel or the services of a reputable consultant who is an expert in international trade. Keep in mind that the importer/ exporter of record is ultimately accountable for compliance. If you make an entry mistake or need to adjust your documents, contact U.S. Customs and Border Protection immediately and ask how to resolve the issue. Getting it right means you will have a compliant, responsive, and competitive supply chain.
How do you envision trade compliance contributing to the global supply chain in the future?
The demand for internationally sourced products and technology will continue to rise. Products and technologies will change over time, as will country-specific sourcing decisions. Therefore, it becomes critical to a company's success that trade lanes producing the lowest total landed cost are protected with compliant trade policy so that it can remain competitive and preserve its freedom to operate.
Trade compliance is an integral and important part of one's global supply chain. Therefore, the need for IT (information technology) systems, well-versed supply chain professionals, and well-defined trade compliance policies will continue to increase. Companies are moving quickly to secure their trade lanes and seek out business partners with similar philosophies who will enhance their global supply chain performance and reliability.
Can professionals like yourself who work with global trade compliance influence regulations in a way that will make the supply chain run more smoothly as well as have a positive impact on the supply chain business?
Yes. As the U.S. government, its agencies, the World Customs Organization, and other world governments work to improve existing policy, opportunities for industry representatives to provide input into policy development often arise. One of the best examples of this cooperation and ability for supply chain leaders to influence regulations is the Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT) program.
What tools has your membership in cscmp provided you to give you an edge in conducting business globally
The wide array of publications, web-based seminars, and the annual global conference are great learning tools for supply chain professionals. And the professional network of industry peers I've created as a result of my CSCMP membership has added enormous value to the work that I do.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
Specifically, the two sides remain at odds over provisions related to the deployment of semi-automated technologies like rail-mounted gantry cranes, according to an analysis by the Kansas-based 3PL Noatum Logistics. The ILA has strongly opposed further automation, arguing it threatens dockworker protections, while the USMX contends that automation enhances productivity and can create long-term opportunities for labor.
In fact, U.S. importers are already taking action to prevent the impact of such a strike, “pulling forward” their container shipments by rushing imports to earlier dates on the calendar, according to analysis by supply chain visibility provider Project44. That strategy can help companies to build enough safety stock to dampen the damage of events like the strike and like the steep tariffs being threatened by the incoming Trump administration.
Likewise, some ocean carriers have already instituted January surcharges in pre-emption of possible labor action, which could support inbound ocean rates if a strike occurs, according to freight market analysts with TD Cowen. In the meantime, the outcome of the new negotiations are seen with “significant uncertainty,” due to the contentious history of the discussion and to the timing of the talks that overlap with a transition between two White House regimes, analysts said.
That percentage is even greater than the 13.21% of total retail sales that were returned. Measured in dollars, returns (including both legitimate and fraudulent) last year reached $685 billion out of the $5.19 trillion in total retail sales.
“It’s clear why retailers want to limit bad actors that exhibit fraudulent and abusive returns behavior, but the reality is that they are finding stricter returns policies are not reducing the returns fraud they face,” Michael Osborne, CEO of Appriss Retail, said in a release.
Specifically, the report lists the leading types of returns fraud and abuse reported by retailers in 2024, including findings that:
60% of retailers surveyed reported incidents of “wardrobing,” or the act of consumers buying an item, using the merchandise, and then returning it.
55% cited cases of returning an item obtained through fraudulent or stolen tender, such as stolen credit cards, counterfeit bills, gift cards obtained through fraudulent means or fraudulent checks.
48% of retailers faced occurrences of returning stolen merchandise.
Together, those statistics show that the problem remains prevalent despite growing efforts by retailers to curb retail returns fraud through stricter returns policies, while still offering a sufficiently open returns policy to keep customers loyal, they said.
“Returns are a significant cost for retailers, and the rise of online shopping could increase this trend,” Kevin Mahoney, managing director, retail, Deloitte Consulting LLP, said. “As retailers implement policies to address this issue, they should avoid negatively affecting customer loyalty and retention. Effective policies should reduce losses for the retailer while minimally impacting the customer experience. This approach can be crucial for long-term success.”