A blueprint for successful supply chain innovation
How can you foster innovation within the supply chain? The four principles put forth in this article can provide a foundation for implementing new ideas in a way that is successful and can be replicated across the business.
The rapid pace of technological advancement and adoption means that innovation is taking place all around us, from the way we communicate to how we get around cities—even to how we shop for groceries. In particular, the supply chain is ripe for innovation. Indeed, it's a focus area for many companies to help them do business more quickly and efficiently—particularly as emerging pressures, like the demand for e-commerce, force them to rethink their current models.
However, any change to the supply chain requires a certain degree of due diligence. Because the supply chain is in many ways the backbone of a company, any major change can have a widespread impact throughout the organization. Consequently, the expectations of innovation in the supply chain are high, but full deployment of new technologies and processes are necessarily slower, as organizations take their time to weigh the impact.
Article Figures
[Figure 1] A blueprint for successful supply chain innovationEnlarge this image
So, what does it take to bring innovation to the supply chain so that it's successful and can be replicated across businesses? At the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals' (CSCMP) EDGE 2017 Conference, supply chain leaders from companies like Coca-Cola, Chervon Technologies, Georgia-Pacific, Kids II, and Sealed Air gathered to discuss the drivers and roadblocks around supply chain innovation in their organizations. Ultimately, four key themes arose from the discussion. (See Figure 1.) These themes, or general principles, can serve as a "blueprint" for companies to follow in order to thoughtfully but successfully drive innovation in their supply chains:
Stop thinking of innovation only as adopting emerging technology.
Break down silos across the organization to foster collaboration amongst peers
Make an investment in innovation—without some risks, companies won't see returns.
Learn from Amazon, but don't try to be it.
For each theme, there are practices you can implement today to help push the innovation needle within organizations.
More than emerging technology
Emerging technologies such as the Internet of Things, drones, driverless trucks, and robotics all suggest endless possibilities for innovation—particularly to members of the C-suite. But it's important to recognize that while these technologies will have a massive impact on the supply chain, the changes won't happen today—or even the immediate future. Indeed for most companies, "innovation" means altering existing processes or the current business model to improve the company's bottom line. In fact, 85 percent of supply chain leaders defined innovation as "process improvements" or "business model innovation."1
Business leaders need to remember that definition as they think about what innovation can mean to their supply chain. Innovation is more than technology buzzwords; it's a continuum of improvements and goals that advance the business to the next level. Some of those goals can certainly include adopting and implementing an emerging technology like wearables, but "adopting emerging technology" shouldn't be the singular innovation goal of the organization.
While companies shouldn't ignore the ever-changing technology landscape, there are many smaller opportunities for companies to innovate that can be as impactful to the business. For example, Kenco Innovation Labs pursued one such smaller innovation idea when it created LoadProof, a photo app for smart devices that allows managers to record the condition of shipments to improve compliance and reduce costs. While the solution seems simple, it helps to solve a major challenge that many of Kenco's customers were having with retail chargebacks. The app was prototyped and launched as a 90-day pilot program that produced results, which led to a wider implementation in over 35 facilities.
To get started finding your next innovation opportunity, identify a supply chain process improvement or business model innovation that can be unilaterally tested and proved within 30 to 90 days. The success of this test can be used as a proof of concept to persuade management to rethink broader organizational processes. It's up to those of us within the supply chain to identify these opportunities and show how smaller improvements over time can have a big impact on the business overall.
Break down barriers
Too often, organizations fall into the bad habit of communicating ideas or process improvements solely within their core groups, creating silos that inhibit collaboration. If your organization is operating in a siloed environment, it's time to break down those barriers to enable idea and information sharing that will improve customer communications and ultimately, create better partnerships.
Opening up communications across teams can breed innovation in many ways including streamlining processes, identifying business challenges that can be better solved cross-functionally, and creating better ways to accomplish tasks.
Nevertheless as you work to bring corporate innovation to the forefront, there will be some barriers to overcome. While you may have the freedom to investigate new technologies or solutions to address a customer challenge at hand, and perhaps even develop a prototype, the biggest hurdle is securing buy-in from management. This includes the information technology (IT) department and senior leadership. However, buy-in can come more easily if there is customer support; working closely with the customer to build the prototype can allow for earlier discussions with the IT team or senior management enabling earlier input from all parties. This way, the end prototype becomes a collaborative effort that each party will see value in launching on a greater scale. Connecting to the necessary leaders within your organization early in the innovation process will help the innovation not only happen more successfully but also secure full support from the business from start to finish.
Take risks
Innovation is an investment that takes time, money, and talent. As with all investments, innovation involves some amount of risk and, often, the greater the risk, the greater the return. In order for innovation to be successful in the supply chain, we all need to move beyond the fixation on cost and instead focus on the reward opportunities for both for the supply chain and for customers.
Most supply chain innovation involves two or more parties working together—either inside or outside the four walls of the organizations. As with all partnerships, an innovation partnership needs to be equally valuable and rewarding for all parties involved. Ideally, a true trusted innovation partnership will require both parties to be equally invested. These investments will push innovation projects to the next level, while holding all accountable to accomplish tasks and understand the importance of the work.
But currently, finding an innovation that both supply chain leaders and customers are willing to fund is tough, almost nonexistent. The two parties need to work together to find a solution that helps fund innovations with the least risk. One possibility could be to create an industrywide consortium of supply chain leaders to pool together funds that support specific innovation projects. There are many different opportunities to work together to innovate in this space to create disruption.
You don't have to be Amazon
The "Amazon Effect" can be felt across all industries, particularly in the supply chain. Amazon has altered customer expectations of when they should receive shipments and how warehouses "pick and pack." What Amazon has accomplished is significant, and much of its success stems from its ability to overcome many of the industry's current innovation roadblocks. However, not every company should try to become the "next Amazon."
Not everyone can innovate to the scale of Amazon, nor should they necessarily aspire to do so. Instead, supply chain leaders should work together to create the next innovative solution or process that will set the bar higher. This solution should be dictated by their own ideas on what the future of the supply chain looks like and not Amazon's or their competitors'. Instead of imitating Amazon, they need to analyze why and how Amazon has derived success from recent innovations, and then take those learnings and apply them to how they can iterate the next innovation in the industry.
As noted earlier, innovation is a collaborative effort, and where we can, the supply chain leaders of today and tomorrow need to share the knowledge gained from our own successes as well as failures. For example, CSCMP and similar industry networks and consortiums provide a neutral platform to help companies collaborate and share knowledge that will help the industry continue to innovate, create new opportunities, and grow in ways that are beneficial for both our organizations and our customers.
To breed innovation, we as supply chain leaders need to continuously nurture and grow with it. The future of the supply chain will require collaboration across teams within organizations and across the industry. However, most importantly, to see truly successful innovation and positive impacts in the supply chain, we all need to remain resilient and open-minded.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.
Specifically, the two sides remain at odds over provisions related to the deployment of semi-automated technologies like rail-mounted gantry cranes, according to an analysis by the Kansas-based 3PL Noatum Logistics. The ILA has strongly opposed further automation, arguing it threatens dockworker protections, while the USMX contends that automation enhances productivity and can create long-term opportunities for labor.
In fact, U.S. importers are already taking action to prevent the impact of such a strike, “pulling forward” their container shipments by rushing imports to earlier dates on the calendar, according to analysis by supply chain visibility provider Project44. That strategy can help companies to build enough safety stock to dampen the damage of events like the strike and like the steep tariffs being threatened by the incoming Trump administration.
Likewise, some ocean carriers have already instituted January surcharges in pre-emption of possible labor action, which could support inbound ocean rates if a strike occurs, according to freight market analysts with TD Cowen. In the meantime, the outcome of the new negotiations are seen with “significant uncertainty,” due to the contentious history of the discussion and to the timing of the talks that overlap with a transition between two White House regimes, analysts said.