Airfreight in the United States is seeing robust growth, as companies look for an alternative to high trucking rates and freighters move into smaller markets.
From an overall industry perspective, the airfreight industry is coming off a good year, with healthy growth in volumes and rates. This growth was a welcome change for a sector that was essentially stagnant for much of the past decade. In 2017, however, robust growth drove rates up by double digits. The shipping consultants Drewry reported average rates hitting highs over US$3.00/kg in late 2017, which put rates at their highest level in five years.1 The key question for shippers and industry players alike is whether this represents a true turnaround or just a temporary blip.
Not an island ...
Article Figures
[Figure 1] Freighter volume growth rates for key airports (2012-2017)Enlarge this image
[Figure 2] Seasonally adjusted imports of consumer packaged goods (CPG)Enlarge this image
When answering that question, it's important to realize that the U.S. airfreight market doesn't operate in a vacuum. It is clearly affected not only by the passenger side of the business but also by market dynamics in other modes of transportation. Indeed, the industry's current growth is partly being driven by the fact that road-freight pricing is at historic highs and truck capacity is tight.
As a result, transporting product from large, coastal gateways such as New York, New York, and Los Angeles, California, to the middle of the country by truck is much more expensive than it was a few years ago. This shift changes the dynamics of the total cost to deliver and is causing shippers to view air freight much more favorably. At the same time, the increasing importance of e-commerce and its dependence on fast delivery times are also pressuring shippers to look to cargo airlines to support critical locations like Ohio, Kentucky, and Indiana with faster service and lower cartage costs.
While demand is up for airfreight to smaller markets, passenger airlines are mostly focused on chasing passenger revenue, which has also been growing robustly. As a result, they are adding larger planes and more routes to key demographic areas and not smaller markets. This has created an opportunity for cargo airlines—those that operate freighters and don't cater to passengers—to build market share in smaller markets that are less-well-served by passenger routes. As a result, international freighter capacity has grown in markets like Dallas, Texas; Cincinnati, Ohio; and Boston, Massachusetts; at a much faster rate than in more traditional air hubs like Los Angeles; Miami, Florida; and New York (see Figure 1). The growth of nontraditional air hubs is possible because, especially over the past year, the heavyweight airfreight industry has experienced a significant rebound in cargo volumes due to general economic growth.
The strong growth in passenger traffic has also played a role in airfreight capacity the past year. Simply put, demand growth exceeded capacity growth from 2016 through 2017. But in the second quarter of 2018, this trend reversed. And since then, growth in airfreight capacity has continued at a rapid pace, but the growth of airfreight volumes has slowed. The International Air Transport Association (IATA) reports that, at the industry level, total capacity increased around 6 percent.2Â Capacity growth now exceeds the 4-percent demand growth rate expected in the market for 2018.3
The tariff effect
Whether or not airfreight will continue to see increased demand and rising rates will depend on the impact of the growing number of tariffs and the increasingly likely trade wars. We expect that demand will be tamped down when tariffs begin to hit electronics and other air-focused commodities.
In fact, we might already be seeing the effects. If you look at the U.S. Census data for imported consumer packaged goods (CPG) over time, you see a large buildup in demand that peaks in Q1 of 2018 (see Figure 2) and then sharply drops. Imports, while still robust by recent standards, have already fallen away from their 12-month peak, and seasonally adjusted volumes are down some 27 percent in May 2018 relative to February highs. Based on increased prices driven by tariffs, volumes could be poised to continue that downward slide. If that trend continues, the airfreight market could be even tougher than economists have predicted for carriers and forwarders.4
And yet, airfreight can be a valuable tool to respond to a dynamic marketplace. As new tariff increases are announced, shippers will scramble to get product distributed ahead of implementation. The punishing level of tariff rates is high enough that shippers will choose to ship by airfreight instead of by ocean—which is less expensive but slower and less predictable—just to make sure that products are already in the country before the tariffs go into effect. As the government continues to announce new tariffs, shippers can expect to see temporary airfreight capacity crunches, which will, in turn, impact pricing and service levels.
Given these trends, industry experts like Drewry expect further rate level increases. But the uncertainty ahead, especially in terms of international trade, means both shippers and carriers can expect their fair share of challenges in servicing their customers. Demand spikes and lulls will drive service levels in terms of booking availability and rate variability. But despite economic and political volatility, shipping growth is here to stay, and by moving into smaller and more widespread markets, the airfreight industry seems poised to take over more share.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.
Specifically, the two sides remain at odds over provisions related to the deployment of semi-automated technologies like rail-mounted gantry cranes, according to an analysis by the Kansas-based 3PL Noatum Logistics. The ILA has strongly opposed further automation, arguing it threatens dockworker protections, while the USMX contends that automation enhances productivity and can create long-term opportunities for labor.
In fact, U.S. importers are already taking action to prevent the impact of such a strike, “pulling forward” their container shipments by rushing imports to earlier dates on the calendar, according to analysis by supply chain visibility provider Project44. That strategy can help companies to build enough safety stock to dampen the damage of events like the strike and like the steep tariffs being threatened by the incoming Trump administration.
Likewise, some ocean carriers have already instituted January surcharges in pre-emption of possible labor action, which could support inbound ocean rates if a strike occurs, according to freight market analysts with TD Cowen. In the meantime, the outcome of the new negotiations are seen with “significant uncertainty,” due to the contentious history of the discussion and to the timing of the talks that overlap with a transition between two White House regimes, analysts said.