The 22nd Annual Third-Party Logistics Study shows that shippers and 3PLs have, in general, built solid, mutually beneficial relationships, but opportunities for improvement still remain.
For many organizations, successful supply chain operations depend on there being strong and positive relationships between shippers and their third-party logistics providers (3PLs). Those partnerships are crucial for enabling the supply chain to improve service and innovation. Shippers and 3PLs alike should be heartened then by the overall results of the 2018 22nd Annual Third-Party Logistics Study, which show that these relationships are indeed strong.
The Annual Third-Party Logistics Study is produced by Infosys Consulting, Penn State University, Korn/Ferry International, and Penske Logistics. It examines the global marketplace for logistics outsourcing, surveying both shippers and third-party logistics providers.
Article Figures
[Figure 1] Information technology (IT) outsourcing servicesEnlarge this image
The survey found that shippers are relying on their 3PL partners for a broad range of logistics and supply chain services. The most frequently outsourced activities are domestic transportation (83 percent), warehousing (66 percent), international transportation (63 percent), customs brokerage (46 percent), and freight forwarding (46 percent).
Less frequently outsourced activities continue to be those that are more strategic and customer-facing. Examples include: service-parts logistics (18 percent), inventory management (17 percent), supply chain consulting services (15 percent), customer service (11 percent), lead logistics provider/4PL services (11 percent), and fleet management (10 percent).
In general, both shippers and 3PLs said they are satisfied with the quality of the services being provided. Among respondents of the 2018 study, 81 percent of shippers and 98 percent of 3PL providers agreed that the use of 3PLs has contributed to improving services to the ultimate (or end) customers. In addition, 73 percent of 3PL users and 92 percent of 3PL providers agreed that 3PLs provide new and innovative ways to improve logistics effectiveness.
Opportunities for improvement
There still remain, however, many opportunities for both 3PLs and shippers to improve on these relationships. For example, achieving effective and efficient relationships requires open and transparent communication between 3PLs and shippers. In the study, 98 percent of shippers and 99 percent of 3PLs agreed that there is an increased need for 3PLs to respond to customers more quickly and with complete, accurate, and consistent information. Both parties also agreed there is a need for improvement, with just over half of shippers—51 percent—and half of 3PLs reporting that 3PLs communicate well in responding to risks and executing operating objectives.
This need for complete, accurate, and consistent information means that the importance of data continues to increase. Both shippers and 3PLs can experience a range of consequences when information at the shipper-3PL interface is not complete, accurate, or consistent. These consequences include creating frustration at the organization (74 percent of shippers and 68 percent of 3PLs) and project delays or cancelation (54 percent of shippers and 51 percent of 3PLs).
Given the importance of collecting, centralizing, and analyzing information, an increasing number of shippers, 27 percent, said they were utilizing information technology (IT) outsourcing services from 3PLs, up from 17 percent in the 2017 study. However, the percentage of shippers satisfied by 3PL IT outsourcing dropped to 56 percent in 2018, down from 65 percent in 2017. (See Figure 1.) C. John Langley, a professor at Penn State University and the founder of the report, said this could be due to higher expectations among shippers as technology continues to make gains. Shippers could also be looking for enhanced analytical capabilities to help drive more effective supply chain decisions, he said.
Indeed, there is increasing interest among 3PLs and shippers in big data analytics. According to the survey, 41 percent of 3PLs are currently use big data analytics, compared to 25 percent of shippers. However, 67 percent of 3PLs and 69 percent of shippers said they will invest in big data analytics in the future.
The future in tech
Big data analytics is not the only technology that 3PLs and users are interested in. The majority of respondents—70 percent of shippers and 77 percent of 3PLs—reported that they are currently using core supply chain technology, such as transportation and warehouse management systems, and 68 percent of shippers and 64 percent of 3PLs reported that they plan to invest in the technology in the future.
Those within the supply chain are also adapting to emerging technologies, such as blockchain, which breaks each movement down into a block and documents transactions every time a shipment changes hands. Among respondents, 30 percent of 3PLs and 16 percent of shippers said they view blockchain as potential application. Automation solutions and equipment are also generating a great deal of interest. The survey shows that 62 percent of 3PLs and 57 percent of shippers investing in automation/digitization.
Third-party logistics providers that take the opportunity to be early adopters of emerging technologies could gain a significant competitive advantage from this expertise. For example, more than half of shippers (67 percent) and 3PLs (62 percent) said they don't know enough about blockchain to be able to fairly rate its potential future benefits to their business. Those that seize the opportunity now could benefit from a head start.
Technology is also reframing the demands on the workforce. Companies are increasingly looking for supply chain employees who have experience with automation, digitization, and data collection. The 2018 study found that workforce innovation and agility, which would allow those within the supply chain to create and redefine positions as the industry changes, will be particularly important for the 3PL industry as the industry changes. These needs will not be limited to entry-level employees or mid-level managers. Supply chain and logistics executives will need to increasingly shift from being focused on the supply chain's physical efficiency to being focused on its data efficiency.
Looking ahead
The 2019 study, which will be released in October 2018, will take a deeper dive into several of these subject areas. Researchers talked with shippers and 3PLs about the need to keep the supply chain relevant, effective, and nimble, which is taking on greater significance given the increasing level of complexity within the supply chain. This is particularly relevant as retailers and manufacturing locations work to keep inventories low, respond to faster shipping demands, and react to changes in demand patterns within the global economy.
For example, the last mile, which generally refers to the final segment of a delivery process, has taken on enhanced significance with the growth in e-commerce and omnichannel distribution. As part of this year's upcoming study, researchers have taken the last-mile concept one step further to look at the "last yard," which is what happens to a shipment once it is delivered to a customer or consumer and how it is routed to the specific location where it may be needed or used. Last-yard logistics can be chaotic, but seamless execution is needed to drive customer service.
The 2019 survey will also look at how retailers are continuing to emphasize an "always-on, always-open" shopping experience that provides seamless interaction across all retail sales channels. Omnichannel retailing is forcing shippers and their logistics partners to be fluid and move quickly. The 3PL study last asked those within the supply chain about omnichannel retailing in 2015. This year's responses demonstrate that many shippers and 3PLs are still struggling to create a true, omnichannel retailing experience.
The 2019 study is also revisiting the topic of supply chain disruption, which it last visited in 2013. Supply chain disruptions are a major area of concern because they can result in increased costs, missed deliveries, and downed production lines. The 2019Annual Third-Party Logistics Study is expected to show that shippers and 3PLs are placing greater importance on mitigating supply chain disruption.
The final version of the study will be presented during the CSCMP EDGE Conference in Nashville, Tennessee, on October 1, at 10:30 a.m.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.
Specifically, the two sides remain at odds over provisions related to the deployment of semi-automated technologies like rail-mounted gantry cranes, according to an analysis by the Kansas-based 3PL Noatum Logistics. The ILA has strongly opposed further automation, arguing it threatens dockworker protections, while the USMX contends that automation enhances productivity and can create long-term opportunities for labor.
In fact, U.S. importers are already taking action to prevent the impact of such a strike, “pulling forward” their container shipments by rushing imports to earlier dates on the calendar, according to analysis by supply chain visibility provider Project44. That strategy can help companies to build enough safety stock to dampen the damage of events like the strike and like the steep tariffs being threatened by the incoming Trump administration.
Likewise, some ocean carriers have already instituted January surcharges in pre-emption of possible labor action, which could support inbound ocean rates if a strike occurs, according to freight market analysts with TD Cowen. In the meantime, the outcome of the new negotiations are seen with “significant uncertainty,” due to the contentious history of the discussion and to the timing of the talks that overlap with a transition between two White House regimes, analysts said.