Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Perspective

Trade wars will mean supply chain pain

In its attempt to bring China to heel, the administration could do great harm to U.S. importers and their supply chain partners.

Abraham lincoln once said, "Give me six hours to chop down a tree, and I will spend the first four sharpening the ax."

Honest Abe understood the importance of preparation. If you want good results, you must take the time to prepare properly before acting.


The current administration should heed this advice, as it certainly has failed to prepare for the possible ramifications of its ongoing trade wars, particularly those with China.

Most would agree that China has not always played fair when it comes to trade, and the president wants to force China to do so or face consequences. That's why in late September he imposed the infamous 10-percent tariff on some US$200 billion worth of Chinese goods. But in its attempt to punish China, the administration is harming U.S. importers and their supply chain partners.

Anticipating such a move, many importers have been stockpiling inventory. But once those stocks are depleted, the new tariffs will cut drastically into margins, forcing importers to raise prices or make aggressive cuts throughout their supply chains. Some are looking at alternative markets to supply goods. But moving contract manufacturing to a new country cannot be done overnight.

Trade wars also disrupt transportation. Ocean carriers and ports may suffer if importers cut back on shipments. Railroads and trucking lines that haul those goods cross-continent may also see disruptions, with thousands of jobs at risk.

The president would like to see many of the products currently manufactured overseas return to U.S. factories. Wouldn't we all? But that's not a practical plan, considering we don't currently have the industrial infrastructure to support it. With an unemployment rate of around 4 percent, we also don't have workers to staff those factories.

While the goal of building up U.S. manufacturing capability at home is laudable, there are better ways to go about it. Rather than punishing companies that do business with China, wouldn't it be better to provide incentives for firms to build the infrastructure needed to boost U.S.-based manufacturing? With a lack of labor to staff such expansion, automated equipment will have to fill the gap. Government can and should encourage the growth of industries that create new technologies that make it cheaper to produce and distribute products here at home.

Mistakes are made when governments move without proper consideration of their consequences. Abe Lincoln also addressed the need to avoid hasty decisions when he said, "Nothing valuable can be lost by taking time."

For a president who likes to compare himself with Mr. Lincoln, our current chief executive should take his words to heart.

Recent

More Stories

Just 29% of supply chain organizations are prepared to meet future readiness demands

Just 29% of supply chain organizations are prepared to meet future readiness demands

Just 29% of supply chain organizations have the competitive characteristics they’ll need for future readiness, according to a Gartner survey released Tuesday. The survey focused on how organizations are preparing for future challenges and to keep their supply chains competitive.

Gartner surveyed 579 supply chain practitioners to determine the capabilities needed to manage the “future drivers of influence” on supply chains, which include artificial intelligence (AI) achievement and the ability to navigate new trade policies. According to the survey, the five competitive characteristics are: agility, resilience, regionalization, integrated ecosystems, and integrated enterprise strategy.

Keep ReadingShow less

Featured

screen shot of returns apps on different devices

Optoro: 69% of shoppers admit to “wardrobing” fraud

With returns now a routine part of the shopping journey, technology provider Optoro says a recent survey has identified four trends influencing shopper preferences and retailer priorities.

First, 54% of retailers are looking for ways to increase their financial recovery from returns. That’s because the cost to return a purchase averages 27% of the purchase price, which erases as much as 50% of the sales margin. But consumers have their own interests in mind: 76% of shoppers admit they’ve embellished or exaggerated the return reason to avoid a fee, a 39% increase from 2023 to 204.

Keep ReadingShow less
robots carry goods through a warehouse

Fortna: rethink your distribution strategy for 2025

Facing an evolving supply chain landscape in 2025, companies are being forced to rethink their distribution strategies to cope with challenges like rising cost pressures, persistent labor shortages, and the complexities of managing SKU proliferation.

But according to the systems integrator Fortna, businesses can remain competitive if they focus on five core areas:

Keep ReadingShow less
shopper uses smartphone in retail store

EY lists five ways to fortify omnichannel retail

In the fallout from the pandemic, the term “omnichannel” seems both out of date and yet more vital than ever, according to a study from consulting firm EY.

That clash has come as retailers have been hustling to adjust to pandemic swings like a renewed focus on e-commerce, then swiftly reimagining store experiences as foot traffic returned. But even as the dust settles from those changes, retailers are now facing renewed questions about how best to define their omnichannel strategy in a world where customers have increasing power and information.

Keep ReadingShow less
artistic image of a building roof

BCG: tariffs would accelerate change in global trade flows

Geopolitical rivalries, alliances, and aspirations are rewiring the global economy—and the imposition of new tariffs on foreign imports by the U.S. will accelerate that process, according to an analysis by Boston Consulting Group (BCG).

Without a broad increase in tariffs, world trade in goods will keep growing at an average of 2.9% annually for the next eight years, the firm forecasts in its report, “Great Powers, Geopolitics, and the Future of Trade.” But the routes goods travel will change markedly as North America reduces its dependence on China and China builds up its links with the Global South, which is cementing its power in the global trade map.

Keep ReadingShow less