Deborah A. Fulton is a senior human resources professional practicing in the Dallas, Texas, area. Her experience includes management of staffing for warehousing, logistics, and manufacturing environments.
You can have the hottest supply chain technology out there. And you can have the coolest-sounding processimprovement initiatives in the business. But they'll all amount to nothing if you don't have the right people in place to use those tools and execute those processes.
But how do you know if you're doing a good job recruiting and retaining the right people? How do you know if your human resource (HR) strategies are actually working? The answer, as is the case in many aspects of business, is to use metrics.
Without any type of human resource metrics, it is difficult to make proactive hiring and personnel decisions, and it is nearly impossible to identify how the results of those decisions are affecting your bottom line. As the business environment becomes more dynamic and complex, and the components of the supply chain become increasingly difficult to manage, it is critical to set HR goals, measure results, and then control the human resource processes that support your company's overall business strategy.
According to the Society for Human Resource Management (www.shrm.org), there are several elements that can be measured to show how HR contributes to your business. These statistics, which are explained in the society's HR Metrics Toolkit, apply across industries and can be readily used by supply chain professionals.
What follows is a brief summary of these elements:
Hiring yield ratios. The hiring yield ratio provides information about the percentage of applicants from a recruitment source that makes it to the next stage of the selection process. For example, if a company receives 100 résumés and 50 are found acceptable, that results in a 50-percent yield.
This ratio can be used to track the percentage of applicants who pass or fail the various steps of the hiring process, such as skills testing, drug screening, and background checks.
Cost per hire. To calculate what your company spends on recruitment, add up all of the costs involved in the hiring of an applicant ("help wanted" advertising, travel, agency fees, and so forth), and then divide the total by the number of people hired.
This metric can be used as a measurement to show any improvements in recruitment or retention costs. It can also be used to determine what the recruiting function can do to increase savings or reduce costs for your company.
Time to fill/hire. This statistic represents the number of days from when the job requisition was approved to when the new hire starts work. It is one way you can determine the efficiency of the recruiting function. It is derived by computing the total number of days elapsed until the requisitions are filled, divided by the number of new hires.
Absence rate. This calculation allows you to measure absenteeism in order to determine whether your company is suffering from this problem. You can also use it to determine the effectiveness of an attendance policy and of management in applying the policy.
To calculate the absence rate, take the total number of days employees are absent in a month and divide it by the average number of people employed during the month. Multiply that answer by the number of workdays, and then multiply the total by 100.
Turnover/retention cost. By calculating the separation, vacancy, replacement, and training costs resulting from employee turnover, a company can determine the turnover cost for a particular position, a class code, a division or functional area, or the entire organization. To get that figure, simply total the costs of separation, vacancy, replacement, and training.
Turnover rate. This measures the rate at which employees leave a company. It is a statistic that will help to identify trends and assist in determining what your organization can do to improve its retention efforts.
To get that figure, divide the number of separations during a month by the average number of employees during the month, and multiply that number by 100.
Human capital return on investment. This metric measures the return on investment (ROI) ratio for employees. It gives companies an opportunity to optimize their investment in such human resource practices as recruitment, motivation, training, and development.
Training return on investment. This measures the total financial gain or benefit an organization realizes from a particular training program, minus the total direct and indirect costs incurred to develop, produce, and deliver the training program. Calculate it by deducting the total direct and indirect cost from the total financial gain or benefit, and multiply that number by 100.
Workers' compensation. Use this number to analyze and compare the year-to-year change in payouts under workers' compensation on a regular basis. Doing so will help you to determine trends in the types of injuries as well as the number of injuries by function, department, and job category. This statistic should be used as a benchmark to show whether your company's HR practices are effective in reducing workers' compensation accidents and costs.
To get this figure, simply divide the total workers' compensation cost for the year by the average number of employees during the year.
Workers' compensation incident rate. This metric looks at the number of injuries and/or illnesses per 100 full-time employees. Divide the number of injuries and/or illnesses per 100 full-time employees by the total hours worked by all employees during the calendar year, and then multiply that number by 200,000. Compare this number to the standard in your industry to determine how your organization is performing compared to its peers.
Next steps
For some companies—especially smaller organizations— the data used to calculate these metrics may not be readily available. In fact, you may need to spend some time identifying sources of the data you need and developing a system to capture that information. Remember that consistent data collection and reporting is critical to the accuracy of any measurement process.
Once you have some results, you can go on to the next steps: benchmarking and goal setting. Comparing the performance of your supply chain organization to others of similar size within your industry will help identify areas of strength as well as areas for improvement. A helpful reference for this type of analysis is the annual "Capital Benchmarking Study" published by the Society for Human Resource Management. This report includes data from a number of key industries, including transportation, warehousing, and distribution.
From there, it is a matter of setting performance goals, homing in on your opportunities, evaluating the key human resource processes involved, and establishing new best practices to optimize your company's performance. Open communication and collaboration across the organization is essential for a successful metrics program.
As you move forward, compare the various metrics outlined here, using the same time frame so that you can accurately identify any improvement or decline in performance. Over time, as process adjustments are made and new practices are institutionalized, the impact on your company's bottom line will become clear.
And the next time you're asked, "Are your HR practices effective?" you'll be able to provide an answer that is based on facts.
Just 29% of supply chain organizations have the competitive characteristics they’ll need for future readiness, according to a Gartner survey released Tuesday. The survey focused on how organizations are preparing for future challenges and to keep their supply chains competitive.
Gartner surveyed 579 supply chain practitioners to determine the capabilities needed to manage the “future drivers of influence” on supply chains, which include artificial intelligence (AI) achievement and the ability to navigate new trade policies. According to the survey, the five competitive characteristics are: agility, resilience, regionalization, integrated ecosystems, and integrated enterprise strategy.
The survey analysis identified “leaders” among the respondents as supply chain organizations that have already developed at least three of the five competitive characteristics necessary to address the top five drivers of supply chain’s future.
Less than a third have met that threshold.
“Leaders shared a commitment to preparation through long-term, deliberate strategies, while non-leaders were more often focused on short-term priorities,” Pierfrancesco Manenti, vice president analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a statement announcing the survey results.
“Most leaders have yet to invest in the most advanced technologies (e.g. real-time visibility, digital supply chain twin), but plan to do so in the next three-to-five years,” Manenti also said in the statement. “Leaders see technology as an enabler to their overall business strategies, while non-leaders more often invest in technology first, without having fully established their foundational capabilities.”
As part of the survey, respondents were asked to identify the future drivers of influence on supply chain performance over the next three to five years. The top five drivers are: achievement capability of AI (74%); the amount of new ESG regulations and trade policies being released (67%); geopolitical fight/transition for power (65%); control over data (62%); and talent scarcity (59%).
The analysis also identified four unique profiles of supply chain organizations, based on what their leaders deem as the most crucial capabilities for empowering their organizations over the next three to five years.
First, 54% of retailers are looking for ways to increase their financial recovery from returns. That’s because the cost to return a purchase averages 27% of the purchase price, which erases as much as 50% of the sales margin. But consumers have their own interests in mind: 76% of shoppers admit they’ve embellished or exaggerated the return reason to avoid a fee, a 39% increase from 2023 to 204.
Second, return experiences matter to consumers. A whopping 80% of shoppers stopped shopping at a retailer because of changes to the return policy—a 34% increase YoY.
Third, returns fraud and abuse is top-of-mind-for retailers, with wardrobing rising 38% in 2024. In fact, over two thirds (69%) of shoppers admit to wardrobing, which is the practice of buying an item for a specific reason or event and returning it after use. Shoppers also practice bracketing, or purchasing an item in a variety of colors or sizes and then returning all the unwanted options.
Fourth, returns come with a steep cost in terms of sustainability, with returns amounting to 8.4 billion pounds of landfill waste in 2023 alone.
“As returns have become an integral part of the shopper experience, retailers must balance meeting sky-high expectations with rising costs, environmental impact, and fraudulent behaviors,” Amena Ali, CEO of Optoro, said in the firm’s “2024 Returns Unwrapped” report. “By understanding shoppers’ behaviors and preferences around returns, retailers can create returns experiences that embrace their needs while driving deeper loyalty and protecting their bottom line.”
Facing an evolving supply chain landscape in 2025, companies are being forced to rethink their distribution strategies to cope with challenges like rising cost pressures, persistent labor shortages, and the complexities of managing SKU proliferation.
1. Optimize labor productivity and costs. Forward-thinking businesses are leveraging technology to get more done with fewer resources through approaches like slotting optimization, automation and robotics, and inventory visibility.
2. Maximize capacity with smart solutions. With e-commerce volumes rising, facilities need to handle more SKUs and orders without expanding their physical footprint. That can be achieved through high-density storage and dynamic throughput.
3. Streamline returns management. Returns are a growing challenge, thanks to the continued growth of e-commerce and the consumer practice of bracketing. Businesses can handle that with smarter reverse logistics processes like automated returns processing and reverse logistics visibility.
4. Accelerate order fulfillment with robotics. Robotic solutions are transforming the way orders are fulfilled, helping businesses meet customer expectations faster and more accurately than ever before by using autonomous mobile robots (AMRs and robotic picking.
5. Enhance end-of-line packaging. The final step in the supply chain is often the most visible to customers. So optimizing packaging processes can reduce costs, improve efficiency, and support sustainability goals through automated packaging systems and sustainability initiatives.
That clash has come as retailers have been hustling to adjust to pandemic swings like a renewed focus on e-commerce, then swiftly reimagining store experiences as foot traffic returned. But even as the dust settles from those changes, retailers are now facing renewed questions about how best to define their omnichannel strategy in a world where customers have increasing power and information.
The answer may come from a five-part strategy using integrated components to fortify omnichannel retail, EY said. The approach can unlock value and customer trust through great experiences, but only when implemented cohesively, not individually, EY warns.
The steps include:
1. Functional integration: Is your operating model and data infrastructure siloed between e-commerce and physical stores, or have you developed a cohesive unit centered around delivering seamless customer experience?
2. Customer insights: With consumer centricity at the heart of operations, are you analyzing all touch points to build a holistic view of preferences, behaviors, and buying patterns?
3. Next-generation inventory: Given the right customer insights, how are you utilizing advanced analytics to ensure inventory is optimized to meet demand precisely where and when it’s needed?
4. Distribution partnerships: Having ensured your customers find what they want where they want it, how are your distribution strategies adapting to deliver these choices to them swiftly and efficiently?
5. Real estate strategy: How is your real estate strategy interconnected with insights, inventory and distribution to enhance experience and maximize your footprint?
When approached cohesively, these efforts all build toward one overarching differentiator for retailers: a better customer experience that reaches from brand engagement and order placement through delivery and return, the EY study said. Amid continued volatility and an economy driven by complex customer demands, the retailers best set up to win are those that are striving to gain real-time visibility into stock levels, offer flexible fulfillment options and modernize merchandising through personalized and dynamic customer experiences.
Geopolitical rivalries, alliances, and aspirations are rewiring the global economy—and the imposition of new tariffs on foreign imports by the U.S. will accelerate that process, according to an analysis by Boston Consulting Group (BCG).
Without a broad increase in tariffs, world trade in goods will keep growing at an average of 2.9% annually for the next eight years, the firm forecasts in its report, “Great Powers, Geopolitics, and the Future of Trade.” But the routes goods travel will change markedly as North America reduces its dependence on China and China builds up its links with the Global South, which is cementing its power in the global trade map.
“Global trade is set to top $29 trillion by 2033, but the routes these goods will travel is changing at a remarkable pace,” Aparna Bharadwaj, managing director and partner at BCG, said in a release. “Trade lanes were already shifting from historical patterns and looming US tariffs will accelerate this. Navigating these new dynamics will be critical for any global business.”
To understand those changes, BCG modeled the direct impact of the 60/25/20 scenario (60% tariff on Chinese goods, a 25% on goods from Canada and Mexico, and a 20% on imports from all other countries). The results show that the tariffs would add $640 billion to the cost of importing goods from the top ten U.S. import nations, based on 2023 levels, unless alternative sources or suppliers are found.
In terms of product categories imported by the U.S., the greatest impact would be on imported auto parts and automotive vehicles, which would primarily affect trade with Mexico, the EU, and Japan. Consumer electronics, electrical machinery, and fashion goods would be most affected by higher tariffs on Chinese goods. Specifically, the report forecasts that a 60% tariff rate would add $61 billion to cost of importing consumer electronics products from China into the U.S.