Deborah A. Fulton is a senior human resources professional practicing in the Dallas, Texas, area. Her experience includes management of staffing for warehousing, logistics, and manufacturing environments.
You can have the hottest supply chain technology out there. And you can have the coolest-sounding processimprovement initiatives in the business. But they'll all amount to nothing if you don't have the right people in place to use those tools and execute those processes.
But how do you know if you're doing a good job recruiting and retaining the right people? How do you know if your human resource (HR) strategies are actually working? The answer, as is the case in many aspects of business, is to use metrics.
Without any type of human resource metrics, it is difficult to make proactive hiring and personnel decisions, and it is nearly impossible to identify how the results of those decisions are affecting your bottom line. As the business environment becomes more dynamic and complex, and the components of the supply chain become increasingly difficult to manage, it is critical to set HR goals, measure results, and then control the human resource processes that support your company's overall business strategy.
According to the Society for Human Resource Management (www.shrm.org), there are several elements that can be measured to show how HR contributes to your business. These statistics, which are explained in the society's HR Metrics Toolkit, apply across industries and can be readily used by supply chain professionals.
What follows is a brief summary of these elements:
Hiring yield ratios. The hiring yield ratio provides information about the percentage of applicants from a recruitment source that makes it to the next stage of the selection process. For example, if a company receives 100 résumés and 50 are found acceptable, that results in a 50-percent yield.
This ratio can be used to track the percentage of applicants who pass or fail the various steps of the hiring process, such as skills testing, drug screening, and background checks.
Cost per hire. To calculate what your company spends on recruitment, add up all of the costs involved in the hiring of an applicant ("help wanted" advertising, travel, agency fees, and so forth), and then divide the total by the number of people hired.
This metric can be used as a measurement to show any improvements in recruitment or retention costs. It can also be used to determine what the recruiting function can do to increase savings or reduce costs for your company.
Time to fill/hire. This statistic represents the number of days from when the job requisition was approved to when the new hire starts work. It is one way you can determine the efficiency of the recruiting function. It is derived by computing the total number of days elapsed until the requisitions are filled, divided by the number of new hires.
Absence rate. This calculation allows you to measure absenteeism in order to determine whether your company is suffering from this problem. You can also use it to determine the effectiveness of an attendance policy and of management in applying the policy.
To calculate the absence rate, take the total number of days employees are absent in a month and divide it by the average number of people employed during the month. Multiply that answer by the number of workdays, and then multiply the total by 100.
Turnover/retention cost. By calculating the separation, vacancy, replacement, and training costs resulting from employee turnover, a company can determine the turnover cost for a particular position, a class code, a division or functional area, or the entire organization. To get that figure, simply total the costs of separation, vacancy, replacement, and training.
Turnover rate. This measures the rate at which employees leave a company. It is a statistic that will help to identify trends and assist in determining what your organization can do to improve its retention efforts.
To get that figure, divide the number of separations during a month by the average number of employees during the month, and multiply that number by 100.
Human capital return on investment. This metric measures the return on investment (ROI) ratio for employees. It gives companies an opportunity to optimize their investment in such human resource practices as recruitment, motivation, training, and development.
Training return on investment. This measures the total financial gain or benefit an organization realizes from a particular training program, minus the total direct and indirect costs incurred to develop, produce, and deliver the training program. Calculate it by deducting the total direct and indirect cost from the total financial gain or benefit, and multiply that number by 100.
Workers' compensation. Use this number to analyze and compare the year-to-year change in payouts under workers' compensation on a regular basis. Doing so will help you to determine trends in the types of injuries as well as the number of injuries by function, department, and job category. This statistic should be used as a benchmark to show whether your company's HR practices are effective in reducing workers' compensation accidents and costs.
To get this figure, simply divide the total workers' compensation cost for the year by the average number of employees during the year.
Workers' compensation incident rate. This metric looks at the number of injuries and/or illnesses per 100 full-time employees. Divide the number of injuries and/or illnesses per 100 full-time employees by the total hours worked by all employees during the calendar year, and then multiply that number by 200,000. Compare this number to the standard in your industry to determine how your organization is performing compared to its peers.
Next steps
For some companies—especially smaller organizations— the data used to calculate these metrics may not be readily available. In fact, you may need to spend some time identifying sources of the data you need and developing a system to capture that information. Remember that consistent data collection and reporting is critical to the accuracy of any measurement process.
Once you have some results, you can go on to the next steps: benchmarking and goal setting. Comparing the performance of your supply chain organization to others of similar size within your industry will help identify areas of strength as well as areas for improvement. A helpful reference for this type of analysis is the annual "Capital Benchmarking Study" published by the Society for Human Resource Management. This report includes data from a number of key industries, including transportation, warehousing, and distribution.
From there, it is a matter of setting performance goals, homing in on your opportunities, evaluating the key human resource processes involved, and establishing new best practices to optimize your company's performance. Open communication and collaboration across the organization is essential for a successful metrics program.
As you move forward, compare the various metrics outlined here, using the same time frame so that you can accurately identify any improvement or decline in performance. Over time, as process adjustments are made and new practices are institutionalized, the impact on your company's bottom line will become clear.
And the next time you're asked, "Are your HR practices effective?" you'll be able to provide an answer that is based on facts.
Businesses are cautiously optimistic as peak holiday shipping season draws near, with many anticipating year-over-year sales increases as they continue to battle challenging supply chain conditions.
That’s according to the DHL 2024 Peak Season Shipping Survey, released today by express shipping service provider DHL Express U.S. The company surveyed small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to gauge their holiday business outlook compared to last year and found that a mix of optimism and “strategic caution” prevail ahead of this year’s peak.
Nearly half (48%) of the SMEs surveyed said they expect higher holiday sales compared to 2023, while 44% said they expect sales to remain on par with last year, and just 8% said they foresee a decline. Respondents said the main challenges to hitting those goals are supply chain problems (35%), inflation and fluctuating consumer demand (34%), staffing (16%), and inventory challenges (14%).
But respondents said they have strategies in place to tackle those issues. Many said they began preparing for holiday season earlier this year—with 45% saying they started planning in Q2 or earlier, up from 39% last year. Other strategies include expanding into international markets (35%) and leveraging holiday discounts (32%).
Sixty percent of respondents said they will prioritize personalized customer service as a way to enhance customer interactions and loyalty this year. Still others said they will invest in enhanced web and mobile experiences (23%) and eco-friendly practices (13%) to draw customers this holiday season.
The practice consists of 5,000 professionals from Accenture and from Avanade—the consulting firm’s joint venture with Microsoft. They will be supported by Microsoft product specialists who will work closely with the Accenture Center for Advanced AI. Together, that group will collaborate on AI and Copilot agent templates, extensions, plugins, and connectors to help organizations leverage their data and gen AI to reduce costs, improve efficiencies and drive growth, they said on Thursday.
Accenture and Avanade say they have already developed some AI tools for these applications. For example, a supplier discovery and risk agent can deliver real-time market insights, agile supply chain responses, and better vendor selection, which could result in up to 15% cost savings. And a procure-to-pay agent could improve efficiency by up to 40% and enhance vendor relations and satisfaction by addressing urgent payment requirements and avoiding disruptions of key services
Likewise, they have also built solutions for clients using Microsoft 365 Copilot technology. For example, they have created Copilots for a variety of industries and functions including finance, manufacturing, supply chain, retail, and consumer goods and healthcare.
Another part of the new practice will be educating clients how to use the technology, using an “Azure Generative AI Engineer Nanodegree program” to teach users how to design, build, and operationalize AI-driven applications on Azure, Microsoft’s cloud computing platform. The online classes will teach learners how to use AI models to solve real-world problems through automation, data insights, and generative AI solutions, the firms said.
“We are pleased to deepen our collaboration with Accenture to help our mutual customers develop AI-first business processes responsibly and securely, while helping them drive market differentiation,” Judson Althoff, executive vice president and chief commercial officer at Microsoft, said in a release. “By bringing together Copilots and human ambition, paired with the autonomous capabilities of an agent, we can accelerate AI transformation for organizations across industries and help them realize successful business outcomes through pragmatic innovation.”
Census data showed that overall retail sales in October were up 0.4% seasonally adjusted month over month and up 2.8% unadjusted year over year. That compared with increases of 0.8% month over month and 2% year over year in September.
October’s core retail sales as defined by NRF — based on the Census data but excluding automobile dealers, gasoline stations and restaurants — were unchanged seasonally adjusted month over month but up 5.4% unadjusted year over year.
Core sales were up 3.5% year over year for the first 10 months of the year, in line with NRF’s forecast for 2024 retail sales to grow between 2.5% and 3.5% over 2023. NRF is forecasting that 2024 holiday sales during November and December will also increase between 2.5% and 3.5% over the same time last year.
“October’s pickup in retail sales shows a healthy pace of spending as many consumers got an early start on holiday shopping,” NRF Chief Economist Jack Kleinhenz said in a release. “October sales were a good early step forward into the holiday shopping season, which is now fully underway. Falling energy prices have likely provided extra dollars for household spending on retail merchandise.”
Despite that positive trend, market watchers cautioned that retailers still need to offer competitive value propositions and customer experience in order to succeed in the holiday season. “The American consumer has been more resilient than anyone could have expected. But that isn’t a free pass for retailers to under invest in their stores,” Nikki Baird, VP of strategy & product at Aptos, a solutions provider of unified retail technology based out of Alpharetta, Georgia, said in a statement. “They need to make investments in labor, customer experience tech, and digital transformation. It has been too easy to kick the can down the road until you suddenly realize there’s no road left.”
A similar message came from Chip West, a retail and consumer behavior expert at the marketing, packaging, print and supply chain solutions provider RRD. “October’s increase proved to be slightly better than projections and was likely boosted by lower fuel prices. As inflation slowed for a number of months, prices in several categories have stabilized, with some even showing declines, offering further relief to consumers,” West said. “The data also looks to be a positive sign as we kick off the holiday shopping season. Promotions and discounts will play a prominent role in holiday shopping behavior as they are key influencers in consumer’s purchasing decisions.”
Third-party logistics (3PL) providers’ share of large real estate leases across the U.S. rose significantly through the third quarter of 2024 compared to the same time last year, as more retailers and wholesalers have been outsourcing their warehouse and distribution operations to 3PLs, according to a report from real estate firm CBRE.
Specifically, 3PLs’ share of bulk industrial leasing activity—covering leases of 100,000 square feet or more—rose to 34.1% through Q3 of this year from 30.6% through Q3 last year. By raw numbers, 3PLs have accounted for 498 bulk leases so far this year, up by 9% from the 457 at this time last year.
By category, 3PLs’ share of 34.1% ranked above other occupier types such as: general retail and wholesale (26.6), food and beverage (9.0), automobiles, tires, and parts (7.9), manufacturing (6.2), building materials and construction (5.6), e-commerce only (5.6), medical (2.7), and undisclosed (2.3).
On a quarterly basis, bulk leasing by 3PLs has steadily increased this year, reversing the steadily decreasing trend of 2023. CBRE pointed to three main reasons for that resurgence:
Import Flexibility. Labor disruptions, extreme weather patterns, and geopolitical uncertainty have led many companies to diversify their import locations. Using 3PLs allows for more inventory flexibility, a key component to retailer success in times of uncertainty.
Capital Allocation/Preservation. Warehousing and distribution of goods is expensive, draining capital resources for transportation costs, rent, or labor. But outsourcing to 3PLs provides companies with more flexibility to increase or decrease their inventories without any risk of signing their own lease commitments. And using a 3PL also allows companies to switch supply chain costs from capital to operational expenses.
Focus on Core Competency. Outsourcing their logistics operations to 3PLs allows companies to focus on core business competencies that drive revenue, such as product development, sales, and customer service.
Looking into the future, these same trends will continue to drive 3PL warehouse demand, CBRE said. Economic, geopolitical and supply chain uncertainty will remain prevalent in the coming quarters but will not diminish the need to effectively manage inventory levels.
That result came from the company’s “GEP Global Supply Chain Volatility Index,” an indicator tracking demand conditions, shortages, transportation costs, inventories, and backlogs based on a monthly survey of 27,000 businesses. The October index number was -0.39, which was up only slightly from its level of -0.43 in September.
Researchers found a steep rise in slack across North American supply chains due to declining factory activity in the U.S. In fact, purchasing managers at U.S. manufacturers made their strongest cutbacks to buying volumes in nearly a year and a half, indicating that factories in the world's largest economy are preparing for lower production volumes, GEP said.
Elsewhere, suppliers feeding Asia also reported spare capacity in October, albeit to a lesser degree than seen in Western markets. Europe's industrial plight remained a key feature of the data in October, as vendor capacity was significantly underutilized, reflecting a continuation of subdued demand in key manufacturing hubs across the continent.
"We're in a buyers' market. October is the fourth straight month that suppliers worldwide reported spare capacity, with notable contractions in factory demand across North America and Europe, underscoring the challenging outlook for Western manufacturers," Todd Bremer, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "President-elect Trump inherits U.S. manufacturers with plenty of spare capacity while in contrast, China's modest rebound and strong expansion in India demonstrate greater resilience in Asia."