Steve Geary is adjunct faculty at the University of Tennessee's Haaslam College of Business and is a lecturer at The Gordon Institute at Tufts University. He is the president of the Supply Chain Visions family of companies, consultancies that work across the government sector. Steve is a contributing editor at DC Velocity, and editor-at-large for CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly.
As consumers we're accustomed to next-day, or even same-day, delivery with a point and a click. Those expectations are now flowing from the B2C (business-to-consumer) world into the B2B (business-to-business) space. That, all by itself, is a challenge. Then a disruption happens. Strike. Trade war. Flood. Hurricane. Tornado. Wild fire. The list goes on.
When it comes to responding effectively to disruptions, commercial supply chains could find inspiration from a surprising source: the public sector. One good place to start is the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA).
With about US$35 billion in annual sales and 27,000 employees around the globe, DLA is perhaps the largest distributor you've never heard of. Headquartered just outside of Washington, D.C., DLA is the U.S. Department of Defense's (DoD's) logistics support agency. DLA manages a global supply chain—from raw materials to end user to disposition—for the U.S. Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, Coast Guard, 10 combatant commands, other federal agencies, and partner and allied nations.
If DLA was a publicly traded company, it would be in the Fortune 100, bigger than Coca-Cola. DLA supplies about 85 percent of the military's spare parts and nearly 100 percent of its fuel and troop support consumables (including food), manages the reutilization of military equipment, provides catalogs and other logistics information products, and offers document automation and production services to a host of military and federal agencies.
Earning its keep
What is interesting about DLA—and makes it a relevant comparison for commercial distributors—is the way it's funded. Unlike most U.S. government operations, DLA is not funded directly by Congress. Instead, it earns its keep.
In practice, DLA runs similarly to a commercial business. DLA maintains what is called a working capital fund, originally created decades ago, and it uses this fund to procure inventory. DLA then "resells" that inventory to its government customers with a modest markup and collects the proceeds. Working capital flows back into the fund, with markup used to fund continuing operations.
Naturally, the government has a name for the markup. They call it a "cost recovery rate." Every year, DLA adjusts the recovery rates to keep ongoing operations running at breakeven. DLA runs like a business, and it competes.
And it does so while operating a globally ready and responsive enterprise. After all, answering rapid shifts in demand patterns is an essential part of any humanitarian relief mission, natural disaster response effort, or military operation.
Ready position
The private sector could learn a thing or two from DLA about handling supply chain disruptions. One key part of handling a disruption is simply readiness. Donnie Thompson, chief of Deployment and Training for DLA Distribution's Expeditionary Logistics division, says that it's imperative for operations to be prepared that things might not go according to plan. "Contingencies happen at a moment's notice," he says in an article published by the DLA Public Affairs Office. "We have to be adaptable, flexible, and understand that missions don't always go by the book—we have to be ready anyway."
How DLA does this is spelled out in its 10-year strategic plan: "The speed and complexity of global crises require resilient networks, robust partnerships, and quickly integrated teams. We will position resources for rapid use, build more deployable capabilities, and strengthen our partnerships using integrated logistics and contracting services."
As a case in point, consider what DLA Distribution calls its "deployable capability." For example, DLA Distribution has gone into the field after Hurricane Ike, dropped into two different locations in Afghanistan in 2010 and 2011, and supported Operation United Assistance—a response to the Ebola outbreak—in 2014. It provides a modular, scalable, and fully deployable distribution capability. When activated, the assessment team arrives on site within 48 hours, and the main body deploys within 96 hours. If force protection is required, the military provides it.
Most operations are not able to deploy this fast, but some do. Waffle House has a fleet of mobile restaurants on wheels. The Red Cross can set up in a matter of hours. The U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has essential life-support supplies cached around the country, ready to mobilize on demand.Â
In each of these cases, the mission defines the operational strategies. DLA's published mission is to "provide an agile, global DoD Distribution network that delivers effective and efficient distribution solutions." That mission means that DLA has to be ready to go anywhere at any time, including inserting into dangerous places. They find a way.
That concept flows down to another pillar of the 10-year strategic plan, a reliance on partnerships to achieve adaptability, flexibility, and agility. Specifically, the plan advises DLA to "work with industry to ensure a capable defense industrial base, generate innovative and efficient solutions, and maintain a secure and resilient supply chain. By building on our strong relationships with industry partners we'll deliver cost-effective, innovative solutions. An agency supplier engagement plan will guide us. We will continuously assess the strength of our industrial capabilities and develop responses to vulnerabilities, reduce single points of failure, and implement best practices." The days of a vertically integrated supply chain are over; we need to work as a team across organizational boundaries.
We all benchmark against our commercial counterparts. Maybe it's time to include capable government operations in the mix. DLA has over 200 locations in the continental United States and another 30 or so dispersed around the world. Go knock on its door; the people there would love to show you around. (I recommend checking out DLA Distribution's Susquehanna facility, located in New Cumberland, Pennsylvania.) They know the warfighter comes first, but they understand that the taxpayer is not far behind.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.
That percentage is even greater than the 13.21% of total retail sales that were returned. Measured in dollars, returns (including both legitimate and fraudulent) last year reached $685 billion out of the $5.19 trillion in total retail sales.
“It’s clear why retailers want to limit bad actors that exhibit fraudulent and abusive returns behavior, but the reality is that they are finding stricter returns policies are not reducing the returns fraud they face,” Michael Osborne, CEO of Appriss Retail, said in a release.
Specifically, the report lists the leading types of returns fraud and abuse reported by retailers in 2024, including findings that:
60% of retailers surveyed reported incidents of “wardrobing,” or the act of consumers buying an item, using the merchandise, and then returning it.
55% cited cases of returning an item obtained through fraudulent or stolen tender, such as stolen credit cards, counterfeit bills, gift cards obtained through fraudulent means or fraudulent checks.
48% of retailers faced occurrences of returning stolen merchandise.
Together, those statistics show that the problem remains prevalent despite growing efforts by retailers to curb retail returns fraud through stricter returns policies, while still offering a sufficiently open returns policy to keep customers loyal, they said.
“Returns are a significant cost for retailers, and the rise of online shopping could increase this trend,” Kevin Mahoney, managing director, retail, Deloitte Consulting LLP, said. “As retailers implement policies to address this issue, they should avoid negatively affecting customer loyalty and retention. Effective policies should reduce losses for the retailer while minimally impacting the customer experience. This approach can be crucial for long-term success.”