Gary Frantz is a contributing editor for CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly and a veteran communications executive with more than 30 years of experience in the transportation and logistics industries. He's served as communications director and strategic media relations counselor for companies including XPO Logistics, Con-way, Menlo Logistics, GT Nexus, Circle International Group, and Consolidated Freightways. Gary is currently principal of GNF Communications LLC, a consultancy providing freelance writing, editorial and media strategy services. He's a proud graduate of the Journalism program at California State University–Chico.
The U.S. trucking industry chalked up a record year in 2018, one that arguably was the best the industry has seen in decades, if not in its history. Most truckload and less-than-truckload (LTL) carriers set new high-water marks for freight tonnage, revenues, and profits as the economy surged, e-commerce continued its rapid growth, and businesses pulled forward inventory in advance of the Trump administration's China tariffs.
"I've been in this business 40 years and have never seen a year that busy," notes Marty Freeman, executive vice president and chief operating officer of Old Dominion Freight Line.
Article Figures
[Figure 1] National average linehaul truckload (van) rates and fuel surchargesEnlarge this image
But 2018 is proving to be a tough act to follow. Demand for motor freight services in 2019 has softened. Last year there were an average of six truckload shipments vying for every one truck; this year, there are three truckload shipments competing for space on one truck. Dry-van truckload spot-market rates in July versus last year were down nearly 19% (see Figure 1), and the pricing pendulum has begun to swing back in the shipper's favor. Carriers are carefully trimming their fleets and scaling back truck purchases this year as the new capacity brought online to handle last year's surging volumes is now competing for fewer shipments.
Last year, when truckload capacity tightened, heavier shipments—typically those around 10,000 to 15,000 pounds—migrated from truckload fleets to LTL carriers, boosting LTL tonnage. That trend has reversed itself this year; those heavier shipments are transitioning back to truckload operators. At the same time, the explosion of e-commerce-generated freight is changing the profile of shipments—and tonnage handled—in LTL carrier networks. It's driving smaller, lighter, and more frequent shipments to and from more distribution centers strategically located to enable next-day—and in some cases same-day—delivery of goods to the end-user.
On balance, carrier executives are cautiously optimistic about the year aheadand expect capacity to gradually tighten as the year progresses. Yet the road ahead is not without challenges. "We are coming into some really critical periods," says Jim Fields, chief operating officer for LTL carrier Pitt Ohio. "Fortunately, the economy is still doing OK, still growing."
A challenging future
So, what's keeping trucking executives up at night? One of the big challenges, Fields believes, is managing the escalation of costs. "They're going up for all service providers," he says. Trucking executives are seeing constant increases in virtually every expense involved in running their businesses—from driver wages to maintenance to health insurance and the cost of tires, trucks, and trailers.
Another factor to keep a close eye on is the December deadline set by the U.S. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration for trucking operators to implement upgraded electronic logging devices (ELDs) to improve compliance with driver hours-of-service (HOS) regulations. For larger carriers, it's a technology mandate they are well on their way toward meeting. For smaller carriers, however, issues around the selection of a technology provider and the timing of the implementation may lead to missed deadlines and end up affecting industry capacity at year-end.
Fleets that already have upgraded their ELDs, however, are seeing a positive result: the number of HOS violations has been reduced by half. "[With] fewer hours-of-service violations, you have fewer vehicles ordered out of service. That opens up capacity you might not otherwise have available," says Bart De Muynck, research vice president, transportation technology, for the research firm Gartner Inc.
The potential benefits of upgraded ELDs and their data could go beyond regulatory compliance, says Darren Hawkins, chief executive of the LTL carrier YRC Worldwide. He believes that a trusted third-party clearinghouse, such as the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), could gather and analyze ELD data to provide insights about traffic and freight flows, time-of-day issues, detention, and more.
One issue that still remains unresolved is who owns the data gathered by the ELD and how this data will be used. "Many of the ELD contracts state that the telematics vendors own the data, and they can sell it ... to a third party," De Muynck says.
This idea of "infonomics" is very contentious, according to De Muynck. "Carriers understand their data is getting monetized," he says. "At some point, they are going to say, 'Give me a cut of that revenue, or I won't give you my data anymore.'"
Indeed, the growing importance of data and the speed of technological change has made having a cohesive technology strategy crucial for trucking companies, according to Pat Martin, corporate vice president of sales for LTL carrier Estes Express Lines.
"Today, data—how you capture, use, share, and manage it—has become just as important as the movement of the freight itself," says Martin. "Our ability to give [customers] visibility from the pickup all the way through to a clear delivery is critical. They are expecting shorter and shorter transit times and [setting] tighter delivery windows. We have to have the technology in place to deliver on those expectations."
Technology is important, but without drivers to move the freight, the industry will see increasing challenges in maintaining, much less growing, capacity. For now, driver recruitment and retention remain a universal concern for trucking companies, as more drivers reach retirement age and fewer younger driver replace them. A recent analysis by the American Trucking Associations threw this challenge into stark relief: If current trends continue, the industry could face a shortage of 160,000 drivers by 2028.
And that concern will not be eased by recently enacted federal regulations that set across-the-board standards for entry-level driver training. Essentially, under the new rules, candidates who want to enter the industry will need a certificate of completion or diploma from a certified driving school in order to get a commercial driver's license (CDL). But third-party schools today already are at capacity, says Greg Orr, president of truckload carrier CFI. "That's potentially a chokepoint in the industry's ability to produce enough drivers with the required training," he says. "And that will impact capacity."
Finally, crumbling infrastructure and increasing congestion also made the list of carrier executives' top concerns. "America's roads and bridges are dangerously deteriorated, and our interstate system is over 60 years old," notes John Smith, president and chief executive of FedEx Freight. "Our federal and state governments need to work toward modernizing our infrastructure ... and [to] adopt common-sense policy solutions, such as [allowing the use of] longer-combination vehicles to increase the efficiency, safety, and capacity of our transportation system."
It's not just potholes and aging bridges that are a concern. An ATRI study found that the U.S. trucking industry lost 1.2 billion hours in congestion-related delays on the national highway system in 2016—the equivalent of 425,000 commercial truck drivers sitting idle for an entire year. That's an image oddly out of sync with the nation's growing appetite for next-day and same-day delivery.
Shipper of choice
All of the issues and concerns cited above make shipper-carrier relationships more crucial than ever before. Indeed, the Great Freight Market of 2018 cemented the concept that it pays to be a "shipper of choice." During that period of time, carriers with scarce capacity gravitated to those shippers who demonstrated a desire to collaborate and cooperate rather than engage in old-style transactional relationships. But has the softer market put a damper on that trend?
"I think [shippers] are definitely collaborating now more than ever," says Estes Express' Martin. Most shippers, he says, recognize "a good working relationship is important to make sure they are not causing undue expense for the carrier to move their freight."
Orr, however, has seen more mixed results over the past six months. While some customers still are trying to figure out what they can do to be a shipper of choice, he says that those conversations are not happening with the same frequency they did in 2018.
And yet, Ricky Stover, executive vice president, sales and marketing at the nationwide refrigerated carrier C.R. England, believes that most shippers "have a sincere desire to be good partners and recognize that shippers and carriers have to collaborate more closely." This is crucial because the current market uncertainty makes good carrier-shipper relationships more important than ever before. "We can overcome that better together," he says.
Just 29% of supply chain organizations have the competitive characteristics they’ll need for future readiness, according to a Gartner survey released Tuesday. The survey focused on how organizations are preparing for future challenges and to keep their supply chains competitive.
Gartner surveyed 579 supply chain practitioners to determine the capabilities needed to manage the “future drivers of influence” on supply chains, which include artificial intelligence (AI) achievement and the ability to navigate new trade policies. According to the survey, the five competitive characteristics are: agility, resilience, regionalization, integrated ecosystems, and integrated enterprise strategy.
The survey analysis identified “leaders” among the respondents as supply chain organizations that have already developed at least three of the five competitive characteristics necessary to address the top five drivers of supply chain’s future.
Less than a third have met that threshold.
“Leaders shared a commitment to preparation through long-term, deliberate strategies, while non-leaders were more often focused on short-term priorities,” Pierfrancesco Manenti, vice president analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a statement announcing the survey results.
“Most leaders have yet to invest in the most advanced technologies (e.g. real-time visibility, digital supply chain twin), but plan to do so in the next three-to-five years,” Manenti also said in the statement. “Leaders see technology as an enabler to their overall business strategies, while non-leaders more often invest in technology first, without having fully established their foundational capabilities.”
As part of the survey, respondents were asked to identify the future drivers of influence on supply chain performance over the next three to five years. The top five drivers are: achievement capability of AI (74%); the amount of new ESG regulations and trade policies being released (67%); geopolitical fight/transition for power (65%); control over data (62%); and talent scarcity (59%).
The analysis also identified four unique profiles of supply chain organizations, based on what their leaders deem as the most crucial capabilities for empowering their organizations over the next three to five years.
First, 54% of retailers are looking for ways to increase their financial recovery from returns. That’s because the cost to return a purchase averages 27% of the purchase price, which erases as much as 50% of the sales margin. But consumers have their own interests in mind: 76% of shoppers admit they’ve embellished or exaggerated the return reason to avoid a fee, a 39% increase from 2023 to 204.
Second, return experiences matter to consumers. A whopping 80% of shoppers stopped shopping at a retailer because of changes to the return policy—a 34% increase YoY.
Third, returns fraud and abuse is top-of-mind-for retailers, with wardrobing rising 38% in 2024. In fact, over two thirds (69%) of shoppers admit to wardrobing, which is the practice of buying an item for a specific reason or event and returning it after use. Shoppers also practice bracketing, or purchasing an item in a variety of colors or sizes and then returning all the unwanted options.
Fourth, returns come with a steep cost in terms of sustainability, with returns amounting to 8.4 billion pounds of landfill waste in 2023 alone.
“As returns have become an integral part of the shopper experience, retailers must balance meeting sky-high expectations with rising costs, environmental impact, and fraudulent behaviors,” Amena Ali, CEO of Optoro, said in the firm’s “2024 Returns Unwrapped” report. “By understanding shoppers’ behaviors and preferences around returns, retailers can create returns experiences that embrace their needs while driving deeper loyalty and protecting their bottom line.”
Facing an evolving supply chain landscape in 2025, companies are being forced to rethink their distribution strategies to cope with challenges like rising cost pressures, persistent labor shortages, and the complexities of managing SKU proliferation.
1. Optimize labor productivity and costs. Forward-thinking businesses are leveraging technology to get more done with fewer resources through approaches like slotting optimization, automation and robotics, and inventory visibility.
2. Maximize capacity with smart solutions. With e-commerce volumes rising, facilities need to handle more SKUs and orders without expanding their physical footprint. That can be achieved through high-density storage and dynamic throughput.
3. Streamline returns management. Returns are a growing challenge, thanks to the continued growth of e-commerce and the consumer practice of bracketing. Businesses can handle that with smarter reverse logistics processes like automated returns processing and reverse logistics visibility.
4. Accelerate order fulfillment with robotics. Robotic solutions are transforming the way orders are fulfilled, helping businesses meet customer expectations faster and more accurately than ever before by using autonomous mobile robots (AMRs and robotic picking.
5. Enhance end-of-line packaging. The final step in the supply chain is often the most visible to customers. So optimizing packaging processes can reduce costs, improve efficiency, and support sustainability goals through automated packaging systems and sustainability initiatives.
Geopolitical rivalries, alliances, and aspirations are rewiring the global economy—and the imposition of new tariffs on foreign imports by the U.S. will accelerate that process, according to an analysis by Boston Consulting Group (BCG).
Without a broad increase in tariffs, world trade in goods will keep growing at an average of 2.9% annually for the next eight years, the firm forecasts in its report, “Great Powers, Geopolitics, and the Future of Trade.” But the routes goods travel will change markedly as North America reduces its dependence on China and China builds up its links with the Global South, which is cementing its power in the global trade map.
“Global trade is set to top $29 trillion by 2033, but the routes these goods will travel is changing at a remarkable pace,” Aparna Bharadwaj, managing director and partner at BCG, said in a release. “Trade lanes were already shifting from historical patterns and looming US tariffs will accelerate this. Navigating these new dynamics will be critical for any global business.”
To understand those changes, BCG modeled the direct impact of the 60/25/20 scenario (60% tariff on Chinese goods, a 25% on goods from Canada and Mexico, and a 20% on imports from all other countries). The results show that the tariffs would add $640 billion to the cost of importing goods from the top ten U.S. import nations, based on 2023 levels, unless alternative sources or suppliers are found.
In terms of product categories imported by the U.S., the greatest impact would be on imported auto parts and automotive vehicles, which would primarily affect trade with Mexico, the EU, and Japan. Consumer electronics, electrical machinery, and fashion goods would be most affected by higher tariffs on Chinese goods. Specifically, the report forecasts that a 60% tariff rate would add $61 billion to cost of importing consumer electronics products from China into the U.S.
That strategy is described by RILA President Brian Dodge in a document titled “2025 Retail Public Policy Agenda,” which begins by describing leading retailers as “dynamic and multifaceted businesses that begin on Main Street and stretch across the world to bring high value and affordable consumer goods to American families.”
RILA says its policy priorities support that membership in four ways:
Investing in people. Retail is for everyone; the place for a first job, 2nd chance, third act, or a side hustle – the retail workforce represents the American workforce.
Ensuring a safe, sustainable future. RILA is working with lawmakers to help shape policies that protect our customers and meet expectations regarding environmental concerns.
Leading in the community. Retail is more than a store; we are an integral part of the fabric of our communities.
“As Congress and the Trump administration move forward to adopt policies that reduce regulatory burdens, create economic growth, and bring value to American families, understanding how such policies will impact retailers and the communities we serve is imperative,” Dodge said. “RILA and its member companies look forward to collaborating with policymakers to provide industry-specific insights and data to help shape any policies under consideration.”