Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Afterword

A threat to globalization?

It is not pessimism to assume that in a highly complex supply chain, something will go wrong somewhere at some time and that preparation for such an eventuality is essential.

Financial crises. Volatile fuel costs. Political upheaval. Global warming. These are only a few of the hazards keeping supply chain managers up at night.

That supply chains are vulnerable to a host of threats is not news. For the last several years, nearly every supply chain- or logistics-related conference has featured presentations on supply chain resilience, adaptability, or agility. It is not pessimism to assume that in a highly complex supply chain, something will go wrong somewhere at some time and that preparation for such an eventuality is essential.


The vulnerability of supply chains and what that could mean for globalization has even reached the pages of Foreign Affairs, a journal that usually focuses more on issues of war, peace, and diplomacy than on business concerns. In an article titled "Freight Pain" in the November/December 2008 issue, economist Marc Levinson argues that high fuel prices and the diminished reliability of global transportation networks will force U.S. businesses to source closer to home and hold larger inventories. Tougher security measures and requirements for reducing carbon footprints will only add to the pressure. The result will be higher costs and a slowdown in the growth of globalization, says Levinson, who has also authored a book on the history of containerization.

Supply chain executives are acutely aware of these risks, according to a recent study published by the global consulting giant McKinsey & Company in its business journal, The McKinsey Quarterly. The survey of corporate-level and operations executives in 49 countries revealed a consensus that supply chain risk is rising sharply. "Executives point to the that many companies are doing the results of the survey suggest financial volatility as top energy prices, and increasing greater complexity of products and services, higher factors influencing their supply chain strategies," the report said.

What is surprising is that precious little to mitigate or prepare for those risks. "Despite the importance respondents place on these trends," the report says, "relatively few say that their companies are acting on them."

Given the severe challenges that businesses around the world face right now, their lack of action could be discouraging news. If we fail to manage these and other risks, could Levinson's dire predictions come true? Will we see companies retreat from their global supply chains?

I suspect economies today are too interconnected to derail globalization for long. But those companies that choose to imitate Nero and merely fiddle while links in their supply chains weaken will pay a heavy price.

Recent

More Stories

Just 29% of supply chain organizations are prepared to meet future readiness demands

Just 29% of supply chain organizations are prepared to meet future readiness demands

Just 29% of supply chain organizations have the competitive characteristics they’ll need for future readiness, according to a Gartner survey released Tuesday. The survey focused on how organizations are preparing for future challenges and to keep their supply chains competitive.

Gartner surveyed 579 supply chain practitioners to determine the capabilities needed to manage the “future drivers of influence” on supply chains, which include artificial intelligence (AI) achievement and the ability to navigate new trade policies. According to the survey, the five competitive characteristics are: agility, resilience, regionalization, integrated ecosystems, and integrated enterprise strategy.

Keep ReadingShow less

Featured

screen shot of returns apps on different devices

Optoro: 69% of shoppers admit to “wardrobing” fraud

With returns now a routine part of the shopping journey, technology provider Optoro says a recent survey has identified four trends influencing shopper preferences and retailer priorities.

First, 54% of retailers are looking for ways to increase their financial recovery from returns. That’s because the cost to return a purchase averages 27% of the purchase price, which erases as much as 50% of the sales margin. But consumers have their own interests in mind: 76% of shoppers admit they’ve embellished or exaggerated the return reason to avoid a fee, a 39% increase from 2023 to 204.

Keep ReadingShow less
robots carry goods through a warehouse

Fortna: rethink your distribution strategy for 2025

Facing an evolving supply chain landscape in 2025, companies are being forced to rethink their distribution strategies to cope with challenges like rising cost pressures, persistent labor shortages, and the complexities of managing SKU proliferation.

But according to the systems integrator Fortna, businesses can remain competitive if they focus on five core areas:

Keep ReadingShow less
shopper uses smartphone in retail store

EY lists five ways to fortify omnichannel retail

In the fallout from the pandemic, the term “omnichannel” seems both out of date and yet more vital than ever, according to a study from consulting firm EY.

That clash has come as retailers have been hustling to adjust to pandemic swings like a renewed focus on e-commerce, then swiftly reimagining store experiences as foot traffic returned. But even as the dust settles from those changes, retailers are now facing renewed questions about how best to define their omnichannel strategy in a world where customers have increasing power and information.

Keep ReadingShow less
artistic image of a building roof

BCG: tariffs would accelerate change in global trade flows

Geopolitical rivalries, alliances, and aspirations are rewiring the global economy—and the imposition of new tariffs on foreign imports by the U.S. will accelerate that process, according to an analysis by Boston Consulting Group (BCG).

Without a broad increase in tariffs, world trade in goods will keep growing at an average of 2.9% annually for the next eight years, the firm forecasts in its report, “Great Powers, Geopolitics, and the Future of Trade.” But the routes goods travel will change markedly as North America reduces its dependence on China and China builds up its links with the Global South, which is cementing its power in the global trade map.

Keep ReadingShow less