Trade wars and tariffs: Understanding the risks to your supply chain
The U.S. tariffs on goods imported from China will have far-reaching effects beyond the two countries involved. Even seemingly not effected companies may need to reassess their sourcing strategies.
There is still a lot of uncertainty swirling around what effect the U.S.-China trade war will have on the global economy.
One way to gain a sense of how tariffs are affecting global trade is to look at IHS Markit's Global Purchasing Managers' Indices (PMIs). The Global PMI has proven to be a reliable indication of world trade dynamics. (Figure 1, for example, shows how the Global Manufacturing PMI for new export orders is a leading indicator of world trade volumes.) The PMI is a series of diffusion indices, where a reading of more than 50 on an index indicates growth, while a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
Article Figures
[Figure 1] New export orders index leads world trade dynamicsEnlarge this image
[Figure 2] Change in market share for the goods subject to tariffsEnlarge this image
Since 2019, the IHS Markit Global PMI has been below 50, indicating that global trade has been contracting. IHS Markit believes that this weakness in global trade has been largely brought about by substantial changes in U.S. tariffs on goods imported from China.
In the past year and a half, the United States has imposed tariffs on three different lists or tranches of goods and has identified a fourth. The first three rounds of tariffs have already resulted in a significant shift away from China and to other countries of origin for goods imported into the United States. Mexico, Taiwan, and South Korea have all gained noteworthy market share. Tranche four, the last to go into effect, stands to see further erosion of Chinese market share as trade shifts substantially toward Vietnam. (See Figure 2.)
As country of origin shifts away from China and toward other markets, there will be reverberating effects elsewhere in all major markets—those in which goods will now be sourced, as well as across all markets that are buyers and consumers of those goods. Those effects will include changes in consumption, changes in production, and changes in investment. These market disruptions will cause the global economy to migrate to a new and suboptimal equilibrium. Under that scenario, the United States and China are both losers as measured by real gross domestic product (GDP), with the United States set to experience a 0.9 percent deviation from baseline and China set to experience a slightly larger deviation of 1.4 percent. Perhaps the most underappreciated fact in the narrative of this bilateral trade war is that the rest of the world will be negatively impacted by it as well, if not to the same degree as the primary participants. IHS Markit estimates that the global economy, at peak impact in 2021, will experience a 0.6 percent deviation from baseline real GDP. (See Figure 3.)
This analysis highlights the broad effects of the ongoing trade war between the United States and China. It is negatively impacting markets beyond those two countries and is resulting in multiplicative impacts in the economy beyond a reduction in trade, including changes in consumption patterns, production, and investment. In other words, the U.S. tariffs have implications for all companies with a global footprint, whether they are exposed to the Chinese market or not. It is incumbent upon each and every company to understand the risks in their current global footprint and the opportunities in new markets to ensure the best response.
Understanding your risks
It's not just tariff increases and the threat of an outright trade war between the United States and China that have led global manufacturers, retailers, and consumer brands to reassess their global supply chains and their sourcing and procurement costs. Other recent political events—such as the uncertainty around an open European marketplace after Brexit and the pending ratification of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA)—will also have an impact on global supply chains.
These events emphasize how necessary it is for companies to pay attention to broader geopolitical events and trends and understand their possible economic ramifications. Furthermore, new risks are present today that firms didn't have to deal with a decade ago and even more will emerge tomorrow—driven by policy uncertainty, shifting bilateral and multilateral alliances, the expansion of consumers in new regions, and new patterns of unrest. Failing to identify the pertinent risks is incredibly expensive—realized through delayed investment and unforeseen losses.
Companies need to take a more rigorous and quantitatively justified approach to their strategic sourcing decisions than they have in the past. When deciding where to source from, it is critical to deploy a holistic decision-making framework informed by the broad spectrum of economic, risk, and industry factors that vary across countries.
There are a series of broad questions that companies should be asking themselves:
How stable and reliable are my current strategic sourcing partner countries? What are the odds of disruption? What are the greatest areas of risk? How are risks evolving over time?
What new strategic sourcing partner countries should I consider? Where do economic, demographic, and risk conditions align? What origin markets already support a product or segment? What origin markets produce adjacent products or segments?
Is my sourcing strategy appropriately diversified? Is my current strategy resilient to local, regional, and global events? Are there hidden or underlying risks that exist across my current strategy?
In a similar fashion, as specific events and developments arise, companies need to analyze how these events could affect their commercial operations. For example:
Will the recent presidential elections in Brazil have substantial effects on the real exchange rate to the U.S. dollar? Could this disrupt our company's input prices?
What effect could labor changes in Southeast Asia (such as changes in wages, labor force availability, and possible industrial actions and disruptions) have on our supply chain network? How would our total costs be impacted?
Could a disruptive event or violence in Latin America, such as large-scale demonstrations against government policy, pose a risk to our in-country team members, facilities, or partners?
How sensitive is our network to changes in the U.S. dollar?
How would a "hard landing," or sudden rapid decline, in the Chinese economy affect our network?
While each company is digesting, measuring, and responding to these critical questions and implications, the global marketplace is constantly changing and growing increasingly complex and interconnected. For example, evolving macroeconomics are dramatically impacting the costs for labor, raw materials, packaging, and shipping, and are doing so differently in countries around the world. Commercially relevant risks, including contract enforcement, labor strikes, and corruption, are increasingly impacting business operations and, sometimes, even strategically impacting companies through reputational risks. Meanwhile policy environments and social conditions, including regulatory, international trade, and tariff regimes, are changing rapidly. Finally, the sourcing behavior of competitors is constantly changing, presenting companies with both new strategic challenges and opportunities.
Companies need to recognize the cost of making the wrong decision, as well as the limitations of their current world view. A proactive and informed strategic sourcing framework is critical to secure existing revenue today and to grow a business tomorrow.
Just 29% of supply chain organizations have the competitive characteristics they’ll need for future readiness, according to a Gartner survey released Tuesday. The survey focused on how organizations are preparing for future challenges and to keep their supply chains competitive.
Gartner surveyed 579 supply chain practitioners to determine the capabilities needed to manage the “future drivers of influence” on supply chains, which include artificial intelligence (AI) achievement and the ability to navigate new trade policies. According to the survey, the five competitive characteristics are: agility, resilience, regionalization, integrated ecosystems, and integrated enterprise strategy.
The survey analysis identified “leaders” among the respondents as supply chain organizations that have already developed at least three of the five competitive characteristics necessary to address the top five drivers of supply chain’s future.
Less than a third have met that threshold.
“Leaders shared a commitment to preparation through long-term, deliberate strategies, while non-leaders were more often focused on short-term priorities,” Pierfrancesco Manenti, vice president analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a statement announcing the survey results.
“Most leaders have yet to invest in the most advanced technologies (e.g. real-time visibility, digital supply chain twin), but plan to do so in the next three-to-five years,” Manenti also said in the statement. “Leaders see technology as an enabler to their overall business strategies, while non-leaders more often invest in technology first, without having fully established their foundational capabilities.”
As part of the survey, respondents were asked to identify the future drivers of influence on supply chain performance over the next three to five years. The top five drivers are: achievement capability of AI (74%); the amount of new ESG regulations and trade policies being released (67%); geopolitical fight/transition for power (65%); control over data (62%); and talent scarcity (59%).
The analysis also identified four unique profiles of supply chain organizations, based on what their leaders deem as the most crucial capabilities for empowering their organizations over the next three to five years.
First, 54% of retailers are looking for ways to increase their financial recovery from returns. That’s because the cost to return a purchase averages 27% of the purchase price, which erases as much as 50% of the sales margin. But consumers have their own interests in mind: 76% of shoppers admit they’ve embellished or exaggerated the return reason to avoid a fee, a 39% increase from 2023 to 204.
Second, return experiences matter to consumers. A whopping 80% of shoppers stopped shopping at a retailer because of changes to the return policy—a 34% increase YoY.
Third, returns fraud and abuse is top-of-mind-for retailers, with wardrobing rising 38% in 2024. In fact, over two thirds (69%) of shoppers admit to wardrobing, which is the practice of buying an item for a specific reason or event and returning it after use. Shoppers also practice bracketing, or purchasing an item in a variety of colors or sizes and then returning all the unwanted options.
Fourth, returns come with a steep cost in terms of sustainability, with returns amounting to 8.4 billion pounds of landfill waste in 2023 alone.
“As returns have become an integral part of the shopper experience, retailers must balance meeting sky-high expectations with rising costs, environmental impact, and fraudulent behaviors,” Amena Ali, CEO of Optoro, said in the firm’s “2024 Returns Unwrapped” report. “By understanding shoppers’ behaviors and preferences around returns, retailers can create returns experiences that embrace their needs while driving deeper loyalty and protecting their bottom line.”
Facing an evolving supply chain landscape in 2025, companies are being forced to rethink their distribution strategies to cope with challenges like rising cost pressures, persistent labor shortages, and the complexities of managing SKU proliferation.
1. Optimize labor productivity and costs. Forward-thinking businesses are leveraging technology to get more done with fewer resources through approaches like slotting optimization, automation and robotics, and inventory visibility.
2. Maximize capacity with smart solutions. With e-commerce volumes rising, facilities need to handle more SKUs and orders without expanding their physical footprint. That can be achieved through high-density storage and dynamic throughput.
3. Streamline returns management. Returns are a growing challenge, thanks to the continued growth of e-commerce and the consumer practice of bracketing. Businesses can handle that with smarter reverse logistics processes like automated returns processing and reverse logistics visibility.
4. Accelerate order fulfillment with robotics. Robotic solutions are transforming the way orders are fulfilled, helping businesses meet customer expectations faster and more accurately than ever before by using autonomous mobile robots (AMRs and robotic picking.
5. Enhance end-of-line packaging. The final step in the supply chain is often the most visible to customers. So optimizing packaging processes can reduce costs, improve efficiency, and support sustainability goals through automated packaging systems and sustainability initiatives.
That clash has come as retailers have been hustling to adjust to pandemic swings like a renewed focus on e-commerce, then swiftly reimagining store experiences as foot traffic returned. But even as the dust settles from those changes, retailers are now facing renewed questions about how best to define their omnichannel strategy in a world where customers have increasing power and information.
The answer may come from a five-part strategy using integrated components to fortify omnichannel retail, EY said. The approach can unlock value and customer trust through great experiences, but only when implemented cohesively, not individually, EY warns.
The steps include:
1. Functional integration: Is your operating model and data infrastructure siloed between e-commerce and physical stores, or have you developed a cohesive unit centered around delivering seamless customer experience?
2. Customer insights: With consumer centricity at the heart of operations, are you analyzing all touch points to build a holistic view of preferences, behaviors, and buying patterns?
3. Next-generation inventory: Given the right customer insights, how are you utilizing advanced analytics to ensure inventory is optimized to meet demand precisely where and when it’s needed?
4. Distribution partnerships: Having ensured your customers find what they want where they want it, how are your distribution strategies adapting to deliver these choices to them swiftly and efficiently?
5. Real estate strategy: How is your real estate strategy interconnected with insights, inventory and distribution to enhance experience and maximize your footprint?
When approached cohesively, these efforts all build toward one overarching differentiator for retailers: a better customer experience that reaches from brand engagement and order placement through delivery and return, the EY study said. Amid continued volatility and an economy driven by complex customer demands, the retailers best set up to win are those that are striving to gain real-time visibility into stock levels, offer flexible fulfillment options and modernize merchandising through personalized and dynamic customer experiences.
Geopolitical rivalries, alliances, and aspirations are rewiring the global economy—and the imposition of new tariffs on foreign imports by the U.S. will accelerate that process, according to an analysis by Boston Consulting Group (BCG).
Without a broad increase in tariffs, world trade in goods will keep growing at an average of 2.9% annually for the next eight years, the firm forecasts in its report, “Great Powers, Geopolitics, and the Future of Trade.” But the routes goods travel will change markedly as North America reduces its dependence on China and China builds up its links with the Global South, which is cementing its power in the global trade map.
“Global trade is set to top $29 trillion by 2033, but the routes these goods will travel is changing at a remarkable pace,” Aparna Bharadwaj, managing director and partner at BCG, said in a release. “Trade lanes were already shifting from historical patterns and looming US tariffs will accelerate this. Navigating these new dynamics will be critical for any global business.”
To understand those changes, BCG modeled the direct impact of the 60/25/20 scenario (60% tariff on Chinese goods, a 25% on goods from Canada and Mexico, and a 20% on imports from all other countries). The results show that the tariffs would add $640 billion to the cost of importing goods from the top ten U.S. import nations, based on 2023 levels, unless alternative sources or suppliers are found.
In terms of product categories imported by the U.S., the greatest impact would be on imported auto parts and automotive vehicles, which would primarily affect trade with Mexico, the EU, and Japan. Consumer electronics, electrical machinery, and fashion goods would be most affected by higher tariffs on Chinese goods. Specifically, the report forecasts that a 60% tariff rate would add $61 billion to cost of importing consumer electronics products from China into the U.S.