The toymaker's bold decision to serve Europe and Asia from the Czech Republic cut logistics costs by 20 percent. But bringing the new operation up to Western European standards wasn't exactly child's play.
If you have children at home, then you probably also have Lego plastic bricks. The colorful, interlocking toys are loved the world over by youngsters who use them to design and construct buildings, vehicles, robots, and other imaginative toys. It's not unusual for children to amass thousands of pieces in all shapes and sizes.
Despite the product's popularity, The Lego Group found itself struggling financially a few years ago, and in 2004 the toymaker's board of directors decided that the company needed to cut 20 percent of its logistics costs. A key step in achieving that objective was consolidating most of Lego's European warehouses and distribution centers (DCs) into one facility located in the Czech Republic. It was a bold move: No other major company had consolidated its regional distribution in Eastern Europe; in fact, none other has done so to date, says Egil Møller Nielsen, vice president of global logistics for Billund, Denmark-based The Lego Group.
It also was a potentially risky decision, Møller Nielsen acknowledges. "To be the first mover had some benefits, but it also had some risks. We decided we wanted to be the first mover," he says.
It turned out to be a risk worth taking. The move to a single distribution center yielded savings that have helped the toymaker's bottom line. In 2008 the company recorded a nearly 19-percent jump in annual revenue to DKK 9,526 million (about US $1.8 billion) with a profit margin of 21 percent.
Given the worldwide economic downturn, sales are unlikely to be as strong in 2009. But Lego is well-positioned to ride out the economic storm, thanks in part to a distribution strategy that will continue to provide a high level of service at a significantly lower cost than in the past.
Advantage: Prague
In 1932 Ole Kirk Christiansen founded what is now the sixth-largest manufacturer of toys in the world. The name Lego is derived from the first two letters of the Danish words "leg godt," which means "play well." Today Lego products are sold in more than 130 countries, with principal markets in the United States and Europe.
Lego's financial problems in 2004 prompted the company to adopt a seven-year strategy called "Shared Vision" to revitalize its sales and profits. At the time, its products were manufactured in Denmark, Switzerland, and the Czech Republic. Lego had 11 warehouses and distribution centers in Denmark, Switzerland, France, and Germany that handled order execution and customer deliveries.
The Danish toymaker recognized that it could cut its logistics costs by consolidating all of its European distribution activities under one roof, save for the Billund, Denmark, warehouse that handles fulfillment of Internet orders. After considering a number of options, Lego settled on Prague in the Czech Republic—a highly unusual decision. "Not many companies have one DC for all of Europe. Normally, they have two, three, or four," observes Møller Nielsen. "If a company has only one DC, it's always located in Germany or the Benelux [BelgiumNetherlands- Luxembourg] area."
Lego chose Prague largely because of its low labor costs. The medieval city, known for its elegant architecture and vibrant arts scene, also offered a larger pool of skilled labor than other Eastern European locations. "We wanted to be close to Prague because of the [workers'] competencies," Møller Nielsen says. "If you were too far away, it would be difficult to get employees who know how to work a complex operation."
The company elected to forgo construction of its own warehouse and instead leased a one-million-square-foot building from the commercial realtor ProLogis. It also decided to hire a third-party logistics company, DHL Exel Supply Chain, to run the day-to-day distribution operation. The main reason why Lego decided to work with a contract logistics company was the seasonal nature of its sales—60 percent occur in the months leading up to the December holidays. "If we had to carry all that [warehousing] capacity ourselves, we would have eight months of a year with huge idle capacity. If you have an outsourcing partner, they can at least try to balance [available capacity] against other customers," Møller Nielsen explains.
It was important that the switch from many warehouses to the single distribution center go smoothly. As Møller Nielsen notes, "Customers and sales don't accept performance interruptions." To minimize the chances of service disruptions during the changeover, Lego conducted its warehouse consolidation in two phases, including a period when it ran parallel operations. In 2006, it closed down five DCs and transferred those operations to the Prague facility. A year later, it closed five more facilities and shifted their responsibilities to the new DC, which by that time was serving all of Lego's markets except the United States.
Transportation shakeup
The move to Prague required Lego to undertake an extensive analysis of its transportation network. Because the adoption of a single distribution hub would profoundly affect its delivery patterns, the company opted to make some changes in its carrier base prior to any relocation. Up to that point, The Lego Group had used 55 transportation providers for inbound and outbound shipments to its 11 warehouses in Europe. It trimmed those ranks to 10 international carriers that could serve not only Europe but also Asian markets. Today the toymaker has at least two carriers handling deliveries to every market it serves.
The carriers' representatives have offices in the Prague DC alongside those of Lego's and DHL's employees. "In our corporation, one day a year we negotiate. The rest of the year we work together," Møller Nielsen says.
Although DHL Exel Supply Chain manages the daily tendering of loads, Lego selects its transportation providers and handles contract negotiations with them. Initially there was some discussion within Lego about which party should handle various aspects of carrier management, says Møller Nielsen. The final decision was that this division of responsibility would be the best way to coordinate activities in the distribution center with inbound and outbound transportation.
Once the new transportation structure was in place, careful planning helped Lego achieve its goal of more efficient line hauls. Working around holidays was a special challenge, as most European countries prohibit truck movements on national highways on those days. "You cannot go from the Czech Republic to the United Kingdom without passing through Germany," Møller Nielsen points out. "So, when we have a delivery scheduled for the U.K., we need to take into consideration when are the [German] bank holidays, because on a bank holiday, you are not allowed to drive the trucks."
Lego also needed to change its shipment scheduling to improve load consolidation. To do that, Lego and DHL together developed a Web-based transportation management system. The software is used to tender loads to carriers, optimize loads, and route shipments, taking into account such factors as the aforementioned holidays to ensure that Lego meets its customers' delivery requirements. Lego and DHL decided to build their own solution to accomplish all this after careful review of the existing packaged solutions. "We couldn't find any solution that provided the things we wanted," explains Møller Nielsen. "We wanted one platform where three or four different parties could access it in real time."
The challenge of knowledge transfer
Transportation wasn't the only issue that Lego confronted when consolidating its distribution operations in the Czech Republic. The relocation meant that the toymaker would need to hire a large number of qualified workers for the new DC. That proved to be more difficult than anyone had anticipated. "We couldn't find people who knew how to drive a forklift in a complex operation," Møller Nielsen says.
Lego and DHL worked together to recruit and train some 400 year-round employees. (In the peak selling season, the labor force climbs to 900 workers.) The goal of the training was to educate the Czech employees, who had little distribution experience, about the ways Lego managed worldwide logistics and order fulfillment.
To collect that knowledge and transfer it to the Czech workers, Lego began to document the steps its existing distribution operations would normally take to meet sales commitments to customers. In many cases, that required the sales staff to describe in detail the obligations included in service-level agreements. "We said to the sales people, if you don't describe it, you won't get it," Møller Nielsen recalls. "If it is a campaign for a customer and we need to do special labeling, we need to describe it."
The process-mapping exercise had an unexpected side benefit. Lego discovered that it was providing customers with additional services that were not only expensive but oftentimes unnecessary. For instance, the toymaker found that it was not achieving complete cube utilization of truck shipments because some customers wanted special-sized pallets that hindered efficient stacking. Some customers had even requested that only one stock-keeping unit be placed on each pallet, even though that meant shipping partial pallet loads. "A lot of things came to the surface," Møller Nielsen says. "A lot of truckloads were only fifty-percent utilized because of [odd] agreements." Thanks to those discoveries, Lego was able to change some of the terms of its sales agreements to eliminate inefficient handling and distribution practices.
Unexpected cost savings
The rationalization of Lego's distribution network and the establishment of the distribution center in Prague turned out to be more successful than the company had originally predicted. For example, Lego now receives inbound loads from manufacturing plants and prepares them for shipment to customers more quickly than it could in the past. Moreover, the move not only achieved the target of 20-percent savings in distribution costs, but Lego could reach the 40-percent mark this year, according to Møller Nielsen.
The reduction in labor costs was only one of several reasons for those savings. Another is that the shift to a single distribution center eliminated unnecessary "touches." "In the old days, most of the product was handled in two or three DCs before it went to a customer," says Møller Nielsen. "Now it's only handled once."
In the past, moreover, several different DCs might have been required to provide a value-added service, such as applying price labels for a particular retailer. Now Lego only needs to train a single group of workers, who can efficiently perform value-added tasks again and again. "We can build the expertise to drive down costs," Møller Nielsen says. "When you bundle things together, you can be more efficient."
The change to a single distribution center also has helped Lego to reduce unnecessary inventory. "If the product was out of stock in one DC, you would fill it with product from another," says Møller Nielsen. "That increased safety stock."
Finally, carrier consolidation greatly reduced Lego's shipping expenses. The company used its leverage as a large-scale shipper to obtain lower freight rates, but it wasn't the only one that benefited from those deals. By committing to a steady volume of shipments to certain markets, Lego gave the transportation providers a base on which they could expand their services between the Czech Republic and other countries. "We asked for services to places like Italy or Norway, and that was new because the carriers had never served there on a regular basis," says Møller Nielsen.
Because it worked with competent partners and took the time to create an efficient operation without compromising service, Lego gained long-term cost benefits that any company would be happy to achieve. Yet, if the move to Eastern Europe has proved to be so successful for Lego, why haven't other companies followed suit and beaten a path to the Czech Republic and neighboring countries? Perhaps the amount of time, effort, and preparation involved are too daunting for most companies. As Møller Nielsen points out, Lego had to build its own foundation for the project's success: "Even when we did this, there were a lot of uncertainties because the competencies aren't there. We had to train people in the Czech Republic to do worldwide logistics."
The practice consists of 5,000 professionals from Accenture and from Avanade—the consulting firm’s joint venture with Microsoft. They will be supported by Microsoft product specialists who will work closely with the Accenture Center for Advanced AI. Together, that group will collaborate on AI and Copilot agent templates, extensions, plugins, and connectors to help organizations leverage their data and gen AI to reduce costs, improve efficiencies and drive growth, they said on Thursday.
Accenture and Avanade say they have already developed some AI tools for these applications. For example, a supplier discovery and risk agent can deliver real-time market insights, agile supply chain responses, and better vendor selection, which could result in up to 15% cost savings. And a procure-to-pay agent could improve efficiency by up to 40% and enhance vendor relations and satisfaction by addressing urgent payment requirements and avoiding disruptions of key services
Likewise, they have also built solutions for clients using Microsoft 365 Copilot technology. For example, they have created Copilots for a variety of industries and functions including finance, manufacturing, supply chain, retail, and consumer goods and healthcare.
Another part of the new practice will be educating clients how to use the technology, using an “Azure Generative AI Engineer Nanodegree program” to teach users how to design, build, and operationalize AI-driven applications on Azure, Microsoft’s cloud computing platform. The online classes will teach learners how to use AI models to solve real-world problems through automation, data insights, and generative AI solutions, the firms said.
“We are pleased to deepen our collaboration with Accenture to help our mutual customers develop AI-first business processes responsibly and securely, while helping them drive market differentiation,” Judson Althoff, executive vice president and chief commercial officer at Microsoft, said in a release. “By bringing together Copilots and human ambition, paired with the autonomous capabilities of an agent, we can accelerate AI transformation for organizations across industries and help them realize successful business outcomes through pragmatic innovation.”
Even as the e-commerce sector overall continues expanding toward a forecasted 41% of all retail sales by 2027, many small to medium e-commerce companies are struggling to find the investment funding they need to increase sales, according to a sector survey from online capital platform Stenn.
Global geopolitical instability and increasing inflation are causing e-commerce firms to face a liquidity crisis, which means companies may not be able to access the funds they need to grow, Stenn’s survey of 500 senior e-commerce leaders found. The research was conducted by Opinion Matters between August 29 and September 5.
Survey findings include:
61.8% of leaders who sought growth capital did so to invest in advanced technologies, such as AI and machine learning, to improve their businesses.
When asked which resources they wished they had more access to, 63.8% of respondents pointed to growth capital.
Women indicated a stronger need for business operations training (51.2%) and financial planning resources (48.8%) compared to men (30.8% and 15.4%).
40% of business owners are seeking external financial advice and mentorship at least once a week to help with business decisions.
Almost half (49.6%) of respondents are proactively forecasting their business activity 6-18 months ahead.
“As e-commerce continues to grow rapidly, driven by increasing online consumer demand and technological innovation, it’s important to remember that capital constraints and access to growth financing remain persistent hurdles for many e-commerce business leaders especially at small and medium-sized businesses,” Noel Hillman, Chief Commercial Officer at Stenn, said in a release. “In this competitive landscape, ensuring liquidity and optimizing supply chain processes are critical to sustaining growth and scaling operations.”
With six keynote and more than 100 educational sessions, CSCMP EDGE 2024 offered a wealth of content. Here are highlights from just some of the presentations.
A great American story
Author and entrepreneur Fawn Weaver closed out the first day of the conference by telling the little-known story of Nathan “Nearest” Green, who was born into slavery, freed after the Civil War, and went on to become the first master distiller for the Jack Daniel’s Whiskey brand. Through extensive research and interviews with descendants of the Daniel and Green families, Weaver discovered what she describes as a positive American story.
She told the story in her best-selling book, Love & Whiskey: The Remarkable True Story of Jack Daniel, His Master Distiller Nearest Green, and the Improbable Rise of Uncle Nearest. That story also inspired her to create Uncle Nearest Premium Whiskey.
Weaver discussed the barriers she encountered in bringing the brand to life, her vision for where it’s headed, and her take on the supply chain—which she views as both a necessary cost of doing business and an opportunity.
“[It’s] an opportunity if you can move quickly,” she said, pointing to a recent project in which the company was able to fast-track a new Uncle Nearest product thanks to close collaboration with its supply chain partners.
A two-pronged business transformation
We may be living in a world full of technology, but strategy and focus remain the top priorities when it comes to managing a business and its supply chains. So says Roberto Isaias, executive vice president and chief supply chain officer for toy manufacturing and entertainment company Mattel.
Isaias emphasized the point during his keynote on day two of EDGE 2024. He described how Mattel transformed itself amid surging demand for Barbie-branded items following the success of the Barbie movie.
That transformation, according to Isaias, came on two fronts: commercially and logistically. Today, Mattel is steadily moving beyond the toy aisle with two films and 13 TV series in production as well as 14 films and 35 shows in development. And as for those supply chain gains? The company has saved millions, increased productivity, and improved profit margins—even amid cost increases and inflation.
A framework for chasing excellence
Most of the time when CEOs present at an industry conference, they like to talk about their companies’ success stories. Not J.B. Hunt’s Shelley Simpson. Speaking at EDGE, the trucking company’s president and CEO led with a story about a time that the company lost a major customer.
According to Simpson, the company had a customer of their dedicated contract business in 2001 that was consistently making late shipments with no lead time. “We were working like crazy to try to satisfy them, and lost their business,” Simpson said.
When the team at J.B. Hunt later met with the customer’s chief supply chain officer and related all they had been doing, the customer responded, “You never shared everything you were doing for us.”
Out of that experience, came J.B. Hunt’s Customer Value Delivery framework. The framework consists of five steps: 1) understand customer needs, 2) deliver expectations, 3) measure results, 4) communicate performance, and 5) anticipate new value.
Next year’s CSCMP EDGE conference on October 5–8 in National Harbor, Md., promises to have a similarly deep lineup of keynote presentations. Register early at www.cscmpedge.org.
2024 was expected to be a bounce-back year for the logistics industry. We had the pandemic in the rearview mirror, and the economy was proving to be more resilient than expected, defying those prognosticators who believed a recession was imminent.
While most of the economy managed to stabilize in 2024, the logistics industry continued to see disruption and changes in international trade. World events conspired to drive much of the narrative surrounding the flow of goods worldwide. Additionally, a diminished reliance on China as a source for goods reduced some of the international trade flow from that manufacturing hub. Some of this trade diverted to other Asian nations, while nearshoring efforts brought some production back to North America, particularly Mexico.
Meanwhile trucking in the United States continued its 2-year recession, highlighted by weaker demand and excess capacity. Both contributed to a slow year, especially for truckload carriers that comprise about 90% of over-the-road shipments.
Labor issues were also front and center in 2024, as ports and rail companies dealt with threats of strikes, which resulted in new contracts and increased costs. Labor—and often a lack of it—continues to be an ongoing concern in the logistics industry.
In this annual issue, we bring a year-end perspective to these topics and more. Our issue is designed to complement CSCMP’s 35th Annual State of Logistics Report, which was released in June, and includes updates that were presented at the CSCMP EDGE conference held in October. In addition to this overview of the market, we have engaged top industry experts to dig into the status of key logistics sectors.
Hopefully as we move into 2025, logistics markets will build on an improving economy and strong consumer demand, while stabilizing those parts of the industry that could use some adrenaline, such as trucking. By this time next year, we hope to see a full recovery as the market fulfills its promise to deliver the needs of our very connected world.
If you feel like your supply chain has been continuously buffeted by external forces over the last few years and that you are constantly having to adjust your operations to tact through the winds of change, you are not alone.
The Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals’ (CSCMP’s) “35th Annual State of Logistics Report” and the subsequent follow-up presentation at the CSCMP EDGE Annual Conference depict a logistics industry facing intense external stresses, such as geopolitical conflict, severe weather events and climate change, labor action, and inflation. The past 18 months have seen all these factors have an impact on demand for transportation and logistics services as well as capacity, freight rates, and overall costs.
The “State of Logistics Report” is an annual study compiled and authored by a team of analysts from Kearney for CSCMP and supported and sponsored by logistics service provider Penske Logistics. The purpose of the report is to provide a snapshot of the logistics industry by assessing macroeconomic conditions and providing a detailed look at its major subsectors.
One of the key metrics the report has tracked every year since its inception in 1988 is U.S. business logistics costs (USBLC). This year’s report found that U.S. business logistics costs went down in 2023 for the first time since the start of the pandemic. As Figure 1 shows, U.S. business logistics costs for 2023 dropped 11.2% year-over-year to $2.4 trillion, or 8.7% of last year’s $27.4 trillion gross domestic product (GDP).
“This was not unexpected,” said Josh Brogan, Kearney partner and lead author of the report, during a press conference in June announcing the results. “After the initial impacts of COVID were felt in 2020, we saw a steady rise of logistics costs, even in terms of total GDP. What we are seeing now is a reversion more toward the mean.”
This breakdown of U.S. Business Logistics Costs for 2023 shows an across-the-board decline in all transportation costs.
CSCMP's 35th Annual "State of Logistics Report"
As a result, Figure 1 shows an across-the-board decline in transportation costs (except for some administrative costs) for the 2023 calendar year. “What such a chart cannot fully capture about this period is the intensification of certain external stressors on the global economy and its logistical networks,” says the report. “These include a growing geopolitical instability that further complicates investment and policy decisions for business leaders and government officials.”Both the report and the follow-up session at the CSCMP EDGE Conference in October provided a vivid picture of the global instability that logistics providers and shippers are facing. These conditions include (but are not limited to):
An intensification of military conflict, with the Red Sea Crisis being particularly top of mind for companies shipping from Asia to Europe or to the eastern part of North America;
Continued fragmentation of global trade, as evidenced by the deepening rift between China and the United States;
Climate change and severe weather events, such as the drought in Panama, which lowered water levels in the Panama Canal, and the two massive hurricanes that ripped through the Southeastern United States;
Labor disputes, such as the three-day port strike which stopped operations at ports along the East and Gulf Coasts of the United States in October; and
Persistent inflation (despite some recent improvement in the United States) and muted global economic growth.
At the same time that the logistics market was dealing with these external factors, it was also facing sluggish freight demand and an ongoing excess of capacity. These twin dynamics have contributed to continued low cargo rates through 2024.
“For 2024, I foresee a generally flat USBLC as a percentage of GDP,” says Brogan. “We did see increases in air and ocean costs in preparation for the East Coast port strike but overall, road freight is down. I think this will balance out with the relatively low level of inflation seen in the general economy.”
Breakdown by mode
The following is a quick review of how the forces outlined above are affecting the primary logistics sectors, as described by the “State of Logistics Report” and the updated presentation given at the CSCMP EDGE Conference in early October.
Trucking: A downturn in consumer demand plus a lingering surplus in capacity led to a plunge in rates in 2023 compared to 2022. Throughout 2024, however, rates have remained relatively stable. Speaking in October, report author Brogan said he expects that trend to continue for the near future. On the capacity side, despite thousands of companies having departed the market since 2022, the number of departures has not been as high as would normally be expected during a down market. Brogan accounts this to investors expecting to see some turbulence in the marketplace and being willing to stick around longer than has traditionally been the case.
Parcel and last mile: Parcel volumes in 2023 were down by 0.5% compared to 2022. Simultaneously, there has been a move away from UPS and FedEx, both of which saw their year-over-year parcel volumes decline in 2023. Nontraditional competitors have taken larger portions of the parcel volume, including Amazon, which passed UPS for the largest parcel carrier in the U.S. in 2023. Additionally, there has been an increasing use of regional providers, as large shippers continue to shift away from “single sourcing” their carrier base. Parcel volumes have increased in 2024, mostly driven by e-commerce. Brogan expects regional providers to claim “the lion’s share” of this volume.
Rail: In 2023, Class I railroads experienced a challenging financial environment, characterized by a 4% increase in operating ratios, a 2% decline in revenue, and an 11% decrease in operating income compared to 2022. These financial troubles were primarily driven by intermodal volume decreases, service challenges, inflationary pressures, escalated fuel and labor expenses, and a surge in employee headcount. The outlook for 2024 is slightly more promising, according to Kearney. Intermodal, often regarded a primary growth driver, has seen increased volumes and market share. Class I railroads are also seeing some positive operational developments with train speeds increasing by 2.3% and terminal dwell times decreasing by 1.8%. Finally, opportunities are opening up for an expansion in cross-border rail traffic within North America.
Air: The air freight market saw a steep decline in costs year over year from 2022 to 2023. Rates in 2024 began flat before starting to pick up in the summer, and report authors expect to see demand increase by 4.5%. Part of the demand pickup is due to disruptions in key sea lanes, such as the Suez Canal, causing shippers to convert from ocean to air. Meanwhile, the capacity picture has been mixed with some lanes having a lot of capacity while others have none. Much of this dynamic is due to Chinese e-commerce retailers Temu and Shein, which depend heavily on airfreight to execute their business models. In order to serve this booming business, some airfreight providers have pulled capacity out of more niche markets, such as flights into Latin America or Africa, and are now using those planes to serve the Asia-to-U.S. or Asia-to-Europe lanes.
Water/ports: The recent “State of Logistics Report” indicated that waterborne freight experienced a very steep decline of 64.2% in expenditures in 2023 relative to 2022. This was mostly due to muted demand, overcapacity, and a normalization from the inflated ocean rates seen during the pandemic years. After the trough of 2023, the market has been seeing significant “micro-spikes” in rates on some lanes due to constraints caused by geopolitical issues, such as the Red Sea conflict and the U.S. East and Gulf Coast ports strike. Kearney foresees a continuation of these rate hikes for the next few months. However, over the long term, the market will have to deal with the overcapacity that was built up during the height of the pandemic, which will cause rates to soften. Ultimately, however, Brogan said he did not expect to see a return to 2023 rate levels.
Third-party logistics (3PLs): The third-party logistics (3PL) sector is facing some significant challenges in 2024. Low freight rates and excess capacity could force some 3PLs to consolidate, especially if they are smaller players and rely on venture capital funding. Meanwhile, Kearney reports that there is some redefining of traditional roles going on within the 3PL-shipper ecosystem. For example, some historically asset-light 3PLs are expanding into asset-heavy services, and some shippers are trying to monetize their own logistics capabilities by marketing them externally.
Freight forwarding: Major forwarders had a shaky final quarter of 2023, seeing a decline in financial performance. To regain form, Kearney asserts that forwarders will need to increase their focus on technology, value-added services, and tiered servicing. Overall, the forwarding sector is expected to grow at slow rate in coming years, with a projected annual growth rate of 5.5% for the period of 2023–2032.
Warehousing: According to Brogan an interesting phenomenon is occurring in the warehousing market with the average asking rents continuing to rise even though vacancy rates have also increased. There are several reasons for this mixed message, according to the “State of Logistics” report, including: longer contract durations, enhanced facility features, and steady demand growth. A record-breaking level of new construction and new facilities, however, have helped to stabilize rent prices and increase vacancy rates, according to the report authors.
Path forward
What is the way forward given these uncertain times? For many shippers and carriers, a fresh look at their networks and overall supply chains may be in order. Many companies are currently reassessing their distribution networks and operations to make sure that they are optimized. In these cost-sensitive times, that may involve consolidating facilities, eliminating redundant capacity, or rebalancing inventory.
It’s important to realize, however, that network optimization should not just focus on eliminating unnecessary costs. It should also ensure that the network has the right amount of capacity to response with agility and flexibility to any future disruptions. Companies must look at their supply chain networks as a whole and think about how they can be utilized to unlock strategic advantage.