While you should certainly use your persuasion skills to make sure you receive the pay you deserve, negotiations should also reinforce the employer's decision to hire you.
There are a few times in your career when you can negotiate your salary and compensation packages: on your way in to a job, on your way out, and when you're asking for a raise or a promotion. Obviously, you have the most leverage on the way in and the least on the way out. So it's important to take an especially thoughtful approach to the negotiation process after you have received a new job offer.
Negotiating a salary and compensation package is not like negotiating the price of a car or house. While you should certainly use your persuasion skills to make sure you receive the pay you deserve, negotiations should also reinforce the employer's decision to hire you. Negotiations should be conducted in a constructive and positive atmosphere, with an emphasis on both parties finding a way to make it work. Here are a few tips on how to take that positive approach.
Getting started
Don't be too quick to discuss specifics when it comes to salary negotiations. The only time you should discuss your salary needs is when the company indicates that it would like to make you an offer.
If you are asked about your salary expectations during the interview process, you should just say that you are looking for a reasonable increase from your current salary with potential for growth. Refrain from giving a fixed number that you would accept unless you truly would be willing to start at that salary. And recognize that if you say you would be interested in a salary between US $110,000 and $120,000, you probably will end up with $110,000.
By the time you reach the negotiations stage, both the candidate and the company need to be serious about making a commitment. If you are not interested in a position or company, you should never let things get to this point.
For professionals in supply chain management, negotiations occur directly between the company and you, the candidate. If you have been working with a recruiter on a position, the recruiter's main role at this point is to assist with negotiations and help both parties come to an agreement that is reasonable.
The numbers game
When it comes to negotiating your compensation package, the size of the company can have a big influence. For large corporations, salary ranges and benefits are determined as part of the approval process for specific positions, so there is limited flexibility. Companies try to ensure that compensation is consistent with similar positions in the department, the corporation, and to some degree, competitors. They employ consultants and use salary surveys to correlate compensation levels.
To change a salary range during the hiring
and interviewing process requires approval at many levels, and it lengthens the search process considerably. Rather than go through the procedures required to upgrade a position's salary range, companies tend to reduce the screening requirements for the position. Smaller and/or private companies, on the other hand, have more flexibility to interview candidates without a specific hiring number and can adjust the salary offer within reason when they interview a candidate they like.
It's typical today for new hires to get an offer for 7 percent to 12 percent above their previous salaries. If you will be relocating, be sure to take into consideration any differences in the cost of living when you state your desired salary. Your new company, however, is not obligated to make up for your past low salary, but it will want to be sure your offer is on parity with similar positions in your department. In other words, even if your present salary is significantly below the starting range of the position, the company can't offer you less than the lowest point of the pay range.
Your current employment status will have a big effect on the strength of your negotiating position. Individuals who are happy where they are and see a future with their present company can often count on receiving larger increases. This is because the hiring company understands that the offer needs to be high enough to warrant a candidate's making a career change.
If you are not currently working, you have less leverage for negotiating. Similarly, candidates who show concerns about their present job or company, a takeover or merger, or a corporate move, tend to have fewer bargaining chips. For that reason, do not mention such concerns as the reason why you are looking for a new job, even if the interviewer might already know this information. At the same time, the hiring company should not take unfair advantage of a candidate who is unemployed. Companies that follow this path risk quickly losing new hires to a company that offers them a better package.
While salary may receive the most attention, it's important to also consider the whole compensation package. If you have negotiated the salary to the maximum and it is not quite at the level you deem sufficient, there are other ways to increase your total compensation: a signing bonus, adding stock, an early review, replacing a portion of your lost bonuses (if it is almost time to receive one in your current job), and vacation time.
Additionally, make sure you understand company policies regarding such areas as eligibility for bonuses, company profit sharing, stock options, retirement plans, saving plans, life and health insurance, vacation, and compensation for relocation costs. Speak to those people in Human Resources who have up-to-date knowledge of these benefits. There is nothing wrong with asking for a written explanation of benefits after an offer has been made. You don't want to find out after you've been hired that the benefits changed and the hiring manager was not aware of it.
There are some things that you should not expect the hiring company to offer. Compensation for your spouse's loss of income, for instance, cannot be a factor in negotiations, and you should consider this before you interview.
An employment contract normally will be offered only at the vice president level or above. In essence, employment contracts are really unemployment contracts, as they guarantee you a payout if you are let go without cause during the term of your contract.
Be sure to employ a lawyer who specializes in this area—not a friend or relative who is doing you a favor—to review the contract. At this point, you should worry more about ensuring that the contract provides you with adequate protection rather than about saving money on legal fees.
Finally, if a company makes you a great offer, don't try to squeeze it for more. Some companies do make their best offer up front.
Nothing personal
One of the problems we have when it comes to employment negotiations is that we tend to personalize them. Remember that your objective isn't to "win" or prove a point—it's to receive an offer that fits your financial and career needs. If this cannot be accomplished, then you want to walk away from the deal leaving the company feeling that you were a great find but the position was the wrong one for you. Be sure to leave the door open for renegotiation and perhaps other opportunities in the future.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.
That percentage is even greater than the 13.21% of total retail sales that were returned. Measured in dollars, returns (including both legitimate and fraudulent) last year reached $685 billion out of the $5.19 trillion in total retail sales.
“It’s clear why retailers want to limit bad actors that exhibit fraudulent and abusive returns behavior, but the reality is that they are finding stricter returns policies are not reducing the returns fraud they face,” Michael Osborne, CEO of Appriss Retail, said in a release.
Specifically, the report lists the leading types of returns fraud and abuse reported by retailers in 2024, including findings that:
60% of retailers surveyed reported incidents of “wardrobing,” or the act of consumers buying an item, using the merchandise, and then returning it.
55% cited cases of returning an item obtained through fraudulent or stolen tender, such as stolen credit cards, counterfeit bills, gift cards obtained through fraudulent means or fraudulent checks.
48% of retailers faced occurrences of returning stolen merchandise.
Together, those statistics show that the problem remains prevalent despite growing efforts by retailers to curb retail returns fraud through stricter returns policies, while still offering a sufficiently open returns policy to keep customers loyal, they said.
“Returns are a significant cost for retailers, and the rise of online shopping could increase this trend,” Kevin Mahoney, managing director, retail, Deloitte Consulting LLP, said. “As retailers implement policies to address this issue, they should avoid negatively affecting customer loyalty and retention. Effective policies should reduce losses for the retailer while minimally impacting the customer experience. This approach can be crucial for long-term success.”