Attendees at CSCMP's 2009 Annual Global Conference may have come from all over the world, from companies big and small, but there's one thing they all had in common: a desire to hear the latest ideas and innovations from leading practitioners, consultants, academics, and service providers in the fields of logistics and supply chain management.
Despite the challenging economic picture, some 2,600 participants gathered in Chicago, Illinois, USA for CSCMP's biggest event of the year. In addition to educational sessions and keynote/general session presentations, attendees could choose from a wealth of other events, including the Learning Exchange, the Student Showcase, special award presentations, networking luncheons, and many more.
If you weren't able to attend this year —or if you did but couldn't get to as many sessions as you would have liked —the following highlights from this year's conference will give you a taste of what you missed. Next year's conference will be held in San Diego, California, USA from September 26-29, 2010.
CSCMP elects new officers
Each year CSCMP introduces its new board of directors at the Annual Global Conference. For 2009-2010, the board will be chaired by Robert B. Silverman, vice president, IT business systems for Tommy Hilfiger USA Inc. Silverman, a CSCMP member for over 15 years, oversees the development and support of information technology systems that support product design, supply chain operations, and finance at the international apparel maker.
Other newly elected officers include:
Immediate Past Chair Roger W. Woody, founding partner of Performance Consultants LLC and executive lecturer and director, SCM external development at the School of Business of the University of Kansas;
Board Chair-elect Keith Turner, general manager, alumina and bauxite sales for ALCOA Inc.;
Board Vice Chair Nancy W. Nix, executive director, EMBA Program and associate professor of supply chain practice at the MJ Neeley School of Business at Texas Christian University (TCU); and
Secretary and Treasurer Rick Jackson, executive vice president, Limited Logistics Services.
CSCMP recognized a number of special achievements at the Annual Global Conference. Here is a brief rundown of the awards that were presented for excellence in business and academics.
The 2009 Distinguished Service Award was presented to Joel Sutherland, managing director of Lehigh University's Center for Value Chain Research. Over the course of his 30-year career, he has been a leader and innovator while a shipper, freight forwarder, ocean carrier, third-party logistics provider (3PL), and academic. He helped to create the non-asset-based 3PL Transplace and later served as president and chief operating officer of Air-Road Express.
Lieutenant Colonel Timothy J. Pettit received the Doctoral Dissertation Award for his research project "Supply Chain Resilience in a Global Enterprise." Pettit is an assistant professor of logistics and supply chain management at the Air Force Institute of Technology.
Matthew A. Waller of the University of Arkansas and Brent D. Williams of Auburn University received the E. Grosvenor Plowman Award for their paper "Improving Order Forecast Accuracy: A Vector Error Correction Approach." The Plowman Award is given to the best research paper presented at CSCMP's Supply Chain Management Educators' Conference.
The Bernard J. La Londe Best Paper Award was given to Daniel J. Flint of the University of Tennessee, Britta Gammelgaard of Copenhagen Business School, and Everth Larsson of Lund University for "Exploring Processes for Customer Value Insights, Supply Chain Learning and Innovation: An International Study." The La Londe Award is presented for the most valuable paper in the Journal of Business Logistics.
Intel Corp. received the Supply Chain Innovation Award for its initiative to improve customer satisfaction. "Just Say Yes —Innovating Responsiveness at Intel" resulted in an improvement of more than 40 percent in customer- feedback scores, supported by a 300-percentplus improvement in change-order responsiveness. The company now responds to a customer request for supply in only one day; previously it took seven to nine days. Intel used hub-based fulfillment, crossorganizational coordination, forecast improvements, postponement, and reduced cycle times to help improve responsiveness while reducing pipeline inventory by 33 percent.
CSCMP session sampler
Here are summaries of just a few of the educational sessions that sparked interest and debate at the annual conference, as reported by the staff of CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. You can learn more about these and other sessions by downloading the presentation slides, which are available on CSCMP's web site. Member ID and password are needed to access them.
Kraft uses SCM to increase cash flow
Improving cash flow is top of mind for everyone these days. But for Kraft Foods, it is also a corporate mandate. The food and beverage giant sharpened its focus on cash when its chief financial officer publicly promised that the company would improve its cash flow by more than US $1 billion over three years.
Philippe Lambotte, senior vice president of global customer service and logistics, outlined how Kraft encouraged its business units to free up cash. The company provided people with both an incentive and the means to achieve their objective. In the supply chain area, the company used a variety of tactics; the following are just a few examples:
Provide managers with incentives linked to cash flow as well as to revenue.
Monitor the number of stock-keeping units (SKUs). The fewer SKUs, the less inventory that must be carried (and therefore the less cash tied up in inventory).
Create a fixed, weekly production schedule that produces the same sequence of SKUs for the same length of time, and only in the quantities actually needed. This results in a more regulated flow of finished goods and reduces raw material and packaging costs.
Evaluate each SKU's revenue and sales volatility, and then phase out those SKUs that have low revenue and high volatility. While this means giving up some revenue, that loss will be outweighed by the increase in cash.
Reduce service levels for some product lines in order to operate with less inventory coverage.
Crisis management begins before there's a crisis
Swine flu. Hurricanes and tornadoes. A supplier's failure. The potential causes of supply chain disruptions are many. In a session on planning for crisis management, the speakers offered suggestions for creating an effective crisis management plan and increasing an organization's resiliency.
Developing crisis management processes involves several challenges, said Philip S. Renaud, a vice president for DHL Exel Supply Chain. These include defining just what constitutes a crisis, developing consistent practices across multiple cultures, and determining when and how often to update business partners. Renaud outlined the "operational risk controls" that DHL has in place to manage crises when they do occur. DHL has also developed internal and external communications tools for use during emergencies, including an incident reporting system.
Lew Roberts, president of L. Roberts & Associates, discussed how to handle supplier risks. He suggested using tools such as managing currency fluctuations, developing rigorous supplier-evaluation processes, developing long-term supplier relationships, and double translation of contracts.
The third panelist, Omar Keith Helferich, professor of supply chain management at Central Michigan University, encouraged participants to investigate software that can help with monitoring and managing risk.
While sound crisis management programs and tools are critical, it's also important not to overreact. "There's a fine line between responsible risk management and overplaying it," Helferich said.
Simplicity beats complexity in managing inventory
Mergers and acquisitions may be good for growth, but they can create headaches for inventory and delivery performance. This was the case for Johnson Controls, according to Michael Maltz, director of global manufacturing and logistics for the Business Efficiency division.
As a result of Johnson Controls' growth by acquisition, Maltz's division lacked a consistent methodology and processes for managing inventory and replenishment of its build-to-stock, assemble-to-order, and build-to-order products. What processes were in place were informal, inconsistent, and specific to local organizations.
To rectify the situation, the Building Efficiency division implemented a two-tiered approach to inventory management. It exerts centralized control over strategic inventory issues, including sales and operations planning, management policies, and development of standards and procedures. But tactical processes, including purchasing and implementation of corporate directives, remain in the hands of local managers.
The division also simplified data collection and decision making by using forecasting software that sits on top of multiple enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems. The software brings together sales, marketing, and operational information from all of the component groups and produces forecasts at both the stock-keeping unit (SKU) and product-family levels. It also provides inventory visibility for both domestic and international distribution centers —information Johnson Controls did not have before. In short, Maltz said, applying standard procedures and a flexible, scalable software program allowed his organization to gain a realistic view of a complex distribution and sourcing structure for the first time.
Do you really understand cargo insurance?
Many logistics and transportation managers assume that their service providers' insurance will adequately cover their shipments in case of loss or damage —a dangerous assumption that can leave them with a hefty and unexpected financial liability.
Carriers, third-party logistics companies, and warehouses do carry insurance, and they are subject to various degrees of liability for the cargo they handle. But they buy policies that protect themselves, not their customers, warned James H. Nerger, a vice president with the insurance company Roanoke Trade Services Inc. during the session "Using Cargo Insurance to Uncover Hidden Risks." "Liability is not insurance," added Theresa Garcia, also a Roanoke VP. "That is protecting [carriers] against their own negligence. It is not insuring your cargo."
Here are some other thoughts the panel of four insurance executives shared with the audience:
Brokered freight can be subcontracted. Make sure insurance coverage still applies when an additional party is involved.
"Warehouse to warehouse" coverage ends with delivery at the receiving warehouse. If freight will be stored for even a short time, get coverage for storage and staging.
Shippers often buy inadequate insurance based on incorrect or outdated assumptions. This typically occurs because of a lack of communication between those who are responsible for arranging coverage and those who know the shipment details.
Just 29% of supply chain organizations have the competitive characteristics they’ll need for future readiness, according to a Gartner survey released Tuesday. The survey focused on how organizations are preparing for future challenges and to keep their supply chains competitive.
Gartner surveyed 579 supply chain practitioners to determine the capabilities needed to manage the “future drivers of influence” on supply chains, which include artificial intelligence (AI) achievement and the ability to navigate new trade policies. According to the survey, the five competitive characteristics are: agility, resilience, regionalization, integrated ecosystems, and integrated enterprise strategy.
The survey analysis identified “leaders” among the respondents as supply chain organizations that have already developed at least three of the five competitive characteristics necessary to address the top five drivers of supply chain’s future.
Less than a third have met that threshold.
“Leaders shared a commitment to preparation through long-term, deliberate strategies, while non-leaders were more often focused on short-term priorities,” Pierfrancesco Manenti, vice president analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a statement announcing the survey results.
“Most leaders have yet to invest in the most advanced technologies (e.g. real-time visibility, digital supply chain twin), but plan to do so in the next three-to-five years,” Manenti also said in the statement. “Leaders see technology as an enabler to their overall business strategies, while non-leaders more often invest in technology first, without having fully established their foundational capabilities.”
As part of the survey, respondents were asked to identify the future drivers of influence on supply chain performance over the next three to five years. The top five drivers are: achievement capability of AI (74%); the amount of new ESG regulations and trade policies being released (67%); geopolitical fight/transition for power (65%); control over data (62%); and talent scarcity (59%).
The analysis also identified four unique profiles of supply chain organizations, based on what their leaders deem as the most crucial capabilities for empowering their organizations over the next three to five years.
First, 54% of retailers are looking for ways to increase their financial recovery from returns. That’s because the cost to return a purchase averages 27% of the purchase price, which erases as much as 50% of the sales margin. But consumers have their own interests in mind: 76% of shoppers admit they’ve embellished or exaggerated the return reason to avoid a fee, a 39% increase from 2023 to 204.
Second, return experiences matter to consumers. A whopping 80% of shoppers stopped shopping at a retailer because of changes to the return policy—a 34% increase YoY.
Third, returns fraud and abuse is top-of-mind-for retailers, with wardrobing rising 38% in 2024. In fact, over two thirds (69%) of shoppers admit to wardrobing, which is the practice of buying an item for a specific reason or event and returning it after use. Shoppers also practice bracketing, or purchasing an item in a variety of colors or sizes and then returning all the unwanted options.
Fourth, returns come with a steep cost in terms of sustainability, with returns amounting to 8.4 billion pounds of landfill waste in 2023 alone.
“As returns have become an integral part of the shopper experience, retailers must balance meeting sky-high expectations with rising costs, environmental impact, and fraudulent behaviors,” Amena Ali, CEO of Optoro, said in the firm’s “2024 Returns Unwrapped” report. “By understanding shoppers’ behaviors and preferences around returns, retailers can create returns experiences that embrace their needs while driving deeper loyalty and protecting their bottom line.”
Facing an evolving supply chain landscape in 2025, companies are being forced to rethink their distribution strategies to cope with challenges like rising cost pressures, persistent labor shortages, and the complexities of managing SKU proliferation.
1. Optimize labor productivity and costs. Forward-thinking businesses are leveraging technology to get more done with fewer resources through approaches like slotting optimization, automation and robotics, and inventory visibility.
2. Maximize capacity with smart solutions. With e-commerce volumes rising, facilities need to handle more SKUs and orders without expanding their physical footprint. That can be achieved through high-density storage and dynamic throughput.
3. Streamline returns management. Returns are a growing challenge, thanks to the continued growth of e-commerce and the consumer practice of bracketing. Businesses can handle that with smarter reverse logistics processes like automated returns processing and reverse logistics visibility.
4. Accelerate order fulfillment with robotics. Robotic solutions are transforming the way orders are fulfilled, helping businesses meet customer expectations faster and more accurately than ever before by using autonomous mobile robots (AMRs and robotic picking.
5. Enhance end-of-line packaging. The final step in the supply chain is often the most visible to customers. So optimizing packaging processes can reduce costs, improve efficiency, and support sustainability goals through automated packaging systems and sustainability initiatives.
Geopolitical rivalries, alliances, and aspirations are rewiring the global economy—and the imposition of new tariffs on foreign imports by the U.S. will accelerate that process, according to an analysis by Boston Consulting Group (BCG).
Without a broad increase in tariffs, world trade in goods will keep growing at an average of 2.9% annually for the next eight years, the firm forecasts in its report, “Great Powers, Geopolitics, and the Future of Trade.” But the routes goods travel will change markedly as North America reduces its dependence on China and China builds up its links with the Global South, which is cementing its power in the global trade map.
“Global trade is set to top $29 trillion by 2033, but the routes these goods will travel is changing at a remarkable pace,” Aparna Bharadwaj, managing director and partner at BCG, said in a release. “Trade lanes were already shifting from historical patterns and looming US tariffs will accelerate this. Navigating these new dynamics will be critical for any global business.”
To understand those changes, BCG modeled the direct impact of the 60/25/20 scenario (60% tariff on Chinese goods, a 25% on goods from Canada and Mexico, and a 20% on imports from all other countries). The results show that the tariffs would add $640 billion to the cost of importing goods from the top ten U.S. import nations, based on 2023 levels, unless alternative sources or suppliers are found.
In terms of product categories imported by the U.S., the greatest impact would be on imported auto parts and automotive vehicles, which would primarily affect trade with Mexico, the EU, and Japan. Consumer electronics, electrical machinery, and fashion goods would be most affected by higher tariffs on Chinese goods. Specifically, the report forecasts that a 60% tariff rate would add $61 billion to cost of importing consumer electronics products from China into the U.S.
That strategy is described by RILA President Brian Dodge in a document titled “2025 Retail Public Policy Agenda,” which begins by describing leading retailers as “dynamic and multifaceted businesses that begin on Main Street and stretch across the world to bring high value and affordable consumer goods to American families.”
RILA says its policy priorities support that membership in four ways:
Investing in people. Retail is for everyone; the place for a first job, 2nd chance, third act, or a side hustle – the retail workforce represents the American workforce.
Ensuring a safe, sustainable future. RILA is working with lawmakers to help shape policies that protect our customers and meet expectations regarding environmental concerns.
Leading in the community. Retail is more than a store; we are an integral part of the fabric of our communities.
“As Congress and the Trump administration move forward to adopt policies that reduce regulatory burdens, create economic growth, and bring value to American families, understanding how such policies will impact retailers and the communities we serve is imperative,” Dodge said. “RILA and its member companies look forward to collaborating with policymakers to provide industry-specific insights and data to help shape any policies under consideration.”