The truth of the matter is that we are all struggling. Struggling to learn how to work remotely. Struggling to figure out how to restart supply chains and respond to new and sometimes extreme demand signals. Struggling to do what is best for our employees, customers, partners, and the population at large.
In early March, before most of the United States had shut down, supply chain resiliency consultant Philip Palin in a commentary published on the Quarterly’s website, “Coronavirus-related cancellations and closures—How they could affect the supply chain,” wrote that government-mandated workplace shutdowns “will quickly and seriously undermine the capacity of all supply chains.” While the shutdowns may have been necessary to slow the spread of the disease, almost all supply chains have been profoundly impacted. How do we now move forward?
Here’s another uncomfortable truth: No one really knows, especially for your particular company and supply chain. This pandemic is unprecedented.
Recognizing that uncertainty, however, the following is some advice from commentaries that have been published on Supply Chain Quarterly’s website over the past couple of months. Take a look, see if there is something that can be gleaned or adapted for your particular situation.
1. Be prepared for “panic buying.” COVID-19 and toilet paper shortages are destined to be forever linked in the world’s collective memory. Could panic buying and hoarding affect your supply chain too? In “How to respond to panic buying,” Albert Oca, partner of strategic operations at the consulting firm Kearney, warns that “Panic buying isn't going anywhere yet, and supply chains need to be able to flex to the situation. Companies in the retail supply chain will need to understand what they need to do to distribute, replenish, and fulfill supplies in bigger quantities and with increased frequency until the virus is contained.” In addition to beefing up supply chain staffing, creating an internal task force, and increasing visibility with supply chain partners, Oca recommends that companies start planning now for similar events in the future. Companies may look to hold greater inventory buffers and use data analytics to rapidly sense demand changes and pivot their supply chains in response. In addition, as sick employees shut down factories and distribution centers, more companies may consider automation so that they are less dependent on human labor.
2. Embrace digital solutions. The pandemic has pushed even more consumers to embrace online sales channels. But this trend is not just limited to business-to-consumer markets, the same effect will be seen in the business-to-business (B2B) world. Oca’s colleague at Kearney, Joshua Swarz writes in “Getting B2B digital sales right in the wake of COVID-19” that the crisis can serve as a wake-up call to companies that do not have the digital capabilities or integrated systems in place that they need. Swarz recommends that companies focus on ensuring that their technology that can help provide five critical capabilities: inventory tracking, distribution tracking, inventory forecasting, prioritization of who gets products first, and identification and tracking of essential stock.
3. Consider diversifying supply. Early in the year, COVID-19 revealed how dependent we all are on manufacturing operations in China. In his online article, Madhav Durbha, a group vice president at the supply chain technology company LLamasoft Inc., specifically looked at how “Coronavirus exposes the weak links in the pharmaceutical supply chain.” Going forward, Durbha recommends asking the following three questions: 1) What part of my supply, and how much of it, is coming from China? 2) What finished products is this supply going into? and 3) What alternate sources do I have to meet the demand? While these questions sound simple, answering them may not be, writes Durbha. Companies may need to turn to artificial intelligence and advanced analytics to build resiliency; identify and weigh the benefits and costs of sourcing alternatives; and monitor future risk.
4. Know where you are vulnerable. One of the side effects of the COVID-19 crisis is that many companies have had to cancel on-site audits of their suppliers. While the cancellations are necessary, they also expose supply chains to greater environmental, labor and human rights, and ethical risks, writes David McClintock, marketing director of ratings company Ecovadis, in “What to do if coronavirus canceled your sustainability audits.” Instead of “flying completely blind” during this time, McClintock makes a case for using supplier ratings and industry-specific self-assessment tools such as the Higg Index for apparel industry.
Have other advice or strategies for navigating out of the crisis? Please contact the editor of Supply Chain Quarterly.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.
Specifically, the two sides remain at odds over provisions related to the deployment of semi-automated technologies like rail-mounted gantry cranes, according to an analysis by the Kansas-based 3PL Noatum Logistics. The ILA has strongly opposed further automation, arguing it threatens dockworker protections, while the USMX contends that automation enhances productivity and can create long-term opportunities for labor.
In fact, U.S. importers are already taking action to prevent the impact of such a strike, “pulling forward” their container shipments by rushing imports to earlier dates on the calendar, according to analysis by supply chain visibility provider Project44. That strategy can help companies to build enough safety stock to dampen the damage of events like the strike and like the steep tariffs being threatened by the incoming Trump administration.
Likewise, some ocean carriers have already instituted January surcharges in pre-emption of possible labor action, which could support inbound ocean rates if a strike occurs, according to freight market analysts with TD Cowen. In the meantime, the outcome of the new negotiations are seen with “significant uncertainty,” due to the contentious history of the discussion and to the timing of the talks that overlap with a transition between two White House regimes, analysts said.