It is clear that the spread of COVID-19 and the global measures to combat it will be the defining story of 2020. In addition to its terrible health and human toll, the virus has caused widespread disruption to global supply chains, paralyzed industries such as travel and live entertainment, and plunged the global economy into a sudden recession. It has even reached into our homes, changing the way we work, learn, socialize, and shop.
Yet the evolution of the pandemic looks radically different than it would have even one or two decades ago. While the interconnected nature of global trade has helped to slash the proportion of the world population living in extreme poverty by nearly two-thirds in the last 20 years, it also allowed the virus to spread faster than it would have in a less connected time. Meanwhile, readily available internet access has made it far easier to adapt our lives and livelihoods to the realities of stay-at-home orders than it would have been before internet was seen as a household staple.
Retail apocalypse redux
As of April 20, 2020, more than 315 million Americans were under some form of stay-at-home order or advisory. Amid widespread closures of storefronts for “nonessential” goods and services, U.S. retail sales in April tumbled a record 16.4% on top of an 8.3% decline in March, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. The effects of the business closures and social distancing related to COVID‑19 were clearly visible in the details, which were sobering—but not surprising. Most categories of sales plunged at unprecedented rates. Sales at clothing and accessories stores essentially stopped short, falling 89% relative to April a year before. Sales at electronics and appliance stores were down 65% versus last year, furniture and home furnishings sellers saw sales plunge 67%, and restaurants and bars did 49% less business than in April 2019. Even sales at “essential” health and personal care stores were down 10%. Modest positive offsets at food and beverage stores, which gained 12% relative to a year ago, paled in comparison to these calamitous declines.
Between the mandated closures of storefronts and consumers’ new social-distancing habits—which are likely to continue for a while longer—brick-and-mortar retailers have been particularly vulnerable to the crisis. Surveys show that consumer behavior may change for an extended period. According to an April 10 report by the polling firm Morning Consult, 20% of consumers say that it will be more than six months before they feel comfortable going out to eat, and 24% say it will be more than six months before they feel comfortable going to a shopping mall. Another poll, The Capgemini Research Institute’s Consumer Behavior Survey, found that 39% of global consumers expect a high level of interaction with physical stores in the next six to nine months—a decrease of 20 percentage points from 59% before COVID-19.
Even after initial stay-at-home orders lift, there may be localized flare-ups in the next year during which additional two- or three-week mandated social distancing periods might become necessary. The psychological scars from COVID-19 could suppress some types of consumer spending for years to come if the “fear factor” is not controlled by the development of a vaccine or other medical treatments. In IHS Markit’s May baseline forecast, we expect retail sales to decline 13.2% over the course of 2020 (fourth quarter over fourth quarter), much more than consumer spending as a whole (which is forecast to decline 8.0%).
Joining the e-commerce party
Even though they can’t go out, today’s consumers are going online. In April, retail sales at nonstore (mostly online) retailers jumped 8.4%, even as total retail spending fell. Sales via this channel were up 22% over the last 12 months. The Capgemini survey found that 37% of respondents reported having high levels of interaction with online channels since COVID-19, a 7 percentage-point increase.
The trend of retail sales shifting online from brick-and-mortar establishments is hardly new. E-commerce retail sales were already growing at a breakneck 16.7% pace in the fourth quarter of 2019 relative to a year earlier. (See Figure 1.) It is true that around the end of 2019 the monthly pattern of sales at electronic shopping and mail-order stores gave the impression that e-commerce had briefly plateaued after a gangbuster summer. However, the pattern of a strong middle of the year for online sales followed by a slower-growing autumn is more reflective of a shift in sales earlier into the year due to influences like Amazon’s Prime Day in July.
In some ways, retail is late to the e-commerce party. As we previously described in the **italics{CSCMP’s Supply Chain Quarterly} Q2/2018 issue, business-to-business (B2B) e-commerce has historically accounted for the vast majority of total e-commerce sales. Due to the use of electronic data interchange (EDI) networks in the 1970s and 1980s, the B2B world had a considerable head start in terms of e-commerce infrastructure. Originally used in the transportation and shipping industries, EDI saw greater adoption by other industries in the mid-1970s thanks to the implementation of industry standards and the publication of the file transfer protocol (FTP) in 1973, which allowed file transfers between internet sites. By 1991, the year the federal government opened up the internet for commercial use, nearly 12,000 companies were using EDI. In 2003, approximately 21.0% of manufacturing sales and 14.6% of wholesale sales in the United States—the vast majority of which constitute B2B trade—were conducted via e-commerce. By 2017, the last year for which these sector-level figures are available, they had risen to a 67% share for manufacturing sales and 32% for wholesale—versus only 9% for retail trade. (See Figure 2.)
The crisis, however, is giving retailers no choice but to catch up. Many consumers who might have been late (or never) adopters are being forced online for the first time, and some of the shift in consumer shopping habits is bound to stick as new online shoppers come to appreciate its convenience. It is not just the demand side that will shift; the distribution of retail businesses will also increasingly favor those more geared toward online sales. When the dust settles on the COVID-19 pandemic, there may be fewer retailers left standing overall. Although many traditionally physical retailers have done a good job marrying their online and brick-and-mortar operations, some are already considering declaring bankruptcy because they will be unable to survive an extended period of closure. A robust web presence is one recourse for retailers, and COVID-19 is giving an advantage to businesses with a strong online operation.
In short, we expect the pandemic to accelerate trends toward online retail shopping that were already in place. To adapt to the extraordinary realities of the pandemic, more retailers are experimenting with novel business models, such as buy online for in-store or curbside pickup. Stores, including grocery, might change their physical footprint to have less consumer-facing space and more of a warehouse-like layout, where workers or machines can quickly build virtual shopping carts for delivery.
As of the fourth quarter of 2019, e-commerce retail sales represented 20.7% of total retail sales excluding food, gas, and autos. IHS Markit is forecasting that share to jump to 23.1% in the second quarter, up 1.2 percentage points over the previous quarter, which would be the largest such increase on record. By mid-2021, we expect one quarter of retail sales excluding food, gas, and autos to be conducted online. The accelerated transition of retail trade to the online channel (Figure 3) won’t be the most earth-shaking change to come out of the COVID-19 era—but it will certainly hit close to home.
Just 29% of supply chain organizations have the competitive characteristics they’ll need for future readiness, according to a Gartner survey released Tuesday. The survey focused on how organizations are preparing for future challenges and to keep their supply chains competitive.
Gartner surveyed 579 supply chain practitioners to determine the capabilities needed to manage the “future drivers of influence” on supply chains, which include artificial intelligence (AI) achievement and the ability to navigate new trade policies. According to the survey, the five competitive characteristics are: agility, resilience, regionalization, integrated ecosystems, and integrated enterprise strategy.
The survey analysis identified “leaders” among the respondents as supply chain organizations that have already developed at least three of the five competitive characteristics necessary to address the top five drivers of supply chain’s future.
Less than a third have met that threshold.
“Leaders shared a commitment to preparation through long-term, deliberate strategies, while non-leaders were more often focused on short-term priorities,” Pierfrancesco Manenti, vice president analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a statement announcing the survey results.
“Most leaders have yet to invest in the most advanced technologies (e.g. real-time visibility, digital supply chain twin), but plan to do so in the next three-to-five years,” Manenti also said in the statement. “Leaders see technology as an enabler to their overall business strategies, while non-leaders more often invest in technology first, without having fully established their foundational capabilities.”
As part of the survey, respondents were asked to identify the future drivers of influence on supply chain performance over the next three to five years. The top five drivers are: achievement capability of AI (74%); the amount of new ESG regulations and trade policies being released (67%); geopolitical fight/transition for power (65%); control over data (62%); and talent scarcity (59%).
The analysis also identified four unique profiles of supply chain organizations, based on what their leaders deem as the most crucial capabilities for empowering their organizations over the next three to five years.
First, 54% of retailers are looking for ways to increase their financial recovery from returns. That’s because the cost to return a purchase averages 27% of the purchase price, which erases as much as 50% of the sales margin. But consumers have their own interests in mind: 76% of shoppers admit they’ve embellished or exaggerated the return reason to avoid a fee, a 39% increase from 2023 to 204.
Second, return experiences matter to consumers. A whopping 80% of shoppers stopped shopping at a retailer because of changes to the return policy—a 34% increase YoY.
Third, returns fraud and abuse is top-of-mind-for retailers, with wardrobing rising 38% in 2024. In fact, over two thirds (69%) of shoppers admit to wardrobing, which is the practice of buying an item for a specific reason or event and returning it after use. Shoppers also practice bracketing, or purchasing an item in a variety of colors or sizes and then returning all the unwanted options.
Fourth, returns come with a steep cost in terms of sustainability, with returns amounting to 8.4 billion pounds of landfill waste in 2023 alone.
“As returns have become an integral part of the shopper experience, retailers must balance meeting sky-high expectations with rising costs, environmental impact, and fraudulent behaviors,” Amena Ali, CEO of Optoro, said in the firm’s “2024 Returns Unwrapped” report. “By understanding shoppers’ behaviors and preferences around returns, retailers can create returns experiences that embrace their needs while driving deeper loyalty and protecting their bottom line.”
Facing an evolving supply chain landscape in 2025, companies are being forced to rethink their distribution strategies to cope with challenges like rising cost pressures, persistent labor shortages, and the complexities of managing SKU proliferation.
1. Optimize labor productivity and costs. Forward-thinking businesses are leveraging technology to get more done with fewer resources through approaches like slotting optimization, automation and robotics, and inventory visibility.
2. Maximize capacity with smart solutions. With e-commerce volumes rising, facilities need to handle more SKUs and orders without expanding their physical footprint. That can be achieved through high-density storage and dynamic throughput.
3. Streamline returns management. Returns are a growing challenge, thanks to the continued growth of e-commerce and the consumer practice of bracketing. Businesses can handle that with smarter reverse logistics processes like automated returns processing and reverse logistics visibility.
4. Accelerate order fulfillment with robotics. Robotic solutions are transforming the way orders are fulfilled, helping businesses meet customer expectations faster and more accurately than ever before by using autonomous mobile robots (AMRs and robotic picking.
5. Enhance end-of-line packaging. The final step in the supply chain is often the most visible to customers. So optimizing packaging processes can reduce costs, improve efficiency, and support sustainability goals through automated packaging systems and sustainability initiatives.
Geopolitical rivalries, alliances, and aspirations are rewiring the global economy—and the imposition of new tariffs on foreign imports by the U.S. will accelerate that process, according to an analysis by Boston Consulting Group (BCG).
Without a broad increase in tariffs, world trade in goods will keep growing at an average of 2.9% annually for the next eight years, the firm forecasts in its report, “Great Powers, Geopolitics, and the Future of Trade.” But the routes goods travel will change markedly as North America reduces its dependence on China and China builds up its links with the Global South, which is cementing its power in the global trade map.
“Global trade is set to top $29 trillion by 2033, but the routes these goods will travel is changing at a remarkable pace,” Aparna Bharadwaj, managing director and partner at BCG, said in a release. “Trade lanes were already shifting from historical patterns and looming US tariffs will accelerate this. Navigating these new dynamics will be critical for any global business.”
To understand those changes, BCG modeled the direct impact of the 60/25/20 scenario (60% tariff on Chinese goods, a 25% on goods from Canada and Mexico, and a 20% on imports from all other countries). The results show that the tariffs would add $640 billion to the cost of importing goods from the top ten U.S. import nations, based on 2023 levels, unless alternative sources or suppliers are found.
In terms of product categories imported by the U.S., the greatest impact would be on imported auto parts and automotive vehicles, which would primarily affect trade with Mexico, the EU, and Japan. Consumer electronics, electrical machinery, and fashion goods would be most affected by higher tariffs on Chinese goods. Specifically, the report forecasts that a 60% tariff rate would add $61 billion to cost of importing consumer electronics products from China into the U.S.
That strategy is described by RILA President Brian Dodge in a document titled “2025 Retail Public Policy Agenda,” which begins by describing leading retailers as “dynamic and multifaceted businesses that begin on Main Street and stretch across the world to bring high value and affordable consumer goods to American families.”
RILA says its policy priorities support that membership in four ways:
Investing in people. Retail is for everyone; the place for a first job, 2nd chance, third act, or a side hustle – the retail workforce represents the American workforce.
Ensuring a safe, sustainable future. RILA is working with lawmakers to help shape policies that protect our customers and meet expectations regarding environmental concerns.
Leading in the community. Retail is more than a store; we are an integral part of the fabric of our communities.
“As Congress and the Trump administration move forward to adopt policies that reduce regulatory burdens, create economic growth, and bring value to American families, understanding how such policies will impact retailers and the communities we serve is imperative,” Dodge said. “RILA and its member companies look forward to collaborating with policymakers to provide industry-specific insights and data to help shape any policies under consideration.”