It is clear that the spread of COVID-19 and the global measures to combat it will be the defining story of 2020. In addition to its terrible health and human toll, the virus has caused widespread disruption to global supply chains, paralyzed industries such as travel and live entertainment, and plunged the global economy into a sudden recession. It has even reached into our homes, changing the way we work, learn, socialize, and shop.
Yet the evolution of the pandemic looks radically different than it would have even one or two decades ago. While the interconnected nature of global trade has helped to slash the proportion of the world population living in extreme poverty by nearly two-thirds in the last 20 years, it also allowed the virus to spread faster than it would have in a less connected time. Meanwhile, readily available internet access has made it far easier to adapt our lives and livelihoods to the realities of stay-at-home orders than it would have been before internet was seen as a household staple.
Retail apocalypse redux
As of April 20, 2020, more than 315 million Americans were under some form of stay-at-home order or advisory. Amid widespread closures of storefronts for “nonessential” goods and services, U.S. retail sales in April tumbled a record 16.4% on top of an 8.3% decline in March, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. The effects of the business closures and social distancing related to COVID‑19 were clearly visible in the details, which were sobering—but not surprising. Most categories of sales plunged at unprecedented rates. Sales at clothing and accessories stores essentially stopped short, falling 89% relative to April a year before. Sales at electronics and appliance stores were down 65% versus last year, furniture and home furnishings sellers saw sales plunge 67%, and restaurants and bars did 49% less business than in April 2019. Even sales at “essential” health and personal care stores were down 10%. Modest positive offsets at food and beverage stores, which gained 12% relative to a year ago, paled in comparison to these calamitous declines.
Between the mandated closures of storefronts and consumers’ new social-distancing habits—which are likely to continue for a while longer—brick-and-mortar retailers have been particularly vulnerable to the crisis. Surveys show that consumer behavior may change for an extended period. According to an April 10 report by the polling firm Morning Consult, 20% of consumers say that it will be more than six months before they feel comfortable going out to eat, and 24% say it will be more than six months before they feel comfortable going to a shopping mall. Another poll, The Capgemini Research Institute’s Consumer Behavior Survey, found that 39% of global consumers expect a high level of interaction with physical stores in the next six to nine months—a decrease of 20 percentage points from 59% before COVID-19.
Even after initial stay-at-home orders lift, there may be localized flare-ups in the next year during which additional two- or three-week mandated social distancing periods might become necessary. The psychological scars from COVID-19 could suppress some types of consumer spending for years to come if the “fear factor” is not controlled by the development of a vaccine or other medical treatments. In IHS Markit’s May baseline forecast, we expect retail sales to decline 13.2% over the course of 2020 (fourth quarter over fourth quarter), much more than consumer spending as a whole (which is forecast to decline 8.0%).
Joining the e-commerce party
Even though they can’t go out, today’s consumers are going online. In April, retail sales at nonstore (mostly online) retailers jumped 8.4%, even as total retail spending fell. Sales via this channel were up 22% over the last 12 months. The Capgemini survey found that 37% of respondents reported having high levels of interaction with online channels since COVID-19, a 7 percentage-point increase.
The trend of retail sales shifting online from brick-and-mortar establishments is hardly new. E-commerce retail sales were already growing at a breakneck 16.7% pace in the fourth quarter of 2019 relative to a year earlier. (See Figure 1.) It is true that around the end of 2019 the monthly pattern of sales at electronic shopping and mail-order stores gave the impression that e-commerce had briefly plateaued after a gangbuster summer. However, the pattern of a strong middle of the year for online sales followed by a slower-growing autumn is more reflective of a shift in sales earlier into the year due to influences like Amazon’s Prime Day in July.
In some ways, retail is late to the e-commerce party. As we previously described in the **italics{CSCMP’s Supply Chain Quarterly} Q2/2018 issue, business-to-business (B2B) e-commerce has historically accounted for the vast majority of total e-commerce sales. Due to the use of electronic data interchange (EDI) networks in the 1970s and 1980s, the B2B world had a considerable head start in terms of e-commerce infrastructure. Originally used in the transportation and shipping industries, EDI saw greater adoption by other industries in the mid-1970s thanks to the implementation of industry standards and the publication of the file transfer protocol (FTP) in 1973, which allowed file transfers between internet sites. By 1991, the year the federal government opened up the internet for commercial use, nearly 12,000 companies were using EDI. In 2003, approximately 21.0% of manufacturing sales and 14.6% of wholesale sales in the United States—the vast majority of which constitute B2B trade—were conducted via e-commerce. By 2017, the last year for which these sector-level figures are available, they had risen to a 67% share for manufacturing sales and 32% for wholesale—versus only 9% for retail trade. (See Figure 2.)
The crisis, however, is giving retailers no choice but to catch up. Many consumers who might have been late (or never) adopters are being forced online for the first time, and some of the shift in consumer shopping habits is bound to stick as new online shoppers come to appreciate its convenience. It is not just the demand side that will shift; the distribution of retail businesses will also increasingly favor those more geared toward online sales. When the dust settles on the COVID-19 pandemic, there may be fewer retailers left standing overall. Although many traditionally physical retailers have done a good job marrying their online and brick-and-mortar operations, some are already considering declaring bankruptcy because they will be unable to survive an extended period of closure. A robust web presence is one recourse for retailers, and COVID-19 is giving an advantage to businesses with a strong online operation.
In short, we expect the pandemic to accelerate trends toward online retail shopping that were already in place. To adapt to the extraordinary realities of the pandemic, more retailers are experimenting with novel business models, such as buy online for in-store or curbside pickup. Stores, including grocery, might change their physical footprint to have less consumer-facing space and more of a warehouse-like layout, where workers or machines can quickly build virtual shopping carts for delivery.
As of the fourth quarter of 2019, e-commerce retail sales represented 20.7% of total retail sales excluding food, gas, and autos. IHS Markit is forecasting that share to jump to 23.1% in the second quarter, up 1.2 percentage points over the previous quarter, which would be the largest such increase on record. By mid-2021, we expect one quarter of retail sales excluding food, gas, and autos to be conducted online. The accelerated transition of retail trade to the online channel (Figure 3) won’t be the most earth-shaking change to come out of the COVID-19 era—but it will certainly hit close to home.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
Specifically, the two sides remain at odds over provisions related to the deployment of semi-automated technologies like rail-mounted gantry cranes, according to an analysis by the Kansas-based 3PL Noatum Logistics. The ILA has strongly opposed further automation, arguing it threatens dockworker protections, while the USMX contends that automation enhances productivity and can create long-term opportunities for labor.
In fact, U.S. importers are already taking action to prevent the impact of such a strike, “pulling forward” their container shipments by rushing imports to earlier dates on the calendar, according to analysis by supply chain visibility provider Project44. That strategy can help companies to build enough safety stock to dampen the damage of events like the strike and like the steep tariffs being threatened by the incoming Trump administration.
Likewise, some ocean carriers have already instituted January surcharges in pre-emption of possible labor action, which could support inbound ocean rates if a strike occurs, according to freight market analysts with TD Cowen. In the meantime, the outcome of the new negotiations are seen with “significant uncertainty,” due to the contentious history of the discussion and to the timing of the talks that overlap with a transition between two White House regimes, analysts said.
That percentage is even greater than the 13.21% of total retail sales that were returned. Measured in dollars, returns (including both legitimate and fraudulent) last year reached $685 billion out of the $5.19 trillion in total retail sales.
“It’s clear why retailers want to limit bad actors that exhibit fraudulent and abusive returns behavior, but the reality is that they are finding stricter returns policies are not reducing the returns fraud they face,” Michael Osborne, CEO of Appriss Retail, said in a release.
Specifically, the report lists the leading types of returns fraud and abuse reported by retailers in 2024, including findings that:
60% of retailers surveyed reported incidents of “wardrobing,” or the act of consumers buying an item, using the merchandise, and then returning it.
55% cited cases of returning an item obtained through fraudulent or stolen tender, such as stolen credit cards, counterfeit bills, gift cards obtained through fraudulent means or fraudulent checks.
48% of retailers faced occurrences of returning stolen merchandise.
Together, those statistics show that the problem remains prevalent despite growing efforts by retailers to curb retail returns fraud through stricter returns policies, while still offering a sufficiently open returns policy to keep customers loyal, they said.
“Returns are a significant cost for retailers, and the rise of online shopping could increase this trend,” Kevin Mahoney, managing director, retail, Deloitte Consulting LLP, said. “As retailers implement policies to address this issue, they should avoid negatively affecting customer loyalty and retention. Effective policies should reduce losses for the retailer while minimally impacting the customer experience. This approach can be crucial for long-term success.”