American Logistics Aid Network’s Kathy Fulton is passionate about the work she does with supply chain and emergency management. Now she and her dedicated volunteers are tackling supply chain challenges caused by the COVID-19 crisis.
For the past decade, Kathy Fulton has dealt with many disasters. As executive director of the American Logistics Aid Network (ALAN), she has become a “master” at coordinating supply chain assistance for U.S. humanitarian relief efforts. While ALAN often deals with more traditional crises like natural disasters, the emergence of the novel coronavirus has presented a different set of challenges for Fulton’s organization to tackle.
Unlike a fire, flood, or hurricane, which impacts the movement of supplies due to physical roadblocks, COVID-19 has upended the supply chain by creating scarcity of essential supplies like personal protective equipment (PPE), cleaning products, and even toilet paper. To help businesses and nonprofit organizations navigate a constantly changing landscape to deliver essential goods across the country, ALAN has taken a number of actions. One new innovation that the organizations has created is the Supply Chain Intelligence Center. This online mapping tool shows the status of roads, ports, and airports as well as the latest policy changes at national, state, local, and county levels.
Fulton’s previous experience in supply chain resiliency and disaster preparedness has helped her mobilize resources quickly during the current pandemic. She spoke recently with CSCMP’s Supply Chain Quarterly Managing Editor Diane Rand about ALAN’s challenges and what governments and businesses can do during this crisis and in the future.
NAME: Kathy Fulton
TITLE: Executive Director, American Logistics Aid Network (ALAN)
EDUCATION: Master’s degree in business administration with concentration in supply chain; Master’s degree in information systems from University of South Florida; Bachelor’s degree in mathematics from Northwestern State University of Louisiana
PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE: Served as ALAN volunteer and director of operations, previously senior manager of information technology services at Saddle Creek Logistics Services, where she led corporate systems implementation, technical support, and business continuity
LEADERSHIP: Member and former president of the Central Florida Roundtable for the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals; member of donations management committee for National Voluntary Organizations Active in Disaster; member of National Emergency Management Agency private sector committee
What has ALAN been doing during the COVID-19 pandemic?
We’ve been involved with this response since late January, even before the WHO (World Health Organization) officially labeled it a pandemic on March 11, so our response has evolved during that time. We started out by ensuring that public health messages were amplified, as well as participating in a project to analyze international freight flows to examine supply chain health.
Once the virus started spreading in the U.S., our support of the analysis work continued, and we began convening a weekly call with our industry association partners to surface and solve common issues. Most recently we’ve been focusing on coordinating donations of logistics services and equipment to help our nonprofit partners surge support for the increasing demand for their services.
We’ve also been building out our Supply Chain Intelligence Center (www.alanaid.org/map) to provide, free of charge, actionable information for organizations—a single location where they can see all of the waivers that enable commodity movements as well as policies that restrict movement. We know there has been such a variety of policies rolled out across states and counties that it can be difficult to keep up with them all. We want to reduce that particular bit of friction so that nourishment, hydration, and medical supplies can get to those who need them rapidly.
What challenges has the organization faced, and what needs do you have?
The challenges we are experiencing are due to the novel nature of the crisis, the volume of work, and the vastness of geography. During a traditional crisis response like a hurricane, fire, or flood, we’re dealing with a limited geography and responding to damages to property and infrastructure.
With COVID-19, we’re working with organizations from across the United States, and instead of physical roadblocks preventing the movement of supplies (a logistics problem) the challenges have been more related to policies, guidance, and supply-side issues. There are actual supply shortages of PPE—and while ALAN doesn’t get involved in medical and health care supply chains, we have been fielding a few requests and trying to help where possible. That is even more challenging, because it isn’t just a logistics problem (which is where most of our expertise lies), but it is truly a supply problem.
Another supply problem we’re seeing is the lack of donations to food banks from traditional sources. We’ve been able to help a couple of organizations with items to expand their capacity to serve their constituents, but it isn’t a short-term problem. Unemployment numbers are climbing each week, so keeping those food safety nets stable and able to serve those in need is always at the front of our minds.
Internally to our operations we’ve expanded our volunteer operations. For needs, we are constantly in need of ongoing financial and in-kind support. I’ll be bold and say that ALAN needs additional staff to support our work, not just during this crisis but on an ongoing basis. We have some amazing volunteers basically on loan to us right now—and having the extra hands has been a huge benefit to our ability to rapidly service requests. We’d welcome support to expand our operations.
Did any of ALAN’s past efforts in supply chain resiliency and disaster preparedness help you with response to COVID-19?
Yes, absolutely—we try to learn from every single response we support, and the relationships we’ve built and knowledge we’ve gained in the past 15 years are being called upon heavily. We’ve participated in activities like the 2014–2015 Ebola outbreak in West Africa, so we had some awareness of what challenges there may be.
And, we’ve participated in pandemic table-top exercises—one notable exercise in 2012 in the Mid-Atlantic region predicted the challenges we’ve experienced with grocery hoarding. I also think the fact that ALAN has always had virtual operations helps us immensely. We’ve done video conferencing for several years—so there was no problem moving to work from home.
If you could give advice to government leaders on how to ensure that supply chains will be resilient during and after the crisis, what would you say?
Fortunately, I don’t have to come up with that answer on my own. I was fortunate to serve on a National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine study that examined that very question, through the lens of the 2017 hurricane season. We came to four recommendations:
1. Shift the focus from pushing relief supplies to ensuring that regular supply chains are restored as rapidly as possible through strategic interventions.
2. Build a system-level understanding of supply chain dynamics as a foundation for effective decision support.
3. Support mechanisms for coordination, information sharing, and preparedness among supply chain stakeholders.
4. Develop and administer training on supply chain dynamics and best practices for private-public partnerships
Basically, encouraging government to work with businesses, not in parallel, or at worst, in competition with them. That is one of ALAN’s key missions—we want to build relationships between and across all sectors becauserelationships allow you to work together and be more resilient in the face of a crisis.
What have you learned from this pandemic?
Number one on my lessons learned is to not eat all of the chocolate in the first two days of the stay-at-home order. All joking aside, we are unfortunately seeing a lot of the same lessons we’ve observed in other crises. People still don’t coordinate their activities well—the many competing programs to get PPE into the hands of medical professionals looks very similar to the individual collection drives we see after traditional disasters.
On the positive side, logistics and supply chain will find a way to serve demand. Despite all of the challenges with policy restrictions and extreme demand, food is still getting to people in (mostly) the same ways it did before. Mostly, because of the reduction in consumption of food away from home (restaurants).
Finally, one of my biggest observations is regarding the strength of normalcy bias. I think many businesses reacted late because they thought this wasn’t going to be that bad. My favorite argument these days is whether or not COVID-19 was a “black swan” [event]. I say no—we had all the warnings that something like this was possible, our normalcy bias just prevented us from believing that it could ever happen.
What are some best practices that you have seen in place?
We are seeing business-to-business collaboration—like where workers from the food service industry are being shared with food warehouses in the retail supply chain. It supports the surge in demand and also keeps those food service workers employed. We are also seeing a lot of cross-industry sharing of guidance and practices on how to protect the workforce, such as how to sanitize facilities, etc.
Finally, like with the volunteers being loaned to us, we are seeing businesses be generous with their support of humanitarian causes—via ALAN and other channels. We’ve heard more than once that businesses “just want to help, and they’d rather pay [their] employees to do something to help than just sit around.” I hope that that spirit of collaboration and community continues.
Do you think this will lead to more companies paying more attention to risk management and supply chain resiliency in the near future? If so, what steps do you expect to see companies take?
I hear a lot of businesses talking about re-examining strategies, and I hope they will. We’re hearing about supplier diversity in terms of companies and geographies and about re-examining inventory. This attention may be short term as businesses determine that some of these strategies are more expensive. It will definitely be interesting to watch as the world recovers from this crisis and determines how to move forward.
First, 54% of retailers are looking for ways to increase their financial recovery from returns. That’s because the cost to return a purchase averages 27% of the purchase price, which erases as much as 50% of the sales margin. But consumers have their own interests in mind: 76% of shoppers admit they’ve embellished or exaggerated the return reason to avoid a fee, a 39% increase from 2023 to 204.
Second, return experiences matter to consumers. A whopping 80% of shoppers stopped shopping at a retailer because of changes to the return policy—a 34% increase YoY.
Third, returns fraud and abuse is top-of-mind-for retailers, with wardrobing rising 38% in 2024. In fact, over two thirds (69%) of shoppers admit to wardrobing, which is the practice of buying an item for a specific reason or event and returning it after use. Shoppers also practice bracketing, or purchasing an item in a variety of colors or sizes and then returning all the unwanted options.
Fourth, returns come with a steep cost in terms of sustainability, with returns amounting to 8.4 billion pounds of landfill waste in 2023 alone.
“As returns have become an integral part of the shopper experience, retailers must balance meeting sky-high expectations with rising costs, environmental impact, and fraudulent behaviors,” Amena Ali, CEO of Optoro, said in the firm’s “2024 Returns Unwrapped” report. “By understanding shoppers’ behaviors and preferences around returns, retailers can create returns experiences that embrace their needs while driving deeper loyalty and protecting their bottom line.”
Facing an evolving supply chain landscape in 2025, companies are being forced to rethink their distribution strategies to cope with challenges like rising cost pressures, persistent labor shortages, and the complexities of managing SKU proliferation.
1. Optimize labor productivity and costs. Forward-thinking businesses are leveraging technology to get more done with fewer resources through approaches like slotting optimization, automation and robotics, and inventory visibility.
2. Maximize capacity with smart solutions. With e-commerce volumes rising, facilities need to handle more SKUs and orders without expanding their physical footprint. That can be achieved through high-density storage and dynamic throughput.
3. Streamline returns management. Returns are a growing challenge, thanks to the continued growth of e-commerce and the consumer practice of bracketing. Businesses can handle that with smarter reverse logistics processes like automated returns processing and reverse logistics visibility.
4. Accelerate order fulfillment with robotics. Robotic solutions are transforming the way orders are fulfilled, helping businesses meet customer expectations faster and more accurately than ever before by using autonomous mobile robots (AMRs and robotic picking.
5. Enhance end-of-line packaging. The final step in the supply chain is often the most visible to customers. So optimizing packaging processes can reduce costs, improve efficiency, and support sustainability goals through automated packaging systems and sustainability initiatives.
Geopolitical rivalries, alliances, and aspirations are rewiring the global economy—and the imposition of new tariffs on foreign imports by the U.S. will accelerate that process, according to an analysis by Boston Consulting Group (BCG).
Without a broad increase in tariffs, world trade in goods will keep growing at an average of 2.9% annually for the next eight years, the firm forecasts in its report, “Great Powers, Geopolitics, and the Future of Trade.” But the routes goods travel will change markedly as North America reduces its dependence on China and China builds up its links with the Global South, which is cementing its power in the global trade map.
“Global trade is set to top $29 trillion by 2033, but the routes these goods will travel is changing at a remarkable pace,” Aparna Bharadwaj, managing director and partner at BCG, said in a release. “Trade lanes were already shifting from historical patterns and looming US tariffs will accelerate this. Navigating these new dynamics will be critical for any global business.”
To understand those changes, BCG modeled the direct impact of the 60/25/20 scenario (60% tariff on Chinese goods, a 25% on goods from Canada and Mexico, and a 20% on imports from all other countries). The results show that the tariffs would add $640 billion to the cost of importing goods from the top ten U.S. import nations, based on 2023 levels, unless alternative sources or suppliers are found.
In terms of product categories imported by the U.S., the greatest impact would be on imported auto parts and automotive vehicles, which would primarily affect trade with Mexico, the EU, and Japan. Consumer electronics, electrical machinery, and fashion goods would be most affected by higher tariffs on Chinese goods. Specifically, the report forecasts that a 60% tariff rate would add $61 billion to cost of importing consumer electronics products from China into the U.S.
That strategy is described by RILA President Brian Dodge in a document titled “2025 Retail Public Policy Agenda,” which begins by describing leading retailers as “dynamic and multifaceted businesses that begin on Main Street and stretch across the world to bring high value and affordable consumer goods to American families.”
RILA says its policy priorities support that membership in four ways:
Investing in people. Retail is for everyone; the place for a first job, 2nd chance, third act, or a side hustle – the retail workforce represents the American workforce.
Ensuring a safe, sustainable future. RILA is working with lawmakers to help shape policies that protect our customers and meet expectations regarding environmental concerns.
Leading in the community. Retail is more than a store; we are an integral part of the fabric of our communities.
“As Congress and the Trump administration move forward to adopt policies that reduce regulatory burdens, create economic growth, and bring value to American families, understanding how such policies will impact retailers and the communities we serve is imperative,” Dodge said. “RILA and its member companies look forward to collaborating with policymakers to provide industry-specific insights and data to help shape any policies under consideration.”
New Jersey is home to the most congested freight bottleneck in the country for the seventh straight year, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
ATRI’s annual list of the Top 100 Truck Bottlenecks aims to highlight the nation’s most congested highways and help local, state, and federal governments target funding to areas most in need of relief. The data show ways to reduce chokepoints, lower emissions, and drive economic growth, according to the researchers.
The 2025 Top Truck Bottleneck List measures the level of truck-involved congestion at more than 325 locations on the national highway system. The analysis is based on an extensive database of freight truck GPS data and uses several customized software applications and analysis methods, along with terabytes of data from trucking operations, to produce a congestion impact ranking for each location. The bottleneck locations detailed in the latest ATRI list represent the top 100 congested locations, although ATRI continuously monitors more than 325 freight-critical locations, the group said.
For the seventh straight year, the intersection of I-95 and State Route 4 near the George Washington Bridge in Fort Lee, New Jersey, is the top freight bottleneck in the country. The remaining top 10 bottlenecks include: Chicago, I-294 at I-290/I-88; Houston, I-45 at I-69/US 59; Atlanta, I-285 at I-85 (North); Nashville: I-24/I-40 at I-440 (East); Atlanta: I-75 at I-285 (North); Los Angeles, SR 60 at SR 57; Cincinnati, I-71 at I-75; Houston, I-10 at I-45; and Atlanta, I-20 at I-285 (West).
ATRI’s analysis, which utilized data from 2024, found that traffic conditions continue to deteriorate from recent years, partly due to work zones resulting from increased infrastructure investment. Average rush hour truck speeds were 34.2 miles per hour (MPH), down 3% from the previous year. Among the top 10 locations, average rush hour truck speeds were 29.7 MPH.
In addition to squandering time and money, these delays also waste fuel—with trucks burning an estimated 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel and producing more than 65 million metric tons of additional carbon emissions while stuck in traffic jams, according to ATRI.
On a positive note, ATRI said its analysis helps quantify the value of infrastructure investment, pointing to improvements at Chicago’s Jane Byrne Interchange as an example. Once the number one truck bottleneck in the country for three years in a row, the recently constructed interchange saw rush hour truck speeds improve by nearly 25% after construction was completed, according to the report.
“Delays inflicted on truckers by congestion are the equivalent of 436,000 drivers sitting idle for an entire year,” ATRI President and COO Rebecca Brewster said in a statement announcing the findings. “These metrics are getting worse, but the good news is that states do not need to accept the status quo. Illinois was once home to the top bottleneck in the country, but following a sustained effort to expand capacity, the Jane Byrne Interchange in Chicago no longer ranks in the top 10. This data gives policymakers a road map to reduce chokepoints, lower emissions, and drive economic growth.”