American Logistics Aid Network’s Kathy Fulton is passionate about the work she does with supply chain and emergency management. Now she and her dedicated volunteers are tackling supply chain challenges caused by the COVID-19 crisis.
For the past decade, Kathy Fulton has dealt with many disasters. As executive director of the American Logistics Aid Network (ALAN), she has become a “master” at coordinating supply chain assistance for U.S. humanitarian relief efforts. While ALAN often deals with more traditional crises like natural disasters, the emergence of the novel coronavirus has presented a different set of challenges for Fulton’s organization to tackle.
Unlike a fire, flood, or hurricane, which impacts the movement of supplies due to physical roadblocks, COVID-19 has upended the supply chain by creating scarcity of essential supplies like personal protective equipment (PPE), cleaning products, and even toilet paper. To help businesses and nonprofit organizations navigate a constantly changing landscape to deliver essential goods across the country, ALAN has taken a number of actions. One new innovation that the organizations has created is the Supply Chain Intelligence Center. This online mapping tool shows the status of roads, ports, and airports as well as the latest policy changes at national, state, local, and county levels.
Fulton’s previous experience in supply chain resiliency and disaster preparedness has helped her mobilize resources quickly during the current pandemic. She spoke recently with CSCMP’s Supply Chain Quarterly Managing Editor Diane Rand about ALAN’s challenges and what governments and businesses can do during this crisis and in the future.
NAME: Kathy Fulton
TITLE: Executive Director, American Logistics Aid Network (ALAN)
EDUCATION: Master’s degree in business administration with concentration in supply chain; Master’s degree in information systems from University of South Florida; Bachelor’s degree in mathematics from Northwestern State University of Louisiana
PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE: Served as ALAN volunteer and director of operations, previously senior manager of information technology services at Saddle Creek Logistics Services, where she led corporate systems implementation, technical support, and business continuity
LEADERSHIP: Member and former president of the Central Florida Roundtable for the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals; member of donations management committee for National Voluntary Organizations Active in Disaster; member of National Emergency Management Agency private sector committee
What has ALAN been doing during the COVID-19 pandemic?
We’ve been involved with this response since late January, even before the WHO (World Health Organization) officially labeled it a pandemic on March 11, so our response has evolved during that time. We started out by ensuring that public health messages were amplified, as well as participating in a project to analyze international freight flows to examine supply chain health.
Once the virus started spreading in the U.S., our support of the analysis work continued, and we began convening a weekly call with our industry association partners to surface and solve common issues. Most recently we’ve been focusing on coordinating donations of logistics services and equipment to help our nonprofit partners surge support for the increasing demand for their services.
We’ve also been building out our Supply Chain Intelligence Center (www.alanaid.org/map) to provide, free of charge, actionable information for organizations—a single location where they can see all of the waivers that enable commodity movements as well as policies that restrict movement. We know there has been such a variety of policies rolled out across states and counties that it can be difficult to keep up with them all. We want to reduce that particular bit of friction so that nourishment, hydration, and medical supplies can get to those who need them rapidly.
What challenges has the organization faced, and what needs do you have?
The challenges we are experiencing are due to the novel nature of the crisis, the volume of work, and the vastness of geography. During a traditional crisis response like a hurricane, fire, or flood, we’re dealing with a limited geography and responding to damages to property and infrastructure.
With COVID-19, we’re working with organizations from across the United States, and instead of physical roadblocks preventing the movement of supplies (a logistics problem) the challenges have been more related to policies, guidance, and supply-side issues. There are actual supply shortages of PPE—and while ALAN doesn’t get involved in medical and health care supply chains, we have been fielding a few requests and trying to help where possible. That is even more challenging, because it isn’t just a logistics problem (which is where most of our expertise lies), but it is truly a supply problem.
Another supply problem we’re seeing is the lack of donations to food banks from traditional sources. We’ve been able to help a couple of organizations with items to expand their capacity to serve their constituents, but it isn’t a short-term problem. Unemployment numbers are climbing each week, so keeping those food safety nets stable and able to serve those in need is always at the front of our minds.
Internally to our operations we’ve expanded our volunteer operations. For needs, we are constantly in need of ongoing financial and in-kind support. I’ll be bold and say that ALAN needs additional staff to support our work, not just during this crisis but on an ongoing basis. We have some amazing volunteers basically on loan to us right now—and having the extra hands has been a huge benefit to our ability to rapidly service requests. We’d welcome support to expand our operations.
Did any of ALAN’s past efforts in supply chain resiliency and disaster preparedness help you with response to COVID-19?
Yes, absolutely—we try to learn from every single response we support, and the relationships we’ve built and knowledge we’ve gained in the past 15 years are being called upon heavily. We’ve participated in activities like the 2014–2015 Ebola outbreak in West Africa, so we had some awareness of what challenges there may be.
And, we’ve participated in pandemic table-top exercises—one notable exercise in 2012 in the Mid-Atlantic region predicted the challenges we’ve experienced with grocery hoarding. I also think the fact that ALAN has always had virtual operations helps us immensely. We’ve done video conferencing for several years—so there was no problem moving to work from home.
If you could give advice to government leaders on how to ensure that supply chains will be resilient during and after the crisis, what would you say?
Fortunately, I don’t have to come up with that answer on my own. I was fortunate to serve on a National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine study that examined that very question, through the lens of the 2017 hurricane season. We came to four recommendations:
1. Shift the focus from pushing relief supplies to ensuring that regular supply chains are restored as rapidly as possible through strategic interventions.
2. Build a system-level understanding of supply chain dynamics as a foundation for effective decision support.
3. Support mechanisms for coordination, information sharing, and preparedness among supply chain stakeholders.
4. Develop and administer training on supply chain dynamics and best practices for private-public partnerships
Basically, encouraging government to work with businesses, not in parallel, or at worst, in competition with them. That is one of ALAN’s key missions—we want to build relationships between and across all sectors becauserelationships allow you to work together and be more resilient in the face of a crisis.
What have you learned from this pandemic?
Number one on my lessons learned is to not eat all of the chocolate in the first two days of the stay-at-home order. All joking aside, we are unfortunately seeing a lot of the same lessons we’ve observed in other crises. People still don’t coordinate their activities well—the many competing programs to get PPE into the hands of medical professionals looks very similar to the individual collection drives we see after traditional disasters.
On the positive side, logistics and supply chain will find a way to serve demand. Despite all of the challenges with policy restrictions and extreme demand, food is still getting to people in (mostly) the same ways it did before. Mostly, because of the reduction in consumption of food away from home (restaurants).
Finally, one of my biggest observations is regarding the strength of normalcy bias. I think many businesses reacted late because they thought this wasn’t going to be that bad. My favorite argument these days is whether or not COVID-19 was a “black swan” [event]. I say no—we had all the warnings that something like this was possible, our normalcy bias just prevented us from believing that it could ever happen.
What are some best practices that you have seen in place?
We are seeing business-to-business collaboration—like where workers from the food service industry are being shared with food warehouses in the retail supply chain. It supports the surge in demand and also keeps those food service workers employed. We are also seeing a lot of cross-industry sharing of guidance and practices on how to protect the workforce, such as how to sanitize facilities, etc.
Finally, like with the volunteers being loaned to us, we are seeing businesses be generous with their support of humanitarian causes—via ALAN and other channels. We’ve heard more than once that businesses “just want to help, and they’d rather pay [their] employees to do something to help than just sit around.” I hope that that spirit of collaboration and community continues.
Do you think this will lead to more companies paying more attention to risk management and supply chain resiliency in the near future? If so, what steps do you expect to see companies take?
I hear a lot of businesses talking about re-examining strategies, and I hope they will. We’re hearing about supplier diversity in terms of companies and geographies and about re-examining inventory. This attention may be short term as businesses determine that some of these strategies are more expensive. It will definitely be interesting to watch as the world recovers from this crisis and determines how to move forward.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
Specifically, the two sides remain at odds over provisions related to the deployment of semi-automated technologies like rail-mounted gantry cranes, according to an analysis by the Kansas-based 3PL Noatum Logistics. The ILA has strongly opposed further automation, arguing it threatens dockworker protections, while the USMX contends that automation enhances productivity and can create long-term opportunities for labor.
In fact, U.S. importers are already taking action to prevent the impact of such a strike, “pulling forward” their container shipments by rushing imports to earlier dates on the calendar, according to analysis by supply chain visibility provider Project44. That strategy can help companies to build enough safety stock to dampen the damage of events like the strike and like the steep tariffs being threatened by the incoming Trump administration.
Likewise, some ocean carriers have already instituted January surcharges in pre-emption of possible labor action, which could support inbound ocean rates if a strike occurs, according to freight market analysts with TD Cowen. In the meantime, the outcome of the new negotiations are seen with “significant uncertainty,” due to the contentious history of the discussion and to the timing of the talks that overlap with a transition between two White House regimes, analysts said.
That percentage is even greater than the 13.21% of total retail sales that were returned. Measured in dollars, returns (including both legitimate and fraudulent) last year reached $685 billion out of the $5.19 trillion in total retail sales.
“It’s clear why retailers want to limit bad actors that exhibit fraudulent and abusive returns behavior, but the reality is that they are finding stricter returns policies are not reducing the returns fraud they face,” Michael Osborne, CEO of Appriss Retail, said in a release.
Specifically, the report lists the leading types of returns fraud and abuse reported by retailers in 2024, including findings that:
60% of retailers surveyed reported incidents of “wardrobing,” or the act of consumers buying an item, using the merchandise, and then returning it.
55% cited cases of returning an item obtained through fraudulent or stolen tender, such as stolen credit cards, counterfeit bills, gift cards obtained through fraudulent means or fraudulent checks.
48% of retailers faced occurrences of returning stolen merchandise.
Together, those statistics show that the problem remains prevalent despite growing efforts by retailers to curb retail returns fraud through stricter returns policies, while still offering a sufficiently open returns policy to keep customers loyal, they said.
“Returns are a significant cost for retailers, and the rise of online shopping could increase this trend,” Kevin Mahoney, managing director, retail, Deloitte Consulting LLP, said. “As retailers implement policies to address this issue, they should avoid negatively affecting customer loyalty and retention. Effective policies should reduce losses for the retailer while minimally impacting the customer experience. This approach can be crucial for long-term success.”