How far along are you on adopting digital technology into your supply chain? Survey results show the C-suite has a very different answer to that question than operational leaders.
Digital continues to be a strategic imperative for most supply chain organizations, according to Gartner’s “Supply Chain Technology User Wants and Needs Survey.” But how far along they are in implementing that strategy seems to be a matter of debate.
For 13 years Gartner has surveyed supply chain business users about their information technology (IT) goals, priorities, maturity, and investment strategies. In the 2019 survey, “digital” was identified as a core strategy and focal point as supply chain organizations looked to advance their supply chain maturity and business performance. (We recognize that the term “digital” has different connotations, depending on the focus of the discussion. In the context of the survey, digitization is defined as applying digital technologies to improve supply chain performance.)
A difference of opinion
The survey represented a variety of viewpoints. A bit over 45% of respondents were senior supply chain leadership with the rest being members of operational management, including vice presidents, directors, and managers.
When we compared the responses of senior-level leadership to those of the front-line, mid-level management respondents, we observed an interesting dichotomy. Throughout the study, senior leadership had an overly optimistic view of their organization’s capabilities and commitments to supply chain IT. This inflated exuberance at the top likely causes companies to overstate their real abilities, which could have negative ramifications for their performance.
For example, respondents were asked to select which statement most closely describes their organization’s current state as it pursues digital supply chain initiatives. They had to choose between: “We struggle to fully understand and define how digital supply chain will affect our business and what investments we will need to make to be successful” and “We have a clear vision, plan, and road map driving our digital initiatives.” Almost unbelievably, 97% of C-suite respondents said they had a clear vision, plan, and road map. Even more surprising is how strong this sentiment was with 66% saying they had moderately to very strong digital competencies; a statement which is not supported by the hundreds of calls Gartner takes each year during which customers seek our guidance on developing digital strategies and road maps. This suggests that respondents are overestimating and overstating their abilities.
In contrast, 81% of respondents who were in operational management felt they had strong digital strategies. So while operational management was still optimistic, there was a 17-percentage point drop from the C-suite. Additionally, those respondents who felt they had moderately high to high levels of competency dropped from 66% for C-suite respondents to 41% for operational management respondents. Again, this highlights a notable disconnect between the beliefs of top supply chain leadership and those of operational management. This misalignment can cause many issues for organizations from frustrations due to differing views of reality, unrealistic expectations, and misallocation of resources.
Emerging tech: A status check
A notable way to advance a company’s supply chain digital maturity is to exploit emerging technologies that offer compelling value propositions. Promising supply chain management technologies can help transform a company’s operations. To explore this, the study asked respondents to rate the importance of and their investment plans for 10 emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML), the Internet of Things (IoT), robotic process automation (RPA), and augmented reality/virtual reality (AR/VR).
The data again found a significant disconnect between what senior leadership believes to be true and what operational, front-line management perceives to be true. Figures 1 and 2 explore how respondents rated the importance of key emerging supply chain technologies and where they are currently investing or planning to invest. The reason we asked these two questions in this way is because we wanted to know if companies were “putting their money where their mouth is.” This would be like asking people if they believe it is important to save for retirement, and then asking them how much they are actually saving. If the data finds that companies consider something to be important, but they are not investing in it, then this indicates they might not see it as important as they say.
Figure 1 shows the responses for C-level supply chain executives, and it shows an overly dense clustering across all the emerging technologies. This clustering indicates that in executives’ minds, these technologies are all equally important and that they are investing significantly in all of these without prioritizing one or the other. This belief is unrealistic and unsupported by anecdotal evidence from Gartner client interactions, which find that companies are selectively investing in a smaller number of these technologies that offer the greatest near-term business value.
[Figure 1] C-suite respondents: Importance vs. Adoption of Emerging Technologies Enlarge this image
Figure 2 shows the responses for all respondents excluding C-level executives. It shows a much more realistic distribution of responses, with some more mature emerging technologies like big data, RFID, and IoT showing the most investment and the greatest importance and the remaining technologies scattered more evenly. This a more realistic view is supported by anecdotal evidence from Gartner client interactions.
[Figure 2] All respondents (except C-suite): Importance vs. Adoption of Emerging Technologies Enlarge this image
We find about 20% of companies identify as early adopters of technologies, and these are the most likely to have pilot programs in multiple emerging technology areas. Around 55% of respondents self-identify as mainstream adopters of technologies. These organizations are much more selective in choosing where to invest, and they typically wait for emerging technologies to mature somewhat before they enter the market for packaged solutions that exploit the emerging technology.
For example, an early adopter might purchase an IoT development platform and build its own predictive maintenance system, while a mainstream adopter would look to buy a predictive maintenance system that leverages IoT. This would align with the position of technologies like big data, RFID, and IoT maturing faster than some other technologies like digital twins or blockchain.
Digital will remain critical to supply chain success. But the study highlights the possible disconnect between senior executives’ digital ambitions and beliefs about their organization and their organization’s actual capability to meet those lofty expectations. No one is served if these two perceptions are not reconciled.
Senior supply chain leadership should admit that they might have overly lofty goals and that the organization cannot “go to college and major in everything” (to quote a CEO I used to work for). Instead, they need to educate themselves on what each of the technologies can do for their supply chain, and then work with their organization, at all levels, to realistically map out their current and desired capabilities.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.
Specifically, the two sides remain at odds over provisions related to the deployment of semi-automated technologies like rail-mounted gantry cranes, according to an analysis by the Kansas-based 3PL Noatum Logistics. The ILA has strongly opposed further automation, arguing it threatens dockworker protections, while the USMX contends that automation enhances productivity and can create long-term opportunities for labor.
In fact, U.S. importers are already taking action to prevent the impact of such a strike, “pulling forward” their container shipments by rushing imports to earlier dates on the calendar, according to analysis by supply chain visibility provider Project44. That strategy can help companies to build enough safety stock to dampen the damage of events like the strike and like the steep tariffs being threatened by the incoming Trump administration.
Likewise, some ocean carriers have already instituted January surcharges in pre-emption of possible labor action, which could support inbound ocean rates if a strike occurs, according to freight market analysts with TD Cowen. In the meantime, the outcome of the new negotiations are seen with “significant uncertainty,” due to the contentious history of the discussion and to the timing of the talks that overlap with a transition between two White House regimes, analysts said.