C. John Langley Jr., Ph.D. (jlangley@psu.edu) is Professor of Supply Chain Management at Penn State University’s Smeal College of Business and the Department of Supply Chain and Information Systems, and Founder of the “Annual Third-Party Logistics Study.”
The markets that logistics service providers (LSPs) serve are changing rapidly. (For a summary of some of the key trends and changes, see the associated sidebar.) In response, both users and providers have been on a relentless drive for innovation and for expansion of available logistics capabilities. As a result, third-party logistics providers (3PL) and fourth-party logistics providers (4PL) have been making significant additions to the range and scope of services that they offer to shippers and other customers.
The evolving roles of LSPs
As the term “supply chain” continues to advance, there have been noticeable changes in many of the terminologies that are used to define various types of logistics service providers. Some of the most widely recognized of these are summarized below.
It is generally accepted that the term “third-party logistics provider” came into being in the 1970s and 1980s. It’s not a coincidence that this timeframe coincides with the legislated deregulation of several transportation sectors in the United States, such as trucking (less-than-truckload and truckload), rail, and air. The deregulated business environment expanded opportunities for logistics service providers to become more market- and customer-focused and created more incentives for LSPs to craft service offerings that better fit their customers’ logistics and supply chain needs.
In response to customer requests and in pursuit of new market opportunities, 3PLs embarked on expansions of their business models beyond what may have been the more limited province of asset-based services. While there are still some identifiable “pure-play” 3PLs, most of today’s 3PL organizations represent an outgrowth and expansion of logistics services from more traditional providers of asset-based logistics services. A quick internet search will validate the large numbers of organizations that operate in the 3PL category. New entrants continue to emerge from former logistics divisions of shipper organizations, wholesalers and distributors, IT organizations, and various international enterprises, to name just a few.
In 1996, Accenture invented and trademarked the term “fourth-party logistics” (4PL) provider to describe “a supply chain integrator that assembles and manages the resources, capabilities, and technology of its own organization with those of complementary service providers to deliver a comprehensive supply chain solution.” Many of these 4PLs are extensions of more traditional LSP organizations, while others have evolved from consulting organizations, firms specializing in data management and analytics, and former logistics divisions of shipper organizations.
In comparison with 3PLs, it is interesting to note that an internet search for 4PL organizations does not turn up much in the way of organized or comprehensive listings of primary participants in this sector. A logical explanation is that this is due to the significant breadth and diversity of the types of services available in general from 4PLs such as lead logistics provider (LLP), consulting/advisory services, advanced IT services, risk management, “control tower” services, and others.
LLP responsibilities are particularly interesting as they require 4PLs to use their high levels of visibility, real-time information, communication abilities, and broad knowledge to align 3PLs, customers, and service providers. A 4PL not only draws on the data it collects itself, it also can draw on data gathered from other supply chain partners. The visibility that is created from that data plays a crucial role in allowing customers and 4PLs to provide seamless supply chain services, manage exceptions, and remove costs and inefficiencies from the supply chain.
Now, some logistics service providers are expanding their offerings to offer the following innovative capabilities:
Develop and implement best possible supply chains or networks,
Plan, design, and implement complete logistics solutions,
Manage networks of supply chains,
Provide linkages to e-business,
Implement logistics solutions and technologies, and
Aggregate demand from 3PLs into more efficient volumes for lower rates.
These innovations and offerings are frequently accompanied by the introduction of a newer term: “5PL.” At face value, these example 5PL capabilities may appear to be similar to those that may be ascribed to many 4PLs. So, a logical next question is: What exactly is a 5PL, and how does it differ from a 3PL and a 4PL? More generally, where in the lexicon of LSPs does the 5PL exist, and how is it unique and different from other types of LSPs? Or, is it perhaps too soon to expect a more succinct and widely agreed upon definition of a 5PL?
The future evolution of LSPs also will be impacted by the current trend toward thinking of supply chains as “ecosystems” instead of linear systems or processes. (See Figure 1.) Essentially, supply chains are evolving into complex international networks that include interlinked companies that interact and collaborate with each other to ultimately create value for their end-user customers or consumers. In addition to including traditional supply chain participants such as suppliers, manufacturers, and distributors, these ecosystems are characterized by the alignment and convergence of digital and physical flows via the internet of things, sensing devices, blockchain, and overall digitization of the supply chain. As this new and innovative context for supply chain continues to gain acceptance, there will be significant opportunities for LSPs to respond and participate accordingly.
Logistics service providers and their clients are facing some very significant changes in their supply chain environments. Just a few of those include:
• “Blurring” of definitions. Over time, the distinctions between terms such as less-than-truckload (LTL), truckload (TL), and parcel have blurred or, in some instances, disappeared. In the past, these terms were suitable descriptors of specific types of “pure-play” service providers, but today most organizations have materially broadened the scope of their service offerings.
• Asset- vs. nonasset-based services. Historically, the predominant model for LSPs was the “asset-based” model where the provider served its customers through use of its own assets and services. In recent decades, however, there has been significant growth and development of “nonasset-based” LSPs that rely on relationships with capable asset-based providers to serve their customers. Even though there are a growing number of products that have become digitized or otherwise electronically transformed (such as books, music, software, and 3D-printed parts and products), most supply chains still depend on capable asset-based services to manage the logistical flows of physical products.
• Greatly enhanced supply chain technologies. Supply chain practices have been greatly impacted by newer technologies such as cloud-based solutions, software-as-a-service (SaaS) platforms, advanced analytics, and 5G broadband networks. Findings from annual 3PL studies conducted by Penn State, Infosys, and Penske confirm that shippers overwhelmingly agree that information technologies are necessary elements of 3PL expertise.
• The “Amazon effect.” While there are many ways to define this term, it is clear that the presence of Amazon and the overall growth of the omnichannel phenomenon have had disruptive impacts on more traditional supply chains. In turn, this has created a need for individual LSPs to reconsider their operating strategies and to make appropriate changes.
• COVID-19. Regrettably, any discussion of the future of supply chains and the roles of 3PLs and 4PLs must consider the impacts of COVID-19. As the effects of this pandemic have become significantly intertwined with global economic and political issues, it is certain that there will be long-lasting and likely fundamental changes ahead for supply chains.
The practice consists of 5,000 professionals from Accenture and from Avanade—the consulting firm’s joint venture with Microsoft. They will be supported by Microsoft product specialists who will work closely with the Accenture Center for Advanced AI. Together, that group will collaborate on AI and Copilot agent templates, extensions, plugins, and connectors to help organizations leverage their data and gen AI to reduce costs, improve efficiencies and drive growth, they said on Thursday.
Accenture and Avanade say they have already developed some AI tools for these applications. For example, a supplier discovery and risk agent can deliver real-time market insights, agile supply chain responses, and better vendor selection, which could result in up to 15% cost savings. And a procure-to-pay agent could improve efficiency by up to 40% and enhance vendor relations and satisfaction by addressing urgent payment requirements and avoiding disruptions of key services
Likewise, they have also built solutions for clients using Microsoft 365 Copilot technology. For example, they have created Copilots for a variety of industries and functions including finance, manufacturing, supply chain, retail, and consumer goods and healthcare.
Another part of the new practice will be educating clients how to use the technology, using an “Azure Generative AI Engineer Nanodegree program” to teach users how to design, build, and operationalize AI-driven applications on Azure, Microsoft’s cloud computing platform. The online classes will teach learners how to use AI models to solve real-world problems through automation, data insights, and generative AI solutions, the firms said.
“We are pleased to deepen our collaboration with Accenture to help our mutual customers develop AI-first business processes responsibly and securely, while helping them drive market differentiation,” Judson Althoff, executive vice president and chief commercial officer at Microsoft, said in a release. “By bringing together Copilots and human ambition, paired with the autonomous capabilities of an agent, we can accelerate AI transformation for organizations across industries and help them realize successful business outcomes through pragmatic innovation.”
Census data showed that overall retail sales in October were up 0.4% seasonally adjusted month over month and up 2.8% unadjusted year over year. That compared with increases of 0.8% month over month and 2% year over year in September.
October’s core retail sales as defined by NRF — based on the Census data but excluding automobile dealers, gasoline stations and restaurants — were unchanged seasonally adjusted month over month but up 5.4% unadjusted year over year.
Core sales were up 3.5% year over year for the first 10 months of the year, in line with NRF’s forecast for 2024 retail sales to grow between 2.5% and 3.5% over 2023. NRF is forecasting that 2024 holiday sales during November and December will also increase between 2.5% and 3.5% over the same time last year.
“October’s pickup in retail sales shows a healthy pace of spending as many consumers got an early start on holiday shopping,” NRF Chief Economist Jack Kleinhenz said in a release. “October sales were a good early step forward into the holiday shopping season, which is now fully underway. Falling energy prices have likely provided extra dollars for household spending on retail merchandise.”
Despite that positive trend, market watchers cautioned that retailers still need to offer competitive value propositions and customer experience in order to succeed in the holiday season. “The American consumer has been more resilient than anyone could have expected. But that isn’t a free pass for retailers to under invest in their stores,” Nikki Baird, VP of strategy & product at Aptos, a solutions provider of unified retail technology based out of Alpharetta, Georgia, said in a statement. “They need to make investments in labor, customer experience tech, and digital transformation. It has been too easy to kick the can down the road until you suddenly realize there’s no road left.”
A similar message came from Chip West, a retail and consumer behavior expert at the marketing, packaging, print and supply chain solutions provider RRD. “October’s increase proved to be slightly better than projections and was likely boosted by lower fuel prices. As inflation slowed for a number of months, prices in several categories have stabilized, with some even showing declines, offering further relief to consumers,” West said. “The data also looks to be a positive sign as we kick off the holiday shopping season. Promotions and discounts will play a prominent role in holiday shopping behavior as they are key influencers in consumer’s purchasing decisions.”
That result came from the company’s “GEP Global Supply Chain Volatility Index,” an indicator tracking demand conditions, shortages, transportation costs, inventories, and backlogs based on a monthly survey of 27,000 businesses. The October index number was -0.39, which was up only slightly from its level of -0.43 in September.
Researchers found a steep rise in slack across North American supply chains due to declining factory activity in the U.S. In fact, purchasing managers at U.S. manufacturers made their strongest cutbacks to buying volumes in nearly a year and a half, indicating that factories in the world's largest economy are preparing for lower production volumes, GEP said.
Elsewhere, suppliers feeding Asia also reported spare capacity in October, albeit to a lesser degree than seen in Western markets. Europe's industrial plight remained a key feature of the data in October, as vendor capacity was significantly underutilized, reflecting a continuation of subdued demand in key manufacturing hubs across the continent.
"We're in a buyers' market. October is the fourth straight month that suppliers worldwide reported spare capacity, with notable contractions in factory demand across North America and Europe, underscoring the challenging outlook for Western manufacturers," Todd Bremer, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "President-elect Trump inherits U.S. manufacturers with plenty of spare capacity while in contrast, China's modest rebound and strong expansion in India demonstrate greater resilience in Asia."
Even as the e-commerce sector overall continues expanding toward a forecasted 41% of all retail sales by 2027, many small to medium e-commerce companies are struggling to find the investment funding they need to increase sales, according to a sector survey from online capital platform Stenn.
Global geopolitical instability and increasing inflation are causing e-commerce firms to face a liquidity crisis, which means companies may not be able to access the funds they need to grow, Stenn’s survey of 500 senior e-commerce leaders found. The research was conducted by Opinion Matters between August 29 and September 5.
Survey findings include:
61.8% of leaders who sought growth capital did so to invest in advanced technologies, such as AI and machine learning, to improve their businesses.
When asked which resources they wished they had more access to, 63.8% of respondents pointed to growth capital.
Women indicated a stronger need for business operations training (51.2%) and financial planning resources (48.8%) compared to men (30.8% and 15.4%).
40% of business owners are seeking external financial advice and mentorship at least once a week to help with business decisions.
Almost half (49.6%) of respondents are proactively forecasting their business activity 6-18 months ahead.
“As e-commerce continues to grow rapidly, driven by increasing online consumer demand and technological innovation, it’s important to remember that capital constraints and access to growth financing remain persistent hurdles for many e-commerce business leaders especially at small and medium-sized businesses,” Noel Hillman, Chief Commercial Officer at Stenn, said in a release. “In this competitive landscape, ensuring liquidity and optimizing supply chain processes are critical to sustaining growth and scaling operations.”
With six keynote and more than 100 educational sessions, CSCMP EDGE 2024 offered a wealth of content. Here are highlights from just some of the presentations.
A great American story
Author and entrepreneur Fawn Weaver closed out the first day of the conference by telling the little-known story of Nathan “Nearest” Green, who was born into slavery, freed after the Civil War, and went on to become the first master distiller for the Jack Daniel’s Whiskey brand. Through extensive research and interviews with descendants of the Daniel and Green families, Weaver discovered what she describes as a positive American story.
She told the story in her best-selling book, Love & Whiskey: The Remarkable True Story of Jack Daniel, His Master Distiller Nearest Green, and the Improbable Rise of Uncle Nearest. That story also inspired her to create Uncle Nearest Premium Whiskey.
Weaver discussed the barriers she encountered in bringing the brand to life, her vision for where it’s headed, and her take on the supply chain—which she views as both a necessary cost of doing business and an opportunity.
“[It’s] an opportunity if you can move quickly,” she said, pointing to a recent project in which the company was able to fast-track a new Uncle Nearest product thanks to close collaboration with its supply chain partners.
A two-pronged business transformation
We may be living in a world full of technology, but strategy and focus remain the top priorities when it comes to managing a business and its supply chains. So says Roberto Isaias, executive vice president and chief supply chain officer for toy manufacturing and entertainment company Mattel.
Isaias emphasized the point during his keynote on day two of EDGE 2024. He described how Mattel transformed itself amid surging demand for Barbie-branded items following the success of the Barbie movie.
That transformation, according to Isaias, came on two fronts: commercially and logistically. Today, Mattel is steadily moving beyond the toy aisle with two films and 13 TV series in production as well as 14 films and 35 shows in development. And as for those supply chain gains? The company has saved millions, increased productivity, and improved profit margins—even amid cost increases and inflation.
A framework for chasing excellence
Most of the time when CEOs present at an industry conference, they like to talk about their companies’ success stories. Not J.B. Hunt’s Shelley Simpson. Speaking at EDGE, the trucking company’s president and CEO led with a story about a time that the company lost a major customer.
According to Simpson, the company had a customer of their dedicated contract business in 2001 that was consistently making late shipments with no lead time. “We were working like crazy to try to satisfy them, and lost their business,” Simpson said.
When the team at J.B. Hunt later met with the customer’s chief supply chain officer and related all they had been doing, the customer responded, “You never shared everything you were doing for us.”
Out of that experience, came J.B. Hunt’s Customer Value Delivery framework. The framework consists of five steps: 1) understand customer needs, 2) deliver expectations, 3) measure results, 4) communicate performance, and 5) anticipate new value.
Next year’s CSCMP EDGE conference on October 5–8 in National Harbor, Md., promises to have a similarly deep lineup of keynote presentations. Register early at www.cscmpedge.org.