To successfully shift production and distribution to Mexico, companies must overcome some challenges and find the right employees, says strategist Rolando García.
Mexico has once again become attractive as a manufacturing and distribution location. In the last year or two, a number of companies have relocated some manufacturing and distribution capacity from Asia to Mexico. Those that make the move can expect to gain important benefits, but to be successful, they will have to overcome challenges in the areas of security, infrastructure, and human resources, says Rolando García.
García, a consultant and CSCMP member, knows both the rewards and challenges of managing supply chains in Mexico. For the past 14 years, he's worked in the fields of strategic planning, logistics, and finance for both Mexican and global corporations. During that time, he's participated in such projects as manufacturing plant startups, enterprise resource planning (ERP) implementations, and lean operations initiatives.
In a recent interview with Editor James Cooke, García offered some practical advice for companies that want to set up operations in Mexico.
Why are more companies considering moving some manufacturing and distribution operations from Asia to Mexico right now?
I can identify three main motives. The first is the quality of the workforce. Mexico has a workforce with many years of experience manufacturing to the highest standards. With the current economic downturn, it's easy to find experienced engineers, managers, and operators at very competitive salaries.
Second, Mexico has accommodating legal and labor laws. A new company can easily arrange to have a "white" union—one that is basically controlled by the company. In addition, the legally mandated minimum wage and benefits are very low compared to the United States, Canada, and Europe. And there are incentives for establishing manufacturing plants in many states. A common example is an exemption from payroll taxes granted for a specified number of years by state governments. I was personally involved in a food manufacturing plant startup for a U.S. company, where one of our main raw materials was water. The company was granted a permit by local government to extract ground water for a number of years at a fraction of the commercial value.
Finally, Mexico offers savings in transportation costs not only to the United States but also to other Latin American countries, such as Brazil. And because Mexico itself is a major consumer market, goods produced here can be made for local consumption.
Name: Rolando García Title: Financial Information and Strategy Manager for Latin America Organization: Teleperformance, a contact-center management company with headquarters in Paris
Associate of Arts in Business Administration from Southwest Texas Junior College
Bachelor of Science in Accounting from Tecnológico de Monterrey
Master of Science in Strategic Planning from Tecnológico de Monterrey
Started BACS, a consulting firm specializing in reengineering finance and operations processes for manufacturing and retail industries, in 2005
Joined Teleperformance's Strategic Planning team in 2010
CSCMP member since 2009
What are some of the challenges companies face when operating in Mexico?
The first is security. For the past two years, Mexico has been going through an unprecedented crime wave. This translates into an increased risk of shipments being robbed en route—and that increases insurance rates, or it must be factored as shrinkage into logistics costs. There's also an increased risk of robbery in warehouses, which must also be factored into insurance rates and costs. The incidence of crimes like car theft and kidnapping has risen in recent years and can affect individuals, but they can be avoided by maintaining a low profile as well as identifying problem zones and staying out of them.
Besides security issues, there are logistics infrastructure challenges. While Mexico is in a privileged geographic position next to the United States and has vast coastlines, its infrastructure is seriously lacking. Public roads, with a few exceptions, are in bad shape. Suspensions and tires on trucks will need to be changed more often than in the United States. There is a vast railroad network, but few stations are configured for loading or unloading cargo.
There also are great differences in the quality of the workforce from region to region. My previous comments about the high quality of the workforce hold for the traditional industrial cities like Mexico City, Guadalajara, San Luis Potosí, Puebla, Monterrey, Saltillo, and others. Once you get out of these cities you will find very low-cost, very willing workers, but you will struggle to find qualified whitecollar workers.
Finally, there's corruption. While the higher levels of government will put in place programs like the tax exemptions I mentioned earlier, companies will encounter corruption in some local offices while trying to perform such basic tasks as obtaining building permits.
How do you find supply chain talent in Mexico, and what kind of education and experience do they typically have?
Regarding white-collar positions: In the three biggest cities—Mexico City, Guadalajara, and Monterrey— and in medium-sized industrial cities like San Luis Potosí, Aguascalientes, Puebla, Toluca, and Chihuahua, you are going to find an abundant pool of very qualified, motivated, and experienced candidates for any supply chain specialty you need.
The reasons are many. First, these cities have been home for many decades to global industries such as car manufacturers and their suppliers, American retailers and their distribution centers, pharmaceuticals, petrochemicals, and steel and cement. So the people in these cities have experience in these industries and are used to working with high quality standards.
Another plus is that many candidates who have worked with global companies will have experience in projects outside of Mexico. Although that experience will be reflected in higher salaries, they may still be lower or comparable to salaries in other countries. For example, an analyst or a manager in these cities will earn maybe 30 to 50 percent of what he or she would earn in the United States. Higher-level directors or chief operating officers will earn just as much in these cities as in the United States.
Second, these cities are where the best schools in the country are located, including Tecnológico de Monterrey, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, and so forth.
Third, for years there has been a shortage of whitecollar jobs in these cities, which in turn has made candidates very competitive. You will find many candidates, not just with bachelor of arts degrees but also with master's degrees, specialization diplomas, and/or professional certifications. You will also find that most candidates in these cities—in my experience more than 50 percent—will have English-language skills, at least enough to understand an e-mail and have a business conversation.
In the rest of the country you have a different scenario. As you go into smaller cities, most of the job opportunities are in local companies. Work conditions and standards are lower than in the larger cities, and there are not many opportunities to get a quality education. You will find that many good candidates who have the opportunity to study in one of the big schools outside of the small cities will eventually stay in the big cities.
Regarding blue-collar workers, you will find that their skills and experience tend to be approximately equal in both kinds of cities; the main difference will be that salaries could be up to 50 percent lower in the small cities. For example, a forklift operator trained to use bar-code scanning hardware can earn maybe US $15 a day in a small city like Zamora, in the state of Michoacán. That same operator can earn up to US $25 a day in Monterrey, in the state of Nuevo León, and he would probably earn around US $80 a day in the United States.
What advice would you give to a company that is planning to move some of its distribution operations to Mexico?
I would start by approaching a high level of government. The Secretaria de Economía (Office of the Secretary of the Economy, which is in charge of promoting industry) is a good starting point. Try to reach them through an official agency of your own country, or contact your chamber of commerce and ask if they have contacts in the Mexican Secretaria de Economía.
I would work on a detailed project plan and create a core project team before anything else. The team should be a mixture of experts from the home country, who will bring the know-how of your industry, and local talent, who will have the know-how related to local conditions. Contract the services of an accredited headhunter to hire local talent. You want to have on the core project team strong local players that line workers can relate to. In my personal experience, the best practice is to hire the local key players months ahead of the go-live date and send them to the home country for training.
If this is the company's first offshore experience, select a site in one of the traditional manufacturing cities. There will be cheaper sites, but you will struggle with logistics infrastructure, connectivity, and quality of the workforce if you make that choice.
Businesses are cautiously optimistic as peak holiday shipping season draws near, with many anticipating year-over-year sales increases as they continue to battle challenging supply chain conditions.
That’s according to the DHL 2024 Peak Season Shipping Survey, released today by express shipping service provider DHL Express U.S. The company surveyed small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to gauge their holiday business outlook compared to last year and found that a mix of optimism and “strategic caution” prevail ahead of this year’s peak.
Nearly half (48%) of the SMEs surveyed said they expect higher holiday sales compared to 2023, while 44% said they expect sales to remain on par with last year, and just 8% said they foresee a decline. Respondents said the main challenges to hitting those goals are supply chain problems (35%), inflation and fluctuating consumer demand (34%), staffing (16%), and inventory challenges (14%).
But respondents said they have strategies in place to tackle those issues. Many said they began preparing for holiday season earlier this year—with 45% saying they started planning in Q2 or earlier, up from 39% last year. Other strategies include expanding into international markets (35%) and leveraging holiday discounts (32%).
Sixty percent of respondents said they will prioritize personalized customer service as a way to enhance customer interactions and loyalty this year. Still others said they will invest in enhanced web and mobile experiences (23%) and eco-friendly practices (13%) to draw customers this holiday season.
The practice consists of 5,000 professionals from Accenture and from Avanade—the consulting firm’s joint venture with Microsoft. They will be supported by Microsoft product specialists who will work closely with the Accenture Center for Advanced AI. Together, that group will collaborate on AI and Copilot agent templates, extensions, plugins, and connectors to help organizations leverage their data and gen AI to reduce costs, improve efficiencies and drive growth, they said on Thursday.
Accenture and Avanade say they have already developed some AI tools for these applications. For example, a supplier discovery and risk agent can deliver real-time market insights, agile supply chain responses, and better vendor selection, which could result in up to 15% cost savings. And a procure-to-pay agent could improve efficiency by up to 40% and enhance vendor relations and satisfaction by addressing urgent payment requirements and avoiding disruptions of key services
Likewise, they have also built solutions for clients using Microsoft 365 Copilot technology. For example, they have created Copilots for a variety of industries and functions including finance, manufacturing, supply chain, retail, and consumer goods and healthcare.
Another part of the new practice will be educating clients how to use the technology, using an “Azure Generative AI Engineer Nanodegree program” to teach users how to design, build, and operationalize AI-driven applications on Azure, Microsoft’s cloud computing platform. The online classes will teach learners how to use AI models to solve real-world problems through automation, data insights, and generative AI solutions, the firms said.
“We are pleased to deepen our collaboration with Accenture to help our mutual customers develop AI-first business processes responsibly and securely, while helping them drive market differentiation,” Judson Althoff, executive vice president and chief commercial officer at Microsoft, said in a release. “By bringing together Copilots and human ambition, paired with the autonomous capabilities of an agent, we can accelerate AI transformation for organizations across industries and help them realize successful business outcomes through pragmatic innovation.”
Census data showed that overall retail sales in October were up 0.4% seasonally adjusted month over month and up 2.8% unadjusted year over year. That compared with increases of 0.8% month over month and 2% year over year in September.
October’s core retail sales as defined by NRF — based on the Census data but excluding automobile dealers, gasoline stations and restaurants — were unchanged seasonally adjusted month over month but up 5.4% unadjusted year over year.
Core sales were up 3.5% year over year for the first 10 months of the year, in line with NRF’s forecast for 2024 retail sales to grow between 2.5% and 3.5% over 2023. NRF is forecasting that 2024 holiday sales during November and December will also increase between 2.5% and 3.5% over the same time last year.
“October’s pickup in retail sales shows a healthy pace of spending as many consumers got an early start on holiday shopping,” NRF Chief Economist Jack Kleinhenz said in a release. “October sales were a good early step forward into the holiday shopping season, which is now fully underway. Falling energy prices have likely provided extra dollars for household spending on retail merchandise.”
Despite that positive trend, market watchers cautioned that retailers still need to offer competitive value propositions and customer experience in order to succeed in the holiday season. “The American consumer has been more resilient than anyone could have expected. But that isn’t a free pass for retailers to under invest in their stores,” Nikki Baird, VP of strategy & product at Aptos, a solutions provider of unified retail technology based out of Alpharetta, Georgia, said in a statement. “They need to make investments in labor, customer experience tech, and digital transformation. It has been too easy to kick the can down the road until you suddenly realize there’s no road left.”
A similar message came from Chip West, a retail and consumer behavior expert at the marketing, packaging, print and supply chain solutions provider RRD. “October’s increase proved to be slightly better than projections and was likely boosted by lower fuel prices. As inflation slowed for a number of months, prices in several categories have stabilized, with some even showing declines, offering further relief to consumers,” West said. “The data also looks to be a positive sign as we kick off the holiday shopping season. Promotions and discounts will play a prominent role in holiday shopping behavior as they are key influencers in consumer’s purchasing decisions.”
Third-party logistics (3PL) providers’ share of large real estate leases across the U.S. rose significantly through the third quarter of 2024 compared to the same time last year, as more retailers and wholesalers have been outsourcing their warehouse and distribution operations to 3PLs, according to a report from real estate firm CBRE.
Specifically, 3PLs’ share of bulk industrial leasing activity—covering leases of 100,000 square feet or more—rose to 34.1% through Q3 of this year from 30.6% through Q3 last year. By raw numbers, 3PLs have accounted for 498 bulk leases so far this year, up by 9% from the 457 at this time last year.
By category, 3PLs’ share of 34.1% ranked above other occupier types such as: general retail and wholesale (26.6), food and beverage (9.0), automobiles, tires, and parts (7.9), manufacturing (6.2), building materials and construction (5.6), e-commerce only (5.6), medical (2.7), and undisclosed (2.3).
On a quarterly basis, bulk leasing by 3PLs has steadily increased this year, reversing the steadily decreasing trend of 2023. CBRE pointed to three main reasons for that resurgence:
Import Flexibility. Labor disruptions, extreme weather patterns, and geopolitical uncertainty have led many companies to diversify their import locations. Using 3PLs allows for more inventory flexibility, a key component to retailer success in times of uncertainty.
Capital Allocation/Preservation. Warehousing and distribution of goods is expensive, draining capital resources for transportation costs, rent, or labor. But outsourcing to 3PLs provides companies with more flexibility to increase or decrease their inventories without any risk of signing their own lease commitments. And using a 3PL also allows companies to switch supply chain costs from capital to operational expenses.
Focus on Core Competency. Outsourcing their logistics operations to 3PLs allows companies to focus on core business competencies that drive revenue, such as product development, sales, and customer service.
Looking into the future, these same trends will continue to drive 3PL warehouse demand, CBRE said. Economic, geopolitical and supply chain uncertainty will remain prevalent in the coming quarters but will not diminish the need to effectively manage inventory levels.
That result came from the company’s “GEP Global Supply Chain Volatility Index,” an indicator tracking demand conditions, shortages, transportation costs, inventories, and backlogs based on a monthly survey of 27,000 businesses. The October index number was -0.39, which was up only slightly from its level of -0.43 in September.
Researchers found a steep rise in slack across North American supply chains due to declining factory activity in the U.S. In fact, purchasing managers at U.S. manufacturers made their strongest cutbacks to buying volumes in nearly a year and a half, indicating that factories in the world's largest economy are preparing for lower production volumes, GEP said.
Elsewhere, suppliers feeding Asia also reported spare capacity in October, albeit to a lesser degree than seen in Western markets. Europe's industrial plight remained a key feature of the data in October, as vendor capacity was significantly underutilized, reflecting a continuation of subdued demand in key manufacturing hubs across the continent.
"We're in a buyers' market. October is the fourth straight month that suppliers worldwide reported spare capacity, with notable contractions in factory demand across North America and Europe, underscoring the challenging outlook for Western manufacturers," Todd Bremer, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "President-elect Trump inherits U.S. manufacturers with plenty of spare capacity while in contrast, China's modest rebound and strong expansion in India demonstrate greater resilience in Asia."