To successfully shift production and distribution to Mexico, companies must overcome some challenges and find the right employees, says strategist Rolando García.
Mexico has once again become attractive as a manufacturing and distribution location. In the last year or two, a number of companies have relocated some manufacturing and distribution capacity from Asia to Mexico. Those that make the move can expect to gain important benefits, but to be successful, they will have to overcome challenges in the areas of security, infrastructure, and human resources, says Rolando García.
García, a consultant and CSCMP member, knows both the rewards and challenges of managing supply chains in Mexico. For the past 14 years, he's worked in the fields of strategic planning, logistics, and finance for both Mexican and global corporations. During that time, he's participated in such projects as manufacturing plant startups, enterprise resource planning (ERP) implementations, and lean operations initiatives.
In a recent interview with Editor James Cooke, García offered some practical advice for companies that want to set up operations in Mexico.
Why are more companies considering moving some manufacturing and distribution operations from Asia to Mexico right now?
I can identify three main motives. The first is the quality of the workforce. Mexico has a workforce with many years of experience manufacturing to the highest standards. With the current economic downturn, it's easy to find experienced engineers, managers, and operators at very competitive salaries.
Second, Mexico has accommodating legal and labor laws. A new company can easily arrange to have a "white" union—one that is basically controlled by the company. In addition, the legally mandated minimum wage and benefits are very low compared to the United States, Canada, and Europe. And there are incentives for establishing manufacturing plants in many states. A common example is an exemption from payroll taxes granted for a specified number of years by state governments. I was personally involved in a food manufacturing plant startup for a U.S. company, where one of our main raw materials was water. The company was granted a permit by local government to extract ground water for a number of years at a fraction of the commercial value.
Finally, Mexico offers savings in transportation costs not only to the United States but also to other Latin American countries, such as Brazil. And because Mexico itself is a major consumer market, goods produced here can be made for local consumption.
Name: Rolando García Title: Financial Information and Strategy Manager for Latin America Organization: Teleperformance, a contact-center management company with headquarters in Paris
Associate of Arts in Business Administration from Southwest Texas Junior College
Bachelor of Science in Accounting from Tecnológico de Monterrey
Master of Science in Strategic Planning from Tecnológico de Monterrey
Started BACS, a consulting firm specializing in reengineering finance and operations processes for manufacturing and retail industries, in 2005
Joined Teleperformance's Strategic Planning team in 2010
CSCMP member since 2009
What are some of the challenges companies face when operating in Mexico?
The first is security. For the past two years, Mexico has been going through an unprecedented crime wave. This translates into an increased risk of shipments being robbed en route—and that increases insurance rates, or it must be factored as shrinkage into logistics costs. There's also an increased risk of robbery in warehouses, which must also be factored into insurance rates and costs. The incidence of crimes like car theft and kidnapping has risen in recent years and can affect individuals, but they can be avoided by maintaining a low profile as well as identifying problem zones and staying out of them.
Besides security issues, there are logistics infrastructure challenges. While Mexico is in a privileged geographic position next to the United States and has vast coastlines, its infrastructure is seriously lacking. Public roads, with a few exceptions, are in bad shape. Suspensions and tires on trucks will need to be changed more often than in the United States. There is a vast railroad network, but few stations are configured for loading or unloading cargo.
There also are great differences in the quality of the workforce from region to region. My previous comments about the high quality of the workforce hold for the traditional industrial cities like Mexico City, Guadalajara, San Luis Potosí, Puebla, Monterrey, Saltillo, and others. Once you get out of these cities you will find very low-cost, very willing workers, but you will struggle to find qualified whitecollar workers.
Finally, there's corruption. While the higher levels of government will put in place programs like the tax exemptions I mentioned earlier, companies will encounter corruption in some local offices while trying to perform such basic tasks as obtaining building permits.
How do you find supply chain talent in Mexico, and what kind of education and experience do they typically have?
Regarding white-collar positions: In the three biggest cities—Mexico City, Guadalajara, and Monterrey— and in medium-sized industrial cities like San Luis Potosí, Aguascalientes, Puebla, Toluca, and Chihuahua, you are going to find an abundant pool of very qualified, motivated, and experienced candidates for any supply chain specialty you need.
The reasons are many. First, these cities have been home for many decades to global industries such as car manufacturers and their suppliers, American retailers and their distribution centers, pharmaceuticals, petrochemicals, and steel and cement. So the people in these cities have experience in these industries and are used to working with high quality standards.
Another plus is that many candidates who have worked with global companies will have experience in projects outside of Mexico. Although that experience will be reflected in higher salaries, they may still be lower or comparable to salaries in other countries. For example, an analyst or a manager in these cities will earn maybe 30 to 50 percent of what he or she would earn in the United States. Higher-level directors or chief operating officers will earn just as much in these cities as in the United States.
Second, these cities are where the best schools in the country are located, including Tecnológico de Monterrey, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, and so forth.
Third, for years there has been a shortage of whitecollar jobs in these cities, which in turn has made candidates very competitive. You will find many candidates, not just with bachelor of arts degrees but also with master's degrees, specialization diplomas, and/or professional certifications. You will also find that most candidates in these cities—in my experience more than 50 percent—will have English-language skills, at least enough to understand an e-mail and have a business conversation.
In the rest of the country you have a different scenario. As you go into smaller cities, most of the job opportunities are in local companies. Work conditions and standards are lower than in the larger cities, and there are not many opportunities to get a quality education. You will find that many good candidates who have the opportunity to study in one of the big schools outside of the small cities will eventually stay in the big cities.
Regarding blue-collar workers, you will find that their skills and experience tend to be approximately equal in both kinds of cities; the main difference will be that salaries could be up to 50 percent lower in the small cities. For example, a forklift operator trained to use bar-code scanning hardware can earn maybe US $15 a day in a small city like Zamora, in the state of Michoacán. That same operator can earn up to US $25 a day in Monterrey, in the state of Nuevo León, and he would probably earn around US $80 a day in the United States.
What advice would you give to a company that is planning to move some of its distribution operations to Mexico?
I would start by approaching a high level of government. The Secretaria de Economía (Office of the Secretary of the Economy, which is in charge of promoting industry) is a good starting point. Try to reach them through an official agency of your own country, or contact your chamber of commerce and ask if they have contacts in the Mexican Secretaria de Economía.
I would work on a detailed project plan and create a core project team before anything else. The team should be a mixture of experts from the home country, who will bring the know-how of your industry, and local talent, who will have the know-how related to local conditions. Contract the services of an accredited headhunter to hire local talent. You want to have on the core project team strong local players that line workers can relate to. In my personal experience, the best practice is to hire the local key players months ahead of the go-live date and send them to the home country for training.
If this is the company's first offshore experience, select a site in one of the traditional manufacturing cities. There will be cheaper sites, but you will struggle with logistics infrastructure, connectivity, and quality of the workforce if you make that choice.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.
That percentage is even greater than the 13.21% of total retail sales that were returned. Measured in dollars, returns (including both legitimate and fraudulent) last year reached $685 billion out of the $5.19 trillion in total retail sales.
“It’s clear why retailers want to limit bad actors that exhibit fraudulent and abusive returns behavior, but the reality is that they are finding stricter returns policies are not reducing the returns fraud they face,” Michael Osborne, CEO of Appriss Retail, said in a release.
Specifically, the report lists the leading types of returns fraud and abuse reported by retailers in 2024, including findings that:
60% of retailers surveyed reported incidents of “wardrobing,” or the act of consumers buying an item, using the merchandise, and then returning it.
55% cited cases of returning an item obtained through fraudulent or stolen tender, such as stolen credit cards, counterfeit bills, gift cards obtained through fraudulent means or fraudulent checks.
48% of retailers faced occurrences of returning stolen merchandise.
Together, those statistics show that the problem remains prevalent despite growing efforts by retailers to curb retail returns fraud through stricter returns policies, while still offering a sufficiently open returns policy to keep customers loyal, they said.
“Returns are a significant cost for retailers, and the rise of online shopping could increase this trend,” Kevin Mahoney, managing director, retail, Deloitte Consulting LLP, said. “As retailers implement policies to address this issue, they should avoid negatively affecting customer loyalty and retention. Effective policies should reduce losses for the retailer while minimally impacting the customer experience. This approach can be crucial for long-term success.”