To successfully shift production and distribution to Mexico, companies must overcome some challenges and find the right employees, says strategist Rolando García.
Mexico has once again become attractive as a manufacturing and distribution location. In the last year or two, a number of companies have relocated some manufacturing and distribution capacity from Asia to Mexico. Those that make the move can expect to gain important benefits, but to be successful, they will have to overcome challenges in the areas of security, infrastructure, and human resources, says Rolando García.
García, a consultant and CSCMP member, knows both the rewards and challenges of managing supply chains in Mexico. For the past 14 years, he's worked in the fields of strategic planning, logistics, and finance for both Mexican and global corporations. During that time, he's participated in such projects as manufacturing plant startups, enterprise resource planning (ERP) implementations, and lean operations initiatives.
In a recent interview with Editor James Cooke, García offered some practical advice for companies that want to set up operations in Mexico.
Why are more companies considering moving some manufacturing and distribution operations from Asia to Mexico right now?
I can identify three main motives. The first is the quality of the workforce. Mexico has a workforce with many years of experience manufacturing to the highest standards. With the current economic downturn, it's easy to find experienced engineers, managers, and operators at very competitive salaries.
Second, Mexico has accommodating legal and labor laws. A new company can easily arrange to have a "white" union—one that is basically controlled by the company. In addition, the legally mandated minimum wage and benefits are very low compared to the United States, Canada, and Europe. And there are incentives for establishing manufacturing plants in many states. A common example is an exemption from payroll taxes granted for a specified number of years by state governments. I was personally involved in a food manufacturing plant startup for a U.S. company, where one of our main raw materials was water. The company was granted a permit by local government to extract ground water for a number of years at a fraction of the commercial value.
Finally, Mexico offers savings in transportation costs not only to the United States but also to other Latin American countries, such as Brazil. And because Mexico itself is a major consumer market, goods produced here can be made for local consumption.
Name: Rolando García Title: Financial Information and Strategy Manager for Latin America Organization: Teleperformance, a contact-center management company with headquarters in Paris
Associate of Arts in Business Administration from Southwest Texas Junior College
Bachelor of Science in Accounting from Tecnológico de Monterrey
Master of Science in Strategic Planning from Tecnológico de Monterrey
Started BACS, a consulting firm specializing in reengineering finance and operations processes for manufacturing and retail industries, in 2005
Joined Teleperformance's Strategic Planning team in 2010
CSCMP member since 2009
What are some of the challenges companies face when operating in Mexico?
The first is security. For the past two years, Mexico has been going through an unprecedented crime wave. This translates into an increased risk of shipments being robbed en route—and that increases insurance rates, or it must be factored as shrinkage into logistics costs. There's also an increased risk of robbery in warehouses, which must also be factored into insurance rates and costs. The incidence of crimes like car theft and kidnapping has risen in recent years and can affect individuals, but they can be avoided by maintaining a low profile as well as identifying problem zones and staying out of them.
Besides security issues, there are logistics infrastructure challenges. While Mexico is in a privileged geographic position next to the United States and has vast coastlines, its infrastructure is seriously lacking. Public roads, with a few exceptions, are in bad shape. Suspensions and tires on trucks will need to be changed more often than in the United States. There is a vast railroad network, but few stations are configured for loading or unloading cargo.
There also are great differences in the quality of the workforce from region to region. My previous comments about the high quality of the workforce hold for the traditional industrial cities like Mexico City, Guadalajara, San Luis Potosí, Puebla, Monterrey, Saltillo, and others. Once you get out of these cities you will find very low-cost, very willing workers, but you will struggle to find qualified whitecollar workers.
Finally, there's corruption. While the higher levels of government will put in place programs like the tax exemptions I mentioned earlier, companies will encounter corruption in some local offices while trying to perform such basic tasks as obtaining building permits.
How do you find supply chain talent in Mexico, and what kind of education and experience do they typically have?
Regarding white-collar positions: In the three biggest cities—Mexico City, Guadalajara, and Monterrey— and in medium-sized industrial cities like San Luis Potosí, Aguascalientes, Puebla, Toluca, and Chihuahua, you are going to find an abundant pool of very qualified, motivated, and experienced candidates for any supply chain specialty you need.
The reasons are many. First, these cities have been home for many decades to global industries such as car manufacturers and their suppliers, American retailers and their distribution centers, pharmaceuticals, petrochemicals, and steel and cement. So the people in these cities have experience in these industries and are used to working with high quality standards.
Another plus is that many candidates who have worked with global companies will have experience in projects outside of Mexico. Although that experience will be reflected in higher salaries, they may still be lower or comparable to salaries in other countries. For example, an analyst or a manager in these cities will earn maybe 30 to 50 percent of what he or she would earn in the United States. Higher-level directors or chief operating officers will earn just as much in these cities as in the United States.
Second, these cities are where the best schools in the country are located, including Tecnológico de Monterrey, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, and so forth.
Third, for years there has been a shortage of whitecollar jobs in these cities, which in turn has made candidates very competitive. You will find many candidates, not just with bachelor of arts degrees but also with master's degrees, specialization diplomas, and/or professional certifications. You will also find that most candidates in these cities—in my experience more than 50 percent—will have English-language skills, at least enough to understand an e-mail and have a business conversation.
In the rest of the country you have a different scenario. As you go into smaller cities, most of the job opportunities are in local companies. Work conditions and standards are lower than in the larger cities, and there are not many opportunities to get a quality education. You will find that many good candidates who have the opportunity to study in one of the big schools outside of the small cities will eventually stay in the big cities.
Regarding blue-collar workers, you will find that their skills and experience tend to be approximately equal in both kinds of cities; the main difference will be that salaries could be up to 50 percent lower in the small cities. For example, a forklift operator trained to use bar-code scanning hardware can earn maybe US $15 a day in a small city like Zamora, in the state of Michoacán. That same operator can earn up to US $25 a day in Monterrey, in the state of Nuevo León, and he would probably earn around US $80 a day in the United States.
What advice would you give to a company that is planning to move some of its distribution operations to Mexico?
I would start by approaching a high level of government. The Secretaria de Economía (Office of the Secretary of the Economy, which is in charge of promoting industry) is a good starting point. Try to reach them through an official agency of your own country, or contact your chamber of commerce and ask if they have contacts in the Mexican Secretaria de Economía.
I would work on a detailed project plan and create a core project team before anything else. The team should be a mixture of experts from the home country, who will bring the know-how of your industry, and local talent, who will have the know-how related to local conditions. Contract the services of an accredited headhunter to hire local talent. You want to have on the core project team strong local players that line workers can relate to. In my personal experience, the best practice is to hire the local key players months ahead of the go-live date and send them to the home country for training.
If this is the company's first offshore experience, select a site in one of the traditional manufacturing cities. There will be cheaper sites, but you will struggle with logistics infrastructure, connectivity, and quality of the workforce if you make that choice.
Just 29% of supply chain organizations have the competitive characteristics they’ll need for future readiness, according to a Gartner survey released Tuesday. The survey focused on how organizations are preparing for future challenges and to keep their supply chains competitive.
Gartner surveyed 579 supply chain practitioners to determine the capabilities needed to manage the “future drivers of influence” on supply chains, which include artificial intelligence (AI) achievement and the ability to navigate new trade policies. According to the survey, the five competitive characteristics are: agility, resilience, regionalization, integrated ecosystems, and integrated enterprise strategy.
The survey analysis identified “leaders” among the respondents as supply chain organizations that have already developed at least three of the five competitive characteristics necessary to address the top five drivers of supply chain’s future.
Less than a third have met that threshold.
“Leaders shared a commitment to preparation through long-term, deliberate strategies, while non-leaders were more often focused on short-term priorities,” Pierfrancesco Manenti, vice president analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a statement announcing the survey results.
“Most leaders have yet to invest in the most advanced technologies (e.g. real-time visibility, digital supply chain twin), but plan to do so in the next three-to-five years,” Manenti also said in the statement. “Leaders see technology as an enabler to their overall business strategies, while non-leaders more often invest in technology first, without having fully established their foundational capabilities.”
As part of the survey, respondents were asked to identify the future drivers of influence on supply chain performance over the next three to five years. The top five drivers are: achievement capability of AI (74%); the amount of new ESG regulations and trade policies being released (67%); geopolitical fight/transition for power (65%); control over data (62%); and talent scarcity (59%).
The analysis also identified four unique profiles of supply chain organizations, based on what their leaders deem as the most crucial capabilities for empowering their organizations over the next three to five years.
First, 54% of retailers are looking for ways to increase their financial recovery from returns. That’s because the cost to return a purchase averages 27% of the purchase price, which erases as much as 50% of the sales margin. But consumers have their own interests in mind: 76% of shoppers admit they’ve embellished or exaggerated the return reason to avoid a fee, a 39% increase from 2023 to 204.
Second, return experiences matter to consumers. A whopping 80% of shoppers stopped shopping at a retailer because of changes to the return policy—a 34% increase YoY.
Third, returns fraud and abuse is top-of-mind-for retailers, with wardrobing rising 38% in 2024. In fact, over two thirds (69%) of shoppers admit to wardrobing, which is the practice of buying an item for a specific reason or event and returning it after use. Shoppers also practice bracketing, or purchasing an item in a variety of colors or sizes and then returning all the unwanted options.
Fourth, returns come with a steep cost in terms of sustainability, with returns amounting to 8.4 billion pounds of landfill waste in 2023 alone.
“As returns have become an integral part of the shopper experience, retailers must balance meeting sky-high expectations with rising costs, environmental impact, and fraudulent behaviors,” Amena Ali, CEO of Optoro, said in the firm’s “2024 Returns Unwrapped” report. “By understanding shoppers’ behaviors and preferences around returns, retailers can create returns experiences that embrace their needs while driving deeper loyalty and protecting their bottom line.”
Facing an evolving supply chain landscape in 2025, companies are being forced to rethink their distribution strategies to cope with challenges like rising cost pressures, persistent labor shortages, and the complexities of managing SKU proliferation.
1. Optimize labor productivity and costs. Forward-thinking businesses are leveraging technology to get more done with fewer resources through approaches like slotting optimization, automation and robotics, and inventory visibility.
2. Maximize capacity with smart solutions. With e-commerce volumes rising, facilities need to handle more SKUs and orders without expanding their physical footprint. That can be achieved through high-density storage and dynamic throughput.
3. Streamline returns management. Returns are a growing challenge, thanks to the continued growth of e-commerce and the consumer practice of bracketing. Businesses can handle that with smarter reverse logistics processes like automated returns processing and reverse logistics visibility.
4. Accelerate order fulfillment with robotics. Robotic solutions are transforming the way orders are fulfilled, helping businesses meet customer expectations faster and more accurately than ever before by using autonomous mobile robots (AMRs and robotic picking.
5. Enhance end-of-line packaging. The final step in the supply chain is often the most visible to customers. So optimizing packaging processes can reduce costs, improve efficiency, and support sustainability goals through automated packaging systems and sustainability initiatives.
That clash has come as retailers have been hustling to adjust to pandemic swings like a renewed focus on e-commerce, then swiftly reimagining store experiences as foot traffic returned. But even as the dust settles from those changes, retailers are now facing renewed questions about how best to define their omnichannel strategy in a world where customers have increasing power and information.
The answer may come from a five-part strategy using integrated components to fortify omnichannel retail, EY said. The approach can unlock value and customer trust through great experiences, but only when implemented cohesively, not individually, EY warns.
The steps include:
1. Functional integration: Is your operating model and data infrastructure siloed between e-commerce and physical stores, or have you developed a cohesive unit centered around delivering seamless customer experience?
2. Customer insights: With consumer centricity at the heart of operations, are you analyzing all touch points to build a holistic view of preferences, behaviors, and buying patterns?
3. Next-generation inventory: Given the right customer insights, how are you utilizing advanced analytics to ensure inventory is optimized to meet demand precisely where and when it’s needed?
4. Distribution partnerships: Having ensured your customers find what they want where they want it, how are your distribution strategies adapting to deliver these choices to them swiftly and efficiently?
5. Real estate strategy: How is your real estate strategy interconnected with insights, inventory and distribution to enhance experience and maximize your footprint?
When approached cohesively, these efforts all build toward one overarching differentiator for retailers: a better customer experience that reaches from brand engagement and order placement through delivery and return, the EY study said. Amid continued volatility and an economy driven by complex customer demands, the retailers best set up to win are those that are striving to gain real-time visibility into stock levels, offer flexible fulfillment options and modernize merchandising through personalized and dynamic customer experiences.
Geopolitical rivalries, alliances, and aspirations are rewiring the global economy—and the imposition of new tariffs on foreign imports by the U.S. will accelerate that process, according to an analysis by Boston Consulting Group (BCG).
Without a broad increase in tariffs, world trade in goods will keep growing at an average of 2.9% annually for the next eight years, the firm forecasts in its report, “Great Powers, Geopolitics, and the Future of Trade.” But the routes goods travel will change markedly as North America reduces its dependence on China and China builds up its links with the Global South, which is cementing its power in the global trade map.
“Global trade is set to top $29 trillion by 2033, but the routes these goods will travel is changing at a remarkable pace,” Aparna Bharadwaj, managing director and partner at BCG, said in a release. “Trade lanes were already shifting from historical patterns and looming US tariffs will accelerate this. Navigating these new dynamics will be critical for any global business.”
To understand those changes, BCG modeled the direct impact of the 60/25/20 scenario (60% tariff on Chinese goods, a 25% on goods from Canada and Mexico, and a 20% on imports from all other countries). The results show that the tariffs would add $640 billion to the cost of importing goods from the top ten U.S. import nations, based on 2023 levels, unless alternative sources or suppliers are found.
In terms of product categories imported by the U.S., the greatest impact would be on imported auto parts and automotive vehicles, which would primarily affect trade with Mexico, the EU, and Japan. Consumer electronics, electrical machinery, and fashion goods would be most affected by higher tariffs on Chinese goods. Specifically, the report forecasts that a 60% tariff rate would add $61 billion to cost of importing consumer electronics products from China into the U.S.