The real issue: stock ranging is out of control
I read the article "A little of everything goes a long way" (Quarter 2/2010) with interest and think it misleads the reader in the management of slow-moving items in retail. In my experience, adding range and complexity adds cost and reduces the GMROI (gross margin return on investment). The example given of an electrical category is recognizable from my experience as having a "flat" Pareto curve. However, this shape does not apply in other market segments, where the last 50 percent of the range drives less than 5 percent of sales. The reality is that the example was of a business where the stock plan was excessive and ranging was out of control. In those circumstances it would not be difficult to make the improvements offered. In my opinion, it is unsound to make the generalization that adding range is a "good thing," as the case example is not representative.
Prof. Alan Braithwaite
Chairman, LCP Consulting Ltd.
Berkhamsted, Hertfordshire, U.K.
Contingency planning costs may outweigh the benefits
Your commentary "Supply Chain vs. the Volcano" (Quarter 2/2010) refers to contingency planning for what we can agree would be the most extreme of situations. My reply assumes the same context and doesn't address typical contingency planning efforts.
I found your article "cute" and "interesting" but not grounded in reality. The reality is that no company will pay what it costs to have the type of contingency planning you hint at in your article. The quarter-byquarter, short-term financial performance required by analysts, boards, and shareholders of public companies certainly won't allow it.
Dual sourcing a piece part from Ireland (like the one that shuttered the Nissan plant in Japan) might cost a company an additional 5 to 11 percent more per unit. Then you double your costs of customs brokerage for entries coming from two different countries. Now add costs for local [shipping and handling], administration, and dual accounts payable, throw in the inability to leverage incremental volume, and this probably adds another 40 percent to your transport costs.
Every Fortune 100 company with which I've previously discussed this hypothesis at the executive level had the same reply: "It doesn't make sense." You can't run your supply chain at a 5-percent (or greater) premium for years and years waiting for the unpredictable to happen. And what is the potential payoff? Someone can say, "See, all this extra money we spent saved us during the two- to three-week global crisis." I believe it's been 92 years since the now-famous Eyjafjallajökull last erupted, and the ROI doesn't seem to be close, although I admit that I haven't done the calculations.
My suggestion is, have the best damn supply chain "partner" you can, and you will suffer less of an impact than anyone else during the same crisis. This approach delivers a competitive supply chain advantage for your company every day.
Mark Mathews
Global Vice President, Client Solutions
UTi
Grapevine, Texas, USA
Underwriters set insurance prices
"Danger on the High Seas" (Quarter 4/2009) was an excellent and timely article. The discussion brings the story out of the hypothetical and into real terms to which shippers will be able to relate.
But as an insurance professional, I have one point of editorial criticism: the article states in the section headed "Price of Piracy," "In response, some marine insurance brokers have added US $20,000 per voyage..." Just a fine point, but insurance brokers act as the policyholders' advocates in dealing with the marketplace. It is the underwriters who set pricing, not the brokers.
John Stoesser
Vice President Marine
Vista Insurance Partners of Illinois Inc.
Chicago, Illinois, USA
The relationship between shippers and third-party logistics services providers (3PLs) is at the core of successful supply chain management—so getting that relationship right is vital. A panel of industry experts from both sides of the aisle weighed in on what it takes to create strong 3PL/shipper partnerships on day two of the CSCMP EDGE conference, being held this week in Nashville.
Trust, empathy, and transparency ranked high on the list of key elements required for success in all aspects of the partnership, but there are some specifics for each step of the journey. The panel recommended a handful of actions that should take place early on, including:
Establish relationships.
For 3PLs, understand and get to the heart of the shipper’s data.
Also for 3PLs: Understand the shipper’s reason for outsourcing to a 3PL, along with the shipper’s ultimate goals.
Understand company cultures and be sure they align.
Nurture long-term relationships with good communication.
For shippers, be transparent so that the 3PL fully understands your business.
And there are also some “non-negotiables” when it comes to managing the relationship:
3PLs must demonstrate their commitment to engaging with the shipper’s personnel.
3PLs must also demonstrate their commitment to process discipline, continuous improvement, and innovation.
Shippers should ensure that they understand the 3PL’s demonstrated implementation capabilities—ask to visit established clients.
Trust—which takes longer to establish than both sides may expect.
EDGE 2024 is sponsored by the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP) and runs through Wednesday, October 2, at the Gaylord Opryland Resort & Convention Center in Nashville.
While the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals' 2024 EDGE Conference & Exhibition is coming to a close on Wednesday, October 2, in Nashville, Tennessee, mark your calendars for next year's premier supply chain event.
The 2025 conference will take place in National Harbor, Maryland. To register for next year's event—and take advantage of an early-bird discount of $600**—visit https://www.cscmpedge.org/website/62261/edge-2025/.
**EDGE EARLY BIRD Terms & Conditions: Promotion is for the EDGE 2025 conference in National Harbor, Maryland. Offer valid for Premier and Basic Members only. Offer excludes Student, Young Professional, Educator, and Corporate registration types. Offer limited to one per customer. Offer is not retroactive and may not be combined with other offers. Offer is nontransferable and may not be resold. Valid through October 31, 2024.
Honoring supply chain professionals and companies for their contributions to the industry is a tradition at the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals annual EDGE Conference. The following are some of the recognitions given out this year.
The 2024 Distinguished Service Award was presented to Heather Sheehan, owner of Crispy Concepts LLC, instructor with Penn State University, and board member and adjunct faculty member with the University of Denver’s Transportation & Supply Chain Institute.
Sheehan, along with Roger Penske, chairman of Penske Corp., were inducted into CSCMP’s Supply Chain Hall of Fame.
Travis Kupla, Ph.D, of the University of Arkansas, won the Doctoral Dissertation Award for his paper “How Supply Chains Respond to Disruptions: Three Essays on Responses to Operational, Geopolitical, and Natural Disaster Disruptions.”
The Bernard J. La Londe Best Paper Award was given to Matias G. Enz from the University of Missouri-Saint Louis, and Douglas M. Lambert from The Ohio State University for their paper “A Supply Chain Management Framework for Services.”
Wenting Li and Dr. Yimin Wang of Arizona State received the E. Grosvenor Plowman Award for their research paper, “A Procurement Advantage In Disruptive Times: New Perspectives On ESG Strategy And Firm Performance.”
The Teaching Innovation Award was given to Dr. Shane Schvaneveldt of Weber State University for his paper, “A Lean 5S Experiential Learning Game for Logistics and Supply Chain Management.”
To see a full list of honorees, please visit cscmp.org and click on the tab "Academia & Awards."
Supply chains today are facing an onslaught of disruption and change from geopolitical events to technological advances to economic shifts. Supply chain partners that successfully navigate those changes together will seize a competitive advantage that will win them market share and increase profits.
The “2025 Third-Party Logistics Study,” spearheaded by Dr. C. John Langley of Penn State University and developed in collaboration withNTT DATAand Penske Logistics highlights the crucial role that change management plays in the relationship between third-party logistics providers (3PLs) and their customers. Unveiled today at the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP) EDGE conference, the study delves into the dynamic nature of relationships between shippers (companies that manufacture goods or provide services) and third-party logistics providers.
“While users and providers of 3PL services continue to report successful relationships, they find themselves having to deal with an increasingly wide range of challenges,” said Dr. C. John Langley, Professor, Supply Chain & Information Systems, Penn State University. “While examples include economic concerns, geopolitical unrest, and changing markets for supply chain services, they also are taking advantage of change management processes to benefit from new and improved capabilities such as artificial intelligence (AI) and direct-to-customer proficiencies.”
The survey found that both shippers (61%) and 3PLs (73%) agree that supply chain change management is vital. Respondents from both groups indicated that the top factors that are driving the need to change their operations were shifting customer demands, economic factors, and technological advancements. In particular, both shippers and 3PLs believe that improvement and change is needed in supply chain visibility, with 69% of shippers and 68% of 3PLs citing it as an area of concern.
AI as change agent
One technological advance that is enabling change in supply chain operations, according to survey respondents, is AI. Both shippers and 3PLs agree that AI can be pivotal in automating data analysis, identifying patterns, solving problems, and automating repetitive tasks. Top implementation areas for AI cited by respondents include supply planning and demand forecasting (33% of shippers and 19% of 3PLs) and transportation and route optimization (27% of shippers and 22% of 3PLs).
The e-commerce effect continues
Omnichannel retailing and e-commerce continue to exert pressure on supply chain operations for shippers and their third-party logistics partners. Both shippers and 3PLs view delivery speed and visibility as strong areas of differentiation. According to the study, 48% of shippers and 53% of 3PLs reported that customers routinely expect deliveries in less than two days, and 27% of shippers and 26% of 3PLs noted that there are three-day or less delivery expectations. Shippers (44%) and 3PLs (38%) are willing to absorb a small percentage of the costs related to shipping speeds.
The Annual 3PL Study surveys 3PL providers and users of 3PL services to understand the current state of 3PLs and how 3PL relationships are evolving with their customers. The 2025 study and past versions are available for download at www.3PLStudy.com.
Container flows at dozens of U.S. East Coast and Gulf Coast ports shuddered to a simultaneous stop this morning when dockworkers launched a promised strike over pay levels and job automation.
The action is affecting work at major locations such as New York/New Jersey, Savannah, Houston, Charleston, Norfolk, Miami, Baltimore, Philadelphia, New Orleans, Jacksonville, Boston, Mobile, Tampa, and Wilmington. That broad span of geographic locations will affect imports and exports for industries spanning retail, automotive, agriculture, food and beverage, and manufacturing, according to an analysis by Overhaul.
Those impacts are forecast to grow rapidly with each additional day the strike continues, since more than 100 vessels are estimated to arrive at the 36 affected ports this week alone, according to analysis by supply chain visibility provider Project44. The recovery from that backup could take some time, as some shippers estimate that for every one week of strike, it will take 4-6 weeks to fully recover, the firm said.
Because of the sudden stop, logistics providers today are quickly reaching out to shippers and other clients to plan for future cargo movements. Specifically, the strike immediately froze a range of work such as the movement of import and export containers and the loading and unloading of containers, according to German maritime transportation provider Hapag-Lloyd AG. “As a result of this situation, which is beyond our control, we will need to adjust our services or temporarily suspend operations as conditions evolve. Our priority remains the protection of your cargo during this period,” Hapag-Lloyd AG said in a note to shippers.
Despite those large impacts, the timeline is unclear for finding a resolution of negotiations between the union—the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA)—and the port management group, United States Maritime Alliance (USMX).
Under those conditions, retail and manufacturing groups have renewed their calls for their White House to step in and force workers back on the job while negotiations resume.
One of those voices came the National Retail Federation (NRF). “NRF urges President Biden to use any and all available authority and tools — including use of the Taft-Hartley Act — to immediately restore operations at all impacted container ports, get the parties back to the negotiating table and ensure there are no further disruptions,” NRF President and CEO Matthew Shay said in a release. “A disruption of this scale during this pivotal moment in our nation’s economic recovery will have devastating consequences for American workers, their families and local communities. After more than two years of runaway inflationary pressures and in the midst of recovery from Hurricane Helene, this strike will result in further hardship for American families.”