To successfully launch manufacturing operations in this fast growing country, take advantage of the private and government assistance that's available, advises consultant Kurt Binh.
Long overshadowed by its giant neighbor, China, Vietnam is becoming a manufacturing hot spot in its own right. In fact, this small Southeast Asian country is one of the fastest growing locations for manufacturing in the world. According to Vietnam's General Statistics Office, foreign direct investment in that sector rose 13.3 percent from 2008 to 2009 and 19.7 percent from 2009 to 2010.
With labor and production costs rising in China and companies wanting to spread their supply chain risk rather than depend on a single manufacturing source, Vietnam has successfully positioned itself as a nearby, lower-cost alternative. Any business that shifts production to Vietnam, however, should be prepared for some challenges in such areas as transportation infrastructure and relationships with local companies and government agencies.
As the owner of SCM Vietnam, a supply chain and logistics consulting company, and chief editor of the magazine Vietnam Supply Chain Insight, Kurt Binh understands those challenges. In a recent interview with Editor James Cooke, the enterprising and energetic Binh offered his insights and advice on what foreign companies should do to succeed in his country.
Have you seen increased interest by foreign companies in opening manufacturing operations in Vietnam in the past year?
Yes, Vietnam is another "rising dragon" in Asia; it is really a most attractive country for foreign direct investment. Since Vietnam increasingly is an integral part of the ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) market rather than a single market, manufacturing companies investing in Vietnam should really consider themselves to be taking part in the ASEAN market.
Moving manufacturing operations to Vietnam is one of the smart strategies that many foreign companies adopted to minimize a high-risk dependence on China. [Some of the] big players we see in Vietnam include Intel, Samsung, Coca-Cola, Canon, Formosa, Pepsi, Nestlé, Procter & Gamble, Unilever, and Honda.
The most interesting and booming sectors in Vietnam are real estate, retail and distribution, high-tech, heavy industry, and processing.
If a foreign company wanted to begin manufacturing in Vietnam, should it contract with a local company or form its own operation? What are the pros and cons of each approach?
There is no optimal solution that works in each case. We see many international retailers sourcing products in Vietnam. Wal-Mart, Kmart, Nike, and Gap already have Vietnam-based sourcing representatives. But we also have seen many foreign high-tech companies establish their own production facilities in Vietnam. The best advice, then, is: If you want to set up labor-intensive manufacturing, you should partner with local companies, but for capital and technology-intensive businesses, it's better to set up your own operations in Vietnam.
Name: Kurt Binh Title: Owner and vice director Organization: SCM Vietnam, a supply chain and logistics consulting company
Chief editor of the monthly magazine Vietnam Supply Chain Insight
SCM consultant and Infor Supply Chain Partner in Vietnam
Education: Truòng Dai hoc Ngoai Thuong (Foreign Trade University)
CSCMP member since 2009
What are some of the supply chain challenges companies will encounter when establishing a manufacturing operation in Vietnam?
There are many challenges for foreign companies that want to set up a production operation in Vietnam.
The first and most important thing is to understand how to think globally and act locally in Vietnam. Vietnam's culture is somewhat different from Western countries; I have seen many companies face culture shocks when they set up manufacturing in Vietnam. My advice is to try to utilize local experts to help during implementation.
The second important challenge is labor skill and expertise. If you want to build high-tech products and operate sophisticated facilities, then you can face a shortage of well-skilled workers. Intel is an example of [a company that encountered this problem]. When it started a chip factory in Vietnam, Intel tried to overcome the challenges by partnering with a Vietnamese technical university to develop well-trained and skilled workers. Anyway, Vietnam's population is very young and has the capability to learn fast, so a company can quickly fill up any "hole."
The third challenge is the legal and regulatory environment. Although Vietnam joined the World Trade Organization in 2007, the legal environment is still in development. This means that a company can face a sudden change in laws and regulations, especially in the import-export area.
The fourth challenge is logistics infrastructure. Over the years, Vietnam has spent a large amount of ODA (Official Development Assistance) in upgrading its logistics infrastructure, but the infrastructure still does not meet the needs of economic growth and foreign investment.
Vietnam is still many years behind China's infrastructure level. Power blackouts, traffic jams, and port congestion are common bottlenecks that have recently been seen in Vietnam. But Vietnam is still an attractive country for investment because of its high number of young workers, advanced telecommunications, increasing transparency in law and economic policy (thanks especially to electronic sharing of government information), and well-educated students.
Are there third-party logistics companies (3PLs) that can assist foreign companies with distribution in Vietnam?
Vietnam is increasingly deregulating its transport and logistics industry. Ten years ago, there were few foreign logistics and shipping companies with official operations in Vietnam. But now a number of them have set up a long-term business in Vietnam in the form of either a joint venture or 100-percent foreign-owned business.
There are a lot of foreign 3PLs that have invested in Vietnam. You can see the presence of 25 of the world's biggest 3PLs, including such companies as DHL, Kuehne + Nagel, Damco, APL Logistics, FedEx, DB Schenker, and Agility. These companies have strong positions in Vietnam, especially in container shipping, freight forwarding, warehousing, and distribution as well as express services.
Recently I observed that many international 3PLs have invested many millions of U.S. dollars in first-class and multipurpose warehouses and distribution centers in parallel with an expansion of their local presence.
But besides that, you also see the significant rise of local 3PLs with strong ambitions, such as Sai Gon New Port, ICD Song Than, ICD Long Binh, Sotrans, and ITL-Kepple. They have strong investments in service capability, facilities, and management. Some of them have deployed complicated information technology solutions, such as warehouse management systems and transportation management systems, which can provide better visibility and decision support for customers.
What is the best transportation option—truck, rail, or barge—for moving products from the factory to a port for export?
It depends on the location of your manufacturing sites, but most moves are done by trucking. This is due to the limited convenience of barge and rail services. The rail mode only provides transportation between the North and South, while barge transportation only serves the Mekong Delta.
In Vietnam we have strong economic clusters located in the South in such places as Ho Chi Minh City, Dong Nai, and Binh Duong, and in such Northern places as Ha Noi, Hai Phong, Bac Ninh, and Hai Duong. Those clusters account for the majority of foreign investment.
Does the government set transportation rates?
In Vietnam, the transportation rates are controlled by the market and not by the government. So shippers can easily deal with providers to get the best rate to meet their logistics requirements. Besides that, we also have the Vietnam Shipper Council [a government agency], which can help shippers to deal with a transport provider on rate stabilization.
Are there state agencies that assist foreign companies that want to initiate production in Vietnam?
There are three sources of information and help whenever you want to set up production in Vietnam.
The first and official source is FIA (Foreign Investment Agency). This organization belongs to the Ministry of Planning and Investment. You can find more information on their official website, www.fia.mpi.gov.vn. Under the FIA, we have many local agencies that can help foreign companies that want to invest in their locations.
The second source—a very important one for foreign companies—is Amcham, or the American Chamber of Commerce, and Eurocham, the European Chamber of Commerce. The organizations in Vietnam are very dynamic and widely connected with foreign and local companies. So they can help foreign companies with up-to-date and useful information on Vietnam's investment climate.
The third source is private, local investment consulting firms. These companies have close relationships with government agencies and have in-depth expertise in investment setup and implementation.
Just 29% of supply chain organizations have the competitive characteristics they’ll need for future readiness, according to a Gartner survey released Tuesday. The survey focused on how organizations are preparing for future challenges and to keep their supply chains competitive.
Gartner surveyed 579 supply chain practitioners to determine the capabilities needed to manage the “future drivers of influence” on supply chains, which include artificial intelligence (AI) achievement and the ability to navigate new trade policies. According to the survey, the five competitive characteristics are: agility, resilience, regionalization, integrated ecosystems, and integrated enterprise strategy.
The survey analysis identified “leaders” among the respondents as supply chain organizations that have already developed at least three of the five competitive characteristics necessary to address the top five drivers of supply chain’s future.
Less than a third have met that threshold.
“Leaders shared a commitment to preparation through long-term, deliberate strategies, while non-leaders were more often focused on short-term priorities,” Pierfrancesco Manenti, vice president analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a statement announcing the survey results.
“Most leaders have yet to invest in the most advanced technologies (e.g. real-time visibility, digital supply chain twin), but plan to do so in the next three-to-five years,” Manenti also said in the statement. “Leaders see technology as an enabler to their overall business strategies, while non-leaders more often invest in technology first, without having fully established their foundational capabilities.”
As part of the survey, respondents were asked to identify the future drivers of influence on supply chain performance over the next three to five years. The top five drivers are: achievement capability of AI (74%); the amount of new ESG regulations and trade policies being released (67%); geopolitical fight/transition for power (65%); control over data (62%); and talent scarcity (59%).
The analysis also identified four unique profiles of supply chain organizations, based on what their leaders deem as the most crucial capabilities for empowering their organizations over the next three to five years.
First, 54% of retailers are looking for ways to increase their financial recovery from returns. That’s because the cost to return a purchase averages 27% of the purchase price, which erases as much as 50% of the sales margin. But consumers have their own interests in mind: 76% of shoppers admit they’ve embellished or exaggerated the return reason to avoid a fee, a 39% increase from 2023 to 204.
Second, return experiences matter to consumers. A whopping 80% of shoppers stopped shopping at a retailer because of changes to the return policy—a 34% increase YoY.
Third, returns fraud and abuse is top-of-mind-for retailers, with wardrobing rising 38% in 2024. In fact, over two thirds (69%) of shoppers admit to wardrobing, which is the practice of buying an item for a specific reason or event and returning it after use. Shoppers also practice bracketing, or purchasing an item in a variety of colors or sizes and then returning all the unwanted options.
Fourth, returns come with a steep cost in terms of sustainability, with returns amounting to 8.4 billion pounds of landfill waste in 2023 alone.
“As returns have become an integral part of the shopper experience, retailers must balance meeting sky-high expectations with rising costs, environmental impact, and fraudulent behaviors,” Amena Ali, CEO of Optoro, said in the firm’s “2024 Returns Unwrapped” report. “By understanding shoppers’ behaviors and preferences around returns, retailers can create returns experiences that embrace their needs while driving deeper loyalty and protecting their bottom line.”
Facing an evolving supply chain landscape in 2025, companies are being forced to rethink their distribution strategies to cope with challenges like rising cost pressures, persistent labor shortages, and the complexities of managing SKU proliferation.
1. Optimize labor productivity and costs. Forward-thinking businesses are leveraging technology to get more done with fewer resources through approaches like slotting optimization, automation and robotics, and inventory visibility.
2. Maximize capacity with smart solutions. With e-commerce volumes rising, facilities need to handle more SKUs and orders without expanding their physical footprint. That can be achieved through high-density storage and dynamic throughput.
3. Streamline returns management. Returns are a growing challenge, thanks to the continued growth of e-commerce and the consumer practice of bracketing. Businesses can handle that with smarter reverse logistics processes like automated returns processing and reverse logistics visibility.
4. Accelerate order fulfillment with robotics. Robotic solutions are transforming the way orders are fulfilled, helping businesses meet customer expectations faster and more accurately than ever before by using autonomous mobile robots (AMRs and robotic picking.
5. Enhance end-of-line packaging. The final step in the supply chain is often the most visible to customers. So optimizing packaging processes can reduce costs, improve efficiency, and support sustainability goals through automated packaging systems and sustainability initiatives.
That clash has come as retailers have been hustling to adjust to pandemic swings like a renewed focus on e-commerce, then swiftly reimagining store experiences as foot traffic returned. But even as the dust settles from those changes, retailers are now facing renewed questions about how best to define their omnichannel strategy in a world where customers have increasing power and information.
The answer may come from a five-part strategy using integrated components to fortify omnichannel retail, EY said. The approach can unlock value and customer trust through great experiences, but only when implemented cohesively, not individually, EY warns.
The steps include:
1. Functional integration: Is your operating model and data infrastructure siloed between e-commerce and physical stores, or have you developed a cohesive unit centered around delivering seamless customer experience?
2. Customer insights: With consumer centricity at the heart of operations, are you analyzing all touch points to build a holistic view of preferences, behaviors, and buying patterns?
3. Next-generation inventory: Given the right customer insights, how are you utilizing advanced analytics to ensure inventory is optimized to meet demand precisely where and when it’s needed?
4. Distribution partnerships: Having ensured your customers find what they want where they want it, how are your distribution strategies adapting to deliver these choices to them swiftly and efficiently?
5. Real estate strategy: How is your real estate strategy interconnected with insights, inventory and distribution to enhance experience and maximize your footprint?
When approached cohesively, these efforts all build toward one overarching differentiator for retailers: a better customer experience that reaches from brand engagement and order placement through delivery and return, the EY study said. Amid continued volatility and an economy driven by complex customer demands, the retailers best set up to win are those that are striving to gain real-time visibility into stock levels, offer flexible fulfillment options and modernize merchandising through personalized and dynamic customer experiences.
Geopolitical rivalries, alliances, and aspirations are rewiring the global economy—and the imposition of new tariffs on foreign imports by the U.S. will accelerate that process, according to an analysis by Boston Consulting Group (BCG).
Without a broad increase in tariffs, world trade in goods will keep growing at an average of 2.9% annually for the next eight years, the firm forecasts in its report, “Great Powers, Geopolitics, and the Future of Trade.” But the routes goods travel will change markedly as North America reduces its dependence on China and China builds up its links with the Global South, which is cementing its power in the global trade map.
“Global trade is set to top $29 trillion by 2033, but the routes these goods will travel is changing at a remarkable pace,” Aparna Bharadwaj, managing director and partner at BCG, said in a release. “Trade lanes were already shifting from historical patterns and looming US tariffs will accelerate this. Navigating these new dynamics will be critical for any global business.”
To understand those changes, BCG modeled the direct impact of the 60/25/20 scenario (60% tariff on Chinese goods, a 25% on goods from Canada and Mexico, and a 20% on imports from all other countries). The results show that the tariffs would add $640 billion to the cost of importing goods from the top ten U.S. import nations, based on 2023 levels, unless alternative sources or suppliers are found.
In terms of product categories imported by the U.S., the greatest impact would be on imported auto parts and automotive vehicles, which would primarily affect trade with Mexico, the EU, and Japan. Consumer electronics, electrical machinery, and fashion goods would be most affected by higher tariffs on Chinese goods. Specifically, the report forecasts that a 60% tariff rate would add $61 billion to cost of importing consumer electronics products from China into the U.S.