Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Commentary

Preparing for emerging regulatory changes

With a new administration in the White House, supply chain leaders need to consider how rules and regulations will be changing in the near future and start making preparations.

AdobeStock_150191362.jpeg

The combination of President Biden’s executive orders on U.S. supply chains, the climate crisis, and lessons learned from the pandemic will likely result in a major rewrite of the compliance handbook as we know it. What does this mean for supply chains? History shows that what starts as an executive order can result in increased financial and compliance disclosures, and finally migrates to enhanced oversight and regulations.

Instead of taking a wait-and-see approach, supply chain risk leaders can proactively prepare for this new regulatory landscape now. By understanding the weaknesses exposed by the pandemic, assessing the current administration’s priorities, and adopting more advanced supply chain risk management practices today, enterprises can not only ensure compliance with future regulations but also reap the benefits of greater supply chain resiliency in the near term.


COVID-19: A Catalyst for Change

With up to 75% of companies reporting significant disruption in their supply chain, the pandemic wreaked havoc on economies across the globe. The pandemic exposed critical weaknesses in supply chain management processes and revealed that most companies lack great visibility into their supply chains.

COVID-19 illustrated the importance of knowing early warning signs for effective disruption avoidance efforts. Unfortunately, most companies lack the continuous, 24/7 risk monitoring capabilities needed for early warning and instead rely on traditional point-in-time practices like periodic risk assessments that happen at best every few months but most often annually or biennially. During the pandemic, data collected during third-party risk assessments conducted a year or even months before the pandemic quickly became stale during the pandemic’s rapidly changing risk environment. When informed and quick decisions in response to disruptions or risks were required, supply chain leaders simply didn’t have the timely data needed to maintain continuity.

Additionally, supply chain risk practices were too focused on a limited set of risks like supplier financial health and contract compliance. During the pandemic, financial and compliance risks were lagging indicators. Supply chain resilience requires widening the risk aperture beyond financial and contract compliance to include regulatory, ESG, and location-based risks. During the pandemic, leading indicators were location-based risks such as local government regulations aimed at controlling the spread of the pandemic - including forced workplace shutdowns, border closures, and travel bans - and local infrastructure weaknesses in terms of equipment and internet availability to enable work from home.

Finally, the lack of supply chain visibility was exacerbated by the fact that most companies’ knowledge of their supply chains was not deep enough. During the pandemic, many supply chains were disrupted by shortages or disruptions occurring at their suppliers’ suppliers. These “Nth” party suppliers often were operating in different locations with different location specific risk landscapes than the companies’ third-party suppliers. Today, “Nth” parties operating in nations or with ownership not aligned with U.S. interests pose significant disruption risks. Supply chain resiliency requires knowing your entire supply chain from third parties all the way to “Nth” parties. 

Undoubtedly prompted by the supply chain disruptions experienced during the pandemic, 

Biden’s executive order on America’s supply chains outlines the administration’s desire to ensure resilient, diverse and secure supply chains in the United States. The findings from the ordered 100-day review of supply chain risks could result in new regulations to address the exposed shortcomings. For example, requirements to disclose monitoring of climate change and diversity activities and the outcomes achieved by both the entity and its suppliers. Along the lines of ensuring secure supply chains, the order highlights the need to identify areas in the civilian supply chain that are dependent on foreign adversaries or competitor nations.

Climate change regulations coming

President Biden has been very clear on his priorities and plans to drive the mitigation of climate pollution and climate-related risks. On day one, he rejoined the Paris Climate Accord, revoked the Keystone XL oil pipeline federal permit, and pledged to “review” a laundry list of existing business regulations. Then in his Executive Order on Climate Change, he established the National Climate Task Force and outlined a broad spectrum of climate goals, including achieving net-zero carbon emissions by 2050.

As outlined in the executive order, the administration intends for climate change initiatives to be adopted across the federal government in terms of policymaking, budget process, contracting, and procurement. These changes could be implemented across every sector of the economy. Therefore, in the near future, we can anticipate emerging regulations to address a variety of climate issues including reduction of climate pollution, increased resilience to the impacts of climate change, environmental justice reform, protection of public health, and conservation of land, water, ocean, and biodiversity. For supply chain professionals, this will mean kickstarting and monitoring initiatives to reduce carbon emissions, waste, water usage and more – and to ensure adequate reporting on performance for assessment. Interestingly we are already seeing signs of this. As an example, the SEC Examination Priorities for 2021 also includes a greater focus on climate and ESG related risks. Based on this, companies can first expect increased financial statement disclosure requirements and new regulations focusing on climate change initiatives throughout the entire business.

Preparing for change? Know your risks.

Keeping up with supply chain changes and expectations requires visibility and continuous risk monitoring. As effects from the pandemic continue and new regulations around sustainability, third-party visibility and near real-time collaboration are created, companies need to advance their supply chain management practices. Integrating continuous monitoring capabilities will enable supply chain leaders to not only make timely and effective decisions to improve supply chain resiliency, but it will also enable companies to keep up with the changing regulatory landscape and avoid costly fines and tarnished reputations. 


Recent

More Stories

photos of grocery supply chain workers

ReposiTrak and Upshop link platforms to enable food traceability

ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.

The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.

Keep ReadingShow less

Featured

minority woman with charts of business progress

Study: Inclusive procurement can fuel economic growth

Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.

The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.

Keep ReadingShow less
Logistics industry growth slowed in December
Logistics Managers' Index

Logistics industry growth slowed in December

Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.

The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.

Keep ReadingShow less
pie chart of business challenges in 2025

DHL: small businesses wary of uncertain times in 2025

As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.

However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).

Keep ReadingShow less
cargo ships at port

Strike threat lingers at ports as January 15 deadline nears

Retailers and manufacturers across the country are keeping a watchful eye on negotiations starting tomorrow to draft a new contract for dockworkers at East coast and Gulf coast ports, as the clock ticks down to a potential strike beginning at midnight on January 15.

Representatives from the International Longshoremen's Association (ILA) and the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX) last spoke in October, when they agreed to end a three-day strike by striking a tentative deal on a wage hike for workers, and delayed debate over the thornier issue of port operators’ desire to add increased automation to port operations.

Keep ReadingShow less