Most of us can remember a time from our childhoods when we failed. Maybe we did poorly on an important test, forgot our lines in the school play, or cost our team the championship game. At the time, those failures felt devastating, and in some ways they were. However, some of us learned early on that failure is essential to winning.
This idea may seem counterintuitive, but it does make sense. Since failure is unavoidable, we must develop the fortitude to learn from it, no matter how difficult that may be. By learning to accept failure, we actually set ourselves up to win.
As adults we often forget this simple yet powerful lesson. That's because in the business world, we are trained to despise failure, and for good reason. It can cost you dearly.
Yet the ability to accept that you have failed, learn from the experience, and "bounce back" to a position of strength is a hallmark of great leaders and is essential to turning a failure into a success.
Accept responsibility
The first step to bouncing back is to accept and assume responsibility for the failure. You have to admit there was an error or a failure in order to learn from it. Your role in that failure has to be openly acknowledged. Why? Because if you do not, people will assume you are refusing to accept accountability and have elected not to learn from the mistake. By admitting your role in a failure, you show your humanity, your humility, and your openness to learning.
When my children were little, they went through a phase of instinctively grabbing any excuse—no matter how ludicrous—to divert the blame from themselves. They have since grown out of that, and they now know that trying to dodge responsibility for a mistake ultimately can have worse consequences than the mistake itself. Yet we all know some adults who still do this. Every error produces an excuse; every failure has a different scapegoat. They probably don't realize it, but they are paying a much higher price than if they owned up to their shortcomings. What they are losing is the trust of their associates and of their company's management. No one wants to work with an excuse-maker for fear of becoming that person's next scapegoat.
It takes a bigger person to own up to mistakes. It takes a person with a strong sense of right and wrong, of fairness. These are traits that people admire and look for in leaders.
Learn from your mistakes
"If at first you don't succeed, try, try again." We all know that age-old axiom. But simply trying the same thing again will usually produce the same result—failure. The sting of failure motivates great leaders to avoid making the same mistake going forward. It may seem compulsive to some, but success depends on analyzing past failure down to its smallest components and gleaning kernels of insight from each dissected piece. Good leaders use these insights to do things differently the next time.
Sometimes after a failure you don't get a second chance. There is no opportunity to "try, try again." In these situations, "bouncing back" may not involve applying what you learned to the same situation. Instead you need to translate the lessons learned for use in other areas of your career or personal life. No lesson learned should ever be wasted.
Let's say you have a job interview. Throughout the interview you provide detailed answers to questions about yourself: your experience, your goals, and your background. When it comes time to ask the interviewer questions regarding the company and the position, you are unprepared. As a result, the job goes to someone else. You know before you even leave the interview that you made a mistake. You cannot ask for a "do-over," as my children would say. What you can do is apply the lesson you learned and never show up at an interview unprepared again.
Continue to be a leader
Sometimes you do get a second chance to succeed. In fact, the same situation may crop up again and again, as happened in the 1993 Bill Murray movie Groundhog Day, in which the main character has to relive the same day over and over again until he "gets it right." (Unlike Murray in Groundhog Day, you should not take 100 iterations to get it right!) In repetitive situations, it is very important to accept responsibility for the mistake openly and quickly. Doing so allows the affected parties to know that things will be different next time.
For example, let's say you issue a monthly report for use by other departments. Last month, you opted not to have your team review the report in advance. Consequently, inaccurate information slipped by and resulted in bad decisions made by other departments. What should you do? In another month, you will be issuing another report. Will the other departments ignore it in favor of getting their own information for decision making? After the adrenaline rush of embarrassment passes, you need to immediately acknowledge the error to all involved, assume responsibility, and vow to find out what went wrong.
It takes a strong and secure person to admit mistakes. It allows you to lead by example. It tells your people that meeting problems head-on is the only way to deal with them. It shows the people who are relying on you that you fix mistakes, and that they can count on receiving good information from you in the future.
Bouncing back and learning from mistakes is an acquired skill. Most of us aren't born with this ability; we learn from experience.
We see firsthand that accepting and learning from mistakes, while initially hard to do, yields lifelong rewards. Great leaders remind themselves of the lessons learned at the knees of their parents, grandparents, teachers, and other influential people in their lives. Most importantly, they remind the people around them of this simple truth: Bouncing back is actually bouncing forward.
First, 54% of retailers are looking for ways to increase their financial recovery from returns. That’s because the cost to return a purchase averages 27% of the purchase price, which erases as much as 50% of the sales margin. But consumers have their own interests in mind: 76% of shoppers admit they’ve embellished or exaggerated the return reason to avoid a fee, a 39% increase from 2023 to 204.
Second, return experiences matter to consumers. A whopping 80% of shoppers stopped shopping at a retailer because of changes to the return policy—a 34% increase YoY.
Third, returns fraud and abuse is top-of-mind-for retailers, with wardrobing rising 38% in 2024. In fact, over two thirds (69%) of shoppers admit to wardrobing, which is the practice of buying an item for a specific reason or event and returning it after use. Shoppers also practice bracketing, or purchasing an item in a variety of colors or sizes and then returning all the unwanted options.
Fourth, returns come with a steep cost in terms of sustainability, with returns amounting to 8.4 billion pounds of landfill waste in 2023 alone.
“As returns have become an integral part of the shopper experience, retailers must balance meeting sky-high expectations with rising costs, environmental impact, and fraudulent behaviors,” Amena Ali, CEO of Optoro, said in the firm’s “2024 Returns Unwrapped” report. “By understanding shoppers’ behaviors and preferences around returns, retailers can create returns experiences that embrace their needs while driving deeper loyalty and protecting their bottom line.”
Facing an evolving supply chain landscape in 2025, companies are being forced to rethink their distribution strategies to cope with challenges like rising cost pressures, persistent labor shortages, and the complexities of managing SKU proliferation.
1. Optimize labor productivity and costs. Forward-thinking businesses are leveraging technology to get more done with fewer resources through approaches like slotting optimization, automation and robotics, and inventory visibility.
2. Maximize capacity with smart solutions. With e-commerce volumes rising, facilities need to handle more SKUs and orders without expanding their physical footprint. That can be achieved through high-density storage and dynamic throughput.
3. Streamline returns management. Returns are a growing challenge, thanks to the continued growth of e-commerce and the consumer practice of bracketing. Businesses can handle that with smarter reverse logistics processes like automated returns processing and reverse logistics visibility.
4. Accelerate order fulfillment with robotics. Robotic solutions are transforming the way orders are fulfilled, helping businesses meet customer expectations faster and more accurately than ever before by using autonomous mobile robots (AMRs and robotic picking.
5. Enhance end-of-line packaging. The final step in the supply chain is often the most visible to customers. So optimizing packaging processes can reduce costs, improve efficiency, and support sustainability goals through automated packaging systems and sustainability initiatives.
Geopolitical rivalries, alliances, and aspirations are rewiring the global economy—and the imposition of new tariffs on foreign imports by the U.S. will accelerate that process, according to an analysis by Boston Consulting Group (BCG).
Without a broad increase in tariffs, world trade in goods will keep growing at an average of 2.9% annually for the next eight years, the firm forecasts in its report, “Great Powers, Geopolitics, and the Future of Trade.” But the routes goods travel will change markedly as North America reduces its dependence on China and China builds up its links with the Global South, which is cementing its power in the global trade map.
“Global trade is set to top $29 trillion by 2033, but the routes these goods will travel is changing at a remarkable pace,” Aparna Bharadwaj, managing director and partner at BCG, said in a release. “Trade lanes were already shifting from historical patterns and looming US tariffs will accelerate this. Navigating these new dynamics will be critical for any global business.”
To understand those changes, BCG modeled the direct impact of the 60/25/20 scenario (60% tariff on Chinese goods, a 25% on goods from Canada and Mexico, and a 20% on imports from all other countries). The results show that the tariffs would add $640 billion to the cost of importing goods from the top ten U.S. import nations, based on 2023 levels, unless alternative sources or suppliers are found.
In terms of product categories imported by the U.S., the greatest impact would be on imported auto parts and automotive vehicles, which would primarily affect trade with Mexico, the EU, and Japan. Consumer electronics, electrical machinery, and fashion goods would be most affected by higher tariffs on Chinese goods. Specifically, the report forecasts that a 60% tariff rate would add $61 billion to cost of importing consumer electronics products from China into the U.S.
That strategy is described by RILA President Brian Dodge in a document titled “2025 Retail Public Policy Agenda,” which begins by describing leading retailers as “dynamic and multifaceted businesses that begin on Main Street and stretch across the world to bring high value and affordable consumer goods to American families.”
RILA says its policy priorities support that membership in four ways:
Investing in people. Retail is for everyone; the place for a first job, 2nd chance, third act, or a side hustle – the retail workforce represents the American workforce.
Ensuring a safe, sustainable future. RILA is working with lawmakers to help shape policies that protect our customers and meet expectations regarding environmental concerns.
Leading in the community. Retail is more than a store; we are an integral part of the fabric of our communities.
“As Congress and the Trump administration move forward to adopt policies that reduce regulatory burdens, create economic growth, and bring value to American families, understanding how such policies will impact retailers and the communities we serve is imperative,” Dodge said. “RILA and its member companies look forward to collaborating with policymakers to provide industry-specific insights and data to help shape any policies under consideration.”
New Jersey is home to the most congested freight bottleneck in the country for the seventh straight year, according to research from the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI), released today.
ATRI’s annual list of the Top 100 Truck Bottlenecks aims to highlight the nation’s most congested highways and help local, state, and federal governments target funding to areas most in need of relief. The data show ways to reduce chokepoints, lower emissions, and drive economic growth, according to the researchers.
The 2025 Top Truck Bottleneck List measures the level of truck-involved congestion at more than 325 locations on the national highway system. The analysis is based on an extensive database of freight truck GPS data and uses several customized software applications and analysis methods, along with terabytes of data from trucking operations, to produce a congestion impact ranking for each location. The bottleneck locations detailed in the latest ATRI list represent the top 100 congested locations, although ATRI continuously monitors more than 325 freight-critical locations, the group said.
For the seventh straight year, the intersection of I-95 and State Route 4 near the George Washington Bridge in Fort Lee, New Jersey, is the top freight bottleneck in the country. The remaining top 10 bottlenecks include: Chicago, I-294 at I-290/I-88; Houston, I-45 at I-69/US 59; Atlanta, I-285 at I-85 (North); Nashville: I-24/I-40 at I-440 (East); Atlanta: I-75 at I-285 (North); Los Angeles, SR 60 at SR 57; Cincinnati, I-71 at I-75; Houston, I-10 at I-45; and Atlanta, I-20 at I-285 (West).
ATRI’s analysis, which utilized data from 2024, found that traffic conditions continue to deteriorate from recent years, partly due to work zones resulting from increased infrastructure investment. Average rush hour truck speeds were 34.2 miles per hour (MPH), down 3% from the previous year. Among the top 10 locations, average rush hour truck speeds were 29.7 MPH.
In addition to squandering time and money, these delays also waste fuel—with trucks burning an estimated 6.4 billion gallons of diesel fuel and producing more than 65 million metric tons of additional carbon emissions while stuck in traffic jams, according to ATRI.
On a positive note, ATRI said its analysis helps quantify the value of infrastructure investment, pointing to improvements at Chicago’s Jane Byrne Interchange as an example. Once the number one truck bottleneck in the country for three years in a row, the recently constructed interchange saw rush hour truck speeds improve by nearly 25% after construction was completed, according to the report.
“Delays inflicted on truckers by congestion are the equivalent of 436,000 drivers sitting idle for an entire year,” ATRI President and COO Rebecca Brewster said in a statement announcing the findings. “These metrics are getting worse, but the good news is that states do not need to accept the status quo. Illinois was once home to the top bottleneck in the country, but following a sustained effort to expand capacity, the Jane Byrne Interchange in Chicago no longer ranks in the top 10. This data gives policymakers a road map to reduce chokepoints, lower emissions, and drive economic growth.”