Most of us can remember a time from our childhoods when we failed. Maybe we did poorly on an important test, forgot our lines in the school play, or cost our team the championship game. At the time, those failures felt devastating, and in some ways they were. However, some of us learned early on that failure is essential to winning.
This idea may seem counterintuitive, but it does make sense. Since failure is unavoidable, we must develop the fortitude to learn from it, no matter how difficult that may be. By learning to accept failure, we actually set ourselves up to win.
As adults we often forget this simple yet powerful lesson. That's because in the business world, we are trained to despise failure, and for good reason. It can cost you dearly.
Yet the ability to accept that you have failed, learn from the experience, and "bounce back" to a position of strength is a hallmark of great leaders and is essential to turning a failure into a success.
Accept responsibility
The first step to bouncing back is to accept and assume responsibility for the failure. You have to admit there was an error or a failure in order to learn from it. Your role in that failure has to be openly acknowledged. Why? Because if you do not, people will assume you are refusing to accept accountability and have elected not to learn from the mistake. By admitting your role in a failure, you show your humanity, your humility, and your openness to learning.
When my children were little, they went through a phase of instinctively grabbing any excuse—no matter how ludicrous—to divert the blame from themselves. They have since grown out of that, and they now know that trying to dodge responsibility for a mistake ultimately can have worse consequences than the mistake itself. Yet we all know some adults who still do this. Every error produces an excuse; every failure has a different scapegoat. They probably don't realize it, but they are paying a much higher price than if they owned up to their shortcomings. What they are losing is the trust of their associates and of their company's management. No one wants to work with an excuse-maker for fear of becoming that person's next scapegoat.
It takes a bigger person to own up to mistakes. It takes a person with a strong sense of right and wrong, of fairness. These are traits that people admire and look for in leaders.
Learn from your mistakes
"If at first you don't succeed, try, try again." We all know that age-old axiom. But simply trying the same thing again will usually produce the same result—failure. The sting of failure motivates great leaders to avoid making the same mistake going forward. It may seem compulsive to some, but success depends on analyzing past failure down to its smallest components and gleaning kernels of insight from each dissected piece. Good leaders use these insights to do things differently the next time.
Sometimes after a failure you don't get a second chance. There is no opportunity to "try, try again." In these situations, "bouncing back" may not involve applying what you learned to the same situation. Instead you need to translate the lessons learned for use in other areas of your career or personal life. No lesson learned should ever be wasted.
Let's say you have a job interview. Throughout the interview you provide detailed answers to questions about yourself: your experience, your goals, and your background. When it comes time to ask the interviewer questions regarding the company and the position, you are unprepared. As a result, the job goes to someone else. You know before you even leave the interview that you made a mistake. You cannot ask for a "do-over," as my children would say. What you can do is apply the lesson you learned and never show up at an interview unprepared again.
Continue to be a leader
Sometimes you do get a second chance to succeed. In fact, the same situation may crop up again and again, as happened in the 1993 Bill Murray movie Groundhog Day, in which the main character has to relive the same day over and over again until he "gets it right." (Unlike Murray in Groundhog Day, you should not take 100 iterations to get it right!) In repetitive situations, it is very important to accept responsibility for the mistake openly and quickly. Doing so allows the affected parties to know that things will be different next time.
For example, let's say you issue a monthly report for use by other departments. Last month, you opted not to have your team review the report in advance. Consequently, inaccurate information slipped by and resulted in bad decisions made by other departments. What should you do? In another month, you will be issuing another report. Will the other departments ignore it in favor of getting their own information for decision making? After the adrenaline rush of embarrassment passes, you need to immediately acknowledge the error to all involved, assume responsibility, and vow to find out what went wrong.
It takes a strong and secure person to admit mistakes. It allows you to lead by example. It tells your people that meeting problems head-on is the only way to deal with them. It shows the people who are relying on you that you fix mistakes, and that they can count on receiving good information from you in the future.
Bouncing back and learning from mistakes is an acquired skill. Most of us aren't born with this ability; we learn from experience.
We see firsthand that accepting and learning from mistakes, while initially hard to do, yields lifelong rewards. Great leaders remind themselves of the lessons learned at the knees of their parents, grandparents, teachers, and other influential people in their lives. Most importantly, they remind the people around them of this simple truth: Bouncing back is actually bouncing forward.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.
Specifically, the two sides remain at odds over provisions related to the deployment of semi-automated technologies like rail-mounted gantry cranes, according to an analysis by the Kansas-based 3PL Noatum Logistics. The ILA has strongly opposed further automation, arguing it threatens dockworker protections, while the USMX contends that automation enhances productivity and can create long-term opportunities for labor.
In fact, U.S. importers are already taking action to prevent the impact of such a strike, “pulling forward” their container shipments by rushing imports to earlier dates on the calendar, according to analysis by supply chain visibility provider Project44. That strategy can help companies to build enough safety stock to dampen the damage of events like the strike and like the steep tariffs being threatened by the incoming Trump administration.
Likewise, some ocean carriers have already instituted January surcharges in pre-emption of possible labor action, which could support inbound ocean rates if a strike occurs, according to freight market analysts with TD Cowen. In the meantime, the outcome of the new negotiations are seen with “significant uncertainty,” due to the contentious history of the discussion and to the timing of the talks that overlap with a transition between two White House regimes, analysts said.