You don?t need to be a corporate giant to save big on supply chain costs. These seven areas offer significant savings opportunities for companies of all sizes and across all industries.
Profits for your company can rocket upward if you achieve sufficient savings in supply chain costs. It's not uncommon for a concerted effort to yield annual savings of between US $2 million and $10 million, depending on the size of the company.
To achieve that degree of savings, though, you have to know where to look. As this article will discuss, there are seven areas that consistently offer opportunities for supply chain cost savings for businesses of all sizes and across all industries. Because these seven opportunities apply to almost every aspect of supply chain management, you can be systematic in your approach to improvement. This is important given the broad scope of the supply chain, which extends beyond your company to include both suppliers and customers. A systematic approach also is important because of the variable requirements supply chain managers must manage: big volume and small volume; large orders and small orders; frequent and less frequent deliveries; special handling needs; temperature control; city and country locations ... and the list goes on.
Before you look at opportunities for supply chain cost savings, though, consider this: The scope and variability of supply chain activities means that anybody who is in business to make a profit needs to understand the "cost to serve" for the different types of customers and the different types of products and services your company provides to them. Here are just three examples that show how the supply chain cost to serve customers varies depending on the type of business:
Cement. Delivery of building products, particularly to building sites, is complex. Very often delivery times must be precise, as workers and equipment are booked for a specific time period to handle the delivery.
Supermarkets. Constraints often exist not only for delivery time, but also for the configuration of the product. Many supermarkets demand only one product per pallet.
Home delivery. Distribution is potentially complex and costly, not only because the order size and value can be quite low (and so the cost for distribution as a percentage of sales is high), but also because the customer is often not at home. This leads to redelivery and even more cost.
As the variability seen in these examples suggests, it is paramount that you first understand the dynamics of your customer base so that you can design your service offering to meet their needs at a sensible cost. If you fail to identify customer needs correctly, you will supply the wrong service at the wrong cost. The danger is, then, that your customers will leave you or you will go bankrupt—or both.
With a systematic approach and an understanding of your cost to serve in mind, let's consider the seven areas that consistently offer opportunities for cost savings for every company, no matter how big or small.
1. Customer service Give customers what they really want, not just what you think they want.
Your customers? requirements should shape your supply chain strategy and structure. It?s a straightforward application of marketing principles: provide customers with what they need and avoid adding costs for things for which they see no value. Although this sounds simple, real-life examples of companies that get it back-to-front are numerous. Here are some that I have observed.
Example 1: One company provided next-day delivery to all of its customers—even though not every customer needed or wanted it. The company was wasting money on express transport by "overservicing" some of its accounts.
Example 2: "On Monday we deliver to the North, on Tuesday we deliver to the West, on Wednesday we deliver to the East, on Thursday we deliver to the South ... and on Friday we do emergency deliveries!" The auto products distributor that followed this practice had no customer service policy or discipline, and it sacrificed customer satisfaction for its own ease of transport planning.
Example 3: To pacify customers calling in with complaints, a distributor gave them free delivery. The loss of revenue for the distributor over the course of a year came to US $500,000. Both the distributor and its customers would have been better off if the distributor had eliminated the complaints by ensuring that the underlying problems did not happen again.
It's important to remember that when customers see value in a particular level of service, they will expect to pay for it—indeed, they will be happy to pay for it when it helps them to run their own businesses better. Make sure the whole of your organization understands this, so that the benefits of aligning customer service to customer requirements can be achieved: more sales, more profits, and more customer loyalty.
2. Supply chain strategy Objectives should drive strategy, and strategy should drive tactics—not the reverse.
Once you have a clear understanding of your customers' needs, you can move on to defining a supply chain strategy that will achieve your business objectives while delivering on your customer service promise.
If you?re wondering whether your own company has taken the right approach, then ask yourself if any of the following problems have been occurring:
You have no documented or generally understood supply chain strategy.
Your company thinks of ?supply chain? as being restricted to one or two functional departments (for example, purchasing and manufacturing) instead of involving the company in general (including logistics, marketing, sales, research and development, and so on).
There is internal and external customer dissatisfaction relative to costs and services.
Many supply chain projects are managed in ?silos,? meaning individual functional departments.
A supply chain strategy is a living thing. It must be adaptable and change to meet evolving business and customer needs, and it needs to be flexible enough (or at least encourage sufficient flexibility) to drive optimal tactical and operational decisions. Yet whatever phase it is in, a supply chain strategy also needs to be clear and precise. If it is, then you can immediately decide whether to take a particular action by asking yourself, ?does this fit with our strategic imperatives??
When your strategic imperatives are correctly defined and your tactics and operations fit these imperatives, then you avoid wasting money on actions that do not make a relevant contribution to your bottom line.
3. Sales and operations planning (S&OP) Get your process right first, and define your systems after.
S&OP is a process that shares information and brings people together in a structured, single plan that is defined across the functional departments. People often confuse S&OP with complex, expensive software tools, but the process comes first, not the system. If you haven?t thought out your process properly, then even the most expensive software in the world won?t save you.
S&OP is a straightforward concept but it is not an easy one to carry out. Signs that you might have a problem with your S&OP process include:
High levels of ?SLOB? (SLow moving OBsolete) stock
Frequent changes to your demand plan and master production schedule
Wild proliferation of SKUs (stock-keeping units)
Excessive stockouts
Poor forecast accuracy—or no forecasting at all
Improving the situation can sometimes be surprisingly simple. For one auto parts distributor, for example, a small change in its forecasting algorithm turned out to be a major step forward, even though it was still using a plethora of spreadsheets to predict demand for more than 20,000 stock-keeping units (SKUs).
For other companies, the solution may be more complex, starting with developing longer-term planning horizons, categorizing products by sales volume, and setting up ?time fences? for production (rolling deadlines to determine whether changes can still be made to sales forecasts or if the purchasing and production plans can no longer be altered).
What kind of cost-related benefits can you expect when you achieve success with your S&OP process? The benefits include improved availability and stock turns; less ?fire-fighting? and expediting; and, of course, improved sales and profits.
4. Supply chain network design Keep costs down and reliability up by designing your network to minimize product handling.
Think of the shape of your physical supply chain network as being determined by two ?bookends?: your customers and your suppliers. Your customer base and the service you provide to them on one end and the location of your suppliers on the other dictate where you hold stock to service your customers. The more unreliable the network—because of suppliers being farther away, for example—the more stock needs to be held in your network to ensure service continuity.
But that?s something you want to avoid, because one of the most important requirements for an efficient and cost-effective distribution network is to minimize product handling. Each ?touch? between the point of supply and the customer incurs cost and increases the risk of error and damage. Inadequate network design can lead to excessive handling, too many stock locations, and poor utilization of your distribution centers. The results are high distribution costs and poor customer service.
The blueprint for achieving a design that minimizes ?touches? while meeting your service commitments can be succinctly outlined this way:
Establish customer service offers (your first
?bookend?)
Customer locations and lead time
Service expectations
Establish supply points/lead times (your other ?bookend?)
Identify current network performance
Facility costs
Inventory costs
Transport costs (inbound and outbound)
Service performance
Test and quantify alternatives for least-cost networks
Consider network transformation, if the benefit will be large enough
To achieve even the simplest revision of a supply chain network requires network modeling software and careful analysis. Appropriate analytical tools will allow you to test a wide range of cost and service options to ensure that you use optimal networks and that sensitivities such as demand increases, fuel cost increases, or changes to the customer service offer are checked.
5. Outsourcing Both parties can benefit from a healthy and proactive partnership.
Eighty-five percent or more of businesses outsource some part of their supply chain operation or management. The two functions that are outsourced most often are warehousing and transport. A common reason for this is that management believes the company will save money by outsourcing. This is not always the case, of course, but cost savings can come about if the service provider is more efficient or skilled in performing the required services than the company is.
Besides saving money, other reasons include:
The service being outsourced is not core to the business and a ?distraction? for management.
Operations are rapidly expanding, and outsourcing provides an effective means of quickly accessing more space, technology, or other resources.
The business requires a degree of flexibility in resourcing and a more variable cost structure, either in resource numbers or type.
The business needs access to specialized skills, equipment, or technology and does not want to invest in those assets directly.
The most important element to get right is the service specification, which includes elements such as frequency and volume of delivery, any special conditions such as packaging, handling, and temperature control, and so on. The initial step of defining this service specification is typically enough to avoid the majority of outsourcing issues, such as higher-than-expected costs, poor service, or misaligned expectations.
A successful outsourcing relationship is characterized by both parties getting what they want through a healthy and proactive partnership. As the customer, you get consistent service at a cost within expectations (and the possibility of a lower cost overall), and your service provider makes the expected profit margins.
6. Asset utilization Get more productivity out of fewer assets.
As a general rule, the more assets you can use within any 24-hour period, the better. Underutilized assets, such as vehicle fleets, facilities, or inventory, mean inefficiency and poor return on investment. Changing the way assets are used or whether they are owned or leased can resolve these issues, as the following examples show:
Instead of making early-morning deliveries and leaving their truck fleets idle for the rest of the day, some bakeries use fewer trucks and spread their deliveries out during the course of the day. Supermarkets get periodic ?top-ups,? food-service businesses can get deliveries later in the day, and some customers may be willing to take deliveries in the evening.
A major retailer outsourced its delivery fleet, which delivered merchandise from its distribution centers to its stores. The original rate structure was a ?truck rate?: for each vehicle that performed deliveries, a flat fee was paid regardless of how full it was. This hardly encouraged the transport company to utilize the fleet efficiently. Now the rate has been changed to a pallet rate; fleet efficiency has gone up and costs to the retailer have gone down.
A very large beverage manufacturer experiences a peak in business at Christmastime. Providing sufficient warehouse capacity to accommodate this peak within its own network would mean very low space utilization at other times of the year. During the build-up to Christmas, therefore, it rents additional warehousing capacity to handle the seasonal peak. It only pays for the extra capacity it needs for a month or two, rather than for the whole year.
7. Performance Measurement Measure what is strategically important so that you can manage and improve it.
What really matters to your business is your supply chain ?end game? objectives. That?s what you need to manage, regularly and consistently, so that you can set realistic targets for improvement. You then choose the corresponding key performance indicators (KPIs) that let you measure your performance compared to your targets. You also embed them in the culture of your organization, with the clear understanding that they are there to serve your objectives, and not the reverse.
Different organizations will have different KPIs. What works well for one may not be relevant for another, so resist the temptation to copy what another company uses. Go through the process of setting your own objectives and targets, and then defining KPIs that give you the right measurement of your own performance.
You?ll know if you have good supply chain KPIs
when the following are true:
KPIs are recognized in your organization as ?meaningful and relevant.?
KPIs are tracked and understood across functional departments.
KPIs are used to focus on and drive performance improvement.
And last—but by no means least—supply chain performance is improving!
Improved supply chain performance means that you get a better return on your investment—or similar performance as before, but for less money.
Basic principles still apply
In my experience, when companies focus on these seven areas of supply chain management, very often they easily uncover significant cost savings. Not all of these areas may need ?fixing? in your own business. However, in almost every company, at least two or three are likely to be worth investigating for potential improvement. No matter which areas you choose to concentrate on, the most basic principles of effective supply chain management will still apply: understanding customer needs, defining the right company objectives and strategy, executing on that strategy, and measuring the results so as to be able to continually improve the whole process.
Excerpted by permission from the forthcoming book Supply Chain Secrets: The number one guide to saving your business millions, by Rob O'Byrne, to be published in July 2011 by Global Publishing Group (Australia).
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.
Specifically, the two sides remain at odds over provisions related to the deployment of semi-automated technologies like rail-mounted gantry cranes, according to an analysis by the Kansas-based 3PL Noatum Logistics. The ILA has strongly opposed further automation, arguing it threatens dockworker protections, while the USMX contends that automation enhances productivity and can create long-term opportunities for labor.
In fact, U.S. importers are already taking action to prevent the impact of such a strike, “pulling forward” their container shipments by rushing imports to earlier dates on the calendar, according to analysis by supply chain visibility provider Project44. That strategy can help companies to build enough safety stock to dampen the damage of events like the strike and like the steep tariffs being threatened by the incoming Trump administration.
Likewise, some ocean carriers have already instituted January surcharges in pre-emption of possible labor action, which could support inbound ocean rates if a strike occurs, according to freight market analysts with TD Cowen. In the meantime, the outcome of the new negotiations are seen with “significant uncertainty,” due to the contentious history of the discussion and to the timing of the talks that overlap with a transition between two White House regimes, analysts said.