You don?t need to be a corporate giant to save big on supply chain costs. These seven areas offer significant savings opportunities for companies of all sizes and across all industries.
Profits for your company can rocket upward if you achieve sufficient savings in supply chain costs. It's not uncommon for a concerted effort to yield annual savings of between US $2 million and $10 million, depending on the size of the company.
To achieve that degree of savings, though, you have to know where to look. As this article will discuss, there are seven areas that consistently offer opportunities for supply chain cost savings for businesses of all sizes and across all industries. Because these seven opportunities apply to almost every aspect of supply chain management, you can be systematic in your approach to improvement. This is important given the broad scope of the supply chain, which extends beyond your company to include both suppliers and customers. A systematic approach also is important because of the variable requirements supply chain managers must manage: big volume and small volume; large orders and small orders; frequent and less frequent deliveries; special handling needs; temperature control; city and country locations ... and the list goes on.
Before you look at opportunities for supply chain cost savings, though, consider this: The scope and variability of supply chain activities means that anybody who is in business to make a profit needs to understand the "cost to serve" for the different types of customers and the different types of products and services your company provides to them. Here are just three examples that show how the supply chain cost to serve customers varies depending on the type of business:
Cement. Delivery of building products, particularly to building sites, is complex. Very often delivery times must be precise, as workers and equipment are booked for a specific time period to handle the delivery.
Supermarkets. Constraints often exist not only for delivery time, but also for the configuration of the product. Many supermarkets demand only one product per pallet.
Home delivery. Distribution is potentially complex and costly, not only because the order size and value can be quite low (and so the cost for distribution as a percentage of sales is high), but also because the customer is often not at home. This leads to redelivery and even more cost.
As the variability seen in these examples suggests, it is paramount that you first understand the dynamics of your customer base so that you can design your service offering to meet their needs at a sensible cost. If you fail to identify customer needs correctly, you will supply the wrong service at the wrong cost. The danger is, then, that your customers will leave you or you will go bankrupt—or both.
With a systematic approach and an understanding of your cost to serve in mind, let's consider the seven areas that consistently offer opportunities for cost savings for every company, no matter how big or small.
1. Customer service Give customers what they really want, not just what you think they want.
Your customers? requirements should shape your supply chain strategy and structure. It?s a straightforward application of marketing principles: provide customers with what they need and avoid adding costs for things for which they see no value. Although this sounds simple, real-life examples of companies that get it back-to-front are numerous. Here are some that I have observed.
Example 1: One company provided next-day delivery to all of its customers—even though not every customer needed or wanted it. The company was wasting money on express transport by "overservicing" some of its accounts.
Example 2: "On Monday we deliver to the North, on Tuesday we deliver to the West, on Wednesday we deliver to the East, on Thursday we deliver to the South ... and on Friday we do emergency deliveries!" The auto products distributor that followed this practice had no customer service policy or discipline, and it sacrificed customer satisfaction for its own ease of transport planning.
Example 3: To pacify customers calling in with complaints, a distributor gave them free delivery. The loss of revenue for the distributor over the course of a year came to US $500,000. Both the distributor and its customers would have been better off if the distributor had eliminated the complaints by ensuring that the underlying problems did not happen again.
It's important to remember that when customers see value in a particular level of service, they will expect to pay for it—indeed, they will be happy to pay for it when it helps them to run their own businesses better. Make sure the whole of your organization understands this, so that the benefits of aligning customer service to customer requirements can be achieved: more sales, more profits, and more customer loyalty.
2. Supply chain strategy Objectives should drive strategy, and strategy should drive tactics—not the reverse.
Once you have a clear understanding of your customers' needs, you can move on to defining a supply chain strategy that will achieve your business objectives while delivering on your customer service promise.
If you?re wondering whether your own company has taken the right approach, then ask yourself if any of the following problems have been occurring:
You have no documented or generally understood supply chain strategy.
Your company thinks of ?supply chain? as being restricted to one or two functional departments (for example, purchasing and manufacturing) instead of involving the company in general (including logistics, marketing, sales, research and development, and so on).
There is internal and external customer dissatisfaction relative to costs and services.
Many supply chain projects are managed in ?silos,? meaning individual functional departments.
A supply chain strategy is a living thing. It must be adaptable and change to meet evolving business and customer needs, and it needs to be flexible enough (or at least encourage sufficient flexibility) to drive optimal tactical and operational decisions. Yet whatever phase it is in, a supply chain strategy also needs to be clear and precise. If it is, then you can immediately decide whether to take a particular action by asking yourself, ?does this fit with our strategic imperatives??
When your strategic imperatives are correctly defined and your tactics and operations fit these imperatives, then you avoid wasting money on actions that do not make a relevant contribution to your bottom line.
3. Sales and operations planning (S&OP) Get your process right first, and define your systems after.
S&OP is a process that shares information and brings people together in a structured, single plan that is defined across the functional departments. People often confuse S&OP with complex, expensive software tools, but the process comes first, not the system. If you haven?t thought out your process properly, then even the most expensive software in the world won?t save you.
S&OP is a straightforward concept but it is not an easy one to carry out. Signs that you might have a problem with your S&OP process include:
High levels of ?SLOB? (SLow moving OBsolete) stock
Frequent changes to your demand plan and master production schedule
Wild proliferation of SKUs (stock-keeping units)
Excessive stockouts
Poor forecast accuracy—or no forecasting at all
Improving the situation can sometimes be surprisingly simple. For one auto parts distributor, for example, a small change in its forecasting algorithm turned out to be a major step forward, even though it was still using a plethora of spreadsheets to predict demand for more than 20,000 stock-keeping units (SKUs).
For other companies, the solution may be more complex, starting with developing longer-term planning horizons, categorizing products by sales volume, and setting up ?time fences? for production (rolling deadlines to determine whether changes can still be made to sales forecasts or if the purchasing and production plans can no longer be altered).
What kind of cost-related benefits can you expect when you achieve success with your S&OP process? The benefits include improved availability and stock turns; less ?fire-fighting? and expediting; and, of course, improved sales and profits.
4. Supply chain network design Keep costs down and reliability up by designing your network to minimize product handling.
Think of the shape of your physical supply chain network as being determined by two ?bookends?: your customers and your suppliers. Your customer base and the service you provide to them on one end and the location of your suppliers on the other dictate where you hold stock to service your customers. The more unreliable the network—because of suppliers being farther away, for example—the more stock needs to be held in your network to ensure service continuity.
But that?s something you want to avoid, because one of the most important requirements for an efficient and cost-effective distribution network is to minimize product handling. Each ?touch? between the point of supply and the customer incurs cost and increases the risk of error and damage. Inadequate network design can lead to excessive handling, too many stock locations, and poor utilization of your distribution centers. The results are high distribution costs and poor customer service.
The blueprint for achieving a design that minimizes ?touches? while meeting your service commitments can be succinctly outlined this way:
Establish customer service offers (your first
?bookend?)
Customer locations and lead time
Service expectations
Establish supply points/lead times (your other ?bookend?)
Identify current network performance
Facility costs
Inventory costs
Transport costs (inbound and outbound)
Service performance
Test and quantify alternatives for least-cost networks
Consider network transformation, if the benefit will be large enough
To achieve even the simplest revision of a supply chain network requires network modeling software and careful analysis. Appropriate analytical tools will allow you to test a wide range of cost and service options to ensure that you use optimal networks and that sensitivities such as demand increases, fuel cost increases, or changes to the customer service offer are checked.
5. Outsourcing Both parties can benefit from a healthy and proactive partnership.
Eighty-five percent or more of businesses outsource some part of their supply chain operation or management. The two functions that are outsourced most often are warehousing and transport. A common reason for this is that management believes the company will save money by outsourcing. This is not always the case, of course, but cost savings can come about if the service provider is more efficient or skilled in performing the required services than the company is.
Besides saving money, other reasons include:
The service being outsourced is not core to the business and a ?distraction? for management.
Operations are rapidly expanding, and outsourcing provides an effective means of quickly accessing more space, technology, or other resources.
The business requires a degree of flexibility in resourcing and a more variable cost structure, either in resource numbers or type.
The business needs access to specialized skills, equipment, or technology and does not want to invest in those assets directly.
The most important element to get right is the service specification, which includes elements such as frequency and volume of delivery, any special conditions such as packaging, handling, and temperature control, and so on. The initial step of defining this service specification is typically enough to avoid the majority of outsourcing issues, such as higher-than-expected costs, poor service, or misaligned expectations.
A successful outsourcing relationship is characterized by both parties getting what they want through a healthy and proactive partnership. As the customer, you get consistent service at a cost within expectations (and the possibility of a lower cost overall), and your service provider makes the expected profit margins.
6. Asset utilization Get more productivity out of fewer assets.
As a general rule, the more assets you can use within any 24-hour period, the better. Underutilized assets, such as vehicle fleets, facilities, or inventory, mean inefficiency and poor return on investment. Changing the way assets are used or whether they are owned or leased can resolve these issues, as the following examples show:
Instead of making early-morning deliveries and leaving their truck fleets idle for the rest of the day, some bakeries use fewer trucks and spread their deliveries out during the course of the day. Supermarkets get periodic ?top-ups,? food-service businesses can get deliveries later in the day, and some customers may be willing to take deliveries in the evening.
A major retailer outsourced its delivery fleet, which delivered merchandise from its distribution centers to its stores. The original rate structure was a ?truck rate?: for each vehicle that performed deliveries, a flat fee was paid regardless of how full it was. This hardly encouraged the transport company to utilize the fleet efficiently. Now the rate has been changed to a pallet rate; fleet efficiency has gone up and costs to the retailer have gone down.
A very large beverage manufacturer experiences a peak in business at Christmastime. Providing sufficient warehouse capacity to accommodate this peak within its own network would mean very low space utilization at other times of the year. During the build-up to Christmas, therefore, it rents additional warehousing capacity to handle the seasonal peak. It only pays for the extra capacity it needs for a month or two, rather than for the whole year.
7. Performance Measurement Measure what is strategically important so that you can manage and improve it.
What really matters to your business is your supply chain ?end game? objectives. That?s what you need to manage, regularly and consistently, so that you can set realistic targets for improvement. You then choose the corresponding key performance indicators (KPIs) that let you measure your performance compared to your targets. You also embed them in the culture of your organization, with the clear understanding that they are there to serve your objectives, and not the reverse.
Different organizations will have different KPIs. What works well for one may not be relevant for another, so resist the temptation to copy what another company uses. Go through the process of setting your own objectives and targets, and then defining KPIs that give you the right measurement of your own performance.
You?ll know if you have good supply chain KPIs
when the following are true:
KPIs are recognized in your organization as ?meaningful and relevant.?
KPIs are tracked and understood across functional departments.
KPIs are used to focus on and drive performance improvement.
And last—but by no means least—supply chain performance is improving!
Improved supply chain performance means that you get a better return on your investment—or similar performance as before, but for less money.
Basic principles still apply
In my experience, when companies focus on these seven areas of supply chain management, very often they easily uncover significant cost savings. Not all of these areas may need ?fixing? in your own business. However, in almost every company, at least two or three are likely to be worth investigating for potential improvement. No matter which areas you choose to concentrate on, the most basic principles of effective supply chain management will still apply: understanding customer needs, defining the right company objectives and strategy, executing on that strategy, and measuring the results so as to be able to continually improve the whole process.
Excerpted by permission from the forthcoming book Supply Chain Secrets: The number one guide to saving your business millions, by Rob O'Byrne, to be published in July 2011 by Global Publishing Group (Australia).
CSCMP EDGE attendees gathered Tuesday afternoon for an update and outlook on the truckload (TL) market, which is on the upswing following the longest down cycle in recorded history. Kevin Adamik of RXO (formerly Coyote Logistics), offered an overview of truckload market cycles, highlighting major trends from the recent freight recession and providing an update on where the TL cycle is now.
EDGE 2024, sponsored by the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP), is taking place this week in Nashville.
Citing data from the Coyote Curve index (which measures year-over-year changes in spot market rates) and other sources, Adamik outlined the dynamics of the TL market. He explained that the last cycle—which lasted from about 2019 to 2024—was longer than the typical three to four-year market cycle, marked by volatile conditions spurred by the Covid-19 pandemic. That cycle is behind us now, he said, adding that the market has reached equilibrium and is headed toward an inflationary environment.
Adamik also told attendees that he expects the new TL cycle to be marked by far less volatility, with a return to more typical conditions. And he offered a slate of supply and demand trends to note as the industry moves into the new cycle.
Supply trends include:
Carrier operating authorities are declining;
Employment in the trucking industry is declining;
Private fleets have expanded, but the expansion has stopped;
Truckload orders are falling.
Demand trends include:
Consumer spending is stable, but is still more service-centric and less goods-intensive;
After a steep decline, imports are on the rise;
Freight volumes have been sluggish but are showing signs of life.
CSCMP EDGE runs through Wednesday, October 2, at Nashville’s Gaylord Opryland Hotel & Resort.
The relationship between shippers and third-party logistics services providers (3PLs) is at the core of successful supply chain management—so getting that relationship right is vital. A panel of industry experts from both sides of the aisle weighed in on what it takes to create strong 3PL/shipper partnerships on day two of the CSCMP EDGE conference, being held this week in Nashville.
Trust, empathy, and transparency ranked high on the list of key elements required for success in all aspects of the partnership, but there are some specifics for each step of the journey. The panel recommended a handful of actions that should take place early on, including:
Establish relationships.
For 3PLs, understand and get to the heart of the shipper’s data.
Also for 3PLs: Understand the shipper’s reason for outsourcing to a 3PL, along with the shipper’s ultimate goals.
Understand company cultures and be sure they align.
Nurture long-term relationships with good communication.
For shippers, be transparent so that the 3PL fully understands your business.
And there are also some “non-negotiables” when it comes to managing the relationship:
3PLs must demonstrate their commitment to engaging with the shipper’s personnel.
3PLs must also demonstrate their commitment to process discipline, continuous improvement, and innovation.
Shippers should ensure that they understand the 3PL’s demonstrated implementation capabilities—ask to visit established clients.
Trust—which takes longer to establish than both sides may expect.
EDGE 2024 is sponsored by the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP) and runs through Wednesday, October 2, at the Gaylord Opryland Resort & Convention Center in Nashville.
While the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals' 2024 EDGE Conference & Exhibition is coming to a close on Wednesday, October 2, in Nashville, Tennessee, mark your calendars for next year's premier supply chain event.
The 2025 conference will take place in National Harbor, Maryland. To register for next year's event—and take advantage of an early-bird discount of $600**—visit https://www.cscmpedge.org/website/62261/edge-2025/.
**EDGE EARLY BIRD Terms & Conditions: Promotion is for the EDGE 2025 conference in National Harbor, Maryland. Offer valid for Premier and Basic Members only. Offer excludes Student, Young Professional, Educator, and Corporate registration types. Offer limited to one per customer. Offer is not retroactive and may not be combined with other offers. Offer is nontransferable and may not be resold. Valid through October 31, 2024.
Honoring supply chain professionals and companies for their contributions to the industry is a tradition at the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals annual EDGE Conference. The following are some of the recognitions given out this year.
The 2024 Distinguished Service Award was presented to Heather Sheehan, owner of Crispy Concepts LLC, instructor with Penn State University, and board member and adjunct faculty member with the University of Denver’s Transportation & Supply Chain Institute.
Sheehan, along with Roger Penske, chairman of Penske Corp., were inducted into CSCMP’s Supply Chain Hall of Fame.
Travis Kupla, Ph.D, of the University of Arkansas, won the Doctoral Dissertation Award for his paper “How Supply Chains Respond to Disruptions: Three Essays on Responses to Operational, Geopolitical, and Natural Disaster Disruptions.”
The Bernard J. La Londe Best Paper Award was given to Matias G. Enz from the University of Missouri-Saint Louis, and Douglas M. Lambert from The Ohio State University for their paper “A Supply Chain Management Framework for Services.”
Wenting Li and Dr. Yimin Wang of Arizona State received the E. Grosvenor Plowman Award for their research paper, “A Procurement Advantage In Disruptive Times: New Perspectives On ESG Strategy And Firm Performance.”
The Teaching Innovation Award was given to Dr. Shane Schvaneveldt of Weber State University for his paper, “A Lean 5S Experiential Learning Game for Logistics and Supply Chain Management.”
To see a full list of honorees, please visit cscmp.org and click on the tab "Academia & Awards."
Supply chains today are facing an onslaught of disruption and change from geopolitical events to technological advances to economic shifts. Supply chain partners that successfully navigate those changes together will seize a competitive advantage that will win them market share and increase profits.
The “2025 Third-Party Logistics Study,” spearheaded by Dr. C. John Langley of Penn State University and developed in collaboration withNTT DATAand Penske Logistics highlights the crucial role that change management plays in the relationship between third-party logistics providers (3PLs) and their customers. Unveiled today at the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP) EDGE conference, the study delves into the dynamic nature of relationships between shippers (companies that manufacture goods or provide services) and third-party logistics providers.
“While users and providers of 3PL services continue to report successful relationships, they find themselves having to deal with an increasingly wide range of challenges,” said Dr. C. John Langley, Professor, Supply Chain & Information Systems, Penn State University. “While examples include economic concerns, geopolitical unrest, and changing markets for supply chain services, they also are taking advantage of change management processes to benefit from new and improved capabilities such as artificial intelligence (AI) and direct-to-customer proficiencies.”
The survey found that both shippers (61%) and 3PLs (73%) agree that supply chain change management is vital. Respondents from both groups indicated that the top factors that are driving the need to change their operations were shifting customer demands, economic factors, and technological advancements. In particular, both shippers and 3PLs believe that improvement and change is needed in supply chain visibility, with 69% of shippers and 68% of 3PLs citing it as an area of concern.
AI as change agent
One technological advance that is enabling change in supply chain operations, according to survey respondents, is AI. Both shippers and 3PLs agree that AI can be pivotal in automating data analysis, identifying patterns, solving problems, and automating repetitive tasks. Top implementation areas for AI cited by respondents include supply planning and demand forecasting (33% of shippers and 19% of 3PLs) and transportation and route optimization (27% of shippers and 22% of 3PLs).
The e-commerce effect continues
Omnichannel retailing and e-commerce continue to exert pressure on supply chain operations for shippers and their third-party logistics partners. Both shippers and 3PLs view delivery speed and visibility as strong areas of differentiation. According to the study, 48% of shippers and 53% of 3PLs reported that customers routinely expect deliveries in less than two days, and 27% of shippers and 26% of 3PLs noted that there are three-day or less delivery expectations. Shippers (44%) and 3PLs (38%) are willing to absorb a small percentage of the costs related to shipping speeds.
The Annual 3PL Study surveys 3PL providers and users of 3PL services to understand the current state of 3PLs and how 3PL relationships are evolving with their customers. The 2025 study and past versions are available for download at www.3PLStudy.com.