Air carriers enjoyed a strong recovery in 2010 and early 2011. But oil price volatility and a looming supply/demand imbalance mean there could be some rate turbulence in the next year or two.
The year 2011 began auspiciously for the heavyweight air cargo market, which had recovered much of the volume it had lost and the rate concessions it had made during the 2009 freight depression.
During the economic downturn, air carriers focused on improving their operational efficiency in an effort to stem losses in a very tough market. They re-examined everything from baggage and cargo handling processes to maximum take-off mass (MTOM). As a result, carriers were well poised for a return to profitability in 2010. Things certainly were looking up from the carriers' point of view: The International Air Transport Association (IATA) reported a new high in demand for cargo services on both freighters and passenger aircraft in the second quarter of 2010, and many of them did in fact have banner years. At the same time, market conditions for transport and fuel had driven airfreight rates higher than they were before the 2009 collapse.
Although 2010 and the first part of 2011 brought good news for the carriers, the outlook for the rest of 2011 appears mixed for several reasons. For one thing, the rate at which new aircraft are entering into service is greater than the projected increases in airfreight demand. As a result, rates generally are declining in most markets relative to where they started in 2011. But that is likely to be temporary. While inflationary factors (mostly fuel) have eased somewhat in June, where they go from here is uncertain. In addition, global political uncertainty arising from such events as the revolutions in the Middle East could generate large price shocks in oil markets. Further clouding the airline industry's overall financial picture are variable exchange rates; sovereign debt default in the countries like Portugal, Ireland, Greece, and Spain; and unclear patterns in consumer demand.
Carriers invest in capacity
Despite all that uncertainty, airlines are lining up to invest in new aircraft. Equipment makers Boeing and Airbus have delivered a combined 480 aircraft to their customers in the first half of 2011, including 97 new widebody planes. Their order books are expanding, with new orders for 948 more aircraft on the way. While most of these aircraft will be entering passenger service, their entry will impact air cargo capacity as well.
This level of investment suggests that carriers will soon encounter some economic turbulence, as the rate of aircraft delivery is outpacing projections for near-term growth in the airfreight market. In May 2011, for instance, capacity grew by 2.8 percent over the prior year while demand declined by 4 percent.
Given this discrepancy between the growth in supply and demand, load factors (the percentage of an aircraft's payload capacity that is actually filled) will decrease until the world economy starts to expand again. International freight load factors have already begun declining year-on-year, and that trend is expected to continue for some time. Moreover, with consumer confidence down over the past few months and gross domestic product (GDP) growth in developed countries predicted to be in the 2-percent range, there should be plenty of capacity through the rest of 2011.
How will all that affect freight rates? With base rates for cargo under pressure for economic reasons and capacity increasing, airfreight rates are unlikely to spike in the short term. But higher rates are likely over the next few years as stronger demand and fuel-price pressures will more than offset increases in cargo capacity. Increased demand for fuel due to a recovering global economy is expected to push energy prices higher. The U.S. Department of Energy, in fact, currently predicts that the price of crude oil will average more than US $100 per barrel in 2012. Higher fuel surcharges, therefore, will be a primary driver of rising airfreight rates over the next one to two years.
The upside of expansion
From the shipper's standpoint, the addition of so many new aircraft will bring a number of benefits. For example, the expansion of airline fleets will allow carriers to increase their service offerings. Understandably, they are expanding them faster in their growth markets. For instance, Delta Airlines went from 28 weekly departures from the United States to China in 2008 to 47 weekly departures in July 2011. The deployment of additional aircraft on more routes will have a positive impact on lead times and space availability. Furthermore, the resulting competitive pressure should keep base freight rates in check. Better service and competitive rates will, in turn, improve the value proposition of air freight relative to surface modes. As the economy improves in 2012-13, air transport will become more costeffective for some shippers. One reason why is that a rise in consumer demand will renew the need for inventory replenishment. When it comes to quickly replenishing inventory, shippers of fast-moving consumer goods will be much more likely to choose air versus ocean.
Additionally those shippers that have taken a totalcost approach to supply chain management may find it beneficial to use more air freight in certain cases. For example, shifting from air to ocean will reduce transportation costs, but when inventory carrying costs are taken into account the overall cost picture may change. The total supply chain cost for highvalue shipments will actually be lower if they are shipped by air than if they are shipped by the much slower ocean route. The cost difference may especially be noticeable in situations where ocean carriers have increased their use of slow-steaming practices and thus lengthened their transit times.
To sum up, the current supply-and-demand relationship does not presage a run-up in airfreight pricing for the remainder of 2011. The rate picture for next few years, however, is less certain as higher fuel prices and growing demand will likely tip the balance toward higher prices for air cargo, despite increases in capacity.
On the plus side, increased capacity will lead to more service and routing options for shippers, making air freight a more attractive option compared to surface transport modes.
Facing an evolving supply chain landscape in 2025, companies are being forced to rethink their distribution strategies to cope with challenges like rising cost pressures, persistent labor shortages, and the complexities of managing SKU proliferation.
1. Optimize labor productivity and costs. Forward-thinking businesses are leveraging technology to get more done with fewer resources through approaches like slotting optimization, automation and robotics, and inventory visibility.
2. Maximize capacity with smart solutions. With e-commerce volumes rising, facilities need to handle more SKUs and orders without expanding their physical footprint. That can be achieved through high-density storage and dynamic throughput.
3. Streamline returns management. Returns are a growing challenge, thanks to the continued growth of e-commerce and the consumer practice of bracketing. Businesses can handle that with smarter reverse logistics processes like automated returns processing and reverse logistics visibility.
4. Accelerate order fulfillment with robotics. Robotic solutions are transforming the way orders are fulfilled, helping businesses meet customer expectations faster and more accurately than ever before by using autonomous mobile robots (AMRs and robotic picking.
5. Enhance end-of-line packaging. The final step in the supply chain is often the most visible to customers. So optimizing packaging processes can reduce costs, improve efficiency, and support sustainability goals through automated packaging systems and sustainability initiatives.
That clash has come as retailers have been hustling to adjust to pandemic swings like a renewed focus on e-commerce, then swiftly reimagining store experiences as foot traffic returned. But even as the dust settles from those changes, retailers are now facing renewed questions about how best to define their omnichannel strategy in a world where customers have increasing power and information.
The answer may come from a five-part strategy using integrated components to fortify omnichannel retail, EY said. The approach can unlock value and customer trust through great experiences, but only when implemented cohesively, not individually, EY warns.
The steps include:
1. Functional integration: Is your operating model and data infrastructure siloed between e-commerce and physical stores, or have you developed a cohesive unit centered around delivering seamless customer experience?
2. Customer insights: With consumer centricity at the heart of operations, are you analyzing all touch points to build a holistic view of preferences, behaviors, and buying patterns?
3. Next-generation inventory: Given the right customer insights, how are you utilizing advanced analytics to ensure inventory is optimized to meet demand precisely where and when it’s needed?
4. Distribution partnerships: Having ensured your customers find what they want where they want it, how are your distribution strategies adapting to deliver these choices to them swiftly and efficiently?
5. Real estate strategy: How is your real estate strategy interconnected with insights, inventory and distribution to enhance experience and maximize your footprint?
When approached cohesively, these efforts all build toward one overarching differentiator for retailers: a better customer experience that reaches from brand engagement and order placement through delivery and return, the EY study said. Amid continued volatility and an economy driven by complex customer demands, the retailers best set up to win are those that are striving to gain real-time visibility into stock levels, offer flexible fulfillment options and modernize merchandising through personalized and dynamic customer experiences.
Geopolitical rivalries, alliances, and aspirations are rewiring the global economy—and the imposition of new tariffs on foreign imports by the U.S. will accelerate that process, according to an analysis by Boston Consulting Group (BCG).
Without a broad increase in tariffs, world trade in goods will keep growing at an average of 2.9% annually for the next eight years, the firm forecasts in its report, “Great Powers, Geopolitics, and the Future of Trade.” But the routes goods travel will change markedly as North America reduces its dependence on China and China builds up its links with the Global South, which is cementing its power in the global trade map.
“Global trade is set to top $29 trillion by 2033, but the routes these goods will travel is changing at a remarkable pace,” Aparna Bharadwaj, managing director and partner at BCG, said in a release. “Trade lanes were already shifting from historical patterns and looming US tariffs will accelerate this. Navigating these new dynamics will be critical for any global business.”
To understand those changes, BCG modeled the direct impact of the 60/25/20 scenario (60% tariff on Chinese goods, a 25% on goods from Canada and Mexico, and a 20% on imports from all other countries). The results show that the tariffs would add $640 billion to the cost of importing goods from the top ten U.S. import nations, based on 2023 levels, unless alternative sources or suppliers are found.
In terms of product categories imported by the U.S., the greatest impact would be on imported auto parts and automotive vehicles, which would primarily affect trade with Mexico, the EU, and Japan. Consumer electronics, electrical machinery, and fashion goods would be most affected by higher tariffs on Chinese goods. Specifically, the report forecasts that a 60% tariff rate would add $61 billion to cost of importing consumer electronics products from China into the U.S.
Shippers are actively preparing for changes in tariffs and trade policy through steps like analyzing their existing customs data, identifying alternative suppliers, and re-evaluating their cross-border strategies, according to research from logistics provider C.H. Robinson.
They are acting now because survey results show that shippers say the top risk to their supply chains in 2025 is changes in tariffs and trade policy. And nearly 50% say the uncertainty around tariffs and trade policy is already a pain point for them today, the Eden Prairie, Minnesota-based company said.
In a move to answer those concerns, C.H. Robinson says it has been working with its clients by running risk scenarios, building and implementing contingency plans, engineering and executing tariff solutions, and increasing supply chain diversification and agility.
“Having visibility into your full supply chain is no longer a nice-to-have. In 2025, visibility is a competitive differentiator and shippers without the technology and expertise to support real-time data and insights, contingency planning, and quick action will face increased supply chain risks,” Jordan Kass, President of C.H. Robinson Managed Solutions, said in a release.
The company’s survey showed that shippers say the top five ways they are planning for those risks: identifying where they can switch sourcing to save money, analyzing customs data, evaluating cross-border strategies, running risk scenarios, and lowering their dependence on Chinese imports.
President of C.H. Robinson Global Forwarding, Mike Short, said: “In today’s uncertain shipping environment, shippers are looking for ways to reduce their susceptibility to events that impact logistics but are out of their control. By diversifying their supply chains, getting access to the latest information and having a global supply chain partner able to flex with their needs at a moment’s notice, shippers can gain something they don’t always have when disruptions and policy changes occur - options.”
That strategy is described by RILA President Brian Dodge in a document titled “2025 Retail Public Policy Agenda,” which begins by describing leading retailers as “dynamic and multifaceted businesses that begin on Main Street and stretch across the world to bring high value and affordable consumer goods to American families.”
RILA says its policy priorities support that membership in four ways:
Investing in people. Retail is for everyone; the place for a first job, 2nd chance, third act, or a side hustle – the retail workforce represents the American workforce.
Ensuring a safe, sustainable future. RILA is working with lawmakers to help shape policies that protect our customers and meet expectations regarding environmental concerns.
Leading in the community. Retail is more than a store; we are an integral part of the fabric of our communities.
“As Congress and the Trump administration move forward to adopt policies that reduce regulatory burdens, create economic growth, and bring value to American families, understanding how such policies will impact retailers and the communities we serve is imperative,” Dodge said. “RILA and its member companies look forward to collaborating with policymakers to provide industry-specific insights and data to help shape any policies under consideration.”